PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Comparison of problems related to the carriage of goods by sea between traditional and autonomous vessels

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
When performing the carriage of goods by sea, each contracting party, shipowner and charterer, has a number of rights and obligations. In legal sources which regulate carriage of goods by sea, in particular contracts concluded between parties, international conventions and national laws, standard clause is shipowner's obligation to provide a seaworthy vessel. Such obligation implies that the vessel must be able to carry and keep the contracted cargo in good condition and also have required number of qualified crew. On the other side, charterer's obligation is to order the vessel to sail to ports/berths which are considered safe (safe port warranty). Also, legal sources of carriage of goods by sea regulate liability issues for loading and discharging operations, the limitation of the shipowner’s liability and application of provisions related to exclusion of liability. All of the above represent important rights and obligations of the regulation of the carriage of goods by sea, and so regulated thus far have been common in the carriage of goods by sea by traditional vessels. However, the question that arises is how the problems related to the carriage of goods by sea will be regulated when such carriage is performed by autonomous vessels. In other words, there is a question about interpretation of the provisions of seaworthiness, safe port warranty, liability and the limitation of the shipowner’s liability and exclusion of liability in the carriage of goods by sea by autonomous ships. The purpose of this paper is comparison of problems related to the carriage of goods by sea between the traditional and autonomous vessels, and regarding the regulation of seaworthiness, safe port warranty, liability, the limitation of the shipowner’s liability and exclusion of liability. The results of this comparison lead to the conclusion that reconsideration of the content of the listed terms is needed when we are talking about carriage of goods by sea by autonomous vessels.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia
autor
  • Adriatic Institute of the Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Zagreb, Croatia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Baltime Form 1939 (revised 2001) Uniform Time Charter: https://www.bimco.org, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 2. Belamarić, G., Bošnjak, R.: Autonomni brodovi. Kapetanov glasnik. 35, 29–36 (2018).
  • 3. BPTime 3 Time Charter Party: https://www.bimco.org, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 4. Bulum, B.: Time Charter Clauses. Comparative Maritime Law. 45, 160, 65–96 (2006).
  • 5. Cooke, J., Young, T., Ashcroft, M., Taylor, A., Kimball, J., Martowski, D., Lambert, L., Sturley, M.: Voyage Charters (Lloyd’s Shipping Law Library). Informa Law from Routledge (2014).
  • 6. Ćorić, D., Pajković, M.: Autonomous ship - a new type of ship in maritime law. Presented at the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Maritime Law, Modern Challenges of Marine Navigation , Split, Croatia September 27 (2018).
  • 7. Höyhtyä, M., Huusko, J., Kiviranta, M., Solberg, K., Rokka, J.: Connectivity for autonomous ships: Architecture, use cases, and research challenges. In: 2017 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). pp. 345–350 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC.2017.8191000.
  • 8. International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rule of Law relating to Bills of Lading (Hague Rules): https://www.jus.uio.no/English/services/library/treaties/ 07/7-04/hague-rules.xml, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 9. International Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims from 1976, as amended by the Protocol from 1996: https://www.jus.uio.no/English/services/library/treaties/ 06/6-07/limitation-liability-maritime.xml, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 10. International Maritime Organization: MASS, https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/ Autonomous-shipping.aspx, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 11. International Monetary Fund: https://www.imf.org, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 12. Kopitoff v Wilson: 1 QBD 602. (1876).
  • 13. Leeds Shipping v Société Francaise Bunge (The Eastern City): 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 127. (1958).
  • 14. MUNIN Project web page: http://www.unmannedship.org/munin/, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 15. New York Produce Exchange Form from 2015 (code name: NYPE 2015): https://www.bimco.org›Samplecopy-NYPE-2015, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 16. Pavić, D.: Pomorsko imovinsko pravo. Poredbeno pomorsko pravo. 46, 161, 329–333 (2007).
  • 17. Protocol to Amend the International Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules of Law, relating to the Bill of Lading (Visby Rules): https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/sea.carriage.hague.visby.rule s.1968/doc.html, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 18. Rolls-Royce: Rolls-Royce unveils a vision of the future of remote and autonomous shipping, https://www.rollsroyce.com/media/press-releases.aspx, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 19. Scrutton, T.E., Boyd;, S.C.., Burrows, A.S., Foxton, D.: Scrutton on charterparties and bills of lading. Sweet & Maxwell, London, UK (1996).
  • 20. Shelltime form Time Charter Party: https://shippingforum.files.wordpress.com, last accessed 2021/04/22.
  • 21. Soyer, B.: Warranties in Marine Insurance. Routledge (2018).
  • 22. Wilford, C., Wilford, K., Kimball, J.D.: Time Charters (Lloyd’s Shipping Law Library). Informa Maritime & Transport; 5th edition (2003).
  • 23. Wilson, J.: Carriage of Goods by Sea. Longman (2010).
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-c644e324-813e-40b6-bf6e-4df8abe09709
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.