PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Influence of the shape of the impactor on residual strength, size and nature of damage to CFRP

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Wpływ kształtu bijaka na wytrzymałość szczątkową, wielkość i charakter uszkodzeń CFRP
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The experimental tests presented in this work concern the impact resistance test and residual strength properties after an impact performed by a drop tower INSTRON CEAST 9340. The authors prepared samples of a composite material with a polymeric matrix L285 and H285 hardener, reinforced with eight ply fabric of carbon fibre. Two shapes of the impactor (spherical and V-shape) were used to perform the testing. The samples were impacted by three values of energy (10, 15, 20 [J]). Three-point bending tests were performed to the residual strength of the samples subjected to impact tests and compared to samples which had not been damaged earlier. The study showed differences in the influence of the shapes of the impactor on the nature of the composite damage. After the test, conclusions were drawn about the influence of the shape of the impactor on the area of composite damage and its character. Also, its influence on residual strength was described. Despite the clear differences in the area of damage to composites impacted by different impactors, this does not have a significant influence on the residual strength.
PL
Przedstawione w pracy badania eksperymentalne dotyczą badania udarności oraz właściwości wytrzymałości szczątkowej po uderzeniu wieżą zrzutową INSTRON CEAST 9340. Autorzy przygotowali próbki materiału kompozytowego z osnową polimerową L285 i utwardzaczem H285, wzmocnionego tkaniną ośmiowarstwową z włókna węglowego. Do badań wykorzystano dwa kształty impaktora (kulisty i V). Próbki były poddawane działaniu trzech wartości energii (10, 15, 20 [J]). Próby zginania trzypunktowego przeprowadzono do wytrzymałości szczątkowej próbek poddanych próbom udarności i porównano z próbkami, które wcześniej nie uległy uszkodzeniu. Badania wykazały różnice we wpływie kształtów impaktora na charakter uszkodzenia kompozytu. Po przeprowadzeniu badań wyciągnięto wnioski dotyczące wpływu kształtu impaktora na obszar uszkodzenia kompozytu i jego charakter. Opisano również jego wpływ na wytrzymałość resztkową. Pomimo wyraźnych różnic w obszarze uszkodzeń kompozytów pod wpływem różnych impaktorów, nie ma to istotnego wpływu na wytrzymałość szczątkową.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
46--53
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 37 poz., il. kolor., fot., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Polish Air Force University, ul. Dywizjonu 303 No. 35, 08-530 Dęblin, Poland
  • Polish Air Force University, ul. Dywizjonu 303 No. 35, 08-530 Dęblin, Poland
  • Polish Air Force University, ul. Dywizjonu 303 No. 35, 08-530 Dęblin, Poland
  • Polish Air Force University, ul. Dywizjonu 303 No. 35, 08-530 Dęblin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Soutis Constantine. 2005. Fibre reinforced composites in aircraft construction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences. Volume 41, Issue 2, 143-151, doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.004.
  • 2. A.J. Beck, A. Hodzic, C. Soutis, C.W. Wilson, 2009. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng.
  • 3. Y.X. Zhang, Zhi Zhu, Richardson Joseph, Isfakul Jamal Shihan. 2020. Damage to aircraft composite structures caused by directed energy system: a literaturę review. Defence technology. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.08.008.
  • 4. Fengyang Jiang, Zhidong Guan, Zengshan Li, Xiaodong Wang. 2021. A method of predicting visual detectability of low-velocity impact damage in composite structures based on logistic regression model. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics. 34(1): 296-308.
  • 5. Królikowski Wacław 2012, Polimerowe kompozyty konstrukcyjne. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • 6. Bruno Castanie, Christophe Bouvet, Malo Ginot. 2020. Review of composite sandwich structure in aeronautic applications , Composites Part C: Open Access 1.
  • 7. Xianfeng Yang, Jingxuan Ma, Dongsheng Wen, Jialing Yang. 2020. Crashworthy design and energy absorption mechanisms for helicopter structures: A systematic literature review, Progress in Aerospace Sciences 114.
  • 8. Qi Liu, Zhangzhi Ge, Wei Song. 2016. Research Based on Patent Analysis about the Present Status and Development Trends of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in China, Open Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 7.
  • 9. Daeil Jo, Yongjin Kwon. 2017. Development of Rescue Material Transport UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle), World Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 4.
  • 10. Jiawen Yu. 2018. Design and Optimization of Wing Structure for a Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV), Modern Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4.
  • 11. Mohamed M. ElFaham, Ayman M. Mostafa, G.M. Nasr. 2020. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) manufacturing materials: Synthesis,spectroscopic characterization and dynamic mechanical analysis(DMA, Journal of Molecular Structure 1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127211.
  • 12. R.C. Batra, G. Gopinath, J.Q. Zheng. 2012. Damage and failure in low energy impact of fiber-reinforced polymeric composite laminates, Composite Structures, Volume 94, Issue 2. 540-547.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.015.
  • 13. G. Perillo, J.K. Jørgensen. 2016. Numerical/Experimental Study of the Impact and Compression after Impact on GFRP Composite for Wind/Marine Applications, Procedia Engineering, Volume 167. 129-137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.679.
  • 14. Ravi B. Gondaliya. 2016. Improving Damage Tolerance of Composite Sandwich Structures Subjected to Low Velocity Impact Loading: Experimental and Numerical Analysis, Dissertations and Theses, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach.
  • 15. Ercan Sevkat, Benjamin Liaw, Feridun Delale, Basavaraju B. Raju. 2009. Drop-weight impact of plain-woven hybrid glass-graphite/toughened epoxy composites, Composites: Part A 40. 1090-1110.
  • 16. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, ‘Composite aircraft structure’, Advisory Circular AC No: 20-107B, Change 1, 24 August 2010.
  • 17. Qihui Lyu, Ben Wang, Zhenqiang Zhao, Zaoyang Guo. 2022. Damage and failure analysis of hybrid laminates with different ply-stacking sequences under low-velocity impact and post-impact compression, Thin-Walled Structures 180.
  • 18. Mubarak Ali, S.C. Joshi, and Mohamed Thariq Hameed Sultan, 2017. Palliatives for Low Velocity Impact Damage in Composite Laminates, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 16 pages.https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8761479.
  • 19. Ramesh Talrejaa, Nam Phanb. 2019. Assessment of damage tolerance approaches for composite aircraft with focus on barely visible impact damage, Composite Structures 219. 1-7.
  • 20. Botelho E.C., Silva R.A., Pardini L.C., Rezende M.C. 2006. A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures. Materials Research. 9(3): 247-256. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392006000300002.
  • 21. Komorek A., Przybyłek P. 2012. Examination of the influence of cross-impact load on bend strength properties of composite materials, used in aviation. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność. 14, 265-269.
  • 22. J. Jefferson Andrew, Sivakumar M. Srinivasan, A. Arockiarajan, Hom Nath Dhakal, 2019. Parameters influencing the impact response of fiber-reinforced polimer matrix composite materials: A critical review, Composite Structures 224.
  • 23. Airoldi A., Cacchione B. 2006. Modelling of impact forces and pressures in Lagrangian bird strike analyses. Int J Impact Eng 32:1651-77.
  • 24. Anghileri M., Castelleti L.M.L., Invernizzi F., Mascheroni M. 2005. A survey of numerical models for hail impact analysis using explicit finite element codes. Int J Impact Eng 31:929-44.
  • 25. Stanislav Dubinskii, Vitaliy Senik, Yuri Feygenbaum, 2019. The Significance of In-Service Factors for the Visual Detectability of Impact Damage in Composite Airframe, Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation. 38:91 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-019-0632-3.
  • 26. M. Droździel, P. Jakubczak, J. Bieniaś. 2021. Low-velocity impact resistance of thin-ply in comparison with conventional aluminium-carbon laminates, Composite Structures, Volume 256.
  • 27. Jianwu Zhoua, Binbin Liaob, Yaoyao Shia, Yangjie Zuoc, Hongliang Tuod, Liyong Jiae, 2019. Low-velocity impact behavior and bending tensile strength of CFRP Laminates, Composites Part B 161. 300-313.
  • 28. S.N.A. Safri, M.T.H. Sultan, N. Yidris, F. Mustapha, 2014. Low Velocity and High Velocity Impact Test on Composite Materials - A review, The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, Volume 3, Issue 9, 50-60.
  • 29. S. Shah, S. Karuppanan, P. Megat-Yusoff i Z. Sajid, 2019. Impact resistance and damage tolerance of fiber reinforced composites: A review. Composite Structures, tom 217. 100-121.
  • 30. Mitrevski T., Marshall I.H., Thomson R., Jones R. 2006. The influence of impactor shape on the damage to the composite laminates. Compos Struct. 76:116-22.
  • 31. Zhou G., Lloyd J.C., McGuirk J.J. 2001. Experimental evaluation of geometric factors affecting damage mechanisms in carbon/epoxy plates. Composites Part A. 32:71-84.
  • 32. Dhakal H.N., Zhang Z.Y., Bennett N., Reis P.N.B. 2012. Low-velocity impact response of non-woven hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites: Influence of impactor geometry and impact velocity. Compos Struct. 94:2756-63.
  • 33. Zarei Hamed, Sadighi Mojtaba, Minak Giangiacomo. 2017. Ballistic analysis of fiber metal laminates impacted by flat and conical impactors. Compos Struct ;161:65-72. ISSN 0263-8223.
  • 34. Artero-Guerrero J.A., Pernas-Sánchez J., López-Puente J., Varas D. 2015. Experimental study of the impactor mass effect on the low velocity impact of carbon/epoxy woven laminates. Compos Struct. 133:774-81. ISSN 0263-8223.
  • 35. N. Razali, M.T.H. Sultan, F. Mustapha, N. Yidris, M.R. Ishak. 2014. Impact Damage on Composite Structures - A Review, The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES). Volume 3. Issue 7. 08-20.
  • 36. FAA. Advisory circular composite aircraft structure. Washington D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration; 2009. Report No.: 20-107 (B); . SAE International. CMH-17 Composite Materials Handbook volume 3. polymer matrix composites materials usage, design, and analysis. Warrendale: SAE. International 2012.
  • 37. Spencer F.W. 1996. Visual inspection research project report on benchmark inspections. Washington D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration. Report No: DOT/FAA/AR-96/6.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-cd3fcfd9-7ad2-40a3-ac6a-3fcd273d593d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.