PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Non-traditional maritime security threats. The dynamic of ASEAN cooperation

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This article attempts to analyze ASEAN’s response to maritime security cooperation. As an organization in Southeast Asia, ASEAN needs to establish good maritime cooperation to protect the various interests of the members and the busy SLOCs as well. The author uses cooperative security to analyze ASEAN maritime security cooperation and identifies sources of cooperative maritime security to explain their willingness to join or not to join a cooperation agreement. This article shows that there is an overlap of cooperation as the result of different in terms of prioritization, capability, and especially perspective regarding the absolute and collective gain that leads to ineffective cooperation. In addition, there are no legally binding frameworks as an outcome from formed cooperation beside a series of dialogues between ASEAN members. But, although each country has different priorities, capability, interest and perspectives, the Cooperative security may become a bridge to overcome the difference. It is possible as the ASEAN members keep showing their willingness to overcome maritime issue by doing bilateral, trilateral, and multilateral cooperation.
Twórcy
autor
  • Universitas Bosowa, Selatan, Indonesia
  • Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, Indonesia
autor
  • Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, Indonesia
autor
  • Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, Indonesia
autor
  • Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Ad’ha Aljunied, S. M. (2011). Countering Terrorism in Maritime Southeast Asia: Soft and Hard Power Approaches. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 47(6), 652–665. - doi:10.1177/0021909611427252.
  • 2. Andrew Mack & Pauline Kerr (1995) The evolving security discourse in the Asia‐pacific, The Washington Quarterly, (18)1, 123-140. - doi:10.1080/01636609509550136.
  • 3. Archarya, Amitav. (2007). ‘Regional Institutions and Security in the Asia-Pacific: Evolution, Adaptation, and Prospects for Transformation’. In AmitavAcharya and Evelyn Goh, Reassessing Security Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific: Competition, Congruence, and Transformation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 4. ASEAN. (2015, December 3). ASEAN Security Outlook 2015. https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-security-outlook-2015.
  • 5. ASEAN (2013, October 17). ASEAN Security Outlook 2013 https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-security-outlook-2013.
  • 6. Evans, Gareth. (1994). Cooperative Security and Intrastate Conflict, Foreign Policy, Washingtonpost: Newsweek Interactive, LLC. - doi:10.2307/1149213.
  • 7. Baird, R. (2012). Transnational security issues in the Asian maritime environment: responding to maritime piracy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 66(5), 501–513. - doi:10.1080/10357718.2011.570240.
  • 8. Bateman, S. (2015). The Future Maritime Security Environment in Asia: A Risk Assessment Approach. Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 37, No. 1 (2015), pp. 49–84, 37(1), 49–84. - doi:10.1355/cs37-1c.
  • 9. Bateman, Sam., Emmers, Ralf. (2009). Security And International Politics In The South China Sea Towards A Cooperative Management Regime, New York: Routledge. - doi:10.4324/9780203885246.
  • 10. Bhattacharyya, A. (2011). Understanding Security in Regionalism Framework: ASEAN Maritime Security in Perspective. Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 6(2), 72–89. - doi:10.1080/09733159.2010.559786.
  • 11. Bhattacharyya, Anushree (2010) Understanding Security in Regionalism Framework: ASEAN Maritime Security in Perspective, Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 6:2, 72-89, DOI: 10.1080/09733159.2010.559786 - doi:10.1080/09733159.2010.559786.
  • 12. Booth, Ken., (2007). Theory Of World Security. Cambridge University Press. - doi:10.1017/CBO9780511840210.
  • 13. Brown, Chris. Ainley, Kirsten. (2005). Understanding International Relations.Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 14. Bueger, C. (2015). From Dusk to Dawn? Maritime Domain Awareness in Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 37(2), 157–182. - doi:10.1355/cs37-2a.
  • 15. Carter, Ashton B., Perry, William J., Steinbruner, John D., (1992).A New Concept of Cooperative Security.Washington D. C.: The Brookings Institution.
  • 16. Cohen, Richard.Mihalka, Michael. (2000) Cooperative Security: New Horizon For International Order (3rded). The Marshal Center Papers. - doi:10.21236/ADA478855.
  • 17. Dewitt, David. (1994). Common, comprehensive, and cooperative security. The Pacific Review Vol. 7, 1-15. - doi:10.1080/09512749408719067.
  • 18. Ho, J. H. (2006). The Security of Sea Lanes in Southeast Asia. Asian Survey, 46(4), 558–574. - doi:10.1525/as.2006.46.4.558.
  • 19. ICC International Maritime Bureau (2017).Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships, https://www.icc-ccs.org/reports/2017-Annual-IMB-Piracy-Report.pdf.
  • 20. IEEE. (2011, June). Framework Document 05/2011 The Evolution Of The Concept Security.http://www.ieee.es/en/Galerias/fichero/docs_marco/2011/DIEEEM05-2011_EvolutionConceptSecurity_ENGLISH.pdf.
  • 21. Katsumata, Hiro. (2009). Asean’s Cooperative Security Enterprise, Norms And Interests InTheAsean Regional Forum. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 22. Keliat, Makmur. (2009). KeamananMaritim Dan ImplikasiKebijakannyaBagi Indonesia, JurnalIlmuSosialdanIlmuPolitik, 13 (1), 111-129 https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10970.
  • 23. Klein, Natalie. (2011). Maritime Security And The Law Of The Sea. Oxford University Press. - doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566532.001.0001.
  • 24. Lee, T., & McGahan, K. (2015). Norm subsidiarity and institutional cooperation: explaining the straits of Malacca anti-piracy regime. The Pacific Review, 28(4), 529 552. - doi:10.1080/09512748.2015.1012537.
  • 25. Llewelyn, J. D. (2017). Preventive diplomacy and the role of civil maritime security cooperation in Southeast Asia. Strategic Analysis, 41(1), 49–60. - doi:10.1080/09700161.2016.1249178.
  • 26. Lim, Kyunghan, (2015). Non-traditional Maritime Security Threats in Northeast Asia: Implications for Regional Cooperation. Journal of International and Area Studies, 22 (2), 135-146.
  • 27. Mccauley, A. (2014, August 15). Asia’s seas offer rich pickings for marauding pirates who steal oil and supplies worth billions of dollars every year. TIME.https://time.com/piracy-southeast-asia-malacca-strait/.
  • 28. Mack, A., Kerr, P. (2010). The Evolving Security In The Asia Pacific. London: Routledge.
  • 29. MI News Network. (2017, January 23). Dryad Maritime Reports Security Issues For Ships In Southeast Asia. https://www.marineinsight.com/shipping-news/dryad-maritime-reports-security-issues-for-ships-in-southeast-asia/.
  • 30. Mily Ming-Tzu Kao. (2011, July).Strategic Culture of Small States The Case of ASEAN. https://repository.asu.edu/attachments/56880/content/Kao_asu_0010E_10849.pdf.
  • 31. Moodie, Michael., (2000). Cooperative Security: Implications for National Security and International Relations. Sandia National Laboratories.
  • 32. Spray, Sharon L. Roselle, Laura, (2012). Research and Writing in International Relations. Pearson.
  • 33. Till, Geoffrey. (2004). Seapower A Guide for the Twenty-First Century.Routledge.
  • 34. ReCaap. (2006, November 29). About ReCAAP Information Sharing Centre, combating maritime robbery, sea piracy. https://www.recaap.org/about_ReCAAP-ISC.
  • 35. RSIS. (2017, September 26). ASEAN Mechanisms On Maritime Security Cooperation. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ER171212_ASEAN-Mechanisms-on-Maritime-Security-Cooperation_WEB.pdf.
  • 36. Severino, Rodolfo C. (2008). ASEAN at Forty A Balance Sheet. In Daljit Sing, Tin MaungMaung Than, Southeast Asian Affairs. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS). - doi:10.1355/SEAA08D.
  • 37. SIPRI.(1996, October).A Future Security Agenda for Europe. https://www.sipri.org/publications/1996/future-security-agenda-europe-report-independent-working-group-established-Stockholm-international.
  • 38. Storey, I. (2016). Addressing the Persistent Problem of Piracy and Sea Robbery in Southeast Asia. ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, (30), 1–11.
  • 39. Valencia, Mark J. (2018, September 17). Maritime Security Cooperation in the South China Sea: Sailing In Different Directions “The diplomatic graveyard is full of failed proposals and efforts that did not take regional realities into account.”.
  • 40. https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/maritime-security-cooperation-in-the-south-china-sea-sailing-in-different-directions/.
  • 41. Weeks, Stanley B. (1998) Sea Lines Of Communication (SLOC) Security And Access 1-72. UC San Diego Policy Papers.
  • 42. Wu, Shicun.,Zou, Keyuan, (2009). Maritime Security in the South China Sea Regional Implications and International Cooperation.Ashgate.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-cae32f25-a215-40c9-b045-48722d560001
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.