A Z-number and MABAC method based on reliability analysis and evaluation of product design concept

• Autorzy: Tan Yuhang , Chen Zhe , Wang Baoping , Ma Qing , Wei Jianing

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17531/ein/178304

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Modular design is a significant method for complicated product development. In the context of modular design, involving users in concept assessment boosts a product's appeal but also introduces decision uncertainty and unreliability. As a solution, this paper proposed a hybrid method by integrating expert consensus modeling, attribute weighting, Z-number, and the Multi-Attribute Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) method. Initially, a consensus model is established using consistency theory to determine expert weights, and attribute priorities are determined through the entropy weighting method. Subsequently, the Z-number-based MABAC method ranks the alternatives, determiningthe optimal solution among them. Using an automated outdoor cleaning vehicle as an example, the proposed method is compared to other techniques. The sensitivity analysis and the comparisons show that the proposed method improves the reliability and objective of the decision-making process.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

product design concept evaluation; Z-number; MABAC; reliability; modular design

• Wydawca: Polskie Naukowo-Techniczne Towarzystwo Eksploatacyjne
• Czasopismo: Eksploatacja i Niezawodność
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 26, no. 1
• Strony: art. no. 178304
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 62 poz., rys., tab. wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Tan Yuhang

• Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China

autor

Chen Zhe

• Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4413-1606

autor

Wang Baoping

• Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China

autor

Ma Qing

• Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China

autor

Wei Jianing

• Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China

Bibliografia

• 1. Rogalewicz M, Kujawińska A, Feledziak A. Ensuring the reliability and reduction of quality control costs by minimizing process variability. Maintenance & Reliability/Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc. 2023;25(2).https://doi.org/10.17531/ein/162626
• 2. Summers GJ, Scherpereel CM. Flawed decision models and flexibility in product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2023;67:101728.
• 3. Li X-Q, Song L-K, Choy Y-S, Bai G-C. Fatigue reliability analysis of aeroengine blade-disc systems using physics-informed ensemble learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A. 2023;381(2260):20220384.
• 4. Chen B, Chen Y, Zhou H, Bai X, Li B, Guo X. A Bi-level gaming programming for regional integrated energy system considering the users’ reliability incentive. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2023;229:108839.
• 5. Li X-Q, Song L-K, Choy Y-S, Bai G-C. Multivariate ensembles-based hierarchical linkage strategy for system reliability evaluation of aeroengine cooling blades. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2023;138:108325.
• 6. Mashal I. Evaluation and assessment of smart grid reliability using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making. Applications of fuzzy logic in planning and operation of smart grids: Springer; 2021. p. 67-104.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64627-1_3
• 7. Lima MB, Kubota FI. A modular product design framework for the home appliance industry. The International Journal of AdvancedManufacturing Technology. 2022;120(3):2311-30.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08896-9
• 8. Ma Q, Sun H, Chen Z, Tan Y. A novel MCDM approach for design concept evaluation based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(11):e0294596.
• 9. Darko AP, Antwi CO, Asamoah KO, Opoku-Mensah E, Ren J. A probabilistic reliable linguistic PROBID method for selecting electronic mental health platforms considering users’ bounded rationality. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2023;125:106716.
• 10. Salas P, Venkataraman S. Laminate optimization incorporating analysis and model parameter uncertainties for predictable failure. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2009;37:541-55.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-008-0259-y
• 11. Chen Z, Zhong P, Liu M, Sun H, Shang K. A novel hybrid approach for product concept evaluation based on rough numbers, shannon entropy and TOPSIS-PSI. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 2021;40:12087-99.https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-210184
• 12. Kimita K, Shimomura Y, Arai T. Evaluation of customer satisfaction for PSS design. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 2009;20(5):654-73.https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380910961046
• 13. Kwok CP, Tang YM. A fuzzy MCDM approach to support customer-centric innovation in virtual reality (VR) metaverse headset design. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2023;56:101910.
• 14. Mirtalaie MA, Hussain OK, Chang E, Hussain FK. A decision support framework for identifying novel ideas in new product development from cross-domain analysis. Information Systems. 2017;69:59-80.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2017.04.003
• 15. Cristiano JJ, Liker JK, White CCI. Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD). IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2001;48(1):81-95.https://doi.org/10.1109/17.913168
• 16. Chen Z, Zhong P, Liu M, Ma Q, Si G. A novel integrated MADM method for design concept evaluation. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):15885.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20044-7
• 17. Qi J, Hu J, Peng Y. New design concept evaluation method involving customer preferences based on rough distance to redefined ideal solution. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2020;147:106677.
• 18. Zoghi M, Rostami G, Khoshand A, Motalleb F. Material selection in design for deconstruction using Kano model, fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Waste Management & Research. 2021;40(4):410-9.https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X211013904
• 19. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control. 1965;8(3):338-53.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
• 20. Alshraideh M, Ababneh S, Gunay EE, Al-Araidah O. A fuzzy-TOPSIS model for maintenance outsourcing considering the quality of submitted tender documents. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność. 2021;23(3).https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2021.3.5
• 21. Li J, DuAn R. Dynamic diagnostic strategy based on reliability analysis and distance-based VIKOR with heterogeneous information. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność. 2018;20(4).https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2018.4.12
• 22. Jiang J, Ren M, Wang J. Interval number multi-attribute decision-making method based on TOPSIS. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2022;61(7):5059-64.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.09.031
• 23. Zhu G-N, Hu J, Ren H. A fuzzy rough number-based AHP-TOPSIS for design concept evaluation under uncertain environments. Applied Soft Computing. 2020;91:106228.
• 24. Zhou M, Zheng Y-Q, Chen Y-W, Cheng B-Y, Herrera-Viedma E, Wu J. A large-scale group consensus reaching approach considering self-confidence with two-tuple linguistic trust/distrust relationship and its application in life cycle sustainability assessment. Information Fusion. 2023;94:181-99.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.01.026
• 25. Liu S, Yu W, Chan FTS, Niu B. A variable weight-based hybrid approach for multi-attribute group decision making under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 2021;36(2):1015-52.https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22329
• 26. Singh S, Ganie AH. On a new picture fuzzy correlation coefficient with its applications to pattern recognition and identification of an investment sector. Computational and Applied Mathematics. 2021;41(1):8.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01699-w
• 27. Jiang Z, Wei G, Guo Y. Picture fuzzy MABAC method based on prospect theory for multiple attribute group decision making and its application to suppliers selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2022;42:3405-15.https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-211359
• 28. Thurston DL, Carnahan JV. Fuzzy Ratings and Utility Analysis in Preliminary Design Evaluation of Multiple Attributes. Journal of Mechanical Design. 1992;114(4):648-58.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2917056
• 29. Alekperov R, editor Using Fuzzy Z -Numbers When Processing Flexible Queries. Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems; 2022 2022//; Cham: Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09173-5_52
• 30. Shidpour H, Da Cunha C, Bernard A. Group multi-criteria design concept evaluation using combined rough set theory and fuzzy set theory. Expert Systems with Applications. 2016;64:633-44.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.022
• 31. Geng X, Chu X, Zhang Z. A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets. Expert Systems with Applications. 2010;37(9):6629-38.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.058
• 32. Jing L, Yao J, Gao F, Li J, Peng X, Jiang S. A rough set-based interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy conceptual design decision approach with considering diverse customer preference distribution. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2021;48:101284.
• 33. Jabeen K, Ullah K, Akram M, Haleemzai I. Interval Valued Picture Fuzzy Aczel–Alsina Aggregation Operators and Their Application by Using the Multiattribute Decision Making Problem. Journal of Mathematics. 2023;2023:1707867.
• 34. Xu W, Shang X, Wang J, Xu Y. Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Based on Interval-Valued q-Rung Dual Hesitant Uncertain Linguistic Sets. IEEE Access. 2020;8:26792-813.https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968381
• 35. Chen Z, Zhong P, Liu M, Ma Q, Si G. An integrated expert weight determination method for design concept evaluation. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):6358.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10333-6
• 36. Zadeh LA. A Note on Z-numbers. Information Sciences. 2011;181(14):2923-32.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.02.022
• 37. Banerjee R, Pal SK. Z*-numbers: Augmented Z-numbers for machine-subjectivity representation. Information Sciences. 2015;323:143-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2015.06.026
• 38. Allahviranloo T, Ezadi S. Z-Advanced numbers processes. Information Sciences. 2019;480:130-43.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.12.012
• 39. Wu M-C, Mao J-J, Yao A-T, Wu T. The novel entropy measurements of Z +-numbers and their application on multi-attribute decision making problem. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2021;40:131-48.https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190300
• 40. Shen K-W, Wang J-Q, Wang T-L. The arithmetic of multidimensional Z-number. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2019;36:1647-61.https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-18927
• 41. Banerjee R, Pal SK, Pal JK. A Decade of the Z-Numbers. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 2022;30(8):2800-12.https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3094657
• 42. Aliev RA, Guirimov BG, Huseynov OH, Aliyev RR. Z-relation equation-based decision making. Expert Systems with Applications. 2021;184:115387.
• 43. Li Y, Rao C, Goh M, Xiao X. Novel multi-attribute decision-making method based on Z-number grey relational degree. Soft Computing. 2022;26(24):13333-47.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07487-w
• 44. Kang B, Wei D, Li Y, Deng Y. A method of converting Z-number to classical fuzzy number. Journal of Information and Computational Science. 2012;9:703-9.
• 45. Kang B, Deng Y, Sadiq R. Total utility of Z-number. Applied Intelligence. 2018;48(3):703-29.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-017-1001-5
• 46. Huang G, Xiao L, Pedrycz W, Pamucar D, Zhang G, Martínez L. Design alternative assessment and selection: A novel Z-cloud rough number-based BWM-MABAC model. Information Sciences. 2022;603:149-89.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.040
• 47. Qi J, Hu J, Huang H, Peng Y. New customer-oriented design concept evaluation by using improved Z-number-based multi-criteria decision-making method. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2022;53:101683.
• 48. Zhu G-N. Design concept evaluation considering information reliability, uncertainty, and subjectivity: An integrated rough-Z-number-enhanced MCGDM methodology. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2022;54:101796.
• 49. Liu Q, Chen J, Wang W, Qin Q. Conceptual Design Evaluation Considering Confidence Based on Z-AHP-TOPSIS Method. Applied Sciences [Internet]. 2021; 11(16).https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167400
• 50. Aydoğan S, Günay EE, Akay D, Okudan Kremer GE. Concept design evaluation by using Z-axiomatic design. Computers in Industry. 2020;122:103278.
• 51. Torkayesh AE, Tirkolaee EB, Bahrini A, Pamucar D, Khakbaz A. A Systematic Literature Review of MABAC Method and Applications:An Outlook for Sustainability and Circularity. Informatica. 2023;34:415-48.https://doi.org/10.15388/23-INFOR511
• 52. Mandal U, Seikh MR. Interval-valued spherical fuzzy MABAC method based on Dombi aggregation operators with unknown attribute weights to select plastic waste management process. Applied Soft Computing. 2023;145:110516.
• 53. Salman M, Chauhan R, Singh T, Prabakaran R, Kim SC. Experimental investigation and optimization of dimple-roughened impinging jet solar air collector using a novel AHP-MABAC approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023;30(13):36259-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24765-0
• 54. Wang T, Wu X, Garg H, Liu Q, Chen G. A prospect theory-based MABAC algorithm with novel similarity measures and interactional operations for picture fuzzy sets and its applications. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2023;126:106787.
• 55. Giachetti RE, Young RE. Analysis of the error in the standard approximation used for multiplication of triangular and trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and the development of a new approximation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1997;91(1):1-13.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00118-2
• 56. Halidini D, Xhafaj E, Xhafaj A, Halidini E. Ranking the Most Important Attributes of using Google Classroom in online Teaching for Albanian Universities: A Fuzzy AHP Method with Triangular Fuzzy Numbers and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers. 2021.https://doi.org/10.25046/aj060134
• 57. Dombi J, Jónás T. Ranking trapezoidal fuzzy numbers using a parametric relation pair. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 2020;399:20-43.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2020.04.014
• 58. Anand MC, Bharatraj J. Theory of Triangular Fuzzy Number2017.
• 59. Banerjee S, Kumar T. Arithmetic Operations on Generalized Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number and its Applications. Turkish Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2012;3:1309-190.
• 60. Hu Z, Lin J. An integrated multicriteria group decision making methodology for property concealment risk assessment under Z-number environment. Expert Systems with Applications. 2022;205:117369.
• 61. Wang S, Li Z, He C, Liu D, Zou G. An Integrated Method for Modular Design Based on Auto-Generated Multi-Attribute DSM and Improved Genetic Algorithm. Symmetry [Internet]. 2022; 14(1).https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14010048
• 62. Sun J, Chai N, Pi G, Zhang Z, Fan B. Modularization of Product Service System Based on Functional Requirement. Procedia CIRP.2017;64:301-5.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.038