Analysis of companies’ approach to sustainable products development: quality, environment, society, cost

• Autorzy: Siwiec Dominika , Pacana Andrzej

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/czoto-2024-0010

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sustainable product development is becoming essential to meet market, but also climate challenges. However, this is problematic mainly because of the need to make many complex decisions at the early stages of product development. Due to limited research in this area, the aim was to analyse the approach of companies to sustainable development when designing new products and improving products already on the market. This approach was considered according to the key aspects of sustainable product development, i.e.: quality (customer satisfaction with use), environment (impact in the life cycle), society (changes in the social environment) and cost. Pilot studies were conducted among manufacturing companies. These were surveys with a Likert scale, in which the following were verified: i) the frequency of actions taken regarding verified aspects, and ii) the degree to which these aspects were taken into account during product development. It was shown, for example, that the most frequently undertaken actions are those related to product costs, then quality, and slightly less often, environment and society. A similar phenomenon was observed in the case of the degree to which these aspects were taken into account in product development activities, which was additionally confirmed by the results of statistical analysis according to the sign test in the STATISTICA program. The results of the pilot studies confirmed the validity of conducting in-depth fundamental studies to determine clear rules and relationships that condition the consideration of key aspects within the framework of sustainable product development.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

customer requirements; LCA; society; economy; sustainable product development; mechanical engineering

PL

wymagania klienta; społeczeństwo; gospodarka; zrównoważony rozwój produktu; inżynieria mechaniczna

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: System Safety : Human - Technical Facility - Environment
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 6, iss. 1
• Strony: 79--88
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Siwiec Dominika

• Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6663-6621

autor

Pacana Andrzej

• Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-6352

Bibliografia

• 1.Aastha, B., Shazi, S. J., 2019. Corporate social responsibility practices in small and medium enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 9-20. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.01
• 2.Adriyanti, A. L., Sahroni, T. R., 2023. Design Sustainability for Battery Packaging to Increase Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Engineering, 1-12. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9916084
• 3.Alfieri, F., Cordella, M., Sanfelix, J., Dodd, N., 2018. An Approach to the Assessment of Durability of Energy-Related Products. Procedia CIRP, 69, 878-881. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.082
• 4.Bigolin, M., Danilevicz, Â. D. M. F., Weiss, M. A., Silva Filho, L. C. P., 2021. Sustainable New Product Development: a decision-making tool for the construction industry. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(4), 618-629. DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2021.1920642
• 5.Carvalho, F. P., 2017. Mining industry and sustainable development: time for change. Food and Energy Security, 6(2), 61-77. DOI: 10.1002/fes3.109
• 6.Czerwińska-Lubszczyk, A., Jagoda-Sobalak, D., Owczarek, T., 2024. Innovation, green innovation and cooperation in publicly funded projects. Production Engineering Archives, 30(4), 453-462. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2024.30.43
• 7.Dangelico, R. M., 2016. Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 560-576. DOI: 10.1002/bse.1886
• 8.De los Rios, I. C., Charnley, F. J. S., 2017. Skills and capabilities for a sustainable and circular economy: The changing role of design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 160, 109-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.130
• 9.Dekker, R., Bloemhof, J., Mallidis, I., 2012. Operations Research for green logistics - An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges. European Journal of Operational Research, 219(3), 671-679. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.010
• 10.Deja, A., Ulewicz, R., Kyrychenko, Y., 2021. Analysis and assessment of environmental threats in maritime transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 55, 1073-1080
• 11.Depczyński, R., 2024. Assessing raw material efficiency and waste management for Sustainable Development: A VIKOR and TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. Production Engineering Archives, 30(4), 537-550. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2024.30.50
• 12.Dwornicka, R., Pietraszek, J., 2018. The outline of the expert system for the design of experiment. Production Engineering Archives, 20(20), 43-48. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2018.20.09
• 13.Gajdzik, B., Siwiec, D., Wolniak, R., Pacana, A., 2024. Approaching open innovation in customization frameworks for product prototypes with emphasis on quality and life cycle assessment (QLCA). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100268. DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100268
• 14.García-Granero, E. M., Piedra-Muñoz, L., Galdeano-Gómez, E., 2018. Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 304-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.215
• 15.Gawlik, R., Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., 2024. Quality-Cost-Environment Assessment of Sustainable Manufacturing of Photovoltaic Panels. Energies, 17(7), 1522. DOI: 10.3390/en17071522
• 16.Gilli, M., Marin, G., Mazzanti, M., Nicolli, F., 2017. Sustainable development and industrial development: manufacturing environmental performance, technology and consumption/production perspectives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6(2), 183-203. DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2016.1249413
• 17.Hong, Z., Wang, H., Gong, Y., 2019. Green product design considering functional-product reference. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 155-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.008
• 18.Hyman, M., Sierra, J., 2016. Selecting a sample size for your customer survey. Business Outlook, 14(5), 1-5.
• 19.Ingaldi, M., Ulewicz, R., 2024. The Business Model of a Circular Economy in the Innovation and Improvement of Metal Processing. Sustainability, 16, 5513. DOI: 10.3390/su16135513
• 20.Jasiewicz, B., Pietraszek, J., Duda, S., Pietrzak, S., Pruszczyński, B., Parol, T., Potaczek, T., Gądek-Moszczak, A., 2021. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability in the radiographic measurements of paediatric forefoot alignment. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 27(4), 371-376. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2020.04.015
• 21.Kalak, T., Cierpiszewski, R., Ulewicz, M., 2021. High efficiency of the removal process of Pb(Ii) and Cu(ii) ions with the use of fly ash from incineration of sunflower and wood waste using the CFBC technology. Energies, 14(6), art. 1771. DOI: 10.3390/en14061771
• 22.Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, C. N., Zeriti, A., 2016. Eco-friendly product development strategy: antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(6), 660-684. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-015-0470-5
• 23.Knop, K., Olejarz, E., Ulewicz, R., 2019. Evaluating and Improving the Effectiveness of Visual Inspection of Products from the Automotive Industry. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 231-243. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17269-5_17
• 24.Marković, S., Arsić, D., Nikolić, R.R., Lazic, V., Hadzima, B., Milovanovic, V.P., Dwornicka, R., Ulewicz, R., 2021. Exploitation characteristics of teeth flanks of gears regenerated by three hard-facing procedures. Materials, 14(15), art. 4203. DOI: 10.3390/ma14154203
• 25.Maťová, H., Triznová, M., Kaputa, V., Šupín, M., Drličková, E., Krahulcová, M., 2020. Consumers - global citizens from the CSR 2.0 perspective. SHS Web of Conferences, 74, 04015. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20207404015
• 26.Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., Cham, T. H., 2020. Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), DOI: 10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
• 27.Michelly Gonçalves Brandão, S., Brunner-La Rocca, H.-P., Pedroso de Lima, A. C., Alcides Bocchi, E., 2023. A review of cost-effectiveness analysis: From theory to clinical practice. Medicine, 102(42), e35614. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035614
• 28.Monson, M., 2023. Socially responsible design science in information systems for sustainable development: a critical research methodology. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(2), 207-237. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1946442
• 29.Ostasz, G., Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., 2021. Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement, 15(5), 1751. DOI: 10.3390/en15051751
• 30.Pacana, A., Siwiec, D., 2022. Method of Determining Sequence Actions of Products Improvement. Materials,15(18), 6321. DOI: 10.3390/ma15186321
• 31.Pacana, A., Pasternak-Malicka, M., Zawada, M., Radoń-Cholewa, A., 2016. Decision support in the production of packaging films by cost-quality analysis. Przemysł Chemiczny, 95(5), pp. 1042-1044
• 32.Palmero, K. L., Montemayor, C. T., 2020. An analysis on the factors influencing green purchase intention among young consumers in the Philippine BPO industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 22(1), pp. 371-384. DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.24
• 33.Pietraszek, J., 2013. The modified sequential-binary approach for fuzzy operations on correlated assessments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7894, 353-364. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642- 38658-9_32
• 34.Radek, N., Pietraszek, J., Szczotok, A., Fabian, P., Kalinowski, A., 2020. Microstructure and tribological properties of DLC coatings. Materials Research Proceedings, 17, 171-176. DOI: 10.21741/9781644901038-26
• 35.Radzymińska-Lenarcik, E., Ulewicz, M., 2015. The use of the steric effect of the carrier molecule in the polymer inclusion membranes for the separation of cobalt(II), nickel(II), copper(II), and zinc(II) ions. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology, 17(2), 51-56. DOI: 10.1515/pjct-2015-0029
• 36.Shapiro, D., Hobdari, B., Oh, C. H., 2018. Natural resources, multinational enterprises and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 53(1), 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.09.005
• 37.Siva, V., Gremyr, I., Bergquist, B., Garvare, R., Zobel, T., Isaksson, R., 2016. The support of Quality Management to sustainable development: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 148-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.020
• 38.Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., 2021. A Pro-Environmental Method of Sample Size Determination to Predict the Quality Level of Products Considering Current Customers’ Expectations. Sustainability, 13(10), 5542. DOI: 10.3390/su13105542
• 39.Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., 2024. Decision-Making Model Supporting Eco-Innovation in Energy Production Based on Quality, Cost and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Energies, 17(17), 4318. DOI: 10.3390/en17174318
• 40.Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., Gavurová, B., Ključnikov, A., Nagy, S., 2024. Qualitative-environmental aspects of products improvement in SMEs from V4 countries. Production Engineering Archives, 30(1), 75-85. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2024.30.7
• 41.Siwiec, D., Pacana, A., 2022. A New Model Supporting Stability Quality of Materials and Industrial Products. Materials 15(13), 4440.. DOI: 10.3390/ma15134440
• 42.Song, W., Wang, G., Ma, X., 2020. Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: A perspective from organizational climate. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 224-234. DOI: 10.1002/sd.1990
• 43.Sullivan, G. M., Artino, A. R., 2013. Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541-542. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18
• 44.Świderska, G. K., Krysik, M., 2022. Koszty z perspektywy zrównoważonego rozwoju - przyczynek do dyskusji. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 64(2), 5-16. DOI: 10.33119/KNoP.2022.64.2.1
• 45.Tolio, T., Bernard, A., Colledani, M., Kara, S., Seliger, G., Duflou, J., Battaia, O., Takata, S., 2017. Design, management and control of demanufacturing and remanufacturing systems. CIRP Annals, 66(2), 585-609. DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.001
• 46.Ul-Durar, S., Awan, U., Varma, A., Memon, S., Mention, A.-L., 2023. Integrating knowledge management and orientation dynamics for organization transition from eco-innovation to circular economy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(8), 2217-2248. DOI: 10.1108/JKM05-2022-0424
• 47.Ulewicz, R., Nový, F., Selejdak, J., 2014. Fatigue strength of ductile iron in ultra-high cycle regime. Advanced Materials Research, 874, 43-48. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.874.43
• 48.Vilochani, S., McAloone, T. C., Pigosso, D. C. A., 2024. Consolidation of management practices for Sustainable Product Development: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 45, 115-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2024.01.002

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).