PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Influence of Storage Conditions on a Quality of Pelletized Waste-Derived Fertilizer

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
A mixture of digestates from biogas plant and bottom ashes from biomass combustion can be a valuable source of nutrients and organic substances as well as an improver of the adsorption capacity and water-air properties of the soil. Pelletization of such a mixture makes its composition more stable and the handling easier. However, the properties of pelletized fertilizer are affected by the external factors. The paper presents the results of the research on the impact of air accessibility during the storage of fertilizer pellets produced on the basis of digestate from biogas plants, bottom ashes derived from the biomass combustion and mineral additives (quicklime, zeolite and bentonite) on their fertilizing properties, enzymatic activity and technical parameters, such as resistance to mechanical loads. The research showed that the fertilizers stored under the roof, exposed to the atmospheric air for 1 year, contained by 5.5% more water compared to the samples shielded from the air. These more humid fertilizers were also characterized by slightly higher nitrogen content and 1.7-fold lower enzymatic activity of dehydrogenases and 1.6-fold higher activity of phosphatases, but their resistance to mechanical loads, both static and dynamic was lower. On the other hand, the effects of storage conditions on the urease activity and the content of potassium, phosphorus and heavy metals were not observed. Generally, the storage of fertilizers in airtight containers is more advantageous, because under such conditions the changes in the fertilizing properties are insignificant, while their resistance to mechanical loads is much higher.
Rocznik
Strony
226--233
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
  • University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-950 Lublin, Poland
  • The Bohdan Dobrzański Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Aladjadjiyan A., Penkov D., Verspecht A., Zahariev A., Kakanakov N. 2016. Biobased Fertilizers - Comparison of Nutrient Content of Digestate/Compos, Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International 8(1), 1-7.
  • 2. Bhadra S.K, Bhavanarayana M. 1997. Estimation of the Influence of Soil Moisture on Soil Colour, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 160 (3), 401-405.
  • 3. Błońska A., Kompała-Bąba A., Sierka E., Besenyei L., Magurno F., Frydecka K., Bierza W., Woźniak G. 2019. Impact of selected plant species on enzymatic activity of soil substratum on post-mining heaps, Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(1), 138-144.
  • 4. Cordovil C.M., de Varennes A., Pinto R.M., Alves T.F., Mendes P., Sampaio S.C. 2017. Decomposition rate and enzymatic activity of composted municipal waste and poultry manure in the soil in a biofuel crops field. J Sci Food Agric., 97(7), 2245-2255.
  • 5. Filipek T., Gonet S., Kucharski J., Mocek A. 2001. The more important units of measurement and symbols used in earth sciences. Polska Akademia Nauk, Wydział Nauk Rolniczych, Leśnych i Weterynaryjnych. Komitet Gleboznawstwa i Chemii Rolnej PAN, Warszawa (in Polish).
  • 6. Futa B., Bielińska E. J., Mocek-Płóciniak A., 2016. The use of enzymatic tests to assess the quality of arable soils along main thoroughfares in Lublin. Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 61(3), 94-97.
  • 7. Garcia-Maraver A., Carpio M., 2015. Biomass Pelletization Process, in: Biomass Pelletization: Standards and Production WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Engineering, Vol. 85, WIT Pres, 53-66.
  • 8. Heděnec P. Vindušková O. Kukla J. Šnajdr J., Baldrian P. Frouz J. 2017. Enzyme activity of topsoil layer on reclaimed and unreclaimed post-mining sites, Biological Communications 62(1), 19-25.
  • 9. James A.K., Thring R.W., Helle S., Ghuman H.S. 2012. Ash Management Review - Applications of Biomass Bottom Ash. Energies, 5, 3856-3873.
  • 10. Joniec J., Frąc M. 2017. Microbial functional diversity and enzymatic activity of soil degraded by sulphur mining reclaimed with various waste. Int. Agrophys., 31, 465-473.
  • 11. Kasprzycka A. Lalak-Kańczugowska J., Tys J., Chmielewska M., Pawłowska M. 2018. Chemical stability and sanitary properties of pelletized organo-mineral waste-derived fertilizer. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44(3), 106-113.
  • 12. Łagocka A., Kamiński M., Cholewiński M., Pospolita W. 2016. Korzyści ekologiczne ze stosowania pofermentu z biogazowni rolniczych jako nawozu organicznego. Kosmos Problemy Nauk Biologicznych, 65(4), 601-607 (in Polish).
  • 13. Mizerski W., Tablice chemiczne, Warszawa 2003 (in Polish).
  • 14. Nilsson D., Bernesson S., Hansson P-A. 2011. Pellet production from agricultural raw materials – A systems study. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(1), 679-68.
  • 15. Ning C. Gao P, Wang B., Lin W., Jiang N. Cai K.. 2017. Impacts of chemical fertilizer reduction and organic amendments supplementation on soil nutrient, enzyme activity and heavy metal content. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16(8), 1819-1831.
  • 16. Nkoa R., 2014. Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34(2), 473-492.
  • 17. Ozga M., Borowski G. 2018. The use of granulation to reduce dusting and manage of fine coal. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 19 (3), 218-224.
  • 18. Patent US5772721A. 1998. Process for producing odorless organic and semi-organic fertilizer, Kazemzadeh M.
  • 19. Patent US6517600B1. 2003. Pure organic fertilizer. Dinel H.
  • 20. PN-EN 13037:2011. Soil improvers and growing media. Determination of pH (in Polish)
  • 21. PN-EN 13039:2011. Soil improvers and growing media. Determination of organic matter content and ash (in Polish)
  • 22. PN-EN 15934:2013-02. Sludge, treated biowaste, soil and waste - Calculation of dry matter fraction after determination of dry residue or water content (in Polish)
  • 23. Russel S., Wyczółkowski A.I., Bieganowski A. (Eds.). 2006. Selected methodological aspects of soil enzyme activity tests. Institute of Agrophysics PAS, Lublin 2006.
  • 24. Salemdeeb R. zu Ermgassen E.K.H.J., Kim, M.H. Balmford A., Al-Tabbaa A. 2017. Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options. J Clean Prod. 140, 871-880.
  • 25. Siłuch M. 2005. Relative air humidity in the Lublin region – A general characteristic (General description of the distribution of relative humidity in the Lublin region between 1951 and 2000). Acta Agrophysica, 6(2), 549-560.
  • 26. Tabatabai M.A., Bremner J.M. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenol phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1, 301-307.
  • 27. Thalmann A. 1968. Zur Methodik derestimmung der Dehydrogenase aktivit in Boden mittels Triphenyltetrazoliumchlorid (TTC). Landwirtsch Forschem 21, 249-258 (in Deutsch).
  • 28. Van Zwieten L. Kimber S., Morris S. Chan K.Y. Downie A., Rust J., Joseph S. Cowie A. 2010. Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant and Soil, 327(1–2), 235-246.
  • 29. Waste Framework Directive. Directive 2008/98/ EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives.
  • 30. WIOŚ: Report on the state of the environment Lublin province in 2015. Environmental Monitoring Library, Lublin, 2016.
  • 31. Wolińska A., Stępniewska Z., 2012. Dehydrogenase activity in the soil environment in: dehydrogenases (Ed. R.A. Canuto), Publisher: INTECH, 183-210.
  • 32. Wu L., Liu M., Liang R., 2008. Preparation and properties of a double-coated slow-release NPK compound fertilizer with superabsorbent and waterretention. Bioresource Technology, 99(3), 547-554.
  • 33. Zantua M.I. Bremner J.M. 1975. Comparison of methods of assaying urease activity in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 7, 291-295.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-c6b01033-15d7-497b-b588-1c245ac0a787
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.