PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Knowledge and technology transfer as driving force for social innovations

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Transfer wiedzy i technologii siłą napędową innowacji społecznych
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Knowledge and technology transfer are defined as driving force for new business models, innovations and economic development. The aim of the paper is to carry out detailed literature analysis in order to create new framework of technology and knowledge transfer that contributes to social innovation. To explore the level of investigation and latest trends of the topic, the article provides bibliometric analysis on knowledge and technology transfer. The information is obtained from Web of Science for the period of 1990 to 2021. VOSviewer has been used for citation analysis, co-authorship and bibliographic de-coupling. More than 5,000 articles have been found with the keywords technology transfer and knowledge transfer in the database WoS indexed at six well-established citation indexes. For the bibliometric analysis, 308 articles in the fields of economics and business management have been used. Results of this review integrates concept of social innovation into theory of knowledge-based of firms. Furthermore, it composes the model of new knowledge and technology transfer that leads to social innovations. Thereby, our article contributes to theory of knowledge-based of firms and the concept of social innovation.
PL
Transfer wiedzy i technologii definiowany jest jako siła napędowa nowych modeli biznesowych, innowacji i rozwoju gospodarczego. Celem artykułu jest przeprowadzenie szczegółowej analizy literatury w celu stworzenia nowych ram transferu technologii i wiedzy przyczyniających się do innowacji społecznych. Aby zbadać poziom badań i najnowsze trendy w tym temacie, artykuł zawiera analizę bibliometryczną dotyczącą transferu wiedzy i technologii. Informacje pochodzą z Web of Science za okres 1990-2021. VOSviewer został wykorzystany do analizy cytowań, współautorstwa i rozprzęgania bibliograficznego. W bazie danych WoS odnaleziono ponad 5000 artykułów ze słowami kluczowymi transfer technologii i transfer wiedzy, zindeksowanych według sześciu uznanych indeksów cytowań. Do analizy bibliometrycznej wykorzystano 308 artykułów z dziedziny ekonomii i zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem. Wyniki tego przeglądu integrują koncepcję innowacji społecznych z teorią firm opartych na wiedzy. Ponadto tworzy model transferu nowej wiedzy i technologii, który prowadzi do innowacji społecznych. Tym samym nasz artykuł wpisuje się w teorię firm opartych na wiedzy oraz koncepcję innowacji społecznych.
Rocznik
Strony
512--536
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 114 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (Vilnius Tech), Faculty Faculty of Business Management, Lithuania
  • Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (Vilnius Tech), Faculty Faculty of Business Management, Lithuania
  • Institute of Transport Economics, Norway
  • Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (Vilnius Tech), Faculty Faculty of Business Management, Lithuania
  • Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (Vilnius Tech), Faculty Faculty of Business Management, Lithuania
Bibliografia
  • 1.Alkhazali, Z., Al-Daoud, K., Alshamayleh, H. and Aledeinat, M., (2021). High performance work system and sustainable development among Jordanian SMEs: knowledge sharing as a moderator. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(4), 280-290.
  • 2.Acs, Z., Pontus Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B. and Carlsson, B., (2009). The knowledge spill-over theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32, 15-30.
  • 3.Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 61, 323-51.
  • 4.Aghion, P., Howitt, P., (2000). On the macroeconomic effects of major technological change. In The economics and econometrics of innovation (pp. 31-53). Springer, Boston, MA.
  • 5.Agrawal, A., Cockburn, I., (2003). The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1227-1253.
  • 6.Aitken, B.J, Harrison, A.E., (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3), 605-618.
  • 7.Aksoy, L.; Alkire, L.; Choi, S.; Kim, P. B. and Zhang, L. (2019). Social Innovation in Service a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of Service Management 30(3): 429-448.
  • 8.Altuna, N., Contri, A. M., Dell’Era, C., Frattini, F., and Maccarrone, P. (2015). Managing social innovation in for-profit organizations: the case of Intesa Sanpaolo. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(2), 258-280.
  • 9.Antras, P., (2005). Incomplete contracts and the product cycle. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1054-1073.
  • 10.Apriliyanti, I. D., Alan, I., (2017). Bibliometric Analysis of Absorptive Capacity. International Business Review, 26, 896-907.
  • 11.Aravind, D., Damanpour, F. and Devece, C., (2014). Environmental Performance: Interplay Between the Roles of Process Innovation Capability and Managerial Innovation Implementation. In Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. (Ed. Peris-Ortiz, M., Hervas-Oliver, J. L.) Management Innovations: Antecendents, Complementaries, and Performance Consequences. Springer. 29-44.
  • 12.Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123-1137.
  • 13.Arrow, K. J., (1971). The economic implications of learning by doing. In Readings in the Theory of Growth (pp. 131-149). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • 14.Azman-Saini, W. N. W., Baharumshah, A. Z. and Law, S. H., (2010). Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and economic growth: International evidence. Economic Modelling, 27(5), 1079-1089.
  • 15.Bacon, E., Williams, M. D. and Davies, G. H., (2019). Recipes for success: Conditions for knowledge transfer across open innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 377-387.
  • 16.Balboni, B., Marchi, G. and Vignola, M., (2017). Knowledge Transfer in the Context of Buyer-Supplier Relationship an analysis of a Suppliers Customer Portfolio. Journal of Business Research, 80, 277-287.
  • 17.Basu, S., Weil, D. N., (1998). Appropriate technology and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1025-1054.
  • 18.Beard, T. R., Ford, G. S., Koutsky, T. M. and Spiwak, L. J., (2009). A Valley of Death in the innovation sequence: an economic investigation. Research Evaluation, 18(5), 343-356.
  • 19.Bekkers, R., Freitas, I. M., (2008). Analysing Knowledge Transfer Channels between University and Industry: To What Degree Do Sectors Also Matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837-1853.
  • 20.Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G. and Mol, M., (2008). Management innovation. Academic Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
  • 21.Blanc-Brude, F., Cookson, G., Piesse and Strange, R., (2014). The FDI location decision: Distance and the effects of spatial dependence. International Business Review, 23, 797-810.
  • 22.Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J. and Lee, J. W., (1999). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of international Economics, 45(1), 115-135.
  • 23.Bozeman, B., (2000). Technology Transfer and Public Policy: A Review of Research and Theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655.
  • 24.Bozeman, B., Rimes, H. and Youtie, J., (2015). The Evolving State-of-Art in Technology Research: Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model. Research Policy, 44, 34-49.
  • 25.Cibák, L., Kollár, V. and Filip, S., (2021). Measuring and evaluating education quality of future public administration employees at private university in the Slovak Republic. Insights into Regional Development, 3(2), 213-228.
  • 26.Cass, D., (1965). Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. The Review of economic studies, 32(3), 233-240.
  • 27.Charlier, H., (2003). Sustainable co-generation from the tides: bibliography. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 7, 215-247.
  • 28.Cohen, W. M., Levinthan, D. A., (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
  • 29.Dearing, J. W., (2009). Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Intervention Development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 503-518.
  • 30.D’Este, P., Patel, P., (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
  • 31.Dhanaraj, C., Parkhe, A., (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669.
  • 32.Dinopoulos, E., Segerstrom, P., (2010). Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 92(1), 13-27.
  • 33.Dzikowski, P., (2018). A bibliometric analysis of born global firms. Journal of Business Research, 85, 281-294.
  • 34.El Idrissi, N. E. A., Ilham Zerrouk, I., Zirari, N. and Monni, S., (2020). Comparative study between two innovative clusters in Morocco and Italy. Insights into Regional Development, 2(1), 400-417.
  • 35.Fetscherin, M., Voss, H. and Gugler, P., (2010). 30 Years of Foreign Direct Investment to China: an interdisciplinary Literature Review. International Business Review, 19, 235-246.
  • 36.Fleming, L., Mingo, S. and Chen, D., (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly 52(3), 443-475.
  • 37.Ford, G. S., Koutsky, T. and Spiwak, L. J., (2007). A valley of death in the innovation sequence: an economic investigation. Available at SSRN 1093006.
  • 38.Fudenberg, D., Gilbert, R., Stiglitz, J. and Tirole, J., (1983). Preemption, leapfrogging and competition in patent races. European Economic Review, 22(1), 3-31.
  • 39.Gallego, J., Rubalcaba, L. and Hipp, C., (2012). Organizational innovation in small European firms: a multidimensional approach. International Small Business Journal, 31, 563-579.
  • 40.Gao, H., Ding, X., H. and Wu, S., (2020). Exploring the domain of open innovation: Bibliometric and content analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122580.
  • 41.Gasparin, M., Green, W., Lilley, S., Quinn, M., Saren, M. and Schinckus, Ch., (2020). Business as Social: A Business Model for Social Innovation. Journal of Business Research [article in press].
  • 42.Gerschenkron, A., (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective: A book of essays (No. 330.947 G381). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • 43.Ginevičius, R., Nazarko, J., Gedvilaitė, D. and Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., (2021). Quantifying the economic development dynamics of a country based on the Lorenz curve. E a M: Ekonomie a Management, 24(1), 55-65.
  • 44.Glänzel, W., Czerwon, H. J., (1996). A new methodological approach to bibliographic coupling and its application to the national, regional and institutional level. Scientometrics, 37(2), 195-221.
  • 45.Glass, A.J., Saggi, K., (1998). International Technology Transfer and Technology Gap. Journal of Development Economics, 55, 369-398.
  • 46.Grant, R. M., (1996). Towards knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
  • 47.Grimaldi, R.,Kenney, M., S.Siegeld, D.S. and Wrighte, M., (2011). 30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045-1057.
  • 48.Griliches, Z., (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The bell journal of economics, 92-116.
  • 49.Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European economic review, 35(2-3), 517-526.
  • 50.Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E., (1992). Endogenous product cycles. Economic Journal, 101, 1214-1229.
  • 51.Guan, J.C., Mok, C.K., Yam, R. C. M., Chin, K.S. and Pin, K. F., (2006). Technology Transfer and Innovation Performance: Evidence form Chinese Firms. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 666-678.
  • 52.Gupta, A.K., Govindarajan, V., (2000). Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 473-496.
  • 53.Hansen, M. T., (1999). The Search - Transfer problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quartely, 44(1), 82-111.
  • 54.Havrenek, T., Iršova, Z., (2011). Estimating Vertical Spill-overs from FDI: why Results Vary and what the Effect is. Journal of International Economics, 85(2), 234-244.
  • 55.Hilkevics, S. Hilkevics, A., (2017). The comparative analysis of technology transfer models. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(4), 540-558.
  • 56.Hong, J., Heikkinen, J. and Blomqvist, K., (2010). Culture and knowledge co‐creation in R&D collaboration between MNCs and Chinese universities. Knowledge and Process Management, 17, 62-73.
  • 57.Howells, J., (2006). Intermediation and the Role of Intermediaries in Innovation. Research Policy, 35, 715-728.
  • 58.Yokota, K., Tomohara, A., (2010). Modelling FDI-Induced Technology Spillovers. The International Trade Journal, 24(1), 5-34.
  • 59.Johansen, L., (1972). Production functions; an integration of micro and macro, short run and long run aspects (No. 04; HB141, J64.).
  • 60.Jones, C. I., (1995). R & D-based models of economic growth. Journal of political Economy, 103(4), 759-784.
  • 61.Jones, C. I., Williams, J. C., (1998). Measuring the social return to R&D. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4), 1119-113.
  • 62.Jude, C., (2016). Technology Spillovers from FDI: Evidence on the Intensity of Different Spillover Channels. World Economy, 39(12), 1947-1973.
  • 63.Koopmans, T. C., (1963). On the concept of optimal economic growth (No. 163). Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
  • 64.Lam, A., (2005). Organizational innovation. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford 115-147.
  • 65.Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E. and Lyles, M. A., (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139-1161.
  • 66.Lane, P. J. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863.
  • 67.Lakatos, I., (1970). Falsification and scientific research programmes. Criticism and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge, eds. I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 68.Lascaux, A. (2019). Absorptive Capacity, Research Output Sharing, and Research Output Capture in University-Industry Partnerships. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(3), 101045.
  • 69.Lis, A.M. (2020). Development of proximity in cluster organizations. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 116-132.
  • 70.Lopez-Cruz, O., Obregen, N., (2015). A Network Based Methodology to Reveal Patterns in Knowledge Transfer. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Multimedia, 3(5), 67-77.
  • 71.Mehmmod, F., Bing, W., Atique, M., Khan, H. and Henna., (2021). Infrastructure and Sectoral FDI in China: An Empirical Analysis. Insights into the regional development, 3(2), 160-175.
  • 72.Martin, D. P., (2019). Knowledge Transfer Models and Poverty alleviation in Developing Countries: Critical Approaches and Foresight. Third World Quarterly, 40(7), 1209-1226.
  • 73.Martinez, F., O‘Sullivan, P., Smith, M. and Esposito, M., (2017). Perspectives on the Role of Business in Social Innovation. Journal of Management Development, 36(5), 681-695.
  • 74.Marz, S., Friedrich-Nichio, M. and Grupp, H., (2006). Knowledge Transfer in an Innovation Simulation Model. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 138-152.
  • 75.Milley, P., Szijarto, B., (2020). Understanding social innovation leadership in universities: empirical insights from a group concept mapping study. European Journal of Innovation Management.
  • 76.Montazavi, S., Eslanni, M.H., Hajikhani, A. and Vaatanen, J., (2021). Mapping Inclusive Innovation: A Bibliometric Study and Literature Review. Journal of Business Research, 122, 736-750.
  • 77.Mura, L., Hajduová, Z. (2021). Small and medium enterprises in regions - empirical and quantitative approach. Insights into Regional Development, 3(2), 252-266.
  • 78.Nassar, N., Tvaronavičienė, M., (2021). A systematic theoretical review on sustainable management for green competitiveness. Insights into Regional Development, 3(2), 267-281.)
  • 79.Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Revised edition from 2009. Harvard university press.
  • 80.Nogami, V. K. C., Vieira, F. G. D. and Veloso, A. R., (2018). Concept of innovation in low-income market. Review of Business Management, 20(1), 127-149.
  • 81.OECD., (2018). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation, The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. October, 22, 255p.
  • 82.O’Shea, R.P., Allen, T. Y., Chevalies, A. and Rocher, F., (2005). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Technology, Transfer and Spinoff performance of U.S. Universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009.
  • 83.Pangarso, A., Astuti, E. S., Raharjo, K. and Afrianty, T. W., (2020). The impact of absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity on sustainable competitive advantage: the case of Indonesian higher education. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2436-2455.
  • 84.Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson., M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A. and Sobrero, M., (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442.
  • 85.Peris-Ortiz, M., Hervas-Oliver, J. L., (2014). Management Innovation and Technological Innovation: Friends or Foes? In Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. (Ed. Peris-Ortiz, M., Hervas-Oliver, J. L.) Management Innovations: Antecendents, Complementaries, and Performance Consequences. Springer. 1-18.
  • 86.Pertuz, V., Miranda, L.F., Charris-Fontanilla, A. and Pertuz-Peralta, L., (2021). University-industry collaboration: a scoping review of success factors. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(3), 280-290.
  • 87.Pritchard, A., (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J. Document, 25 (4), 348-349.
  • 88.Ramsey, F. P., (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. The economic journal, 38(152), 543-559.
  • 89.Ringsted, C., Hodges, B. and Scherpbier, A., (2011). The research compass': An introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 56. Medical Teacher, 33(9), 695-709.
  • 90.Rogers, E. M., (1964). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster, sixth edition 2010.
  • 91.Romer, P. M., (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71-S102.
  • 92.Saji, B. S., (2016). Social Innovation Model for Business Performance and Innovations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance, 65(2), 256-274.
  • 93.Scarpetta, S., Hemmings, P., Tressel, T. and Woo, J., (2002). The role of policy and institutions for productivity and firm dynamics: evidence from micro and industry data, OECD Economics Department, Working Paper no. 329.
  • 94.Scarra, D., Piccaluga, A., (2020). The Impact of Technology Transfer and Knowledge Spill-overs from Big Science: Literature Review. Technovation (article in press).
  • 95.Schumpeter, J. A., (1976). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (1942). J. Econ. Literature, 20, 1463.
  • 96.Scherer, F. M., (1984). Innovation and growth: Schumpeterian perspectives. MIT Press Books.
  • 97.Siegel, D.S., Phan, P., (2005). Analysing the Effectiveness of University Technology Transfer, “Implications for Entrepreneurship Education”, Libecap, G.D. (Ed.), University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer (advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, 16, 1-38. Emerald Publishing.
  • 98.Sempere-Ripoll, F., Hervás-Oliver, J. L. and Peris-Ortiz, M, (2014). Combining Technological and Management Innovations: Empirical Evidence of a Premium Effect. In Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. (Ed. Peris-Ortiz, M., Hervas-Oliver, J. L.) Management Innovations: Antecendents, Complementaries, and Performance Consequences. Springer. 19-28.
  • 99.Solow, R. M., (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  • 100.de Souza, A. C. A., de Souza L., B. (2019). Social innovation and the promotion of local economic development. Innovation & Management Review, 16(1), 55-71.
  • 101.Szulanski, G. (2000). The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness. Organizational Behaviour on Human Decision Process, 82(1), 9-27.
  • 102.Szulanski, G., Ringov, D. and Jensen, R.J., (2016). Overcoming Stickiness: How the Timing of Knowledge Transfer Methods Affects Transfer Difficulty. Organization Science 27(2), 304-322.
  • 103.Swan, T. W., (1956). Economic growth and capital accumulation. Economic record, 32(2), 334-361.
  • 104.Tarde, G., (1890). Les lois de l'imitation, The Laws of Imitation, translated by Elsie Clews Parsons in 1903.
  • 105.Tandon, A., Kaur, P., Mäntymäki, M. and Dhir, A., (2021). Blockchain applications in management: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166(May), 120649
  • 106.Tavani, N., S., Tavani, N. Z., Naude, P., Oghazi, P. and Zeynaloo, E., (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management Volume, 73, 193-205.
  • 107.Vernon, R., (1966). International trade and international investment in the product cycle. Quarterly journal of economics, 80(2), 190-207.
  • 108.Villani, E., Rasmussen, E. and Grimaldi, R., (2017). How Intermediary Organizations Facilitate University - Industry Technology Transfer: A Proximity Approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 114, 86-102.
  • 109.Zahra, S.A., George, G., (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review - Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
  • 110.Xiao, Zhixing; Tsui and Anne S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1-31.
  • 111.Xu, B., (2000). Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. Journal of development economics, 62(2), 477-493.
  • 112.Wang, C. L., Ahmed, P. K., (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31- 51.
  • 113.Wang, E. Y., Kafouros, M., (2020). Location still matters! How does geographic configuration influence the performance-enhancing advantages of FDI spillovers. Journal of International Management, 26(3), 100777.
  • 114.Wang, L., Li, S., You, Z. (2020). The effects of knowledge transfer on innovation capability: A moderated mediation model of absorptive capability and network reliance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 31(1), 100372.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ccfbce36-cb59-4307-ae7f-7b099face205
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.