From social distancing to the financial and medical services disintermediation during the Covid-19 pandemic

• Autorzy: Solarz Jan Krzysztof , Waliszewski Krzysztof

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2022.160.36

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose of the article: In one sentence, disintermediation, it is said, neutralized the negative effects of the lack of trust that accrue from the use of a trusted third party, the intermediary. Disintermediation it is new system allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted party. Its conceptual framework focuses on posing key cognitive questions. The first core question to ask here is: how can we in intermediation after Global Financial Crisis? The second core question to ask is: how can humans blend disintermediation with policy norms to sustain disintermediation when they know that a minority can violate pandemic norms? Institutional experiences of disintermediation to individual-level social distancing, can sharpe individual beliefs, risk attitudes, and choices for years to come. The aim of the article is to indicate the mechanisms of conscious exclusion from traditional financial intermediation. Indirectly, it is gaining momentum as a result of distrust of banks and health services. In the first part, we remind you how successive financial crises crushed the banks ’natural monopoly on direct contact with customers. Tin the second part, we show how artificial intelligence penetrates people and enforces self-confidence. Social distinctions is ubiquitous in times of trust in social media. In conclusion, we show that the COVID-19 pandemic did not cause, but only exposed the scale of the social distance to traditional banking. Research methods: Narrative literature review of disintermediation discuss the state of the science of a specific theme from a theoretical and contextual point of view. We start with critical analysis of securitisation, switch to social distancing and transfer to telemedicine. Systematic literature review need replace disintermediation by digital transformation, social distancing by pandemic as catalyst of change, securitisation as equivalent of financial capital and telemedicine as equivalent of human capital. This is a conceptual article. Orginality/value: The pandemic has become a catalyst for the disclosure of long-term changes in financial intermediation. The tendency to financial mediation emerged half a century ago during the crisis of small and medium-sized banks in the United States. Collective memory has survived and has been used to advance digital non-banking intermediation. The barrier to its development was digital exclusion cantered around seniors and socially excluded people.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

social distance; financial disintermediation; medical services; COVID-19 pandemic

PL

dystans społeczny; dezintermediacja finansowa; usługi medyczne; pandemia Covid-19

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 160
• Strony: 561--576
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 52 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Solarz Jan Krzysztof

• WSB University in Warsaw

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6528-7645

autor

Waliszewski Krzysztof

• Poznan University of Economics and Business

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4239-5875

Bibliografia

• 1. Afeltowicz, Ł., Wróblewski, M. (2021). Socjologia epidemii. Wyłaniające się choroby zakaźne w perspektywie nauk społecznych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
• 2. Agrawal, V., Cantor, J.H., Sood, N., Whaley, C.M. (2021). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Policy resonses on excess mortality. NBER Working Paper No. 28930.
• 3. Alsan, M., Chandra, A., Simon, K.I. (2021). The great unequalizer: initial healt effects of COVID-19 in the United States. NBER Working Paper No. 28958.
• 4. Armantier, O., Doerr, S., Frost, J., Fuster, A., Shue, K. (2021). Whom do consumers trust with their data? Desrosiers US survey evidence. BIS Bulletin, No 42.
• 5. Banzhaf, H.S. (2021). The Value of Statistical Life: A Meta-analysis of Meta-Analyse. NBER Working Paper, No 29185.
• 6. Bergeijk, P.A.G. (2021). Pandemic Economics. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• 7. Blanchot, M. (1986). The Writing of the Disaster. University of Nebraska Press.
• 8. Bodner, E., Bergman, Y.S. Ben-David, B., Palgi, Y. (2021). Vaccination anxiety when vaccinations are available: The role of existential concerns. Stress and Health, No. 8.
• 9. Brunet, F., Malas, K., Desrosiers, M.E. (2021). Will telemedicine survive after COVID-19? Healthcare Management Forum, Vol. 34, No. 5.
• 10. Buesa, A., Perez, J.J., Santabarbara, D. (2021). Awareness of Pandemics and the Impact of COVID-19. Documentos de Trabajo Banco de Espana, N 2123.
• 11. Cassar, M.R., Borg, D., Camilleri, L., Schembri, A., Anastasi, E.A., Buhagiar, K., Callus, C., Grech, M. (2021). International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. 103.
• 12. Chalmers, D.J. (2017). The Virtual and the Real. Disputatio, Vol. IX, No. 46.
• 13. Chang, T., Jacobson, M., Shah, M., Pramanik, R., Shah, S.B. (2021). Financial incentives and other nudges do not increase COVID-19 vaccinations among the Vaccine hesitant. NBER Working Paper No 29403.
• 14. Chernoff, A., Warman, C. (2021). COVID-19 and Implications for Automation. Bank of Canada Staff Working Paper, No. 25.
• 15. Chukwuere, G.C.J. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and its effect on human psychology. Academia Letters. Article 3469. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3469.
• 16. Cruijsen, C., Haan, J., Jonker, N. (2021). Has the COVID-19 pandemic affected public trust? Evidence for the US and the Netherlands. DNB Working Paper, No.723.
• 17. Cusmariu, A. (2021). Are COVID-19 Mortality Statistics Valid? Academia Letters, Article 2932.
• 18. Czudy, Z., Matuszczak, M., Donderska, M., Haczyńska, J. (2021). The Role of (Dis) information in Society During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Problemy Zarządzania (Management Issues), 19(2), 49-63. https://doi.org/107172/1644-9584.92.3.
• 19. Dahlhaus, T., Welte, A. (2021). Payment Habits During COVID-19: Evidence from High 2 Frequency Transaction Data. Bank of Canada Staff Working paper, no. 43.
• 20. Demczuk, A. (2021). SARS-COV-2 I COVID-19. Plotki, dezinformacje I narracje spiskowe w polskim dyskursie publicznym. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
• 21. Długosz, P. (2021). Trauma pandemii COVID-19 w polskim społeczeństwie. CeDeWu.
• 22. Economic policy and the COVID-19 crisis. The macroeconomic response in the US, Europe and East Asia, eds. Bernandette Andreosso-O’Callaghan. Woosik Moon, Wook Sohn (2022). Routledge.
• 23. Folwarski, M. (2021). Innowacje cyfrowe w bankowości a włączenie cyfrowe i finansowe społeczeństwa. Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• 24. Greiwe, J. (2022). Telemedicine Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, Vol. 22, No. 1.
• 25. Heal, G. (2021). Empathy and the efficient provision of public goods. NBER Working Paper, No. 29255.
• 26. Helliwell, J.F., Norton, M.B., Akin, L.B., Huang, H. (2021). Well-being analysis favours a virus – elimination strategy for COVID-19. NBER Working Paper, No. 29092.
• 27. Horton, R. (2020). COVID-19 is not a pandemic, Vol. 396, Iss. 10255, p. 874.
• 28. https://github.com/akarlinsky/world_mortality, 10.11.2021.
• 29. Ikeda, Y., Kerry, W., Lewrick, U., Schmieder, C. (2021). Covid-19 and bank resilience: where do we stand? BIS Bulletin, no. 44.
• 30. Jarynowski, A., Wójta-Kempa, M., Płatek, D., Czopek, K. (2020). Attempt to understand public-health relevant social dimensions of Covid-19 outbreak in Poland. Society Register, No. 3.
• 31. Kichloo, A., Albosta, M., Dettloff, K., Wani, F., El-Amir, Z., Singh, J. Aljadah, M., Chakinala, R.C., Kanudula, A.K., Solanki, S., Chugh, S. (2020). Telemedicine, the current
• COVID-19 pandemmic and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Family Medicine and Community Health, no. 8.
• 32. Lerner, J., Seru, A., Short, N., Sun, Y. (2021). Financial innovation in the 21st 28 Century: Evidence from U.S.Patents. NBER Working Paper, No. 28980.
• 33. Lessons Learnt from the COVID-19 Pandemic from a Financial Stability Perspective. Final report (2021). Basel: Financial Stability Board.
• 34. Lewis, B., Lewis, W. (2021). The COVID-19 Wars: Physician vs. Clinician. Academia Letters. Article 3085. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3085.
• 35. Leyshon, A., Thrift, N. (1996). Financial exclusion and the shifting boundaries of the financial system. Environment and Planning, A28(7), 1150-1156.
• 36. Michelangeli, V., Viviano, E. (2021). Can internet banking affect households’ participation in financial markets and financial awareness? Banca D’Italia Working Papers, No. 1329.
• 37. Olcoń-Kubicka, M., Felczak, J., Posłuszny, Ł., Kubicki, P. (2021). Przemiany praktyk konsumpcyjnych w gospodarstwach domowych w pierwszych miesiącach pandemii COVID-19, w Zmiana społeczna pandemia, kryzys, konteksty empiryczne i teoretyczne. Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
• 38. PayTech-innowacyjne rozwiązania płatnicze na rynku polskim (2020). NBP.
• 39. Peters, M.A., Jandric, P., Mc Laren, P. (2020). Viral modernity? Epidemics, infodemics, and the “bioinforamtional” Paradigm. Educational Philosophy and Theory. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1744226.
• 40. Pierri, N. Timmer, Y. (2021). The importance of technology in banking during a crisis. European Systemic Risk Board Working Paper, No. 117.
• 41. Qian, A.S., Schiaffino, M.K., Nalawade, V., Aziz, L., Pacheco, F.V., Nguyen, B., Vu P., Patel, S.P., Martinez, M.E., Murphy, J.D. (2022). Disparities in telemedicine during COVID-19. Cancer Medicine, No. 11.
• 42. Rudert, S.C., Gleibs, I.H., Gollwitzer, M., Haefner, M., Hajek, K.V., Harth, N.S., Imhoff, R., Schneider, D. (2021). Us and the virus: Understanding the COVID-19 pandemic through a social psychological lens. European Psychologist, No. 1.
• 43. Rungcharoenkitkul, P. (2021). Macroeconomic effects of COVID-19: a mid-term review. BIS Working Paper, No. 959.
• 44. Saka, O., Eichengreen, B., Aksoy, C.G. (2021). Epidemic exposure, fintech adoption, and the digital divide. NBER Working Paper, No. 29006.
• 45. Solarz, J.K., Waliszewski, K. (2020). Zarządzanie ryzykiem systemowym. Pandemia COVID-19. Kraków-Legionowo: Edu-Libri.
• 46. Solarz, J.K., Waliszewski, K. (2022). Pandemia COVID-19 z perspektywy finansów – integration of m Health technologies in telemedicine during the COVID-19 era: A cross 23 sectional study, Plos one, https://doi. Org/10.1371/ journal.pone. 02644436.
• 47. Solarz, M., Swacha-Lech, M. (2011). Samowykluczenie bankowe w aspekcie finansów behawioralnych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, nr 193.
• 48. Szmyd, B., Karuga, F.F., Bartoszek, A., Staniecka, K., Simecka, N., Bartoszek, A., Błaszczyk, M., Radek, M. (2021). Attitude and Behaviors towards SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination among Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study from Poland. Vaccines, No. 9.
• 49. Tessier, L., Stavrianakis, A.(2020). Go Suppress Yourself. A Chronicle. Somotospshere.
• 50. Menkes, J., Suska, M. (eds.) (2022). The economic and leagal impact of COVID-19. The case of Poland. Routledge.
• 51. Uscher-Pines, L., Martineau, M. (2021). Telehealth After COVID-19. Clarifying Policy Golas for a Way Forward, Perspective. RAND Corporation.
• 52. Vilendrer, S., Sackeyfio, S., Akimnbami, E., Gosh, R., Luu, J.H., Pathak, D., Shimada, M., Williamson, E.E., Shieh, L. (2022). Patient Perspectives of Inpatient Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Assessment. JMIRRorm Re, Vol. 6, No. 3, e 32933, doi:10.2196/32933.
• 53. WHO Guideline: Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening (2019). Geneva, https://apps. Who.int/ins/handle (10665311941).
• 54. Zaltzer, D., Einav, L., Rashba, J., Balicer, R. (2021). The Impact of Increased Access to Telemedicine. NBER Working Paper, 28978.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).