The influence of nitrogen fertilization applied in different doses on fodder quality of meadow sward

• Autorzy: Jankowski K. , Jodełka J. , Sosnowski J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/2081139X.1056044

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The experiment was organized in four replicants in arrangement split-plot with plots having a surface equal 9 m². The basic fertilization was applied under the first regrowth. It was a mixture of unary fertilizers (ammonium nitrate, superphosphate, potassic salt) or polifoska. One form of supplementary fertilization was applied under the second and third regrowth. It was the stable form of fertilizer applied to soil. This form of supplemented nitrogen gave respectively: 50 kg N•ha ^-1; 80 kg N•ha^-1; 110 kg N•ha ^-1; per each moving. During the vegetation season three movings were harvested. From each movings the sampIes of green matter were taken for chemical analyses, i.e. total protein content, soluble carbohydrates and net energy (NEL). The obtained results showed large differences in fodder quality of the meadow sward fertilized with three doses of nitrogen.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

total protein; net energy (NEL); nitrogen dose; permanent meadow

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 14, nr 3
• Strony: 59--62
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Jankowski K.

• Institute of Agronomy, University of Natural Sciences and Humantities, B. Prusa 14, 08–110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Jodełka J.

• Institute of Agronomy, University of Natural Sciences and Humantities, B. Prusa 14, 08–110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Sosnowski J.

• Institute of Agronomy, University of Natural Sciences and Humantities, B. Prusa 14, 08–110 Siedlce, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Butkute R., Daugeliene N. 2006. Study on long-term meadow productivity and botanical composition in response to different liming and fertilization. Grasslands Science in Europe, 13, 224-226.
• 2. Carassai I.J., Da Trindade J.K., Nabinger C., Lemaire G., Carvalho P.C.F., Silva C.E.G., Vieira P.C., Dutra V.S., Tischler M.R. 2012. Ecophysiological model of growth of annual ryegrass as function of nitrogen fertilization. Grasslands Science in Europe, 17, 91-93.
• 3. Dickson T.L., Bryan L. 2011. Fertilization decreases plant biodiversity even when light is not limiting. Ecology Letters, DOI: 10.1111/j.1461- 0248.2011.01599.x, 1-9.
• 4. Hannessy D., Enriquez-Hidalgo D., O’Donovan M., Gilliland T. 2012. Effect of N fertilizer application rate on herbage production and sward clover contents in grazed grass clover plots. Grasslands Science in Europe, 17, 124-127.
• 5. Humphreys J., O’connell K., Casey I.A. 2008. Nitrogen flows and balance in four grassland based systems of dairy production on a clay-loam soil in a moist maritime climate. Grass and Forage Sci¬ence, 63, 467-480.
• 6. Jodełka J, Jankowski K. 2001. Re1ation between soil and foliar fertilization of permanent meadow. Acta Agroph., 52, 87-91.
• 7. Kolczarek R., Ciepie1a G.A., Jankowska J., Jodełka J. 2008. Influence of different forms of nitrogen ferti1ization on the content of macroe1ements in meadow sward. J. Elementom., 13(3), 349-355.
• 8. Gough L., Osenberg C.W., Gross K.L., Collins S.L. 2000. Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous plant communities. OIKOS, 89, 428–439.
• 9. Mrkvicka J., Wesela M. 2009. Species richness and diversity of foxtai1-type stand during 10 ng-term fertilization. Grasslands Science in Europe, 15, 196-199.
• 10. Muhammad A.U., Maqsood A., Amir S.R. 2010. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and harvesting intervals on the yield and forage quality of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) under mesic climate of pothowar plateau. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 47(3), 231-234.
• 11. Nefeler D., Huguenin-Elie O., Suter M., Frossard E., Lűscher A. 2006. Well-balanced grasslegume mixtures with low nitrogen fertilizations can be as productivities as highly grass monocultures. Grasslands Science in Europe, 13, 197-200.
• 12. Preś J. 1997. Produkcja pasz zielonych a potrzeby intensywnego żywienia zwierząt. Zesz. Prob. Post. Nauk. Ro1n., 24, 61-67.
• 13. Rajaniemi T.K. 2002. Why does fertilization resduce plant species diversity? Testing three competition-based hypotheses. J. Ecol., 90, 316–324.
• 14. Singh S., Nandita G., Singh K.P. 2007. Synchronizing nitrogen availability through application of organic inputs of varying resource quality in a tropical dry land agro ecosystem. Appl. Soil Ecol., 36, 164-175.
• 15. Spatz G., Buchgraber K. 2003. Balancing economic and ecological aspects. Optimal forage systems for animal production and the environment. Grasslands Science in Europe, 8, 11-13.
• 16. Wasilewski Z., Sutkowska E. 2001. Kształtowanie się składu botanicznego plonów pod wpływem nawożenia w wieloletnim doświadczeniu pastwiskowym. Pam. Puł., 125, 75-84.
• 17. Winnicka J., Bobrecka-Jamro D. 1996. Wpływ różnych dawek azotu na plon i skład florystycz-ny runi łąkowej przy wieloletnim użytkowaniu kośnym łąki górskiej. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków Roln., 312(3), 115-119.
• 18. Zhu Z.L. 2000. Loss of fertilizer N from plants soil system and the strategies and techniques for its reduction. Soil Environ. Sci., 9, 1-6.