Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The theory and analysis of an American economist Hazel Kyrk (1886-1957) and her PhD student Margaret Reid (1896-1991) carried out on the consumption, production or economics of women for various reasons are not widely discussed in Poland. Although over the years, this theory has been modified, its essence remained practically unchanged and applies also to the new business models of the 21st century. Household production is based on the principle of self-help and free exchange of different goods between members of the local community. Similarly, as the work of housewives is non-profit according to the theory of Hazel Kyrk, the exchange of products and services, skills and knowledge, from the point of view of economic account doesn't generate revenue, but it helps to create the social or economic value that is in no way accounted in statistics and is not measured. Production of the household is also a source of opportunities and threats to economic security, in particular the financial security. The aim of the work is to present the theory of household production by Hazel Kyrk in order to describe its importance for the economy of the 21st century, in particular the new models based on sharing (the sharing economy) and access (the access economy). The methods used in the work are the historical method, the method of critical analysis of literature and statistical method.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
365--376
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 32 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- The Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Branch in Piotrków Trybunalski
Bibliografia
- 1. Bardhi, F., and Eckhardt, G.M. (2012). Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 881-987.
- 2. Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 715-734.
- 3. Burgiel, A. (2014). Wspólna konsumpcja (collaborative consumption), jako alternatywna opcja dla konsumenta XXI wieku. Marketing i Rynek, 8, 1010-1011.
- 4. Cicarelli, J., and Cicarelli, J. (2003). Distinguished Women Economists. Westport (Connecticut): Greenwood Press.
- 5. Durlauf, S.N., and Blume, L. (2008). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. New York, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
- 6. Forget, E. (2010). Margaret Gilpin Reid. In: R.B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics (pp. 315-317). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
- 7. Goldstein, C.M. (2012). Creating Consumers: Home Economists in Twentieth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
- 8. Jaros, B. (2016). Sharing economy jako ważny trend w obszarze zrównoważonej konsumpcji. Handel Wewnętrzny, 5(364), 82-91.
- 9. Jones, C.C. (2016). Retaking Home Economics: Gendered Perspectives on Tax Equity. In: A.C. Infanti (ed.), Controversies in Tax Law: A Matter of Perspectives (pp. 11-27). New York: Routledge.
- 10. Kirk, H. (1923). A Theory of Consumption, Houghton Mifflin Company. Boston and New York.
- 11. Kirk, H. (1933). Economic Problems of the Family. New York: Harper.
- 12. Kirk, H. (1934). The Consumer and the Marketing System. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
- 13. Kirk, H. (1950). The Income Distribution as a Measure of Economic Welfare. American Economic Review, 40, 342-355.
- 14. Kirk, H. (1952). Economic Responsibilities of Families: Increasing or Diminishing? Journal of Home Economics, 44, 8, 616-661.
- 15. Kirk, H. (1953). The Family in the American Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- 16. Olsen, N. (2018). The Sovereign Consumer: A New Intellectual History of Neoliberalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- 17. Pietrewicz, J.W., Sobiecki, R. (2016). Przedsiębiorczość sharing economy. In.: M. Poniatowska-Jaksch, R. Sobiecki (eds.), Sharing economy (gospodarka współdzielenia). Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH: Warszawa.
- 18. Pietrykowski, B. (2009). The Political Economy of Consumer Behavior: Contesting Consumption. London-New York: Routledge.
- 19. Reid, M.G. (1934). Economics of Household Production. J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- 20. Rudawska, I. (2016). Ekonomia dzielenia się, czyli konsumpcja współdzielona i inne formy alternatywnego dostępu do dóbr. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, 254, 181-189.
- 21. Rutherford, M. (2010). Chicago Economics and Institutionalism. In: R.B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics (pp. 25-39). Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.
- 22. Sobiecki, R. (2016). Sharing economy - dylematy pojęciowe. In.: M. Poniatowska-Jaksch, R. Sobiecki (eds.), Sharing economy (gospodarka współdzielenia). Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH: Warszawa.
- 23. Stępnicka, N., and Wiączek, P. (2018). Sharing economy vs. access economy - wybrane aspekty metodologiczne. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 530, 13-25.
- 24. Stępnicka, N., and Wiączek, P., Time Banks vs Household Production Theory and Threats to the Fiscal Security of the State, article in the review proces.
- 25. Stępnicka, N., The Role of E(-)vangelists in the Development of Economic Theory and the Internet Economy, article in the review proces.
- 26. Sulivan-Dunbar, S. (2017). Human Dependency and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 27. Sztokfisz, B. (2017). Gospodarka współdzielenia - pojęcie, źródła, potencjał. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 6(966), 89-103.
- 28. Velzen, von S. (2003). Hazel Kyrk and the Ethics of Consumption. In: D.K. Barker, and E. Kuiper (eds.), Toward a Feminist Philo-sophy of Economics (pp. 38-55). London-New York: Routledge.
- 29. Ware, S., Braukman, S. (2004). Notable American Women: A Biographical Dictionary Completing the Twentieth Century, New York: Harvard University Press.
- 30. Williams, F.M. (1932). Family Living Standards Depend on Use as Well as Size of Income. Yearbook of Agriculture, 549-551.
- 31. Zalega, T. (2013). Nowe trendy i makrotrendy w zachowaniach konsumenckich gospodarstw domowych w XXI wieku. Konsumpcja i Rozwój, 2(5), 3-21.
- 32. Zuckerman, M.E., Carsky, M.L. (1990). Contribution of Women to US Marketing Thought: the Consumers’ Perspective, 1900-1940. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18, 4, 313-318.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-cb364174-6edc-474e-a585-a06964dc778e