Preview Control: A Review

• Autorzy: Vikram , Singla S. K. , Dewan L.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Sterowanie z wykorzystaniem podglądu – przegląd metod

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The advanced knowledge of reference signal plays a vital role in enhancing the tracking performance of a control system. Disturbance rejection can also be improved if future values of exogenous signals are available. The use of future information (reference and/or disturbance) in the design of control systems is termed as “preview control”. In preview control, a controller can look ahead and use information about the command from time t to time t+tla where tla is called the preview length. Preview control is related to a distinct class of control problems with a preview length that spreads for a fixed time into the future. In this paper a review of preview control has been presented.

PL

W artykule przedstawiono przegląd metod sterowania bazującego na informacji o przyszłych wartościach zadanych i zakłóceniach. Metody te pozwalają na „podgląd” przyszłego stanu układu i uwzględnienie tych informacji w algorytmie sterowania.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

preview control; H∞ control; preview length

PL

sterowanie H∞; długość podglądu

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Przegląd Elektrotechniczny
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: R. 89, nr 2a
• Strony: 134--138
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., schem.

Twórcy

autor

Vikram

• Department of Electrical & Instrumentation Engineering at Thapar University Patiala

autor

Singla S. K.

• Thapar University Patiala

autor

Dewan L.

• NIT Kurukshetra

Bibliografia

• [1] K. Takaba, A tutorial on preview control systems, SICE Annual Conference in Fukui Japan, August 2003, pp. 1561-1566
• [2] Thomas B. Sheridan, Three models of preview control, IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, vol. HFE-7 n. 2, June 1966, pp. 91-102.
• [3] M. Tomizuka, Optimal continous finite preview problem, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. AC-20, June-1975, pp. 362-365.
• [4] C.C. MacAdam, Application of an optimal preview control for simulation of closed loop automobile driving, IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. SMC-11 n. 6, June 1981, pp. 393-399.
• [5] D.A. Pierre, Steady state error conditions for use in the design of look ahead digital control systems, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. AC-27 n. 4, August 1982, pp. 943-945.
• [6] D.J. Trundnowski, D.A. Pierre, A performance limit for a finite settling time system using look ahead control, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 34 n. 7, July 1989, pp. 760-763.
• [7] M.E. Halpern, MengSc, Optimal tracking with previewed commands, IEE Proceedings-D, vol. 138 n. 3, May 1991, pp. 237-241.
• [8] M.E. Halpern, Preview tracking for discrete time SISO systems, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 39 n. 3, March 1994, pp. 589-592.
• [9] T. Hessburg, M. Tomizuka, Fuzzy logic control for lateral vehicle guidance, IEEE Control Systems, August 1994, pp. 55-63.
• [10] A. Matsushita, Decoupled preview control system and its application to induction motor, IEEE Transactions On Industrial Electronics, vol.42 n. 1, February 1995, pp. 50-57.
• [11] G. Prokop, R.S. Sharp, Performance enhancement of limited bandwidth active automotive suspensions by road preview, IEE Proceedings On Control Theory Applications, vol.142, n. 2, March 1995, pp. 140-148.
• [12] E. Mosca, A. Casavola, Deterministic LQ preview tracking design, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 40 n. 7, July 1995, pp. 1278-1281.
• [13] A. Cohen, U. Shaked, Linear discrete time H∞ optimal tracking with preview, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 42 n. 2, February 1997, pp. 270-276.
• [14] N. Yoshitani, A. Hasegawa, Model based control of strip temperature for the heating furnace in continous annealing, IEEE Transactions On Control Systems Technology, vol. 6 n. 2, March1998, pp. 146-156.
• [15] A. Kojima, S. Ishijima, LQ preview synthesis: Optimal control and worst case analysis, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 44 n. 2, February 1999, pp. 352-357.
• [16] C.E. de Souza, U. Shaked, Robust H2 filtering for uncertain systems with measurable inputs, IEEE Transactions On Signal Processing, vol. 47 n. 8, August 1999, pp. 2286-2292.
• [17] J. Chen, Z. Ren, S. Hara, L. Qiu, Optimal tracking performance: Preview control and exponential signals, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 46 n. 10, October 2001, pp. 1647-1653.
• [18] J.I. Hernandez, C.Y. Kuo, Steering control of automated vehicles using absolute positioning GPS and magnetic markers, IEEE Transactions On Vehicular Technology, vol. 52 n. 1, January 2003, pp. 150-161.
• [19] Z.J. Wloszek, D. Philbrick, M.A. Kaya, A. Packard, G. Balas, Control with distance preview and online optimization, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 49 n. 2, February 2004, pp. 266-270.
• [20] H. Katoh, H∞ optimal preview controller and its performance limit, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 49 n. 11, November 2004, pp. 2011-2017.
• [21] E. Gershon, D.J.N. Limebeer, U. Shaked, I. Yaesh, Stochastic H∞ tracking with preview for State multiplicative systems, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 49 n. 11, November 2004, pp. 2061-2068.
• [22] G. Tadmor, L. Mirkin, H∞ control and estimation with preview-Part I: Matrix ARE solutions in continous time, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 50 n. 1, January 2005, pp. 19-28.
• [23] G. Tadmor, L. Mirkin, H∞ control and estimation with preview-Part II: Fixed size ARE solutions in discrete time, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 50 n. 1, January 2005, pp. 29-40.
• [24] M. M. M. Negm, J.M. Bakhashwain, M.H. Shwehdi, Speed control of a three phase Induction motor based on robust optimal preview control theory, IEEE Transactions On Energy Conversion, vol. 21 n. 1, March2006, pp. 77-84.
• [25] G. Marro, D. Prattichizzo, E. Zattoni, A unified setting for decoupling with preview and Fixed- lag smoothing in the geometric context, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 51 n. 5, May2006, pp. 809-813.
• [26] A. Kojima, S. Ishijima, Formulas on preview and delayed H∞ control, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 51 n. 12, December 2006, pp. 1920-1937.
• [27] L. Mianzo, H. Peng, Output feedback H∞ preview control of an electromechanical valve Actuator, IEEE Transactions On Control System Technology, vol.15 n. 3, May 2007 pp. 428-437.
• [28] K.Y. Polyakov, E.N. Rosenwasser, B.P. Lampe, Optical stochastic SD control with preview, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 52 n. 8, August 2007, pp. 1532-1538.
• [29] L. Mirkin, G. Tadmor, On geometric and analytic constraints in the H∞ fixed-lag smoothing, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 52 n. 8, August 2007, pp. 1514-1519.
• [30] E. Zattoni, Structural invariant subspaces of singular hamiltonian systems and non-recursive Solutions of finitehorizon optimal control problems, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 53 n. 5, June 2008, pp. 1279-1284.
• [31] K.D. Running, N.C. Martins, Optimal preview control of markovian jump linear systems, IEEE Transactions On Automatic Control, vol. 54 n. 9, September 2009, pp. 2260-2266.
• [32] B.A. Asadi, A. Vahidi, Predictive cruise control: Utilizing upcoming traffic signal information for improving fuel economy and reducing trip time, IEEE Transactions On Control Systems Technology, vol. 19 n. 3, May 2011, pp. 707-714.
• [33] A.T. Salton, Z. Chen, J. Zheng, M. Fu, Preview control of dual stage actuator systems fo rSuperfast transition time, IEEE Transactions On Mechatronics, vol. 16 n. 4, August2011, pp. 758-763.
• [34] T.K. Dao, C.K. Chen, Path tracking control of a motorcycle based on system identification, IEEE Transactions On Vehicular Technology, vol. 60 n. 7, September 2011, pp. 2927-2935.