Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Choice of Functional Form for Independent Variables in Accident Prediction Models

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
The development of multivariate statistical models to identify factors that explain systematic variation in accident counts has been an active field of research in the past 20 years. During this period many different models and functional forms have been applied. This study, based on data for national roads in Norway, tests alternative functional forms of the relationship between independent variables and the number of injury accidents. The paper compares six different functional forms (sets of independent variables and specifications of the form of their relationship to accident occurrence) by means of Poisson-lognormal regression. The best model was identified in terms of five goodness of fit measures and a graphical method – the CURE plot (CURE = cumulative residuals). The coefficients estimated for the independent variables were found to vary according to functional form. It is therefore important to compare different functional forms as part of an exploratory analysis when developing accident prediction models.
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab.
  • Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences Department of Mathematics, Poland
  • [1] Abdel-Aty, M. A., Radwan, A. E., 2000. Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32, 633-642.
  • [2] Anastasopoulos, P. C., Mannering, F. L., 2009. A note on modeling vehicle accident frequencies with random-parameters count models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 153-159.
  • [3] Couto, A., Ferreira S., 2011. A note on modeling road accident frequency: A flexible elasticity model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 2104-2111.
  • [4] El-Basyouny, K., Sayed, T., 2009A. Collision prediction models using multivariate Poisson-lognormal regression. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 820-828.
  • [5] El-Basyouny, K., Sayed T., 2009B. Accident prediction models with random corridor parameters. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 1118-1123.
  • [6] Elvik, R., 2008. The predictive validity of empirical Bayes estimates of road safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 1964-1969
  • [7] Halvorsen, R., Palmquist, R., 1980. The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equation. American Revew 70 (30), 474-475.
  • [8] Hauer, E., 1986. On the estimation of the expected number of accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 1-12.
  • [9] Hauer, E. 2004. Statistical road safety modeling. Transportation Research Record, 1897, 81-87.
  • [10] Hauer, E., Bamfo, J., 1997. Two tools for finding what function links the dependent variable to the explanatory variables. In: Proceedings of the ICTCT 1997 Conference, Lund, Sweden.
  • [11] Karlaftis, M. G., Tarko, A. P., 1997. Heterogeneity considerations in accident modeling. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30, 425-433.
  • [12] Li, X., Lord, D., Zhang, Y., Xie, Y., 2008. Predicting motor vehicle crashes Support Vector Machine models. Accident Analysis and Prevention 40, 1611-1618.
  • [13] Li, C. C., Lu, J. C., Park, J., Kim, K., Brinkley, P. A., Peterson, J. P., 1999. Multivariate zero-inflated Poisson models and their applications. Technometrics, 41 (1), 29-38.
  • [14] Lin, D. Y., Wei, L. J., Ying, Z., 2002. Model-Checking Techniques Based on Cumulative Residuals. Biometrics, 58, 1-12.
  • [15] Lord, D., Guikema, S. D., Geedipally, S. R., 2009. Application of the Conway-Maxwell-Poisson generalized linear model for analyzing motor vehicle crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 1123-1134.
  • [16] Lord, D., Mannering, F., 2010. The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transportation Research Part A, 44, 291-305.
  • [17] Lord, D., Miranda-Moreno, L. F., 2008. Effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter of Poisson-gamma models for modeling motor vehicle crashes: a Bayesian perspective. Safety Science, 46, 751-770.
  • [18] Lord, D., Park, P. Y-J., 2008. Investigating the effects of the fixed and varying dispersion parameters of Poisson-gamma models on empirical Bayes estimates. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 1441-1457.
  • [19] Lord, D., Persaud, B. N., 2000. Accident prediction models with and without trend: application of the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) procedure. Transportation Research Record, 1717, 102-108.
  • [20] Lord, D., Washington S. P., Ivan, J. N., 2005. Poisson, Poisson-gamma and zero-inflated regression models of motor vehicle crashes: balancing statistical fit and theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 35-46.
  • [21] Ma, J., Kochelman, K. M., 2006. Bayesian multivariate Poisson regression for models of injury count by severity. Transportation Research Record 1950, 24-34.
  • [22] Ma, J., Kochelman, K. M., Damien, P., 2008. A multivariate Poisson-lognormal regression model for prediction of crash counts by severity, using Bayesian methods. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 964-975.
  • [23] Maher, M., Mountain, L., 2009. The sensitivity of estimates of regression to the mean. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 861-868.
  • [24] Maher, M.J., Summersgill, I., 1996. A comprehensive methodology for the fitting of predictive accident models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.28, no.3, 281-296.
  • [25] Miaou. S. P., 1996. Measuring the Goodness-of-fit of Accident Prediction Models. Publication FHWA-RD-96-040. FHWA, U.S.DOT.
  • [26] Miaou, S.-P., Bligh, R. P., Lord, D., 2005. Developing median barrier installation guidelines: A benefit/cost analysis using Texas data. Transportation Research Record, 1904, 3-19.
  • [27] Miaou, S.-P., Song, J. J., Mallick, B. K., 2003. Roadway traffic crash mapping: a space-time modeling approach. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 6, 33-57.
  • [28] Milton, J., Mannering, F., 1998. The relationship among highway geometrics, traffic-related elements and motor-vehicle accident frequencies. Transportation 25, 395-413.
  • [29] Noland, R.B., Karlaftis, M.G., 2005. Sensitivity of crash models to alternative specifications. Transportation Research Part E, 41, 439-458.
  • [30] Park, B-J., Lord D., 2009. Application of finite mixture models for vehicle crash data analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 683-691.
  • [31] Park, E. S., Lord, D., 2007. Multivariate Poisson-Lognormal Models for Jointly Modeling Crash Frequency by Severity. Transportation Research Record, 2019, 1-6.
  • [32] Satterthwaite, S.P., 1981. A survey of Reasearch into Relationship Between Traffic Accidents and Traffic Volumes. Supplementary Report 692. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire.
  • [33] Tsionas, E. G., 2001. Bayesian Multivariate Poisson Regression. Communication in Statistics – Theory and Methods, Vol.30, no. 2, 243-255.
  • [34] Vogt, A., 1999. Crash Models for Rural Intersection: Four-lane by Two-lane Stop-controlled and Two-line by Two-line Signalized. Publication FHWA-RD-99-128. FHWA, U.S.DOT.
  • [35] Wang, X., Abdel-Aty, M., 2007. Right-Angle Crash Occurrence at Signalized Intersections. Transportation Research Record, 2019, 156-168.
  • [36] Winkelmann, R., 2008. Econometric Analysis of Count Data. Fifth edition. New York, Springer
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.