The factor determining effective modelling of the urban spatial transformation process based on temporary use

• Autorzy: Szaton-Orlińska Karolina , Opania Szymon

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ACEE-2024-0021

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The research involves analysing strategic models of urban spatial transformation processes in cities using temporary use as a significantly supportive tool or as the core of the transformations. The scope of the research includes identifying effective transformation models through the verification of cases based on established criteria and conducting detailed studies of selected cases to highlight the process elements, analyse their relationships, and assess the role of temporary use. The research method relies on critically comparing and analysing chosen cases. As a result, we have identified fundamental criteria that indicate the application of temporary use as part of a broader transformation process, along with supplementary indicators and characteristics that impact the effectiveness of the conducted transformations. These indicators can help model transformation processes based on temporary use. The research holds particular significance in utilizing temporary use within a broader, integrated urban transformation process that goes beyond a one-time intervention.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

temporary use; tactical urbanism; urban intervention; urban sustainability; urban regeneration

PL

użytkowanie tymczasowe; urbanistyka taktyczna; interwencja urbanistyczna; zrównoważony rozwój miast; rewitalizacja miast

• Wydawca: Silesian University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Architecture Civil Engineering Environment
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 17, no. 3
• Strony: 59--70
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 56 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Szaton-Orlińska Karolina

• PhD arch.;Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Research and Development Department, Kossutha 6, 40-844 Katowice, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3390-8774

autor

Opania Szymon

• Assistant Prof.; Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Akademicka 7, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9801-6945

Bibliografia

• [1] Bishop, P., and Williams, L. (2012). The Temporary City. Routledge.
• [2] Till, K. E., and McArdle, R. (2015). The Improvisional City: Valuing Urbanity beyond the Chimera of Permanence. Irish Geography, 48(1), 37-68.
• [3] Burgers, J. (2000). Urban landscapes on public space in the post-industrial city. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 15, 145-164.
• [4] Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.
• [5] Bauman, Z., and Tester, K. (2001). Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• [6] Urbaniak, M. (2014). Gorzki posmak płynnej nowoczesności. Wybrane zagadnienia z filozofii społecznej Zygmunta Baumana (eng.: The bitter aftertaste of liquid modernity. Selected issues from Zygmunt Bauman's social philosophy). KNUV, 42, 5-27.
• [7] Hou, J. (2020). Guerrilla urbanism: urban design and the practices of resistance. Urban design international, 25, 117-125.
• [8] Koolhaas, R., and Mau, B. (1995). S, M, L, XL. The Monacelli Press.
• [9] Tschumi, B. (1994). Event-Cities. Cambridge: MIT Press Ltd.
• [10] Rewers, E. (2005). POST-POLIS. Wstęp do filozofii ponowoczesnego miasta (eng: An introduction to the philosophy of the postmodern city). Kraków: Universitas.
• [11] Gołębiewski, J. I. (2016). Perspektywy rewitalizacji Międzyodrza w Szczecinie przy zastosowaniu tymczasowych interwencji przestrzennych (eng.: Prospects for revitalisation of Międzyodrza in Szczecin using temporary spatial interventions.). Szczecin: Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny (eng.: Szczecin: West Pomeranian University of Technology).
• [12] Martin, M., Hincks, S., and Deas, I. (2020). Temporary use in England's core cities: Looking beyond the exceptional. Urban Studies, 57(16), 3381-3401.
• [13] Bosák, V, Slach, O., Novácek, A., and Krticka, L. (2020). Temporary use and brown-field regeneration in post-socialist context: From bottom-up governance to artists exploitation. European Planning Studies, 28(3), 604-626.
• [14] O’Callaghan, C., and Lawton, P. (2015). Temporary Solutions? Vacant Space Policy and Strategies for ReUse in Dublin. Irish Geography, 48(1), 69-87.
• [15] Lauermann, J. (2016). Temporary projects, durable outcomes: Urban development through failed Olympic bids? Urban Studies, 53(9), 1885-1901.
• [16] Corner, J. (2006). Terra Fluxus [in:] The Landscape Urbanism Reader, Waldheim, C. [ed.], New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
• [17] Galdini, R. (2019). Temporary uses in contemporary spaces. A European project in Rome. Cities, 96, 103-868.
• [18] Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., and Misselwitz, P. (2013). Urban Catalyst: The Power of Temporary Use. Berlin: DOM publishers.
• [19] Lehtovuori, P., and Ruoppila, S. (2012). Temporary uses as means of experimental urban planning. SAJ- Serbian Architectural Journal, 4(1), 29-54.
• [20] Andres, L., and Kraftl, P. (2021). New directions in theorizing temporary urbanisms: Adaptability, activation, and trajectory. Progress in Human Geography, 45(5), 1237-1253.
• [21] Chang, R. A., and Gerrits, L. (2022). What spatially stabilizes temporary use? A qualitative comparative analysis of 40 temporary use cases along synchronized stabilization trajectories. Cities, 130, 103-868.
• [22] Andres, L. (2013). Differential spaces, power hierarchy, and collaborative planning: a critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places. Urban Studies, 50(4), 759-775.
• [23] Moore-Cherry, N., and McCarthy, L. (2016). Debating temporary uses for vacant urban sites: Insights for practice from a stakeholder workshop. Planning Practice and Research, 31(3), 347-357.
• [24] Gorard, S. (2002). The Role of Secondary Data in Combining Methodological Approaches. Educational Review, 54(3), 231-237.
• [25] Bednarowska, Z. (2015). Desk research - wykorzystanie potencjału danych zastanych w prowadzeniu badań marketingowych i społecznych (eng.: Desk research - harnessing the potential of foundational data in marketing and social research). Marketing i rynek (eng.: Marketing and the market), 7(2015), 18-26.
• [26] Moore-Cherry, N. (2017). Beyond art in ‘meanwhile spaces’: Temporary parks, urban governance, and the co-production of an urban area. The impact of artists on contemporary European urban development, 207-224.
• [27] Sasser, J. (2016). Mike Lydon and Anthony Garcia, Tactical Urbanism: Short Term Action for Long Term Change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
• [28] Madsen, K. (2010). Kragh and Berglund. A+t. Vitoria-Gasteiz, 80-91.
• [29] Kamvasinou, K. (2017). Short Term Projects, Long Term Ambitions: Facets of Transience in Two London Development Sites. Transience and Permanence in Urban Development, 65-83.
• [30] Samson, K. (2015). Aesthetic Performativity in Urban Design and Art. Engaging Spaces: Sites of Performance, Interaction, and Reflection, 292.
• [31] Deboosere, B., De Raeve, W., and Miessen, M. (2016). On Tempelhofer Feld. Spector Books.
• [32] Roskamm, N. (2013). 4,000,000 m2 of Public Space: The Berlin “Tempelhofer Feld” and a Short Walk with Lefebvre and Laclau. In Public Space and the Challenges of Urban Transformation in Europe (pp. 63-77). Routledge.
• [33] St Hill, C. (2019). This is Temporary: how transient projects are redefining architecture. Routledge.
• [34] Ataman, C., and Tuncer, B. (2022). Urban interventions and participation tools in urban design processes: a systematic review and thematic analysis (1995-2021). Sustainable Cities and Society, 76, 103-462.
• [35] Mackrodt, U. (2015). Cui bono? Die Pioniernutzungen auf dem Tempelhofer Feld in Berlin zwischen Partizipation, Stadtmarketing und Protest. Stadtische Planungskulturen im Spiegel von Konflikten, Protesten und Initiativen, 277-302.
• [36] SenStadt (Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung Berlin) (2010). Zwischen und Pioniernutzungen im Tempelhofer Park. Berlin.
• [37] Team Ideenwerkstatt Berlin (2008). Dokumentation Expertenkonferenz am 29. und 30. November 2007 im Flughafen Berlin-Tempelhof. Berlin.
• [38] Huber, E. E. (2021). Wir schenken der Welt das Tempelhofer Feld. Praxismanual Situationsansatz: Ein Bildungskonzept für Padagogik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, 295-323.
• [39] Leonhard, S. (2016). Das Tempelhofer Feld- Partizipationsprozess und Bewertung der Nachnutzungskonzepte (Doctoral dissertation, Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin).
• [40] Roskamm, N., and Karge, T. (2010). Grand opening Tempelhofer Feld. Berlin: Universitatsverlag der Technischen Universitat Berlin.
• [41] Schonball, R. (2012). Tempelhofer Feld. Brennpunkt der Gentrifizierung. Der Tagesspiegel, 30.10.2012.
• [42] Dehne, M. (2015). Soziologie der Angst. Konzeptuelle Grundlagen, soziale Bedingungen und empirische Analysen, Wiesbaden, Springer Fachmedien.
• [43] Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), 131-152.
• [44] Chen, L., and Conroy, M. M. (2023). Vacant urban land temporary use and neighborhood sustainability: A comparative study of two Midwestern cities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1-25.
• [45] Fabian, L., and Samson, K. (2016). Claiming partici- pation-a comparative analysis of DIY urbanism in Denmark. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 9(2), 166-184.
• [46] Romer, A., and Aït Sidhoum, N. (2013). Low Tech Transgression: The Interventional Work of EXYZT. Architectural Design, 83(6), 66-69.
• [47] Suau, C., Davidson, R., and Lascelles, M. (2011). DIY: Do It Yourself. In The Union Street Urban Orchard: A Case Study of Creative Interim Use.
• [48] Stevens, Q. (2018). Temporary uses of urban spaces: How are they understood as “creative”? Archnet- IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 12(3), 90.
• [49] Priemus, H. (2004). The path to successful urban renewal: Current policy debates in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 199-209.
• [50] Pratt, A. C., and Hutton, T. A. (2013). Reconceptualizing the Relationship between the Creative Economy and the City: Learning from the Financial Crisis. Cities, 33, 86-95.
• [51] Ferreri, M. (2015). The seductions of temporary urbanism. Ephemera, 15(1), 181-191.
• [52] Bragaglia, F., and Rossignolo, C. (2021). Temporary urbanism as a new policy strategy: a contemporary panacea or a trojan horse? International planning studies, 26(4), 370-386.
• [53] Sandler, D. (2020). Correction to: Grassroots urbanism in contemporary São Paulo. Urban Design International, 25, 137-151.
• [54] Madanipour, A. (2018). Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity, and precarity. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1093-1110.
• [55] Kamvasinou, K. (2017). Temporary intervention and long term legacy: lessons from London case studies. Journal of Urban Design, 22(2), 187-207.
• [56] Schultz, M., and Hernes, T. (2020). The temporal interplay between strategy and identity: Punctuated, subsumed, and sustained modes. Strategic Organization, 18(1), 106-135.