Anatomical protocol for gait analysis: joint kinematics measurement and its repeatability

• Autorzy: Żuk M. , Trzeciak M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15632/jtam-pl.55.1.369

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

International Society of Biomechanics has proposed a general reporting standard for joint kinematics based on anatomical reference frames. Nevertheless, the gait analysis protocols based on this standard are still poorly reported. The purpose of the current study is to propose and preliminarily assess the potential of an anatomically based ISB 6-DOF protocol, which combines the ISB reporting standard together with a marker cluster technique. The proposed technical marker set enables full description of the lower limb kinematics (including three-dimensional ankle-foot complex rotations) according to the current biomechanical recommendation. The marker set provides a clinically acceptable inter-trial repeatability and minimal equipment requirements.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

joint kinematics; gait analysis protocol; repeatability; anatomical protocol; marker-set; motion capture system

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Mechaniki Teoretycznej i Stosowanej
• Czasopismo: Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 55 nr 1
• Strony: 369--376
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Żuk M.

• Wroclaw University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Mechatronics and Theory of Mechanisms, Wrocław, Poland

autor

Trzeciak M.

• Wroclaw University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Mechatronics and Theory of Mechanisms, Wrocław, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Baker R., 2006, Gait analysis methods in rehabilitation, Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation, 3
• 2. Benedetti M.G., Catani F., Leardini A., Pignotti E., GianniniG., 1998, Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications, Clinical Biomechanics, 13, 3, 204-215
• 3. Borhani M., McGregor A.H., Bull A.M.J., 2013, An alternative technical marker set for the pelvis is more repeatable than standard pelvic marker set, Gait and Posture, 38, 4, 1032-1037
• 4. Collins T.D., Ghoussayni S.N., Ewins D.J., Kent J.A., 2009, A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: Repeatability and comparison with modified Helen Hayes set, Gait and Posture, 30, 173-180
• 5. Davis III R.B., Ounpuu S., Tyburski D. Gage J.R. ˜ , 1991, A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique, Human Movement Science, 10, 5, 575-587
• 6. Delp S.L, Anderson F.C., Arnold A.S., Loan P., Habib A., John C.T., Guendelman E., Thelen D.G., 2007, OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 54, 11, 1940-1950
• 7. Dollar A.M., Herr H., 2008, Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 1, 144-158
• 8. Erdemir A, McLean S, Herzog W., van den Bogert A.J., 2007, Model-based estimation of muscle forces excerted during movements, Clinical Biomechanics, 22, 131-154
• 9. Ferrati A., Benedetti M.G., Pavan E., Frigo C., Bettinelli D., Rabuffetti M., Crenna P., Leardini A., 2008, Quantitative comparsion of five current protocols in gait analysis, Gait and Posture, 28, 207-216
• 10. Kadaba M.P., Ramakrishnan H., Wootten M., 1990, Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking, Journal of Orthopedic Research, 8, 383-393
• 11. Leardini A., Sawacha Z., Paolini G., Ingrosso S., Nativo R., Benedetti M.G., 2007, A new anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children, Gait and Posture, 26, 560-571
• 12. Manca M., Leardini A., Cavazza S., Ferraresi G., Marchi P., Zanaga E., Benedetti M.G., 2010, Repeatability of new protocol for gait analysis in adult subject, Gait and Posture, 32, 282-284
• 13. McGinley J.L., Baker R., Wolfe R., Morris M.E., 2009, The reliability of three dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review, Gait and Posture, 29, 360-369
• 14. Oliński M., Lewandowski B., Gronowicz A., 2015, Type synthesis and preliminary design of devices supporting lower limb’s rehabilitation, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 17, 1, 117-127
• 15. Schwartz M.H., Trost J.P., Wervey R.A., 2004, Measurement and management of errors in quantitative gait data, Gait and Posture, 20, 196-203
• 16. Syczewska M., Graff K., Kalinowska M., Szczerbik E., Domaniecki J., 2012, Influence of the structural deformity of the spine on the gait pathology in scoliotic patients, Gait and Posture, 35, 2, 209-213
• 17. Tupling S.J., Pierrynowski M.R., 1987, Use of cardan angles to locate rigid bodies in threedimensional space, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 25, 527-532
• 18. Wu G., Siegler S., Allard P., Kirtley C., Leardini A., Rosenbaum D., Whittle M., D’Lima D.D., Cristofolini L., Witte H., Schmid O., Stokes I., 2002, ISB reccommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for reporting of human joint motion – part I: ankle, hip, and spine, Journal of Biomechanics, 35, 543-548
• 19. Żuk M., Pezowicz C., 2015, Kinematic analysis of a six-degrees-of-freedom model based on ISB recommendation: a repeatability analysis and comparison with conventional gait model, Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, Article ID 503713, 1-9
• 20. Żuk M., Pezowicz C., 2016, The influence of uncertainty in body segment mass on calculated joint moments and muscle forces, Information Technologies in Biomedicine, 5, 349-359
• 21. Żuk M., Świątek-Najwer E., Pezowicz C., 2014, Hip joint centre localization: evaluation of formal methods and effects on joint kinematic, Information Technologies in Biomedicine, 4, 57-67

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)