Expansion of didymosphenia geminata (Lyngbe) M. Schmidt (Bacillariophyceae) in running Waters in S-E Poland: new records in the Podkarpacie Region

• Autorzy: Noga T , Stanek-Tarkowska J. , Pajączek A , Peszek Ł. , Kochman N

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993.1094976

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Nowadays Didymosphenia geminata is one of the most frequently studied diatoms in the world, due to its massive development in most continents. In Poland, up to the 1990’s only a small number of specimens were recorded, from streams in the Tatra Mountains and the Dunajec River. D. geminata was found in 2007–2008 in the middle and upper sections of the Wisłok River, while in 2009 and 2011 it was also found in the Wisłoka, Ropa, Bielcza and San. The cells belonged to one morphotype “geminata” and were characterized by high variability of size. It develops in mesotrophic, well-oxygenated, upper parts of flowing waters with rapid currents. It was most abundant below reservoirs on the San, Wisłok and Wisłoka.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Didymosphenia geminata; running waters; ecology

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 15, nr 2
• Strony: 31--39
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Noga T

• Department of Biological Foundations of Agriculture and Environmental Education, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Stanek-Tarkowska J.

• Department of Soil Studies, Environmental Chemistry and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Pajączek A

• Department of Soil Studies, Environmental Chemistry and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Peszek Ł.

• International Doctoral Studies in Natural Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Kochman N

• International Doctoral Studies in Natural Sciences, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Bednarczyk T., Michalec B. 1997. Wpływ zamulania małych zbiorników karpackich na ich eksploatację. [In:] Współczesne problemy inżynierii wodnej. II Konferencja Naukowa, Wisła 23–25.04.1997. Politechnika Krakowska.
• 2. Bhatt J.P., Bhaskar A., Pandit M.K. 2008. Biology, distribution and ecology of Didymosphenia geminata (Lyngbye) Schmidt an abundant diatom from the Indian Himalayan rivers. Aquatic Ecol. 42: 347–353.
• 3. Biggs B.J, Kilroy C., Vieglais C.C. 2006. A New Zeland science response to help manage Didymosphenia geminata – an unwanted diatom invader of freshwaters, p. 29 [In:] Current Knowledge of Didymosphenia geminata: Developing a Research and Management Response. Federation of Fly Fishers and EPA region 8, held in association with Western Division American Fisheries Society Annual Meeting, May 15–16, Montana State University, USA.
• 4. Blanco S., Ector L. 2009. Distribution, ecology and nuisance effects of the freshwater invasive diatom Didymosphenia geminata (Lyngbye) M. Schmidt: a literature review. Nova Hedwigia 88(3–4): 347–422.
• 5. Bucka H. 2000. Upper Vistula River: response of aquatic communities to pollution and impoudment. VI. Net phytoseston communities. Pol. J. Ecol. 50: 167–189.
• 6. Cleve-Euler A. 1955. Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finland. Handl. K. Svenska Vetensk Akad., Fjärde Ser. 5(4): 1–232.
• 7. Dąbal L. 2005. Wisłok – niedoceniany ekosystem. Dzikie Życie 9: 135.
• 8. Hofmann G., Werum M., Lange-Bertalot H. 2011. Diatomeen im Süβwasser – Benthos vom Mittel-europa. Bestimmungsflora Kieselalgen für die ökologische Praxis. Über 700 der häufigsten Arten und ihre Ökologie. [In:] H. Lange-Bertalot (ed.), pp. 908. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G.
• 9. Johansson C. 1980. Attached algae vegetation in some streams from the Norssag area South Greenland. Acta Phytogeogr. Svecica 68: 89–96.
• 10. Kasza H., Galas J. 2000. Upper Vistula River: response of aquatic communities to pollution and impoudment. II. Chemical composition of water and sediment. Pol. J. Ecol. 50: 123–135.
• 11. Kawecka B. 1965. Communities of benthic algae in the River Białka and its Tatra tributaries The Rybi Potok and Roztoka. Komitet Zagosp. Ziem Górskich PAN 11: 113–129.
• 12. Kawecka B. 1980. Sessile algae in European mountains streams. 1. The ecological characteristics of communities. Acta Hydrobiol. 22: 361–420.
• 13. Kawecka B. 2012. Diatom diversity in streams of the Tatra National Park (Poland) as indicator of environmental conditions. W. Szafer Institute of Botany Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
• 14. Kawecka B., Eloranta P. 1987. Communities of sessile algae in some small streams of Central Finnland. Comparision of the algae of the high mountains of Europe and those of its northen regions. Acta Hydrobiol. 29: 403–415.
• 15. Kawecka B., Sanecki J. 2003. Didymosphenia geminata in running waters of southern Poland – symptoms of change in water quality? Hydrobiologia 495: 193–201.
• 16. Kondracki J. 2001. Geografia regionalna Polski. PWN, Warszawa
• 17. Krammer K. 2000. The genus Pinnularia. In: H. Lange-Bertalot (ed.), Diatoms of Europe. 1, A.R.G. Ganter Verlag K.G., Vaduz.
• 18. Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H. 1986. Bacillariophyceae. 1. Naviculaceae. In: H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heyning, D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 2(1), G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart – New York.
• 19. Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H. 1988. Bacillariophyceae. 2. Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. [In:] H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heyning, D. Mollenhauer (eds.), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 2(2), G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart–New York.
• 20. Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H. 1991a. Bacillariophyceae. 3. Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. [In:] H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heyning, D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 2(3), G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart – Jena.
• 21. Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H. 1991b. Bacillariophyceae. 4. Achnanthaceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolate) und Gomphonema Gesamtliteraturverzeichnis. [In:] H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heyning, D. Mollenhauer (eds.), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 2(4), G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart – Jena.
• 22. Lange-Bertalot H. 1993. 85 new taxa and much more than 100 taxonomic clarifications supplementary to Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. 2(1–4), Bibliotheca Diatomologica 27. J. Cramer, Berlin – Stuttgart.
• 23. Lange-Bertalot H. 2001. Diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. Navicula sensu stricto, 10 Genera Separated from Navicula sensu lato, Frustulia. [In:] H. Lange-Bertalot (ed.), Diatoms of Europe. 2, A.R.G. Gartner Verlag, K.G., Vaduz.
• 24. Metzeltin D., Lange-Bertalot H. 1995. Kritische Wertung der Taxa Didymosphenia (Bacillario-phyce). Nova Hedwigia 60: 381–405.
• 25. Michałowicz-Kubal M., Kubal G. 2001. Powiat Jarosławski. Oficyna Wydawnicza „ALPA”, Krosno (in Polish).
• 26. Mrozińska-Broda T., Czerwik-Marcinkowska J. 2004. Eucaryotic algae and cyanobacteria in the River Dunajec upstream and downstream from the New dam reservoirs in Czorsztyn and Sromowce and their use for monitoring. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 33(3): 83–97.
• 27. Mrozińska-Broda T., Czerwik-Marcinkowska J., Gradziński M. 2006. A new species of Didymos¬phenia (Bacillariophyceae) from the Western Car¬pathian Mountains of Poland and Slovakia. Nova Hedvigia 83: 499–510.
• 28. Noga T. 2003. Dispersion of Didymosphenia geminata in the flowing waters of Southern Poland – new sites of species occurrence in the Orawska Watershed and the Orawska Basin. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 32(4): 159–170.
• 29. Noga T. 2012. Diversity of diatom communities in the Wisłok River (SE Poland). [In:] K. Wołowski, I. Kaczmarska, J.M. Ehrman, A.Z. Wojtal (eds), Phycological Reports: Current advances in algal taxonomy and its applications: phylogenetic, ecological and applied perspective. pp. 109–128. Institute of Botany Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow.
• 30. Noga T., Stanek-Tarkowska J., Irlik E., Soliwoda K., Peszek Ł. 2012. Nowe stanowiska Didymosphenia geminata w Ropie i Białej Tarnowskiej (Polska południowa). Inżynieria Ekologiczna 30: 257–265 (in Polish with English summary).
• 31. Pajączek A., Musiałek M., Pelczar J., Noga T. 2012. Diversity of diatoms in the Mleczka River, Morwawa River and Różanka Stream (tributaries of the Wisłok River, SE Poland), with particular reference to threatened species. [In:] Phycological Reports: Current advances in algal taxonomy and its applications: phylogenetic, ecological and applied perspective, K. Wołowski, I. Kaczmarska, J.M. Ehrman, A.Z. Wojtal (eds). Institute of Botany Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, 129–152.
• 32. Siemińska J. 1964. Bacillariophyceae – Okrzemki. In: K. Starmach (ed.), Flora Słodkowodna Polski. 6. PWN, Warszawa.
• 33. Skulberg O.M.A., Lillehammer A. 1984. Glåma. In: B.A. Whitton (ed.), Ecology of European Rivers, pp. 469–498. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford- Melbourne.
• 34. Sladeček V. 1986. Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 14(5): 555–566.
• 35. Van Dam H., Martens A., Sinkeldam J. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator Values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands J. Aquatic Ecol. 28: 117–133.
• 36. Whitton B.A., Al-Shehri A.M., Ellwood N.T., Turner B.L. 2005. Ecological aspects of phospha-tase activity in cyanobacteria, eukaryotic algae and bryophytes, [In:] B.L. Turner, E. Frossard, D.S. Baldwin (eds), Organic Phosphorus in the Environment, pp. 205–241. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
• 37. Whitton B.A., Ellwood N.T., Kawecka B. 2009. Biology of the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia: a review. Hydrobiol. 630: 1–37.
• 38. WIOŚ – Jasło. 1996. Raport o stanie środowiska w województwie podkarpackim, (The state of the environment, report in Subcarphatian Voivodeship).
• 39. WIOŚ – Kraków. 2000. Raport o stanie środowiska w województwie krakowskim, (The state of the environment, report in Cracow Voivodeship).
• 40. WIOŚ – Rzeszów. 2009. Raport o stanie środowiska w województwie podkarpackim, (The state of the environment, report in Subcarphatian Voivodeship).