Contemporary threats to the state air defence system

• Autorzy: Radomyski Adam , Materak Witold

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0010.5635

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The contents of this article are focused on presenting the results of research concerning development of the means of air threat as a major determinant of changes in the modernisation of the air defence system in Poland. In this regard, the authors emphasise the role and means of air threat as a kind of pacemaker development of air defence systems. In this article, the main area of scientific considerations are technical and tactical aspects concerned with the evolution of manned and unmanned aircraft. The directions of their development of combat capabilities and an estimate of their use in contemporary and future battlefields against military objectives and non-military ones are covered. The article has high educational value and highlights future threats to the state air defence system and development trends in the twenty-first century.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

air defence; air defence systems; fighter aircraft; ballistic missiles; air threats; air terrorism

• Wydawca: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej
• Czasopismo: Security and Defence Quarterly
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 11, No. 2
• Strony: 45--69
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 45 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Radomyski Adam

• Polish Air Force Academy, Dęblin, Poland

autor

Materak Witold

• War Studies University, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. AA P-6 Glossary of terms and definitions NATO in 2009.
• 2. Adamski J., New technologies in the service of terrorists, Ed. Trio, Warsaw 2007.
• 3. Babut R., unmanned flying machines. The development and application,”Review of Air Force regulations and Air Defense” 1993, No. 11.
• 4. Bondaruk, Shock Unmanned flying on the battlefield, “Overview of the Air Force and the Air Defense” 1999, No. 9.
• 5. Birch J. Dańko Z. Unmanned aircraft and ASG as a new challenge and threat in the air, “Overview of the Air Force,” 2004, No. 8.
• 6. Dęga Cz., Armament and army battlefield 2020, Warsaw 1995.
• 7. Shoot K., Endangered terrestrial objects aviation terrorism, [in] Member - State Response to threats of terrorism aerospace, edited by A. Glen, National Defense University, Warsaw 2010.
• 8. Doyle MR, Samuel DJ, Conway T., Klimowski RR , Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System - EMALS, Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Lakehurst, NJ 08733 .
• 9. Franklin M., Unmanned combat air vehicles: Opportunities for the guided weapons in- destroy? Military Sciences Department, Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, September 2008.
• 10. Fritz M., War contemporary face, Ed. MADO, Torun, 2009. CN Ghosh, Application of unmanned combat aerial vehicles in future battles of the Subcontinent, “Strategic Analysis”, Volume 25, Issue 4, 2001 .
• 11. CN Ghosh, Application of unmanned combat aerial vehicles in future battles of the Subcontinent, “Strategic Analysis”, Volume 25, Issue 4, 2001 .
• 12. Gilmore J.H., The Army’s Future Combat System program, CBO Testimony, Washington, DC April 4, 2006.
• 13. DM Gormley, Unmanned Air Vehicles as Terror Weapons: Real or Imagined? , Center for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS), Monterey Institute of International Studies, July 2005.
• 14. She cooked J., Night importance in combat operations of modern aviation, “Overview of the Air Force and the Air Defense,” 1999, No. 1.
• 15. She cooked J., System and technological conditions of development of the Air Force, “ National Defense University Scientific Papers”, No. 2 (Special), National Defense University, Warsaw 2002.
• 16. She cooked J., Six steps beyond the horizon of modernity. Trends in the development of military aviation, “Overview of the Air Force and the Air Defense,” 2004, No. 7.
• 17. She cooked J., Technology boom and combat effectiveness of military aviation, “An overview of the Air Force and the OP” 2003, No. 4.
• 18. She cooked J., Anxiety in the air, “Overview of the Air Force and the Air Defense” 2003, No. 1.
• 19. Gruszczyńki J., Fisher M., Joint Vision 2020. Keynote U.S. defense doctrine, “Overview of the Air Force and the Air Defense,” 2003, No. 5.
• 20. Gruszczyński , J. Tactical - Technical conditions for the development of aviation fighterbomber , “ AON Scientific Papers “, No. 2 ( Special) , Warsaw 2002.
• 21. M. Isherwood, Strike now. Next generation long range strike system Provides strategic options, “Armed Force Journal,” February 2009.
• 22. Jackson Jr J. A. Jones, B.L. Lee J. Lehmkuhl , An Operational Analysis for Air Force 2025: An Application of Value- Focused Thinking to Future Air and Space Capabilities , May 1996.
• 23. Pebble M., hypersonic speeds, “Overview of the Air Force” 2011, No. 1 Karpowicz J. Klich E., flight safety and aviation security against attacks of unlawful interference, AON, Warsaw 2004.
• 24. RO Keohane, Joseph S. Nye, Jr. , Power and Interdependence in the Information Age, “Foreign Affairs”,September/October 1998 , Vol 77, No . 5.
• 25. Kobuz M., Conflicts early twenty-first century. The use of the Air Force, National Defense University, Warsaw 2007.
• 26. Krawczyk P., American unmanned, man. I checked in battle, “Aviation” 2005, No. 3. Lynn N. , Amerykanischer stealth - bomber B-2 erstmals vorgestell , “Flug Revue” 1989 , No. 1.
• 27. Markiewicz TM piloted aircraft - new challenges for air traffic management systems, “Overview of the Air Force and the Air Defense” 2002, No. 7.
• 28. Masnikov E. Threat of terrorism using Unmanned Vehicles Serial, Moscow, 2005.
• 29. Miasnikov E. Threat of Terrorist Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Technical Aspects, Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at MIPT, Dolgoprudny, June, 2004. National Defence Council , Global Trends 2015, A Dialogue Abort the Future With Nongovement Experts, NIC 2000-02 , December 2000 http://www.defenselink.mil/.
• 30. M. Nawrocki, Air impact strategic air doctrine of the United States, “Review of the Air Force and the Air Defense,” 2004, No. 4.
• 31. Nowacki, G., Space information support systems of the United States and the Russian Federation, [in:] Information support air defense symposium materials, National Defense University, Warsaw 2003.
• 32. Odon E., Future Mission for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Exploring Outside the Box, “Aerospace Power Journal” Summer, 2002.
• 33. Radomyski A. (eds.), Army air defense Polish Armed Forces to the new challenges of military materials from the symposium, National Defense University, Warsaw 2008 .
• 34. Radomyski A. Hazard Air Army, “Military Thought” 2003, No. 6.
• 35. Report on the United States Air Force Expeditionary Force Vole 1: Summary, United State Air Force Scientific Advisory Board, November 1997.
• 36. Robert. B. Chapman II, Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles. Dawn of a New Age, “Aerospace Power Journal,” Summer, 2002.
• 37. Stacewicz J., Megatrends and strategy and policy development, Ellipse, Warsaw 1996.
• 38. Goldfinch, J., Development of air threat, “Overview of the Air Force” 2011, No. 1.
• 39. Szpyra R., Air power policy instrument of the international state, “Overview of the Air Force and the OP ,” 2004 , No. 4.
• 40. The Army’s Future Combat Systems. Program and Alternative, the Congressional Budget Office, August 2006.
• 41. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap 2005-2030, Office of the Secretary of Defense, 4 August 2005.
• 42. Walowski S., Airmen must wait, “Review of the Armed Forces” 2007, No. 1.
• 43. Wolski W., R. Hare, battlefield twenty-first century. Requirements in relation to antiaircraft weapons, the materials of the second international conference on science and technology, Tarnow, 1999.
• 44. Zajas S. Air Force operations combined. Theory and Practice, “Overview of the Air Force and the Air Defense” 2003, No. 7.
• 45. Zielinski T., Future Combat unmanned aerial vehicles, “Review of Force After - windy” 2011, No. 1.