Fabrication and properties of βTCP/Zeolite/Gelatin scaffold as developed scaffold in bone regeneration: in vitro and in vivo studies

• Autorzy: Yazdanian Mohsen , Tabesh Hadi , Houshmand Behzad , Tebyanian Hamid , Soufdoost Reza Sayyad , Tahmasebi Elahe , Karami Ali , Ghullame Sayede

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1016/j.bbe.2020.10.006

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Synthetic scaffolds, as an alternative to allograft and xenograft scaffolds, are suitable for bone regeneration. This study aimed to synthesize a composite biomaterial of zeolite and beta-tricalcium phosphate (bTCP) to obtain a biocompatible material with physical and mechanical properties in bone regeneration. One scaffold without zeolite (bZG 0) and two scaffolds with different amounts of zeolite (bZG 1 and bZG 2) were synthesized. The scaffolds were evaluated by FTIR, XRD, compressive strength test, MTT assay, and radiographic and histological analyses. The XRD results confirmed the presence of bTCP and ZSM-5 phases in the composite scaffolds and also, indicated that the addition of gelatin decrease the crystallinity of composite scaffolds. FTIR revealed the gelatin, b-TCP and ZSM-5 functional groups in the composite structure. bZG 2 group had the maximum porosity among the scaffolds (74%) ranging in size from 61-600 mm. Compressive strength test showed that the Young's modulus changed from 23 MPa to 59 MPa, and the zeolite nanostructure was the most influential factor responsible for this change. The MTT assay showed the superiority of bZG 2, and the macroscopic and microscopic results at 4, 8, and 12 weeks revealed the maximum bone regeneration and formation of bone trabeculae in the bZG 2 and bZG 1 groups, respectively. The zeolite scaffold showed the superior mechanical, radiographic and histological properties compared with the control and non-zeolite scaffold. bTCP/ Zeolite/ Gelatin scaffold can be an appropriate candidate for medical application in bone regeneration.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

zeolite; gelatin; beta-tricalcium phosphate; bone tissue engineering

PL

zeolit; żelatyna; fosforan trójwapniowy; inżynieria tkanki kostnej

• Wydawca: Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Elsevier
• Czasopismo: Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 40, no. 4
• Strony: 1626--1637
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Yazdanian Mohsen

• Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

autor

Tabesh Hadi

• Department of Life Science Engineering, Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

autor

Houshmand Behzad

• Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

autor

Tebyanian Hamid

• Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

autor

Soufdoost Reza Sayyad

• Dentistry Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

autor

Tahmasebi Elahe

• Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

autor

Karami Ali

• Research Center for Prevention of Oral and Dental Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

autor

Ghullame Sayede

• Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Bibliografia

• [1] Sopyan I, Mel M, Ramesh S, Khalid KA. Porous hydroxyapatite for artificial bone applications. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 2016;8:116–23.
• [2] Yunus Basha R, Sampath Kumar TS, Doble M. Design of biocomposite materials for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2015;57:452–63.
• [3] Perić Kacarević Ž, Rider P, Alkildani S, Retnasingh S, Pejakić M, Schnettler R, et al. An introduction to bone tissue engineering. Int J Artif Organs 2020;43:69–86.
• [4] Qasim M, Chae DS, Lee NY. Bioengineering strategies for bone and cartilage tissue regeneration using growth factors and stem cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2020;108:394–411.
• [5] Black CR, Goriainov V, Gibbs D, Kanczler J, Tare RS, Oreffo RO. Bone Tissue Engineering. Curr Mol Biol Rep 2015;1:132–40.
• [6] Pereira HF, Cengiz IF, Silva FS, Reis RL, Oliveira JM. Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2020;31:27.
• [7] Blokhuis TJ, Arts JJ. Bioactive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes: definitions, facts and myths. Injury 2011;42 (Suppl 2). S26-9.
• [8] Becker J, Lu L, Runge MB, Zeng H, Yaszemski MJ, Dadsetan M. Nanocomposite bone scaffolds based on biodegradable polymers and hydroxyapatite. J Biomed Mater Res A 2015;103:2549–57.
• [9] Lee DS, Pai Y, Chang S, Kim DH. Microstructure, physical properties, and bone regeneration effect of the nano-sized beta-tricalcium phosphate granules. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016;58:971–6.
• [10] Raucci MG, D'Amora U, Ronca A, Demitri C, Ambrosio L. Bioactivation Routes of Gelatin-Based Scaffolds to Enhance at Nanoscale Level Bone Tissue Regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019;7:27.
• [11] Mishra R, Varshney R, Das N, Sircar D, Roy P. Synthesis and characterization of gelatin-PVP polymer composite scaffold for potential application in bone tissue engineering. European Polymer Journal 2019;119:155–68.
• [12] Carr DA, Lach-hab M, Yang S, Vaisman II, Blaisten-Barojas E. Machine learning approach for structure-based zeolite classification. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2009;117:339–49.
• [13] Bedi RS, Beving DE, Zanello LP, Yan Y. Biocompatibility of corrosion-resistant zeolite coatings for titanium alloy biomedical implants. Acta Biomater 2009;5:3265–71.
• [14] Rhodes CJ. Properties and applications of zeolites. Sci Prog 2010;93:223–84.
• [15] Lei XG, Jockusch S, Ottaviani MF, Turro NJ. In situ EPR investigation of the addition of persistent benzyl radicals to acrylates on ZSM-5 zeolites. Direct spectroscopic detection of the initial steps in a supramolecular photopolymerization. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2003;2:1095–100.
• [16] Bilim C. Properties of cement mortars containing clinoptilolite as a supplementary cementitious material. Construction and Building Materials 2011;25:3175–80.
• [17] Gupta V, Sadegh H, Yari M, Shahryari-ghoshekandi R, Maazinejad B, Chahardori M. Removal of ammonium ions from wastewater: A short review in development of efficient methods. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management 2015;1:71–94.
• [18] Kurzendörfer CP, Liphard M, von Rybinski W, Schwuger MJ. Sodium-aluminium-silicates in the washing process part IX: Mode of action of zeolite A additive systems. Colloid and Polymer Science 1987;265:542–7.
• [19] Zhang Y, Cui X, Zhao S, Wang H, Rahaman MN, Liu Z, et al. Evaluation of injectable strontium-containing borate bioactive glass cement with enhanced osteogenic capacity in a critical-sized rabbit femoral condyle defect model. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015;7:2393–403.
• [20] Cundy CS, Cox PA. The hydrothermal synthesis of zeolites: Precursors, intermediates and reaction mechanism. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2005;82:1–78.
• [21] Kaur B, Srivastava R, Satpati B, Kondepudi KK, Bishnoi M. Biomineralization of hydroxyapatite in silver ion-exchanged nanocrystalline ZSM-5 zeolite using simulated body fluid. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2015;135:201–8.
• [22] Wu S, Liu X, Yeung KWK, Liu C, Yang X. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2014;80:1–36.
• [23] Ansari M. Bone tissue regeneration: biology, strategies and interface studies. Prog Biomater 2019;8:223–37.
• [24] Zhu L, Luo D, Liu Y. Effect of the nano/microscale structure of biomaterial scaffolds on bone regeneration. Int J Oral Sci 2020;12:6.
• [25] Freeman FE, Browe DC, Nulty J, Von Euw S, Grayson WL, Kelly DJ. Biofabrication of multiscale bone extracellular matrix scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 2019;38:168–87.
• [26] Li Y, Jiao Y, Li X, Guo Z. Improving the osteointegration of Ti6Al4V by zeolite MFI coating. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015;460:151–6.
• [27] Uyumaz AN, Ozyegin LS, Buyukakyuz N, Yesilbek B, Oktar FN. Evaluation of TCP Loaded Clinoptilolite Use as Graft Material on Rabbit Tibia. Key Engineering Materials 2011;493-494:175–80.
• [28] Kim HW, Knowles JC, Kim HE. Hydroxyapatite and gelatin composite foams processed via novel freeze-drying and crosslinking for use as temporary hard tissue scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;72:136–45.
• [29] Takahashi Y, Yamamoto M, Tabata Y. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in biodegradable sponges composed of gelatin and beta-tricalcium phosphate. Biomaterials 2005;26:3587–96.
• [30] Iqbal N, Abdul Kadir MR, Mahmood NHB, Yusoff MFM, Siddique JA, Salim N, et al. Microwave synthesis, characterization, bioactivity and in vitro biocompatibility of zeolite–hydroxyapatite (Zeo–HA) composite for bone tissue engineering applications. Ceramics International 2014;40:16091–7.
• [31] Sabareeswaran A, Basu B, Shenoy SJ, Jaffer Z, Saha N, Stamboulis A. Early osseointegration of a strontium containing glass ceramic in a rabbit model. Biomaterials 2013;34:9278–86.