Spatial-temporal analysis of landslides in complex hillslopes of catchments using Dynamic Topmodel

Bahmani, Farid; Fattahi, Mohamad Hadi; Sabzevari, Touraj; Haghighi, Ali Torabi; Talebi, Ali

doi:10.1007/s11600-022-00786-8

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Spatial-temporal analysis of landslides in complex hillslopes of catchments using Dynamic Topmodel

Autorzy

Bahmani Farid , Fattahi Mohamad Hadi , Sabzevari Touraj , Haghighi Ali Torabi , Talebi Ali

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-022-00786-8

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Hillslopes of the catchments in nature have three forms (convergent, divergent, parallel) in terms of plan shape and also in terms of floor curvature profile, they have three convex, concave, and straight shapes combining into complex hillslopes. Previous studies indicated the topography and geometry of complex hillslopes influence their hydrologic responses/attributes in both surface and subsurface flow. The three-dimensional shape and geometry of the hillslopes were introduced into Topmodel as the new parameters, and a complex Topmodel was presented that could check the saturation of different parts of complex hillslopes. The complex Topmodel model was linked to the landslide model “SINMAP”. Finally, the spatial– temporal variations of the saturation of the complex hillslopes and their stability rate were investigated using the Dynamic Topmodel. Results revealed that the influence of local slope, which is a function of curvature of the hillslopes, is more dominant than the saturation rate on the stability of the hillslopes. In contrast with convex hillslopes, the downstream in the concave hillslopes was more stable than upstream. Nevertheless, the upstream area in the concave hillslopes and downstream in the convex ones can be prioritized to implement artificial stabilization.

Słowa kluczowe

topography landslide SINMAP dynamic Topmodel complex hillslope

topografia osuwisko SINMAP

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2022

Tom

Vol. 70, no 3

Strony

1417--1432

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 112 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Bahmani Farid

Department of Civil Engineering, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

autor

Fattahi Mohamad Hadi

Department of Civil Engineering, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran

autor

Sabzevari Touraj

tooraj.sabzevari@gmail.com

Department of Civil Engineering, Estahban Branch, Islamic Azad University, Estahban, Iran

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3965-1751

autor

Haghighi Ali Torabi

Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

autor

Talebi Ali

Faculty of Natural Resources, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

Bibliografia

1. Akbari,A., Azizan, A., and S. K. Ngien. (2016). effect of slope adjustment on curve number using global digital elevation data: new look into sharply-williams and huang methods, Second International Conference on Science, Engineering & Environment,Osaka City, Japan, Nov.21–23, 2016, ISBN: 978-4-9905958-7-6 C3051.
2. Ardekani AA, Sabzevari T (2020) Effects of hillslope geometry on soil moisture deficit and base flow using an excess saturation model. Acta Geophys 68(3):773–782
3. Arnone E, Noto LV, Lepore C, Bras RL (2011) Physically-based and distributed approach to analyze rainfall-triggered landslides at watershed scale. Geomorphology 133:121–131
4. Aryal SK, O’Loughlin EM, Mein RG (2005) A similarity approach to determine response times to steady-state saturation in landscapes. Adv Water Resour 28:99–115
5. Avanzi GD, Giannecchini R, Puccinelli A (2004) The influence of the geological and geomorphological settings on shallow landslides. An example in a temperate climate environment: the June 19, 1996 event in northwestern Tuscany (Italy). Eng Geol 73:15–228
6. Barling RD, Moore ID, Grayson RB (1994) A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterizing the spatial distribution of zones of surface saturation and soil water content. Water Resour Res 30(4):10291044
7. Berne, A., Uijlenhoet, R., & Troch, P. A. (2005). Similarity analysis of subsurface flow response of hillslopes with complex geometry. Water Resour Res, 41(9).
8. Beven KJ, Freer J (2001) A dynamic TOPMODEL. Hydrol Process 15(10):1993–2011
9. Beven K, Kirkby M (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology/un mode`le a base physique de zone d’appel variable de l’hydrologie du bassin versant. Hydrol Sci J 24(1):43–69
10. Bishop AW (1959) The principle of effective stress. Tek Ukebl 106(39):859–863
11. Borga M, Dalla Fontana G, Cazorzi F (2002) Analysis of topographic and climatologic control on rainfall-triggered shallow landsliding using a quasi-dynamic wetness index. J Hydrol 268:56–71
12. Campos TMP, Andrade MHN, Gerscovich DMS, Vargas Jr. EA. (1994). Analysis of the failure of an unsaturated gneissic residual soil slope in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 1st Panamerican Symposium On Landslides, pp. 201–213.
13. Cardozo CP, Lopes ESS, Monteiro AMV (2018) Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment using SINMAP in Nova Friburgo (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Rev Bras Cartogr 70(4):1206–1230
14. Cascini L, Cuomo S, Pastor M, Sorbino G (2010) Modeling of rainfall induced shallow landslides of the flow-type. J Geotech Geoenviron 136(1):85–98. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000182
15. Cerdà A, García-Fayos P (1997) The influence of slope angle on sediment, water and seedlosses on badland landscapes. Geomorphology 18(2):77–90
16. Chaplot V, Le Bissonais Y (2000) Field measurements of interrill erosion under different slopes and plot sizes. Earth Surf Process Landf 25:145–153
17. Chen L, Young MH (2006) Green-Ampt infiltration model for sloping surfaces. WaterResour Res 42:W07420
18. Cho SE, Lee SR (2001) Instability of unsaturated soil slopes due to infiltration. Comput Geotech 28(3):185–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(00)00027-6
19. Cred C (2020) Counter.Cartographies-notes towards a future Atlas. Parallax 13(1):119–637
20. Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64(1):65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00093-X
21. De Ploey J, Savat J, Moeyersons J (1976) The differential impact of some soil loss factors on flow, runoff creep and rainwash. Earth Surf Process Landf 1:151–161
22. Dietrich WE, Montgomery DR (1998) SHALSTAB: a digital terrain model for mapping shallow landslide potential. National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement. Technical Report
23. Dilley M, Chen RS, Deichmann U, Lerner-Lam A, Arnold M, Agwe J, Buys P, Kjekstad O, Lyon B, Yetman G (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. World bank disaster risk management series
24. Djorovic, M. (1980). Slope effect on runoff and erosion, in Assessment of Erosion, edited by M. De Boodt and D. Gabriels, pp. 215– 225, JohnWiley, Hoboken, N. J.
25. Dunne T, Black RD (1970) An experimental investigation of runoff production in permeable soils. Water Resour Res 6:478–490
26. Evans IS (1980) An integrated system of terrain analysis and slope mapping. Zeitschrift Fur Geomorphologie, Supplementband 36:274–295
27. Fan Y, Bras RL (1998) Analytical solutions to hillslope subsurface storm flow and saturation overland flow. Water Resour Res 34(4):921–927
28. Fariborzi H, Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S, Mohammadpour R (2019) Prediction of the subsurface flow of hillslopes using a subsurface time-area model. Hydrogeol J 27(4):1401–1417
29. Fernandes NF, Guimarães RF, Gomes RAT et al (2004) Topographic controls of landslides in Rio de Janeiro: field evidence and modeling. CATENA 55:163–181
30. Fox DM, Bryan RB, Price AG (1997) The influence of slope angle on final infiltrationrate for interrill conditions. Geoderma 80:181–194
31. Franchini M, Wendling J, Obled C, Todini E (1996) Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL. J Hydrol 175(1–4):293–338
32. Freer JE, McMillan H, McDonnell JJ, Beven KJ (2004) Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures. J Hydrol 291(3–4):254–277
33. Gao J, Maro J (2010) Topographic controls on evolution of shallow landslides in pastoral Wairarapa, New Zealand, 1979–2003. Geomorphology 114:373–381
34. Godt JW, Baum RL, Lu N (2009) Using soil suction and moisture content measurements for landslide prediction. Geophys Res Lett 36:L02403. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035996
35. Govers G (1991) A field study on topographical and topsoil effects on runoff generation. CATENA 18:91–111
36. Grosh JL, Jarrett AR (1994) Interrill erosion and runoff on verysteep slopes. Trans ASAE 37(4):1127–1133
37. Ha ND, Sayama T, Sassa K, Takara K, Uzuoka R, Dang K, & Van Pham T (2020). A coupled hydrological-geotechnical framework for forecasting shallow landslide hazard—a case study in Halong City, Vietnam. Landslides, 1–16.
38. Hammond C, Hall D, Miller S, Swetik P (1992). Level I Stability Analysis (LISA) documentation for version 2.0. USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-285.
39. Hilberts A, Van Loon E, Troch PA, Paniconi C (2004) The hillslope-storage Boussinesq model for non-constant bedrockslope. J Hydrol 291:160–173
40. Hilberts A, Troch PA, Paniconi C, Boll J (2007) Low-dimensional modeling of hillslope subsurface flow: the relationship between rainfall, recharge, and unsaturated storage. Water Resour Res 43:W03445. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR006496
41. Iida T (1999) A stochastic hydro-geomorphological model for shallow landsliding due to rainstorm. CATENA 34:293–313
42. Janeau JL, Bricquet JP, Planchon O, Valentin C (2003) Soil crusting and infiltration on steep slopes in northern Thailand. Europ J Soil Sci 54:543–553
43. Kim MS, Onda Y, Kim JK, Kim SW (2015) Effect of topography and soil parameterisation representing soil thicknesses on shallow landslide modelling. Quatern Int 384:91–106
44. Kim MS, Onda Y, Uchida T, Kim JK, Song YS (2018) Effect of seepage on shallow landslides in consideration of changes in topography: case study including an experimental sandy slope with artificial rainfall. CATENA 161:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2017.10.004
45. Kirkby MJ (1997) TOPMODEL: a personal view. Hydrol Process 11(9):1087e1097
46. Kjekstad O, & Highland L (2009). Economic and social impacts of landslides. In: Landslides–disaster risk reduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
47. Lal R (1976) Soil erosion of Alfisols in western Nigeria: Effects ofslope, crop rotation and residue management. Geoderma 16:363–375
48. Lamb R, Beven K (1997) Using interactive recession curve analysis to specify a general catchment storage model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 1(1):101e113
49. Lane SN, Brookes CJ, Kirkby MJ, Holden J (2004) A network-index-based version of TOPMODEL for use with high-resolution digital topographic data. Hydrol Process 18(1):191e201
50. Liang WL, Chan MC (2017) Spatial and temporal variations in the effects of soil depth and topographic wetness index of bedrock topography on subsurface saturation generation in a steep natural forested headwater catchment. J Hydrol 546:405–418
51. Lin Q, Wang Y (2018) Spatial and temporal analysis of a fatal landslide inventory in China from 1950 to 2016. Landslides 15:2357–2372
52. Liu Y, Freer J, Beven K, Matgen P (2009) Towards a limits of acceptability approach to the calibration of hydrological models: extending observation error. J Hydrol 367(1–2):93–103
53. Lu N, Godt J (2013) Hill slope hydrology and stability. Cambridge University Press, New York
54. Mah MGC, Douglas LA, Ringrose-voase AJ (1992) Effects ofcrust development and surface slope on erosion by rainfall. Soil Sci 154:37–43
55. Metcalfe P, Beven K, Hankin B, Lamb R (2017) A modelling framework for evaluation of the hydrological impacts of nature-based approaches to flood risk management, with application to in-channel interventions across a 29-km2 scale catchment in the United Kingdom. Hydrol Process 31(9):1734–1748
56. Michel GP, Kobiyama M, Goerl RF (2014) Comparative analysis of SHALSTAB and SINMAP for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Cunha river basin, southern Brazil. J Soils Sediments 14(7):1266–1277
57. Mishra SK, Chaudhary A, Shrestha RK, Pandey A, Lal M (2014) Experimental verification of the effect of slope and land use on SCS runoff curve number. Water Resour Manage 28:3407–3416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0582-6
58. Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1994) A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding. Water Resour Res 30:1153–1171
59. Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991). Digital terrainmodelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, andbiological applications. Hydrolog. Processes 5, 3±30.
60. Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, Flammini A, Cifrodelli M, Corradini C, Govindaraju RS (2015) Infiltration on sloping surfaces: Laboratory experimental evidence and implicationsfor infiltration modelling. J Hydrol 523:79–85
61. Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C, Flammini A, Cifrodelli M, Picciafuoco T, Corradini C, Govindaraju RS (2016) Laboratory investigation on the role of slope on infiltration overgrassy soils. J Hydrol 543:542–547
62. Nachabe, M.H. (2006).Equivalence between TOPMODEL and the NRCS curve number method in peredicting variable runoff source areas. Journal of the american water resources association.
63. Nassif SH, Wilson EM (1975) The influence of slope and rain intensity on runoff and infiltration. Hydrol Sci Bull 20(4):539–553
64. Ng CWW, Shi Q (1998) A numerical investigation of the stability of unsaturated soil slopes subjected to transient seepage. Comput Geotech 22(1):1–28
65. Norbiato D, Borga M (2008) Analysis of hysteretic behaviour of a hillslope-storage kinematic wave model for subsurface flow. Adv Water Resour 31(1):118–131
66. Ogden FL, Watts BA (2000) Saturated area formation on nonconvergent hillslope topography with shallow soils: a numerical investigation. Water Resour Res 36(7):1795–1804
67. O’loughlin EM (1986) Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis. Water Resour Res 22(5):794–804
68. Pack AB, Goodwin CN (2012) SINMAP user's manual
69. Pack RT, Tarboton DG, & Goodwin C N (1998a). Terrain stability mapping with SINMAP, technical description and users guide for version 1.00.
70. Pack RT, Tarboton DG, & Goodwin CN (1998b). The SINMAP approach to terrain stability mapping
71. Pack RT, Tarboton DG, Goodwin CN. (1998c). Terrain stability mapping with SINMAP, technical description and users guide for version 1.00. Report Number 4114–0, Terratech Consulting Ltd., Salmon Arm, Canada, 68 p.
72. Pack RT, Tarboton DG, Goodwin CN (1999). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping with SINMAP. Proceedings of the 34th symposium on engineering geology and geotechnical engineering. BAY, J. A. (Ed.). Logan, pp. 219–231.
73. Pack, R. T., Tarboton, D. G., & Goodwin, C. N. (2001). Assessing terrain stability in a GIS using SINMAP.
74. Page T, Beven KJ, Freer J, Neal C (2007) Modelling the chloride signal at Plynlimon, Wales, using a modified dynamic TOPMODEL incorporating conservative chemical mixing (with uncertainty). Hydrol Process Int J 21(3):292–307
75. Park SJ, McSweeney K, Lowery B (2001) Identification of the spatial distribution of soils using a process-based terrain characterization. Geoderma 103:249–272
76. Park HJ, Lee JH, Woo I (2013) Assessment of rainfall-induced shallow landslide susceptibility using a GIS-based probabilistic approach. Eng Geol 161:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.011
77. Peters NE, Freer J, Beven K (2003) Modelling hydrologic responses in a small forested catchment (Panola Mountain, Georgia, USA): a comparison of the original and a new dynamic TOPMODEL. Hydrol Process 17(2):345–362
78. Philip JR (1991a) Hillslope infiltration: divergent and convergent slopes. Water Resour Res 27:1035–1040
79. Philip JR (1991b) Infiltration and downslope unsaturated flows in concave and convex topographies. Water Resour Res 27:1041–1048
80. Pishvaei MH, Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S, Mohammadpour R (2020) Effects of hillslope geometry on spatial infiltration using the TOPMODEL and SCS-CN models. Hydrol Sci J 65(2):212–226
81. Poesen J (1984) The influence of slope angle on infiltration rate and Hortonian overland flow. Zeitschrift Für Geomorpholgie, Suppl 49:117–131
82. Philip JR (1991) Hillslope infiltration: planar slopes. Water Resour Res 27(1):109–117
83. Preti F, Letterio T (2015) Shallow landslide susceptibility assessment in a datapoor region of Guatemala (Comitancillo Municipality). J Agric Eng 46(3):85–95
84. Rabonza ML, Felix RP, Lagmay F, Eco RNC, Ortiz IJG, Aquino DT (2016) Shallow landslide susceptibility mapping using high resolution topography for areas devastated by supertyphoon Haiyan. Landslides 13:201–210
85. Ribolzi O, Hermida M, Karambiri H, Delhoume JP, Thiombiano L (2006) Effects of aeolian processes on water infiltration in sandy Sahelian rangeland in Burkina Faso. CATENA 67:145–154
86. Ribolzi O, Patin J, Bresson L, Latsachack K, Mouche E, Sengtaheuanghoung O, Silvera N, Thiébaux JP, Valentin C (2011) Impacy of slope gradient on soil surfacefeatures and infiltration on steep slopes in northern Laos. Geomorphology 127(1–2):53–63
87. Rogers, C. T. and Sitar, N. (1993). Expert systems approach to regional evaluation of debris flow hazard, Geotechnical engineering report No. UCB/GT/93–08, Geotechnical engineering department of civil engineering, University of california, Berkeley.
88. Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S (2014) Effects of hillslope geometry on surface and subsurface flows. Hydrogeol J 22(7):1593–1604
89. Sabzevari T, Talebi A (2021) Landslide hazard zonation of catchments by using TOPMODEL and SINMAP models. Watershed Eng Manag 13(1):222–234
90. Sabzevari T, Talebi A, Ardakanian R, Shamsai A (2010a) A steady-state saturation model to determine the subsurface travel time (STT) in complex hillslopes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(6):891–900
91. Sabzevari T, Talebi A, Ardakanian R, Shamsai A (2010b) A steady state saturation model to determine the subsurface travel time (STT) in complex hillslopes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:891–900. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-891-2010
92. Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S, Pishvaei M (2015a) Efects of geometry on runoff time characteristics and time-area histogram of hillslopes. Elsevier, J Hydrol 531:638–648
93. Sabzevari T, Noroozpour S, Pishvaei MH (2015b) Effects of geometry on runoff time characteristics and time-area histogram of hillslopes. J Hydrol 531:638–648
94. Safaei M, Omar H, Huat BK, Yousof ZBM, Ghiasi V (2011) Deterministic rainfall induced landslide approaches, advantage and limitation. Electron J Geotech Eng 16:1619–1650
95. Sharma RH (2013) Evaluating the effect of slope curvature on slope stability by a numerical analysis. Aust J Earth Sci 60(2):283–290
96. Sharma K, Singh H, Pareek O (1983) Rain water infiltration into a bar loamy sand. Hydrol Sci J 28:417–424
97. Sharma K, Pareek O, Singh H (1986) Microcatchment water harvestingfor raising Jujube orchards in an arid climate. Trans ASEA 29(1):112–118
98. Shrestha RK, Mishra SK, Pandey A (2013) Curvenumberaffected by slope of experimental plot having maize crop. J IndianWater Resour Soc 33(2):42–50
99. Talebi A, Uijlenhoet R, Troch PA (2008a) A low-dimensional physically based model of hydrologic control of shallow landsliding on complex hillslopes. Earth Surface Process Landf: J British Geomorphol Res Group 33(13):1964–1976
100. Talebi A, Uijlenhoet R, Troch PA (2008b) A low-dimensional physically based model of hydrologic control of shallow landsliding on complex hillslopes. Earth Surf Proc Land 33:1964–1976
101. Talebi A, Troch PA, Uijlenhoet R (2008c) A steady-state analytical hillslope stability model fo complex hillslopes. Hydrol Process 22:546–553
102. Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and contributing areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 33(2):309–319
103. Tarolli P, Tarboton DG (2006) A new method for determination of most likely landslide initiation points and the evaluation of digital terrain model scale in terrain stability mapping. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:663–677
104. Troch PA, van Loon AH, Hilberts AGJ (2002) Analytical solutions to a hillslope storage kinematic wave equation for subsurface flow. Adv Water Resour 25(6):637–649
105. Troch, P. A., Paniconi, C., & Emiel van Loon, A. E. (2003a). Hillslope‐storage Boussinesq model for subsurface flow and variable source areas along complex hillslopes: 1 Formulation and characteristic response. Water Resources Research, 39(11).
106. Troch PA, Paniconi C, Van Loon E (2003b) Hillslope-storage Boussinesq model for subsurface flow and variable source areas along complexhillslopes: 1. formulation and characteristic response. Water ResourRes 39(11):1316. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002WR001728
107. Wang J, Chen L, Yu Z (2018) Modeling rainfall infiltration on hillslopes using fluxconcentration relation and time compression approximation. J Hydrol 557:243–253
108. Ward RC (1967) Principles of Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, London, p 403
109. Watson KK (1965) A statistical treatment of the factors affecting the infiltration capacity of field soils. J Hydrol 3:38–65
110. Wu W, Sidle R (1995) A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins. Water Resour Res 31:2097–2110
111. Zhang LL, Zhang J, Zhang LM, Tang WH (2011) Stability analysis of rainfall induced slope failure: a review. Proc ICE-Geotech Eng 164(5):299–316
112. Zizioli D, Meisina C, Valentino R, Montrasio L (2013) Comparison between different approaches to modeling shallow landslide susceptibility: a case history in Oltrepo Pavese, Northern Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:559–573

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-cb985e98-ddc3-44d7-ae7d-0dfb03b362b8