PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Study on selection and direct inversion method of brittleness index for shale reservoir

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The brittleness index can be indirectly converted by elastic parameters which are obtain by pre-stack amplitude variation with offset inversion and extended to the whole work area. However, indirect conversion will bring cumulative errors. In order to improve the accuracy of obtaining the brittleness index, the exact Zoeppritz equation including different brittleness indices is derived. Before inversion, we analyzed the characteristics of the brittleness index under the changes of brittle minerals, porosity and organic matter content through rock physics model, and selected the brittleness index most suitable for the work area. Based on the Bayesian framework, we introduce the Limited-memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (L-BFGS) method to invert theoretical and actual data. Theoretical data inversion results demonstrate this method can achieve good results in both PP- and PS-wave joint inversion as well as only PP-wave inversion. To further verify the effectiveness of the algorithm, the brittleness index of actual data is directly inverted by using the studied algorithm and process. The inversion results of the borehole-side trace are in good agreement with the brittleness index calculated by log data. Both theoretical and practical data prove the feasibility of our proposed method.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
757--768
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 39 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Academy of Arts and Films, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
autor
  • Key Laboratory of Earth Exploration and Information Technology of Ministry of Education, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • College of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
autor
  • School of Earth Science and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
autor
  • Seismic Anisotropy Group, Department of Geosciences, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA
autor
  • Shale Gas Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gasfeld Company, Chengdu 610051, China
Bibliografia
  • 1. Alemie W, Sacchi MD (2011) High-resolution three-term AVO inversion by means of a Trivariate Cauchy probability distribution. Geophysics 76(03):R43–R55
  • 2. Altindag R (2002) The evaluation of rock brittleness concept on rotary blast hole drills. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 102(01):61–66
  • 3. Alzate JH, Devegowda D (2013) Integration of surface seismic, microseismic, and production logs for shale gas characterization. methodology and field application. Interpretation 1(02):SB37–49
  • 4. Banik N, Adam K, Kaseeh K (2010) Young’s modulus from point-receiver surface seismic data. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2794–2798
  • 5. Bi CC, Wang YC, Xie W, Liu W (2020) Prestack AVO inversion for brittleness index of shale based on BI_Zoeppritz equation and NSGA II. Acta Geophys 68(02):1067–1082
  • 6. Buland A, Omre H (2003) Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics 68(01):185–198
  • 7. Gale J, Reed RM, Holder J (2007) Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments. AAPG Bull 91(04):603–622
  • 8. Gholami R, Rasouli V, Sarmadivaleh M, Minaeian V, Fakhari N (2016) Brittleness of gas shale reservoirs: A case study from the north Perth basin, Australia. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:1244–1259
  • 9. Goodway B, Perez M, Varsek J, Abaco C (2010) Seismic petrophysics and isotropic-anisotropic AVO methods for unconventional gas exploration. Lead Edge 29(12):1500–1508
  • 10. Guo Z, Chapman M, Li X (2012) A shale rock physics model and its application in the prediction of brittleness index, mineralogy, and porosity of the Barnett Shale. SEG Technical Program Expand Abstracts 1–5
  • 11. Heidari M, Khanlari GR, Torabi-Kaveh M (2014) Effect of porosity on rock brittleness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(02):785–790
  • 12. Honda H, Sanada Y (1956) Hardness of coal. Fuel 35(04):451–461
  • 13. Hucka V, Das B (1974) Brittleness determination of rocks by different methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 17(10):389–392
  • 14. Jarvie DM, Hill RJ, Ruble TE, Pollastro RM (2007) Unconventional shale-gas systems: the mississippian barnett shale of North-Central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment. AAPG Bull 91(04):475–499
  • 15. Jin X, Shah SN, Roegier J-C, Zhang B (2015) An Fracability evaluation in shale reservoirs-an integrated petrophysics and geomechanics approach. SPE J 20(03):518–526
  • 16. Kivi IR, Ameri M, Molladavoodi H (2018) Shale brittleness evaluation based on energy balance analysis of stress-strain curves. J Petrol Sci Eng 167:1–19
  • 17. Labani M, Rezaee R (2015) The importance of geochemical parameters and shale composition on rock mechanical properties of gas shale reservoirs: a case study from the Kockatea shale and Carynginia formation from the Perth basin. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1249–1257
  • 18. Li SJ, Gui JY, Gao JH, Wang S, Li H (2019) Direct inversion for sensitive elastic parameters of deep reservoirs. Acta Geophys 67(04):1329–1340
  • 19. Lu J, Yang Z, Wang Y, Ying S (2015) Joint PP and PS AVA seismic inversion using exact Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics 80(05):R239-250
  • 20. Lu LB, Wang KP, Tan HD, Li Q (2020) Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion using L-BFGS. Acta Geophys 68(03):1049–1066
  • 21. Pan XP, Zhang GZ, Chen JJ (2020) The construction of shale rock physics model and brittleness prediction for high-porosity shale gas-bearing reservoir. Pet Sci 17(03):658–670
  • 22. Pan XP, Zhang GZ, Zhang JJ, Yin XY (2017) Zoeppritz-based AVO inversion using an improved Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Pet Sci 14(01):75–83
  • 23. Rickman R, Mullen M, Petre E, Grieser B,Kundert D (2008) A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization: all shale plays are not clones of the Barnett shale. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition.
  • 24. Rybacki E, Meier T, Dresen G (2016) What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks?—Part II: Brittleness. J Petrol Sci Eng 144:39–58
  • 25. Santoso D, Alam S, Hendraya L, Alfia N, Sulistiyon O, Munadi S (1995) Estimation of limestone reservoir porosity by seismic attribute and AVO analysis. Explor Geophys 26(03):437–443
  • 26. Sharma RK, Chopra S (2012) New attribute for determination of lithology and Brittleness. SEG Technical Program Expand Abstracts.
  • 27. Tarasov B, Potvin Y (2013) Universal criteria for rock brittleness estimation under triaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 59:57–69
  • 28. Walton G, Hedayat A, Kim E, Labrie D (2017) Post-yield strength and dilatancy evolution across the brittle-ductile transition in Indiana limestone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:1691–1710
  • 29. Wang B, Yin XY, Zhang FC (2006) Lamé parameters inversion based on elastic impedance and its application. Appl Geophys 03(03):174–178
  • 30. Wolfe P (1971) Convergence conditions for ascent methods II: Some corrections. SIAM Rev 13(02):185–188
  • 31. Xia YJ, Li LC, Tang CA, Li XY, Ma S, Li M (2017) A new method to evaluate rock mass brittleness based on stress-strain curves of class I. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(05):1123–1139
  • 32. Zhang FQ, Wei FJ, Wang YC, Wang WJ (2013) Generalized linear AVO inversion with the priori constraint of trivariate Cauchy distribution based on Zoeppritz equation. Chin J Geophys 56(06):2098–2115
  • 33. Zhang GZ, Du BY, Li HS, Chen HZ, Yin XY (2014) The method of joint pre-stack inversion of PP and P-SV waves in shale gas reservoirs. Chin J Geophys 57(12):4141–4149
  • 34. Zhang FQ, Jin ZJ, Sheng XJ, Li XS, Liu XQ (2017a) A direct inversion for brittleness index based on GLI with basic-pursuit decomposition. Chin J Geophys 60(10):3954–3968
  • 35. Zhang S, Huang HD, Dong YP, Yang X, Wang C, Luo Y (2017b) Direct estimation of the fluid properties and brittleness via elastic impedance inversion for predicting sweet spots and the fracturing area in the unconventional reservoir. Journal of Nat Gas Sci Eng 45:415–427
  • 36. Zhi LX, Chen SQ, Song BS, Li XY (2018) Nonlinear PP and PS joint inversion based on the exact Zoeppritz equations: a twostage procedure. J Geophys Eng 15(02):397–410
  • 37. Zhou L, Li JY, Chen XH, Liu X, Chen L (2017) Prestack amplitude versus angle inversion for Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio based on the exact Zoeppritz equations. Geophys Prospect 65(06):1462–1476
  • 38. Zoeppritz K (1919) On reflection and propagation of seismic waves. Gottinger Nachrichten 1:66–84
  • 39. Zong ZY, Yin XY, Zhang F, Wu GC (2012) Reflection coefficient equation and pre-stack seismic inversion with Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio. Chin J Geophys 55(11):3786–3794
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-c8ef6ae6-bdac-470c-8fb5-a40cb3567d90
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.