Use of safety analysis in industrial maintenance management

• Autorzy: Tabor Joanna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/cqpi-2021-0016

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The maintenance system is one of the key systems in the industry, because it ensures the continuity of work and the safety of the production systems. The maintenance system includes a set of specific activities carried out by people in various environmental conditions, with the use of appropriate equipment and within a specific organizational and management structure. Activities carried out by maintenance workers are related to the occurrence of various types of physical, chemical, biological or psychosocial risks. These dangers can lead to accidents or occupational diseases. Therefore, the task of managers within maintenance systems is to provide people working in these systems with an appropriate level of safety through the use of properly selected preventive measures. The methods of safety analysis are related to the examination of various systems in order to identify and assess the risks in these systems and to prepare the safety characteristics of these systems, which allows for the correct adjustment of preventive measures to the identified needs. The purpose of this work is to present the basic methods of Safety Analysis in terms of their possible use in the area of industrial maintenance. As part of the work, the hazards at work in maintenance were characterized, the importance of safety analysis for the identification of hazards and accident prevention was discussed, and the key methods of safety analysis were presented in terms of their possible use to improve work safety in an industrial maintenance system. The presented considerations are original. The findings of the article will be very useful for management in implementing safe maintenance systems in industry.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maintenance management; safety analysis

PL

zarządzanie utrzymaniem ruchu; analiza bezpieczeństwa

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Quality Production Improvement - QPI
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 3, Iss. 1
• Strony: 162--172
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 76 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Tabor Joanna

• Częstochowa University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-2970

Bibliografia

• 1.Alsyouf, I., 2007. The role of maintenance in improving companies’ productivity and profitability, International Journal of Production Economics, 105(1), 70-78, DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.06.057
• 2.Annet, J., Stanton, N.A., 2000. Task analysis, Taylor & Francis, London 2000.
• 3.Antti, S, Mats, D., 2011. Costs of poor maintenance, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 17(1), 63-73.
• 4.Aven, T., 2008. Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties Beyond Expected Values and Probabilities, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2008.
• 5.Bell, J., Holroyd J., 2009. Review of human reliability assessment methods, Health and Safety Laboratory, Research Report RR679, HSE.
• 6.Bird, F., Germain, G.,1985. Practical Loss Control Leadership, International Loss Control Institute, Georgia, USA.
• 7.Blaise, J.C., Levrat, E., Iung, B., 2014. Process approach-based methodology for safe maintenance operation: From concepts to SPRiMI software prototype, Safety Science, 70, 99-113, DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.008
• 8. Branford, K., Naikar, N., Hopkins, A., 2009. Guidelines for AcciMap analysis, [In:] A. Hopkins (Ed.) Learning from high reliability organizations, CCH Australia, Sydney, 193-212.
• 9.BSI, 2010. BS EN 13306: 2010, Maintenance-Maintenance terminology, BSI Standards Publication, CEN, Brussels.
• 10.Carrillo-Castrillo, J.A., Rubio-Romero, J.C., Guadix, J., Onieva, L., 2015. Risk assessment of maintenance operations: the analysis of performing task and accident mechanism, International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 22(3), 267-277.
• 11.Carvalho, F., Melo, R., 2013, Reliability in Risk Assessment: Evaluation of the Stability and Reproducibility in the use of semi quantitative assessment methods, International Symposium on Occupational Safety and Hygiene - SHO 2013, Guimarães, Portugal, 2013, p.80-81.
• 12.Caputo, A.C., Pelagagge, P.M., Salini, P., 2013. AHP-based methodology for selecting safety devices of industrial machinery, Safety Science, 53, 202-218, DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.10.006
• 13.CCPS, 1985. Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
• 14.CCPS, 2011. Guidelines for Auditing Process Safety Management Systems (2nd Edition), Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), Wiley, USA.
• 15.CISHC, 1977, A Guide to Hazard and Operability Studies, Chemical Industry and Safety Council, Chemical Industries Association, London, 1977.
• 16.Cox, L.A., 2008, What’s wrong with Risk Matrices? Risk Analysis, 2008, 28, 497-511.
• 17.Crespo Márquez, A., Moreu de León, P., Gómez Fernández, J.F., Parra Márquez, C., López Campos, M., 2009. The maintenance management framework: A practical view to maintenance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 15(2), 167-178, DOI:10.1108/13552510910961110
• 18.Ding, S.H., Kamaruddin, S., Azid, I.A., 2014. Maintenance policy selection model – a case study in the palm oil industry, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(3), 415-435.
• 19.DOE, 1999. Conducting Accident Investigations (version 2), U.S. Department of Energy, USA.
• 20.Duijm, N.J., 2009. Safety-barrier diagrams as a safety management tool, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 332-341.
• 21.FAA: System Safety Handbook, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, 22.USA, 2000.
• 22.EASHW, 2010. Safe maintenance in practice, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2010.
• 23.Evenéus, P., Rollenhagen, C.2007. In-depth investigation based on a systemic MTO perspective in Vattenfall hydro plants, [In:] The 4th EADAC Symposium, Chengdu, China.
• 24.Ferry, T.S., 1988, Modern Accident Investigation and Analysis (2nd ed.), John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
• 25. Gertman, D.I., Blackman, H.S., 1994. Human Reliability and Safety Analysis Data Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
• 26.Grabara, J., 2019. Health and Safety Management in the Aspects of Singularity, 9th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education - MSE 2019 “Trends in New Industrial Revolution”(MSE 2019), Sibiu, Romania, Vol.290, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201929012014
• 27.Gyekye, S.A., 2005. Workers’ perceptions of workplace safety and job satisfaction, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE), 11(3), 291-302.
• 28.Haddon, W. Jr., 1980.The basic strategies for reducing damage from hazards of all kinds, Hazard Prevention, 16, 8-12.
• 29.Hale, A.R., Heming, B.H.J., Carthey, J., Kirwan, B., 1997. Modelling of safety management systems, Safety Science, 26, 121-140.
• 30.Hammer, W., 1972. Handbook of system and product safety, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
• 31.Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2000, Assessment of safety functions at an industrial workplace – a case study, [In:] M.P. Cottam, D.W. Harvey, R.P. Pape, J. Tait, (Eds.): Foresight and Precaution, ESREL 2000, Balkema, Edinburgh, s.1373-1378.
• 32.Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2001. Safety analysis – Principles and practice in occupational safety, (Second edition), Taylor & Francis, London.
• 33.Harms-Ringdahl, L., 2013. Guide to safety analysis for accident prevention, IRS Riskhantering AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
• 34.Heinrich, H.W., Petersen, D., Roos, N., 1980. Industrial Accident Prevention (5th Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.
• 35.Hendrick, K., Benner, L., 1987. Investigating accidents with STEP, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
• 36.Hollnagel, E., 1998. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method – CREAM, Elsevier Science, Oxford, England.
• 37.Hollnagel, E. Speziali, J., 2008. Study on Developments in Accident Investigation Methods: A survey of the State-of-the Art, Ski Report 2008:50.
• 38.HSE, 2008, Five steps to risk assessment, Health and Safety Executive, Great Britain.
• 39.IEC, 1995. Dependability management – Risk analysis of technological systems (IEC 300-3-9), International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
• 40.IEC/ISO 31010: 2009, Risk management – Risk assessment techniques, CENELEC, Brussels.
• 41.ILO, 1988. Major Hazard Control. A practical manual, International Labour Office, Geneva.
• 42.Johnson, W.G., 1980. MORT Safety assurance systems, Marcel Dekker, New York.
• 43.Kapustka, K., Ziegmann, G., Klimecka-Tatar, D., Ostrega, M., 2020. Identification of health risks from harmful chemical agents–review concerning bisphenol A in workplace, Production Engineering Archives, 26(2), 45-49, DOI:10.30657/pea.2020.26.10
• 44.Kelly, T.P., McDermid, J.A., 2001. A systematic approach to safety case maintenance, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 71(3), 271-284.
• 45. Kirwan, B., 1994. A guide to practical human reliability assessment, Taylor & Francis Ltd., London.
• 46.Kirwan B., Ainsworth L.K. (Eds.), 1993. A Guide to Task Analysis, Taylor & Francis, Washington, D.C., USA.
• 47.Kiseľáková, D., Hairul, Gallo, P., Gallo, P., Čabinová, V., Onuferová, E., 2020. Total quality management as managerial tool of competitiveness in enterprises worldwide, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 195-209, DOI:10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.14
• 48.Kjellén U., 1984. The deviation concept in occupational accident control – Definition and classification, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 16, 289-306.
• 49.Kučera, M., Kopčanová, S., 2020. Lubricant analysis as the most useful tool in the proactive maintenance philosophies of a machinery and its components, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 28(3), 196-201, DOI:10.2478/mspe-2020-0029
• 50.Lees, F.P., 1996. Loss prevention in the process industries (2nd Ed.), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
• 51.Leong, T.K., Zakuan, N., Saman, M.Z.M., 2012. Quality management maintenance and practices – technical and non-technical approaches, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 688-696.
• 52.Leveson, N.G., 2004. A new accident model for engineering safer systems, Safety Science, 42(4), 237-270.
• 53.Lind, S., Nenonen, S., 2008. Occupational risks in industrial maintenance, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 14(2),194-204, DOI:10.1108/13552510810877683
• 54.Liyanage, J.P., Badurdeen, F., Chandima Ratnayake, R.M., 2009. Industrial Asset Maintenance and Sustainability Performance: Economical, Environmental and Societal Implications, [in:] M. Ben-Daya, S.O. Duffuaa, A. Raouf, J. Knezevic, D. Ait-Kadi (eds.) Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering (pp.665-693), Springer.
• 55.Löfsten, H., 1999. Management of industrial maintenance-economic evaluation of maintenance policies, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(7), 716-737, DOI:10.1108/01443579910271683
• 56.McElroy, F. (Ed.), 1974. Accident Prevention Manual for Industrial Operations (7th Ed.), National Safety Council, USA.
• 57.Niciejewska, M., Kiriliuk, O., 2020. Occupational health and safety management in small size enterprises, with particular emphasis on hazards identification, Production Engineering Archives, 26(4), 195-201, DOI:10.30657/pea.2020.26.34
• 58.Parida, A., Chattopadhyay, G., 2007. Development of a multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM), Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 13(3), 241-258, DOI:10.1108/13552510710780276
• 59.Pollard, J., Heberger, J., Dempsey, P.G., 2014. Maintenance and repair injuries in US mining, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 20(1), 20-31.
• 60.Rasmussen, J., 1997. Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem, Safety Science, 27, 183-213.
• 61. Rasmussen, J., Svedung, I., 2000. Proactive risk management in a dynamic society, Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Karlstad.
• 62.Rausand M., Høyland A., 2004. System Reliability Theory; Models, Statistical Methods and Applications (2nd edition), Wiley, New York..
• 63.Reason, J., Hobbs, A., 2003. Managing Maintenance Error – A Practical Guide, Ashgate Publishing Company, Burlington, VT.
• 64.Ruuhilehto, K., 1993. The management oversight and risk tree (MORT), [In:] J. Suokas, V. Rouhiainen (Eds.): Quality Management of Safety and Risk Analysis, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
• 65.Sheikhalishahi, M., Pintelon, L., Azadeh, A., 2016. Human factors in maintenance: a review, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 22(3), 218-237.
• 66.Sklet, S., 2004. Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 111, 29-37.
• 67.Stadnicka, D., Antosz, K., Chandima Ratnayake, R.M., 2014. Development of an empirical formula for machine classification: Prioritization of maintenance tasks, Safety Science, 34-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.020
• 68.Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P., 2005. Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design, Ashgate Pub. Co., Aldershot, England, 2005.
• 69.Svenson, O., 1991. The accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model applied to incident analysis in the processing industries, Risk Analysis, 11, 499-507.
• 70.Tabor, J. 2014. Maintenance Management and Occupational Safety in Manufacturing Organizations, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 10(2), 225-235.
• 71.Taylor, J.R., 1994. Risk analysis for process plan, pipelines and transport, E&FN Spon, London.
• 72.Teplická, K., Hurná, S., 2021. New approach of costs of Quality according their trend of during long period in industrial enterprises in SMEs, Management Systems in Production Engineering, 29(1), 20-26, DOI:10.2478/mspe-2021-0003
• 73.Tsang, A.H.C., 2002. Strategic dimensions of maintenance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 8(1), 17-39, DOI:10.1108/13552510210420577
• 74.Vesely, W., Goldberg, F., Roberts, N.H., Haasl, D., 1981. Fault Tree Handbook. (NUREG–0492) Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, USA.
• 75.Wang, L., Chu, J., Wu, J., 2007. Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, International Journal of Production Economics, 107(1), 151-163, DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005
• 76.Woźny, A., 2020. Selected problems of managing work safety - case study, Production Engineering Archives, 26(3), 99-103, DOI:10.30657/pea.2020.26.20

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).