PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Homogeneity and heterogeneity of the workforce: leveraging on diversity management to build inclusive workplace

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Jednorodność i niejednorodność siły roboczej: zarządzanie różnorodnością w celu stworzenia miejsca pracy umożliwiającego integrację społeczną
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Given the globalized nature of the contemporary business environment, organisations require more interaction among people from diverse cultures and heterogeneous demographic characteristics than ever before. Consequently, organisations have no other feasible choice but to adopt and implement diversity initiatives that align sameness or differences in workforce composition to build inclusive workplace. This paper sought to examine the homogeneity and heterogeneity of the workforce with a view of leveraging on diversity management to build inclusive workplace. The paper review extant studies on the subject matter to achieve the focal objectives highlighted. The paper documented that diversity management is characterized by ambiguity; as there are numerous diverse reasons and initiatives of diversity management. Moreover, effective diversity management propel cohesion that integrate all members of the organization. The paper further noted that organisational commitment to diversity is rooted less on a moral dictate toward justice and fairness and more on self-serving desire to address external pressures and achieve other desirable outcomes. Consequently, most firms approached diversity issue as a basic response to change which does not capture its essence. The paper concludes that diversity management is good for business and should be viewed as a key mechanism for improving business competitiveness. Similarly, effective diversity management can lead to better talent management and possession of competence to solve long-term problems.
PL
Ze względu na globalny charakter współczesnego otoczenia biznesu, organizacje potrzebują więcej interakcji między osobami z różnych kultur, o niejednorodnych cechach demograficznych, w większym stopniu niż kiedykolwiek wcześniej. W konsekwencji organizacje nie mają innego wyboru, niż zarządzanie różnorodnością, która pozwoli na dostosowanie sposobu zarządzania do zmieniających się warunków i umożliwi poprawę integracji społecznej. Niniejszy artykuł podejmuje próbę badań w zakresie jednorodności i niejednorodności siły roboczej z myślą o wykorzystaniu tej koncepcji do budowy miejsca pracy, umożliwiającego integrację społeczną. Autorzy dokonują przeglądu istniejących publikacji na omawiany temat. Analiza pozwala na stwierdzenie, że zarządzanie różnorodnością charakteryzuje się wysoką wieloznacznością, ponieważ istnieje wiele różnorodnych przyczyn i inicjatyw zarządzania różnorodnością. Ponadto, skuteczne zarządzanie różnorodnością wymaga działań, które integrują wszystkich członków organizacji. Ponadto, w artykule zauważono, że zaangażowanie organizacyjne w zakresie zarządzania różnorodnością jest mniej zakorzenione w postawach moralnych wobec sprawiedliwości i uczciwości, a bardziej oparte na egoistycznych chęciach zaspokojenia nacisków zewnętrznych i osiągnięcia innych pożądanych rezultatów przez organizacje. W konsekwencji większość firm traktuje kwestię różnorodności jako podstawową odpowiedź na zmiany, które zachodzą w obszarze zasobów siły roboczej. W artykule stwierdza się, że zarządzanie różnorodnością jest dobre dla biznesu i powinno być postrzegane jako kluczowy mechanizm dla poprawy konkurencyjności przedsiębiorstw. Podobnie, skuteczne zarządzanie różnorodnością może prowadzić do lepszego zarządzania talentami i posiadania przez organizację kompetencji do rozwiązywania problemów długoterminowych.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
409--426
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 73 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria. Department of Business Administration
autor
  • University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria. Department of Business Administration
  • University of Nsukka, Nigeria Faculty of Business Administration. Department of Management
Bibliografia
  • 1. Ahonen P., Tienari J., Meriläinen. S., Pullen A.: Hidden contexts and invisible power relations: A Foucauldian reading of diversity research. “Human Relations”, No. 67(3), 2014, p. 263-286.
  • 2. April K.A.: Ways of looking at reality, [in:] April K., Shockley M. (eds.): Diversity: New realities in a changing world. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2007, p. 9-13.
  • 3. Bary B., Bateman T.S.: A social trap of analysis of the management of diversity. “Academy of Management Review”, No. 21(3), 1996, p. 758-759.
  • 4. Beck W., Maesen V.W.: Some considerations with regard to Yitzhak Berman’s paper about indicators for social cohesion. Working paper DG12.34. European Foundation on Social Quality, Amsterdam 2003.
  • 5. Bennett-Alexander D.: Ten ways to value diversity in your workplace and avoid potential liability in the process. “Empirical Rights Quality”, No. 1(2), 2000, p. 57-64.
  • 6. Bennington L., Wein R.: Anti-discrimination legislation in Australia – Fair, effective, efficient or irrelevant? “International Journal of Manpower”, No. 21(1), 2000, p. 21-33.
  • 7. Berman Y., Phillips D.: Indicators for social cohesion. Paper submitted to the European Network on Indicators of Social Quality of the European Foundation on Social Quality, Amsterdam 2004.
  • 8. Bollen K.A., Hoyle R.H.: Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. “Social Forces”, No. 69(2), 1990, p. 479-504.
  • 9. Bowen D.E., Ostroff C.: Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system. “Academy of Management Review”, No. 29(2), 2004, p. 203-221.
  • 10. Bryan J.H.: The diversity imperative. “Executive Excellence”, No. 6, 1999.
  • 11. Burnett A.: Inclusion: Our biggest organisational challenge. “Footprints”, No. 1(2), 2003, p. 156-159.
  • 12. Carrel M.R.: Defining workforce diversity programs and practices in organizations: A longitudinal study. “Labor Law Journal”, Spring 2006, www.emeraldinsight.com, 17.06.2015.
  • 13. Chan D.: Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. “Journal of Applied Psychology”, No. 83(2), 1998, p. 234-246.
  • 14. Cooley C.H.: Social organization. Schocken Books, New York 1962.
  • 15. Cornelius N., Gagnon S.: Exploring diversity from an ethical perspective. Working paper presented at the Towards a Human-Centred Human Resource Management conference. Imperial College of Science and Technology, London 2000.
  • 16. Daft R.L.: Management. Dryden Press, 1994.
  • 17. Dass P., Parker B.: Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning. “Academy of Management Executive”, No. 13(2), 1999, p. 68-80.
  • 18. DiTomaso N., Post C., Parks-Yancy R.: Workforce diversity and inequality: Power, status, and numbers. “Annual Review of Sociology”, No. 33, 2007, p. 473-501.
  • 19. Earley P.C., Mosakowski E.: Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. “Academy of Management Journal”, No. 43, 2000, p. 26-49.
  • 20. Esty K., Griffin R., Hirsch M.S.: Workplace diversity. A manager’s guide to solving problems and turning diversity into a competitive advantage. Adams Media Corporation, Avon, MA 1995.
  • 21. Festinger L., Schachter S., Back K.: Social pressures in informal groups. Harper, New York 1950.
  • 22. Friday E., Friday S.: Managing diversity using a strategic planned change approach. “Journal of Management Development”, No. 22(10), 2003, p. 863-880.
  • 23. Gaertner S.L., Rust M.C., Dovidio J.F., Bachman B.A., Anastasio P.A.: The contact hypothesis: The role of a common in group identity on reducing intergroup bias. “Small Group Research”, No. 25, 1994, p. 224-249.
  • 24. Gilbert J.A., Stead B.A., Ivancevich J.M.: Diversity management: A new organizational paradigm. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 21(1), 1999, p. 61-76.
  • 25. Greenberg J.: Workplace diversity: Benefits, challenges and solutions. AlphaMeasure, Inc., 2004, http://www.alphameasure.com, 14.07.2015.
  • 26. Harrison D.A., Price K.H., Gavin J.H., Florey A.T.: Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. “Academy of Management Journal”, No. 45, 2002, p. 1029-1045.
  • 27. Joshi A., Roh H.: The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. “Academy of Management Journal”, No. 52(3), 2009, p. 599-627.
  • 28. Kandola R., Fullerton J.: Managing the Mosaic. CIPD, London 1994.
  • 29. Kanter R.M., Brinkerhoff D.: Organisational performance for diversity – recent developments in measurement. “Annual Review of Sociology”, No. 7, 1991, p. 321-349.
  • 30. Kersten A.: Diversity management: Dialogue, dialectics and diversion. “Journal of Organizational Change Management”, No. 13(3), 2000, p. 235-248.
  • 31. Kirby E.L., Harter L.M.: Discourses of diversity and the quality of work life: The character and costs of the managerial metaphor. “Management Communication Quarterly”, No. 15(1), 2001, p. 121-127.
  • 32. Kisha N.B., Konjit V.P., Sarah W., Jennifer S.F. (n.d.): Exploring diversity: Race and culture in the inclusive workplace. Boston College Center for Work & Family, http://www.bc.edu/cwf, 17.06.2015.
  • 33. Konrad A.: Defining the domain of workplace diversity scholarship. “Group & Organization Management”, No. 28(1), 2003, p. 4-17.
  • 34. Kreitz P.A.: Best practices for managing organizational diversity. “The Journal of Academic Librarianship”, No. 34, 2008, p. 101-120.
  • 35. Kundu S.C.: Valuing cultural diversity: A study of employees’ reactions to employer efforts to value diversity in India. Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Pacific Management Conference – The Great Asia in the 21st century. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and National Cheng Kung University, Tainan. “ROC”, No. (2), 2001, p. 635-646.
  • 36. Lewin K.: Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. Harper and Brothers, New York 1948.
  • 37. Lorbiecki A., Jack G.: Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management. “British Journal of Management”, No. 11, 2000, p. S17-S31.
  • 38. Managing a multicultural workforce. “Black Enterprise Magazine”, July 2001.
  • 39. Matuska E., Sałek-Imińska A.: Diversity management as employer branding strategy. “Theory and Practice”, Vol. VIII, No. 2, 2014.
  • 40. Mazur B.: Cultural diversity in organisational theory and practice. “Journal of Intercultural Management”, Vol. 2, No. 2, November 2010, p. 5-15.
  • 41. McDonald F., Patton M.: The nascent European policy towards older working: Can the European Union help the older worker? “Personnel Review”, No. 26(4), 1996, p. 293-306.
  • 42. McLeod P.L., Lobel S.A., Cox T.H.: Ethnic diversity and creativity in small group. “Small Group Research”, No. 27(2), 1996, p. 248-264.
  • 43. Mensi-Klarbach H.: Diversity management: The business and moral cases, [in:] Danowitz M.A., Hanappi-Egger E., Mensi-Klarbach H. (Eds.): Diversity in organizations. Concepts and practices. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills 2012, p. 63-89.
  • 44. Moreno J.L.: Sociometry and the cultural order. “Sociometry Monographs”, No. 21, Beacon House, New York 1943.
  • 45. O’Reilly C.A., Williams K.Y., Barsade W.: Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help?, [in:] Gruenfeld D. (ed.): Research on managing groups and teams, vol. 1. Elsevier, St. Louis, MO 1998, p. 183-207.
  • 46. Olsen J.E., Martins L.L.: Understanding organizational diversity management programs: A theoretical framework and directions for future research. “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, No. 33(8), 2012, p. 1168-1187.
  • 47. Őzbilgin M. (n.d.): Global diversity management: the case of automobile manufacturing companies in Japan. School of Business and Management Queen Mary, University of London, www.ozbilgin.net, 17.04.2015.
  • 48. Paxton P., Moody J.: Structure and sentiment: Explaining emotional attachment to group. “Social Psychology Quarterly”, No. 66(1), 2003, p. 34-47.
  • 49. Pietschmann P.: Managing diversity: What does it mean? An analysis of different approaches and strategies. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik gGmbH. Discussion Paper, Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, 2014, from http://www.die-gdi.de, 14.07.2015.
  • 50. Ponciano L., Shabazian A.: Interculturalism: Addressing diversity in early childhood. “Dimensions of Early Childhood”, No. 40(1), 2012, p. 23-30.
  • 51. Richard O., Kochan T., McMillan-Capehart A.: The impact of visible diversity on organizational effectiveness: Disclosing the contents in Pandora’s black box. “Journal of Business and Management”, No. 8, p. 2002, p. 1-26.
  • 52. Richard O.C., Johnson N.B.: Understanding the impact of human resource diversity practices on firm performance. “Journal of Managerial Issues”, No. 13(2), 2001, p. 177-195.
  • 53. Richard O.C.: Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource- based view. “Academy of Management Journal”, No. 43(2), 2000, p. 164-177.
  • 54. Richard O.C.: Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. “Academy of Management Journal”, No. 43, 2000, p. 164-177.
  • 55. Risburg A., Soderberg A.M.: Translating a management concept: Diversity management in Denmark. “Gender in Management”, No. 23(6), 2008, p. 426-441.
  • 56. Roberson L., Kulik C., Pepper M.: Using needs assessment to resolve controversies in diversity training design. “Group and Organization Management”, No. 28(1), 2003, p. 148-174.
  • 57. Rose M.: Why so fed up and footloose in IT? “Industrial Relations Journal”, No. 38(4), 2007, p. 356-384.
  • 58. Ross R., Schneider R.: From equality to diversity – A business case for equal oppourtunities. Pitman, London 1992.
  • 59. Rush R.S.: A different perspective: Cohesion, morale and operational effectiveness in the German Army. Fall, 1944. “Armed Forces and Society”, No. 25(3), 1999, p. 477-508.
  • 60. Salo M.: United we stand-divided we fall: A standard model of unit cohesion. Dissertation. 2011. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, http://www.books @unigrafia.fi, 12.01.2016.
  • 61. Shills E.A., Janowitz M.: Cohesion and disintegration in the Wahrmacht in World War II. “Public Opinion Quarterly”, No. 12, 1948, p. 280-315.
  • 62. Society for Human Resource Management-SHRM: How should my organization define diversity?, 2007, http://www.shrm.org/diversity/library_published/nonIC/CMS_011970. asp#TopOfPagge, 17.06.2015.
  • 63. Standing H., Baume E.: Equity, equal opportunities, gender and organization performance. Workshop on Global Health Workforce Strategy Annecy, France, 9-12 December 2000, World Health Organization Department of Organization of Health Services Delivery. Geneva, Switzerland 2000.
  • 64. Tajfel H., Turner J.: The social identity of intergroup behavior, [in:] Worchel S., Austin W. (eds.): Psychology and intergroup relations. Nelson- Hall, Chicago 1985.
  • 65. Tatli A., Ozbilgin M.F.: An emic approach to intersectional study of diversity at work: A bourdieuan framing. “International Journal of Management Reviews”, No. 14(2), 2012, p. 180-200.
  • 66. The costs and benefits of diversity. European Commission, 2003, http://www.diversity atwork.net/NL/ Docs/CostsBenefExSum.pdf, 17.06.2015.
  • 67. The Network of Executive Women. Leveraging management diversity for competitive advantage. Best Practices, First in a Series, 2006, from www.newsonline.org, 17.06.2015.
  • 68. Thomas D.A., Ely R.J.: Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity. “Harvard Business Review”, September-October, 1996, p. 79-90.
  • 69. Thomas R.R. Jr.: Managing diversity: A conceptual framework, [in:] Jackson S.E. (ed.): Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives. Guilford Press, New York 1992, p. 306-317.
  • 70. van Knippenberg D., Schippers M.C.: Work group diversity. “Annual Review of Psychology”, No. 58, 2007, p. 515-541.
  • 71. Vranken J.: No social cohesion without social exclusion? Research Unit on, social exclusion and the City University of Antwerp, 2001, http://www.shakti.uniurb.it/eurex/ syllabus/lecture4/Eurex4-Vranken.pdf, 12.01.2016.
  • 72. Williams K.Y., O’Reilly C.A.: Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. “Research in Organizational Behavior”, No. 2, 1998, p. 77-140.
  • 73. Yang Y.: Developing cultural diversity advantage: The impact of diversity management structures. “Academy of Management Best Conference Paper”, 2005, GDO: H1-6.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-c84e775d-9cbb-442b-b328-2fd3f253e16d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.