Costs, Benefits and Obstacles to the Adoption and Retention of Shelterbelts: Regional Perception and Mind Map Analyses for Ukraine

• Autorzy: Popov Andriy , Tymoshevskyi Vladyslav , Poliakh Vadym

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/geom.2022.16.2.157

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The role of shelterbelts within an agricultural landscape is changing significantly. In the past, shelterbelts have been encouraged and established to reduce soil erosion and increase crop yields. Land reform (land privatisation) and advances in production technology led to increases in agricultural holding size. This requires a revision of policy concerning shelterbelt management in rural communities, especially since there is no recent research on community perceptions regarding the adoption and retention of shelterbelts. The specific objective of this research was to identify the public costs, benefits and obstacles from the adoption and retention of shelterbelts. In the summer of 2019, a survey was conducted of territorial communities (hromadas) in Ukraine. It was observed that many of the benefits of shelterbelts were classified as noneconomic. Therefore, these benefits are more difficult for the leaders of hromadas to recognise within their management decisions. The costs to hromadas were identified and strongly affected management decisions but the actual monetary costs were not identified. Shelterbelts have the potential to mitigate climate change yet most hromadas do not recognise the social and environmental benefits of shelterbelts within their management decisions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

shelterbelts; costs; benefits; obstacles; perception; hromada; adoption; retention

• Wydawca: AGH University of Science and Technology Press
• Czasopismo: Geomatics and Environmental Engineering
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 16, no. 2
• Strony: 157--176
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., fot., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Popov Andriy

• Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V.V. Dokuchayev, Kharkiv, Ukraine

autor

Tymoshevskyi Vladyslav

• Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University, Kharkiv, Ukraine

autor

Poliakh Vadym

• Rohan hromada (Rohan village united territorial community)

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7479-1912

Bibliografia

• 1. Legislation of Ukraine, About the statement of Rules of the maintenance and preservation of the field protective forest belts located on the lands of agricultural purpose. Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, no. 650, 22.07.2020. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/650-2020-%D0%BF#Text [access: 6.12.2021].
• 2. Dudiak N., Pichura V., Potravka L.: Ecological and economic aspects of afforestation in Ukraine in the context of sustainable land use. Land Management, Cadastre and Land Monitoring, no. 2, 2019, pp. 49–63.
• 3. Open’ko I.A., Yevsyukov T.O.: Ekoloho-ekonomichni zasady ratsional’noho vykorystannya ta okhorony zemel’ pid polezakhysnymy lisovymy nasadzhennyamy: monohrafiya. Komprynt, Kyyiv 2016 [Опенько І.А., Євсюков Т.О.: Екологоекономічні засади раціонального використання та охорони земель під полезахисними лісовими насадженнями: монографія. Компринт, Київ 2016].
• 4. Cholovs’kyy Yu.M.: Ahrolisomelioratyvni zakhody yak skladnyk ratsional’noho zemlekorystuvannya – Agroforestrymeliorative measures as a constituents of rational land use. Naukovyy visnyk NLTU Ukrayiny [Чоловський Ю.М.: Агролісомеліоративні заходи як складник раціонального землекористування. Науковий вісник НЛТУ України], vol. 20(5), 2010, pp. 58–62.
• 5. Brandle J., Johnson B., Akeson T.: Field windbreaks: are they economical? Journal of Production Agriculture, no. 5, pp. 393–398. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1992.0393.
• 6. Brandle J., Wardle T., Bratton G.: Opportunities to increase tree planting in shelterbelts and the potential impacts on carbon storage and conservation. [in:] Sampson R., Hair D. (eds.), Forests and Global Change. Volume One: Opportunities for Increasing Forest Cover, U.S.D.A., U.S. E.P.A., U.S. D.O.E., American Forest Council, Washington 1992, pp. 158–176.
• 7. Kort J., Bank G., Pomeroy J., Fang X.: Effects of shelterbelts on snow distribution and sublimation. Agroforestry Systems, no. 83, 2012, pp. 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9466-4.
• 8. Lukisha V.V.: Ekolohichni funktsiyi polezakhysnykh lisovykh nasadzhenʹ – Ecological functions of field windbreak plantation. Ekolohichni nauky [Лукіша B.B.: Екологічні функції полезахисних лісових насаджень. Екологічні науки], no. 1, 2013, pp. 56–64.
• 9. Kulshreshtha S., Van Rees K., Hesseln H., Johnston M., Kort J.: Agroforestry Development on the Canadian Prairies. Nova Science Publishers, New York 2010.
• 10. Casement B., Timmermans J.: Field Shelterbelts for Soil Conservation. Alberta Agriculture and Food, Edmonton 2007.
• 11. Desjardins R., Kulshreshtha S., Junkins B., Smith W., Grant B., Boehm M.: Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture. Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems, no. 60, 2001, pp. 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012697912871.
• 12. Lukisha V.V.: Problemy polezakhysnykh lisosmuh u ahrolandshaftakh Ukrayiny v konteksti zmin klimatu – Problems of field-protective forest bands in agrolandscapes of Ukraine in the context of climate change. Ekolohichni nauky [Лукіша В.В.: Проблеми полезахисних лісосмуг у агроландшафтах України в контексті змін клімату. Екологічні науки], vol. 2, no. 25, 2019, pp. 64–68. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716-2019-2-25-10.
• 13. Chappell A., Baldock J., Sanderman J.: The global significance of omitting soil erosion from soil organic carbon cycling schemes. Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, 2016, pp. 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2829.
• 14. Lal R.: Enhancing eco-efficiency in agro-ecosystems through soil carbon sequestration. Crop Science, vol. 50, no. S1, 2010, pp. S-120–S-131. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.01.0012.
• 15. Nicholls C., Altieri M., Vázquez L.: Agroecology: Principles for the Conversion and Redesign of Farming Systems. Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography, vol. S5, no. 1, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7625.S5-010.
• 16. Yukhnovs’kyy V.Yu.: Lisoahrarni landshafty rivnynnoyi Ukrayiny: optymizatsiya, normatyvy, ekolohichni aspekty. Instytut ahrarnoyi ekonomiky, Kyyiv 2003 [Юхновський В.Ю.: Лісоаграрні ландшафти рівнинної України: оптимізація, нормативи, екологічні аспекти. Інститут аграрної економіки, Київ 2003].
• 17. Zubets’ M.V. (red.): Naukovi osnovy ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva v zoni Stepu Ukrayiny. Ahrarna nauka, Kyyiv 2004 [Зубець М.В. (ред.): Наукові основи агропромислового виробництва в зоні Степу України. Аграрна наука, Київ 2004].
• 18. Furdychko O.I., Stadnyk A.P.: Lisovi melioratsiyi yak osnovnyy faktor stabilizatsiyi stepovykh ekosystem – Forest reclamation as a main factor for the stabilization of steppe ecosystems. Ekolohiya ta noosferolohiya [Фурдичко О.І., Стадник А.П.: Лісові меліорації як основний фактор стабілізації степових екосистем. Екологія та ноосферологія], vol. 19, no. 3–4, 2008, pp. 13–24.
• 19. Furdychko O.I., Hladun H.B., Lavrov V.V.: Lis u Stepu: osnovy staloho rozvytku. Osnova, Kyyiv 2006 [Фурдичко О.І., Гладун Г.Б., Лавров В.В.: Лісу Степу: основи сталого розвитку. Основа, Київ 2006].
• 20. Vakulyuk P.H., Samoplavsʹkyy V.I.: Lisovidnovlennya ta lisorozvedennya v rivnynnykh rayonakh Ukrayiny. Polifast, Fastiv 1998 [Вакулюк П.Г., Самоплавський В.І.: Лісовідновлення та лісорозведення в рівнинних районах України. Поліфаст, Фастів 1998].
• 21. Legislation of Ukraine, On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning Resolving the Issue of Collective Land Ownership, Improving Land Use Rules in Agricultural Land, Preventing Raids and Promoting Irrigation in Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, no. 2498-VIII, 10.07.2018. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2498-19#Text [access: 6.12.2021].
• 22. Ukrinform, Forest shelterbelts from A to Z. About restoration and reconstruction of field protective shelterbelts in Ukraine. https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-presshall/3045822-lisosmugi-vid-a-do-a-pro-vidnovlenna-ta-re-konstrukcii-polezahisnih-lisovih-smug-v-ukraini.html [access: 6.12.2021].
• 23. Legislation of Ukraine, On Land-Use Planning: Law of Ukraine, no. 858-IV, 22.05.2003. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/858-15#Text [access: 6.12.2021].
• 24. Peneder M.: The problem of private under­investment in innovation: A policy mind map. Technovation, vol. 28, no. 8, 2008, pp. 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.006.
• 25. Buzan T., Griffith C.: Mind Maps for Business: Revolutionize Your Business Thinking and Practice. Pearson, 2013.
• 26. Rempel J.C., Kulshreshtha S.N., Amichev B.Y., Rees K.C.: Costs and benefits of shelterbelts: A review of producers’ perceptions and mind map analyses for Saskatchewan, Canada. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 97, no. 3, 2017, pp. 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2016-0100.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu „Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki” - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)