PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Green intellectual capital and sustainability: the moderating role of top management support

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Zielony kapitał intelektualny i zrównoważony rozwój: moderująca rola wsparcia najwyższego kierownictwa
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The purpose of the present study is to examine the relationship between green intellectual capital (green human capital, green structural capital, and green rational capital) and sustainability. Moreover, it examines the moderating role of top management support for these relationships. The study is empirical in nature. Responses from 253 oil and gas companies in Indonesia were otained from the period of July until December 2022 through self-administered questionnaire using convenience sampling. An advanced Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis was conducted to reveal the study results. The study findings confirmed the positive effect of green human capital and green structural capital on sustainability. Moreover, study shows no positive relationship between green relational capital and sustainability. Furthermore, results reveals that top management does not moderate these relationships. This study provides important implications for sustainable performance by improving green human capital and green structural capital; particularly for its unique context, the oil and gas sector. This study is considered original since it is one of the few to provide empirical evidence for the link of green intellectual capital with sustainability and moderating role of top management support.
PL
Celem niniejszego badania jest określenie związku między zielonym kapitałem intelektualnym (zielonym kapitałem ludzkim, zielonym kapitałem strukturalnym i zielonym kapitałem racjonalnym) a zrównoważonym rozwojem. Ponadto badanie analizuje moderującą rolę wsparcia najwyższego kierownictwa w tych relacjach. Badanie ma charakter empiryczny. Odpowiedzi od 253 firm naftowych i gazowych w Indonezji zostały zebrane w okresie od lipca do grudnia 2022 roku za pomocą kwestionariusza samooceny przy użyciu nielosowej metody doboru próby. Przeprowadzono zaawansowaną analizę modelowania strukturalnego Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM). Wyniki badania potwierdziły pozytywny wpływ zielonego kapitału ludzkiego i zielonego kapitału strukturalnego na zrównoważony rozwój. Ponadto badanie nie wykazało pozytywnego związku między zielonym kapitałem relacyjnym a zrównoważonym rozwojem. Co więcej wyniki ukazują, że najwyższe kierownictwo nie moderuje tych relacji. Badanie to przynosi istotne implikacje dla zrównoważonych wyników poprzez poprawę zielonego kapitału ludzkiego i zielonego kapitału strukturalnego, zwłaszcza ze względu na swój unikalny kontekst jakim jest sam sektor naftowy i gazowy. Badanie to uważa się za oryginalne, ponieważ jest jednym z niewielu, które dostarcza dowodów empirycznych na temat związku zielonego kapitału intelektualnego ze zrównoważonym rozwojem i moderującą rolą wsparcia najwyższego kierownictwo.
Rocznik
Strony
25--42
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 50 poz., tab.
Bibliografia
  • 1.Al Issa, H. E., Abdullatif, T. N., Ntayi, J. and Abdelsalam, M. K., (2023). Green intellectual capital for sustainable healthcare: Evidence from Iraq. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24(4), 929-947.
  • 2.Ali, M., Puah, C. H., Ayob, N. and Raza, S. A., (2020). Factors influencing tourist’s satisfaction, loyalty and word of mouth in selection of local foods in Pakistan. British Food Journal, 122(6), 2021-2043.
  • 3.Amoah, J., Egala, S. B., Keelson, S., Bruce, E., Dziwornu, R. and Duah, F. A., (2023). Driving factors to competitive sustainability of SMEs in the tourism sector: An introspective analysis. Cogent Business and Management, 10(1), 2163796 .
  • 4.Anwar, N., Nik Mahmood, N. H., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Noor Faezah, J. and Khalid, W., (2020). Green human resource management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120401.
  • 5.Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R. and Yaghoubi, M., (2022). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 76-93.
  • 6.Chen, Y. S., (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 271-286.
  • 7.Cheng, Y., Liu, H., Yuan, Y., Zhang, Z. and Zhao, J., (2022). What makes employees green advocates? Exploring the effects of green human resource management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 1807.
  • 8.Colwell, S. R., Joshi, A. W., (2013). Corporate ecological responsiveness: Antecedent effects of institutional pressure and top management commitment and their impact on organizational performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(2), 73-91.
  • 9.Darban, G., Karatepe, O. M. and Rezapouraghdam, H., (2022). Does work engagement mediate the impact of green human resource management on absenteeism and green recovery performance? Employee Relations, 44(5), 1092-1108.
  • 10.Delmas, M. A., Pekovic, S., (2013). Environmental standards and labor productivity: Understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 230-252.
  • 11.Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K., (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141.
  • 12.Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., (2013). The performance frontier: Innovating for a sustainable strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 50-60.
  • 13.Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. and Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
  • 14.Epstein, M. J., Buhovac, A. R., (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • 15.Fachada, J., Rebelo, T., Lourenço, P., Dimas, I. and Martins, H., (2022). Green human resource management: A bibliometric analysis. Administrative Sciences, 12(3), 1-22.
  • 16.Florin, J., Lubatkin, M. and Schulze, W., (2003). A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 374-384.
  • 17.Franke, G., Sarstedt, M., (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430-447.
  • 18.Gupta, H., Sharma, N., (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: A review and research agenda. Management Decision, 56(1), 129-158.
  • 19.Hahn, E. D., Ang, S. H., (2017). From the editors: New directions in the reporting of statistical results in the Journal of World Business. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 125-126.
  • 20.Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D. and Schiemann, F., (2015). An empirical analysis of the relationship between the indicators of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: Evidence from the European chemical industry. Ecological Economics, 109, 1-12.
  • 21.Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L. and Sarstedt, M., (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107.
  • 22.Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M. and Thiele, K. O., (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616-632.
  • 23.Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C. M., (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
  • 24.Heim, I., Vigneau, A. C. and Kalyuzhnova, Y., (2023). Environmental and socio-economic policies in oil and gas regions: Triple bottom line approach. Regional Studies, 57(1), 181-195.
  • 25.Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M., (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
  • 26.Huang, S. Z., Chien, F. and Sadiq, M., (2022). A gateway towards a sustainable environment in emerging countries: The nexus between green energy and human capital. Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 35(1), 4159-4176.
  • 27.Juschten, M., Jiricka-Pürrer, A., Unbehaun, W. and Hössinger, R., (2019). The mountains are calling! An extended TPB model for understanding metropolitan residents’ intentions to visit nearby alpine destinations in summer. Tourism Management, 75(2019), 293-306.
  • 28.Williams Jr, R., L. Morrell, D. and V. Mullane, J., (2014). Reinvigorating the mission statement through top management commitment. Management Decision, 52(3), 446-459.
  • 29.Kock, N., (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.
  • 30.Kott, P. S., (2021). Encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining. Springer: Germany
  • 31.Long, S., Liao, Z., (2023). Green relational capital, integration capabilities and environmental innovation adoption: The moderating role of normative pressures. Sustainable Development, 31(3), 1570-1580.
  • 32.Malik, S. Y., Cao, Y., Mughal, Y. H., Kundi, G. M., Mughal, M. H. and Ramayah, T., (2020). Pathways towards sustainability in organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management practices and green intellectual capital. Sustainability, 12(8), 3228.
  • 33.Marsden, P. V., Campbell, K. E., (2021). Social networks: Development, management, and organization. Routledge: UK.
  • 34.Men, F., Yaqub, R. M. S., Yan, R., Irfan, M. and Haider, A., (2023). The impact of top management support, perceived justice, supplier management, and sustainable supply chain management on moderating the role of supply chain agility. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 2599.
  • 35.Mention, A. L., Bontis, N., (2013). Intellectual capital and performance within the banking sector of Luxembourg and Belgium. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(2), 286-309.
  • 36.Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources., (2021). Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. https://www.esdm.go.id/id/profil/tugas-fungsi/kementerian-esdm
  • 37.Murillo-Ramos, L., Huertas-Valdivia, I. and García-Muiña, F. E., (2022). Exploring the cornerstones of green, sustainable and socially responsible human resource management. International Journal of Manpower, 44(3), 524-542.
  • 38.Obeidat, S. M., Al Bakri, A. A. and Elbanna, S., (2020). Leveraging “green” human resource practices to enable environmental and organizational performance: Evidence from the qatari oil and gas industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2), 371-388.
  • 39.Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A., Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H. and Memon, M. A., (2018). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using smartPLS 3.0. An updated guide and practical guide to statistical analysis (2nd ed). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Pearson.
  • 40.Ricart, J. E., Rodríguez, M. Á. and Sanchez, P., (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical examination of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index leaders. Corporate Governance: the international journal of business in society, 5(3), 24-41.
  • 41.Ringle, C. M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.-M., (2022). SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS.
  • 42.Shahbaz, M., Rashid, N., Saleem, J., Mackey, H., McKay, G. and Al-Ansari, T., (2023). A review of waste management approaches to maximise sustainable value of waste from the oil and gas industry and potential for the state of Qatar. Fuel, 332, 126220.
  • 43.Sharabati, A. A. A., Jawad, S. N. and Bontis, N., (2010). Intellectual capital and business performance in the pharmaceutical sector of Jordan. Management Decision, 48(1), 105-131.
  • 44.Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J. and Rasinski, K., (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press: UK.
  • 45.Wang, Z., Wang, N. and Liang, H., (2014). Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance. Management Decision, 52(2), 230-258.
  • 46.Wijethilake, C., Lama, T., (2019). Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 143-154.
  • 47.Yong, J. Y., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Sehnem, S. and Mani, V., (2020). Pathways towards sustainability in manufacturing organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 212-228.
  • 48.Yusliza, M.Y., Tanveer, I.I., Ramayah, T., Kumar, S.C., Saputra, J. and Noor Faezah, N. (2021). Perceived green human resource management among employees in manufacturing firms, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(1), 470-486.
  • 49.Yusoff, Y.M., Omar, M. K., Zaman, M. D. K. and Samad, S., (2019). Do all elements of green intellectual capital contribute toward business sustainability? Evidence from the Malaysian context using the Partial Least Squares method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 626-637.
  • 50.Zhao, L., Detlor, B., (2023). Towards a contingency model of knowledge sharing: interaction between social capital and social exchange theories. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(1), 197-209.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-c75bfd9a-1dc9-496d-8920-121b38037a9a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.