PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Model for the hierarchic application of foresight project results

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Model hierarchicznego wykorzystania rezultatów projektów foresight
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The article presents two crucial and correlated issues concerning the hierarchic structure of foresight projects and the practical application of their results. Nowadays, there are weak linkages observed between national foresight projects and foresight projects realised on the sectoral and corporate levels. On the other hand, the range of the practical application of the results of foresight projects remains insufficient. The article presents an outline of the model for the hierarchic application of foresight project results. The model is based on the need of greater interrelations of foresight projects at subsequent hierarchic levels: national, sectoral, and corporate one.
PL
W artykule zaprezentowano dwa kluczowe i wzajemnie powiązane zagadnienia dotyczące hierarchicznej struktury projektów foresight oraz praktycznego wykorzystania ich rezultatów. Obecnie powiązania między projektami foresight realizowanymi na poziomie krajowym a tymi realizowanymi na poziomie sektorowym czy korporacyjnym należy uznać za niewystarczające. Jednocześnie skala praktycznego wykorzystania rezultatów projektów foresight pozostaje niezadowalająca. W artykule zaprezentowano propozycję modelu hierarchicznego wykorzystania rezultatów projektów foresight. Model zakłada wzajemne powiązanie projektów foresight na kolejnych hierarchicznych poziomach ich realizacji: krajowym, sektorowym i korporacyjnym.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
29--40
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Institute for Sustainable Technologies – National Research Institute, Radom
  • Institute for Sustainable Technologies – National Research Institute, Radom
Bibliografia
  • 1. Martin B.R. (1995) Foresight in science and technology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7, pp. 139–168.
  • 2. Jemala M. (2010). Evolution of foresight in the global historical context, foresight, Vol. 12, Iss: 4, pp. 65–8.
  • 3. Cagnin C., Keenan M., Johnston R., Scopolo F., Barré R. (eds.) (2008) Future-Oriented Technology Analysis. Strategic Intelligence for an Innovative Economy, Springer, Germany.
  • 4. United Nations Industrial Development Organisation (2005) Technology Foresight Manual , Vol. 1–2, Vienna.
  • 5. Poteralska B. (2012) Hierarchic structure for generation of innovative research directions and technologies, XXIII ISPIM Conference – Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience, Barcelona, Spain.
  • 6. Poteralska B., Sacio-Szymańska A. Evaluation of technology foresight projects. European Journal of Futures Research, Volume 2, Issue 1, Article 26, published online 24.11.2013 r.
  • 7. Piirainen, K. A., Gonzales, R. A., Bragge, J. (2012) “A systemic evaluation framework for futures research”, Futures, 44.
  • 8. Johnston, R. (2012) “Developing the capacity to assess the impact of foresight”, Foresight, vo. 14, no 1, 2012, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • 9. Li S-S., Kang M-H., Lee L-C. (2009) Developing the evaluation framework of technology foresight program: lesson learned from European countries, Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy.
  • 10. Smith J. (2012) Measuring Foresight Impact, EFP Brief No. 249.
  • 11. Keenan M., Marvin S., Winters C. (2002). Mobilising the regional foresight potential for enlarged European Union, United Kingdom Country Report, Brussels.
  • 12. Klusacek K. (2003) Technology Foresight in the Czech Republic, Discussion Paper Series, article 03–15.
  • 13. Cuhls K. (2003) From forecasting to foresight processes – new participative foresight activities in Germany, Journal of Forecasting, 22, pp. 93–111.
  • 14. Giesecke S. (2007) Future – The German Research Dialogue, Foresight Brief No.1, The European Foresight Monitoring Network EFMN.
  • 15. National and Regional Key Technologies (2008) European Foresight Monitoring Network, www.efmn.info.
  • 16. Cadiou Y. (2003) From key-technologies to key-competencies. Scientific and technological competencies at the regional level related to the French “Key-Technologies” exercises, The Second International Conference on Technology Foresight, Tokyo.
  • 17. Hoffmann B., Rader M. (2003) WP 1 – Review and analysis of national foresight. D1.1FR – Case study, France – technologies clés 2005, Report on the realisation of the FISTERA Project in 5PR.
  • 18. Sokolov A., Chulok A., Mesropyan V. (2013) Long-Term Science and Technology Policy – Russian priorities for 2030 / Working papers by NRU Higher School of Economics. Series WP BRP “Science, Technology and Innovation”. No. 19/STI/2013.
  • 19. Cuhls K. (2003) Development and Perspectives of Foresight in Germany, Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis Nr. 2, 12. Jg., http://www.itas.fzk.de/tatup/032/cuhl03a.pdf.
  • 20. Harper J.C. (2013) Impact of Technology Foresight. Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester.
  • 21. Nazarko J. (Scient. Ed.) (2012) Badanie ewaluacyjne projektów foresight realizowanych w Polsce, Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, Warsaw.
  • 22. Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B. Sustainable Development of Poland (in Polish). In: Kleer J., Wierzbicki A. (Eds.) (2009) National Foresight Programme Poland 2020. Discussion on scenarios assumptions. Polish Academy of Sciences. ISBN 978-83-61236-09-2, pp. 105–152.
  • 23. Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B. (2010) Determining the priority research directions and key advanced technologies using foresight methods. In: Huizingh K. R. E., Conn S., Torkkeli M., Bitran I. (Eds.) Proceedings of The XXI ISPIM Conference, Bilbao, Spain, ISSN 9789522149268.
  • 24. Doctoral thesis by Anna Sacio-Szymańska (2010). Technological foresight as a tool for determining development directions of strategic research institutes (in Polish). Cracow University of Economics, supervised by Prof. Adam Mazurkiewicz.
  • 25. Mazurkiewicz A. (ed.) (2011) Technical support for sustainable development. Research and application directions (in Polish). Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji – PIB, Radom.
  • 26. Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B. (Eds.) (2011) Advanced industrial and ecological technologies for the sustainable development of Poland. Selected problems (in Polish). Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji – PIB Radom.
  • 27. Sacio-Szymanska A., Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B. (2011) Setting priority R&D directions for the strategic research institutes. In: Huisingh K.R.E, Conn S., Torkkeli M., Bitran I (Eds.) XXII ISPIM Conference. Sustainability in Innovation: Innovation Management Challenges, ISBN 978-952-265-091-7, Hamburg.
  • 28. Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B. (2010) Strategic innovative programmes of technical support for sustainable economic growth in Poland. Selected problems. In: Mazurkiewicz A. (Ed.) Innovative Technological Solution for Sustainable Development. Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji – PIB Radom (Poland) – Szanghai (China), pp. 11–28, ISSN 9788372049551.
  • 29. Mazurkiewicz A., Poteralska B. (2013) Problems of Development and Practical Implementation of Innovative Technological Solutions, The Proceedings of the 6th ISPIM Innovation Symposium – Innovation in the Asian Century, Melbourne, Australia.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-c99e929e-183d-4649-8473-6c9572979024
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.