Utility of GSMap Precipitation and Point Scale in Gauge Measurements for Stream Flow Modelling – A Case Study in Lam River Basin, Vietnam

• Autorzy: Kha Dang Dinh , Nhu Nguyen Y. , Long Vu Viet , Van Dao Thi Hong

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/116350

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The benefit from integrating the information from multi-source was confirmed in the research of hydrologic processes in river basins. However, the use of satellite-based rainfall products in hydrologic stream flow modeling has been limited because of the perceived uncertainty associated with such data. In this study the authors presented the simulated streamflow from a SWAT model driven by merging rainfall between satellite and gauge-observed rainfall for the Lam River Basin. The results demonstrate the usefulness of merging rainfall data for stream flow modelling at a monthly time step.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

GSMaP; SWAT model; merging; Lam river basin; flow modelling

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 21, nr 2
• Strony: 39--45
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kha Dang Dinh

• Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam

autor

Nhu Nguyen Y.

• Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam

autor

Long Vu Viet

• Power Engineering Consulting Joint Stock Company 1, Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam

autor

Van Dao Thi Hong

• Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 334, Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam

Bibliografia

• 1. Abbaspour, K.C. 2015. SWAT-CUP: SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs – A User Manual, Department of Systems Analysis, Intergrated Assessment and Modelling (SIAM), EAWAG. Swiss Federal Institute of Aqualtic Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland. User Manual: 100p.
• 2. Arnold. J. G et al. 2012. SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation. Transactions of the ASABE 55(4): 1317–35. http://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp??JID=3&AID=42244&CID=t2012&v=55&i=4&T=1.
• 3. Artan, Guleid et al. 2007. Adequacy of Satellite Derived Rainfall Data for Stream Flow Modeling. Natural Hazards 43(2): 167–85.
• 4. Bitew, M. M., and M. Gebremichael. 2011. Assessment of Satellite Rainfall Products for Streamflow Simulation in Medium Watersheds of the Ethiopian Highlands. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15(4): 1147–55.
• 5. Bui, Thi Hieu, and Hiroshi Ishidaira. 2015. Evaluation of Satellite-Gauge Merging Precipitation Methods for Rainfall Runoff Simulations. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 (Hydraulic Engineering) 71(4): I_79-I_84.
• 6. Chiang, Yen Ming et al. 2007. Merging Multiple Precipitation Sources for Flash Flood Forecasting. Journal of Hydrology 340(3–4): 183–96.
• 7. Gebregiorgis, Abebe, and Faisal Hossain. 2011. How Much Can a Priori Hydrologic Model Predictability Help in Optimal Merging of Satellite Precipitation Products? Journal of Hydrometeorology 12(6): 1287–98.
• 8. Khan, Sadiq I. et al. 2011. Satellite Remote Sensing and Hydrologic Modeling for Flood Inundation Mapping in Lake Victoria Basin: Implications for Hydrologic Prediction in Ungauged Basins. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 49(1 PART 1): 85–95.
• 9. Li, Dan, George Christakos, Xinxin Ding, and Jiaping Wu. 2018. Adequacy of TRMM Satellite Rainfall Data in Driving the SWAT Modeling of Tiaoxi Catchment (Taihu Lake Basin, China). Journal of Hydrology 556: 1139–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.006.
• 10. Nerini, Daniele et al. 2015. A Comparative Analysis of TRMM-Rain Gauge Data Merging Techniques at the Daily Time Scale for Distributed RainfallRunoff Modeling Applications. Journal of Hydrometeorology 16(5): 2153–68.
• 11. Nie, Suping et al. 2015. A Merging Scheme for Constructing Daily Precipitation Analyses Based on Objective Bias-Correction and Error Estimation Techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research 175(4449): 238.
• 12. Ren, Peizhen et al. 2018. Evaluation of Multiple Satellite Precipitation Products and Their Use in Hydrological Modelling over the Luanhe River Basin, China. Water (Switzerland) 10(6).
• 13. Ruan, Hongwei et al. 2017. Runoff Simulation by SWAT Model Using High-Resolution Gridded Precipitation in the Upper Heihe River Basin, Northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Water (Switzerland) 9(11).
• 14. Seo, D. J. 1998. Real-Time Estimation of Rainfall Fields Using Rain Gage Data under Fractional Coverage Conditions. Journal of Hydrology 208(1–2 /2): 25–36.
• 15. Tugrul Yilmaz, M., Paul Houser, Roshan Shrestha, and Valentine G. Anantharaj. 2010. Optimally Merging Precipitation to Minimize Land Surface Modeling Errors. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 49(3): 415–23.
• 16. Tuo, Ye, Zheng Duan, Markus Disse, and Gabriele Chiogna. 2016. Evaluation of Precipitation Input for SWAT Modeling in Alpine Catchment: A Case Study in the Adige River Basin (Italy). Science of the Total Environment 573: 66–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.034.
• 17. Ushio, Tomoo et al. 2009. A Kalman Filter Approach to the Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP) from Combined Passive Microwave and Infrared Radiometric Data. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 87 A(June 2008): 137–51.
• 18. WMO. 2008. I Journal of the Nepal Medical Association Guide to Hydrological Practices. Volume I: Hydrology–From Measurement to Hydrological Information.
• 19. Yuemei, Hou, Zhang Xiaoqin, Song Jianguo, and Na Jina. 2007. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 50(3): 885–900.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).