Human Factors and Safety Culture in Maritime Safety (revised)

• Autorzy: Berg H. P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.07.03.04

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

As in every industry at risk, the human and organizational factors constitute the main stakes for maritime safety. Furthermore, several events at sea have been used to develop appropriate risk models. The investigation on maritime accidents is, nowadays, a very important tool to identify the problems related to human factor and can support accident prevention and the improvement of maritime safety. Part of this investigation should in future also be near misses. Operation of ships is full of regulations, instructions and guidelines also addressing human factors and safety culture to enhance safety. However, even though the roots of a safety culture have been established, there are still serious barriers to the breakthrough of the safety management. One of the most common deficiencies in the case of maritime transport is the respective monitoring and documentation usually lacking of adequacy and excellence. Nonetheless, the maritime area can be exemplified from other industries where activities are ongoing to foster and enhance safety culture.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Maritime Safety; Human Factor; Safety Culture; Safety Management, Maritime Transportation; Maritime Safety Culture; Investigation on Maritime Accidents; Safety Performance

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 7, no. 3
• Strony: 343--352
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 51 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Berg H. P.

• Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) 2012. Guidance notes on safety culture and leading indicators of safety, January 2012.1. Berg, H.P. 2008. Safety management and safety culture assessment in Germany. Proceedings of the ESREL Conference 2008, Safety Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications, Vol. 2, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 1439 – 1446.
• 2 Berg, H.P. 2010. Risk based safety management to enhance technical safety and safety culture. Transactions ENC\ 2010 – European Nuclear Conference, May/June 2010.
• 3.Berg, H.P. 2011. Maritime safety culture. Proceedings of the XV International Scientific and Technical Conference on Marine Traffic Engineering, 12 – 14 October 2011, Akademia Morska, Szczecin 2011, 49 – 59.
• 4.Berg, H.P. 2013. Human factors and safety culture in maritime safety. Human Resources and Crew Manning – STCW, Maritime Education and Training (MET), Human Resources and Crew Manning, Maritime Policy, Logistics and Economic Matters – Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation – Weintrit & Neumann (ed.), CRC, Press, A Balkema Book.
• 5.Brun, W., Eid, J., Johnsen, B.H., Labertg, J.‐C., Ekornas, B. & Kobbeltvedt, T. 2005. Bridge resource management training: enhancing shared mental models and task performance? In H. Montgomery, R. Lipshitz & B. Brehmer (Eds), How professionals make decisions, 183– 193), Mahwah: LEA.
• 6.Caridis, P. 1999 CASMET. Casualty analysis methodology for maritime operations. National Technical University of Athens.
• 7.Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 2012. Safety culture for nuclear licensees, Discussion paper DIS‐12‐07, August 2012.
• 8.Chirea‐Ungureanu, C. & Rosenhave, P.‐E. 2012. A door opener: teaching cross cultural competence to seafarers. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 6, Number 4, December 2012.
• 9.Chauvin, C. 2011. Human factors and maritime safety. The Journal of Navigation 64: 625–632. Drouin, P. 2010. The building blocks of a safety culture. Seaways, October 2010, 4‐7.
• 10.Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J.‐P. & Langard, B. 2013. Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS, Accident Analysis and Prevention 59, 26– 37.
• 11.Erdoğan, I. 2011. Best practices in near‐miss reporting. The role of near‐miss reporting in creating and enhancing the safety culture, Department of Shipping and Marine technology, Chalmers University of Technology , Göteborg, Sweden, Report No. NM‐11/21.
• 12.Gard 2012. Safety culture ‐ incidents resulting from human error. Gard News 207, August/October 2012.
• 14.Goldberg, M. 2013. Proof that safety culture and training does work, April 29, 2013.
• 15.Håvold, J.I. 2005. Safety culture in a Norwegian shipping company, Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 36, 441‐458.
• 16.Håvold, J.I. (2007) National cultures and safety orientation: A study of seafarers working for Norwegian shipping companies, Work & Stress, 21 (2):73‐195.
• 17.Heijari, J., & Tapainen, U. 2010. Efficiency of the ISM Code in Finnish shipping companies, Report A 52, Centre for Maritime Studies, Turku.
• 18.Hetherington, C., Flin, R. & Mearns, K. 2006. Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 401–411.
• 19.Hjorth, F. 2013. Safety culture in the Baltic Sea: A study of maritime safety, safety culture and working conditions aboard vessels, Baltic Sea Logistic and Transportation Problems – STCW, Maritime Education and Training (MET), Human Resources and Crew Manning, Maritime Policy, Logistics and Economic Matters – Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation – Weintrit & Neumann (ed.), CRC Press, A Balkema Book.
• 20.International Atomic Energy Agency 1991. Safety culture, A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, Safety Series, No. 75‐INSAG‐4, IAEA, Vienna, Austria.
• 21.International Atomic Energy Agency 2002. Key practical issues in strengthening safety culture, A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, INSAG‐15, IAEA, Vienna, Austria.
• 22.International Atomic Energy Agency 2006. The management system for facilities and activities. GS‐R‐3 Safety Standards Series – Safety Requirements, IAEA, Vienna, Austria. International Atomic Energy Agency 2009. The Management System for Nuclear Installations, Safety Guide No. GS‐G‐3.5, IAEA, IAEA, Vienna, Austria.
• 23.International Atomic Energy Agency 2013. Regulatory oversight of safety culture in nuclear installations. IAEA‐TECDOC‐1707, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, March 2013.
• 24.International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2008.
• 25.International Safety Management (ISM) Code.
• 26.International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2013. Statement of the participants to the IMO Symposium on the Future of Ship Safety, 11 June 2013.
• 27.Kobylinski, L. 2009. Risk analysis and human factor in prevention of CRG casualties. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 3, Number 4, December 2009.
• 28.Kopisch, C. & Berg, H.P. 2012. The role of the regulator in the field of safety culture. Proceedings of the SSRAOC Workshop, Antwerp, Belgium, January 2012.
• 29.Lappalainen, J. 2008.Transforming maritime safety culture, Publications from the Centre for Maritime Studies, University of Turku , A 46, 2008, Kopijyvä Oy, Kouvola.
• 30.Lappalainen, J. 2011. Incident reporting in Finnish Shipping Companies. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 10, no 2, pp. 167‐181.
• 31.Lappalainen, J. & Salmi, K. 2009. Safety culture and maritime personnel’s safety attitudes, Interview report, Publications from the Centre for Maritime Studies, University of Turku, A 48, 2009, Kopijyvä Oy, Kouvola.
• 32.Lappalainen, J., Vepsäläinen, A. & Tapaninen, U. 2010. Analysis of the International Safety Management Code, in: Efficiency of the ISM Code in Finnish Shipping Companies, Heijari, J. & Tapaninen, U. (Eds.), Publications from the Centre for Maritime Studies, University of Turku, A 52, 2010, Kopijyvä Oy, Kouvola.
• 33. Little, A. 2004. Driving safety culture, identification of leadership qualities for effective safety management. Final Report to Maritime and Coastguard Agency, Part, Cambridge, October 2004.
• 34. Lützhöft, M. H. & Dekker, S. W. A. 2002. On your watch: automation on the bridge. Journal of Navigation, 55(1), 83–96.
• 35. Mackay, M. 2000. Safer transport in Europe: tools for decision‐making. European Transport Safety Council Lecture.
• 36. Madsen, O.M. 2011. A new look at safety culture. DNV Forum 2011 No. 2.
• 37. Martínez de Osés, F. X., & Ventikos, N. P. 2006. A critical assessment of human element regarding maritime safety.
• 38. Mauritzson, B. 2011. The masters’ perception of the concept of maritime safety, an explorative study, Department of Shipping and Marine technology, Chalmers University of Technology , Göteborg, Sweden, Report No. NM‐ 11/17.
• 39. Ministry of Transport and Communications. 2013. Preparation of a maritime transport strategy for Finland, Fact sheet 3/2013, January, 21, 2013
• 40. Oltedal, H.A. 2011. Safety culture and safety management within the Norwegian‐controlled shipping industry, state of art, interrelationships, and influencing factors. PhD Thesis, University of Stavanger.
• 41. Parker, A. W., Hubinger, L. M., Green, S., Sargent, L., & Boyd, R. 2002. Health stress and fatigue in shipping. Australian Maritime Safety Agency.
• 42. Porathe, T. & Shaw. G. 2012. Working with the human element: human factors and technical innovation from EfficienSea and on to ACCSEAS, Proceedings of the International Symposium. Information on Ships, ISIS 2012, 30‐31 August 2012, Hamburg, Germany.
• 43. Räisänen, P. 2009. Influence of corporate top management to safety culture, A literature survey. Turku University of Applied Sciences, Reports 88, Turku.
• 44. Rothblum A. 2000. Human error and marine safety. Maritime Human Factors Conference, Linthicum, MD, March 13‐14, 2000.
• 45. Rusconi, C. 2013. Interactive training, a methodology for improving safety culture, International Experts’ Meeting, on Human and Organizational Factors in Nuclear Safety in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, 21 ‐24 May 2013, International Atomic energy Agency, Vienna.
• 46. Ryser, C. 2013. Implications of the Fukushima accident from a regulatory perspective, , International Experts’ Meeting, on Human and Organizational Factors in Nuclear Safety in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, 21 ‐24 May 2013, International Atomic energy Agency, Vienna.
• 47. Salas, E., Wilson, K.A., Burke, C.S., & Wightman, D.C. 2006. Does crew resource management training work? An update, an extension, and some critical needs. Human Factors 48 (2), 392–412.
• 48. Schröder‐Hinrichs, J.‐U., Hollnagel, E., Baldauf, M., Hofmann, S. & Kataria, A. 2013. Maritime human factors and IMO policy, Maritime Policy & Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research, 40:3, 243‐260.
• 49. Storgård, J., Erdogan, I. & Tapaninen, U. 2012. Incident reporting in shipping, Experiences and best practices for the Baltic Sea, Publications from the Centre for Maritime Studies, University of Turku, A 59, 2012, Kopijyvä Oy, Kouvola.
• 50. The National Diet of Japan 2012. The official report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission ‐ Executive Summary. Available at: http://naiic.go.jp/wp‐content/uploads/2012/08/ NAIIC_report_lo_res5.pdf.
• 51. Transport Canada. 2009. The new wave marine safety strategic plan 2009–2015, TP 13111 (07/2009).