Comparative Analysis of Industry Expectations Related to Engineering Graduates in Poland and the United States

• Autorzy: Czerwińska-Lubszczyk Agnieszka , Grebski Michalene , Jagoda-Sobalak Dominika , Łapuńka Iwona

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mape-2020-0057

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper contains a comparative analysis of the competences needed to practice engineering in Poland and the United States (USA). Surveys of industries were conducted in Poland and the USA. Legal background of curricula was discussed. The surveys were done for the purpose of assessing the importance of competences as well as level of mastery those skills and attributes by engineering graduates. The results confirm differences in approach of entrepreneurs to graduates of engineering studies in Poland and the USA. In the USA entrepreneurs have higher expectations and the importance of individual competences is also different. The comparative analysis was done to identify the weaknesses in the engineering curricula and identifying the best practices.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

engineering education; graduates’ competences

• Wydawca: STE GROUP ; De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 3, Iss. 1
• Strony: 681--693
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Czerwińska-Lubszczyk Agnieszka

• University of Bielsko-Biala, Poland

autor

Grebski Michalene

• Northampton Community College, USA

autor

Jagoda-Sobalak Dominika

autor

Łapuńka Iwona

• Opole University of Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Appelo J. (2016). Zarządzanie 3.0. Kierowanie zespołami z wykorzystaniem metodyk Agile. Gliwice: Helion.
• 2. Balve P. and Ebert L. (2019). Ex Post Evaluation of a Learning Factory – Competence Development Based on Graduates Feedback. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, pp. 8-13.
• 3. Beyer K. (2012). Współczesna organizacja – organizacja oparta na wiedzy. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 736, Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 55, pp. 9-25.
• 4. BRICS Skill Development Working Group (2016). Whitepaper, Skill Development for Industry 4.0. Roland Berger GmbH.
• 5. Castro-Bedriñana J., Chirinos-Peinado D., Zenteno-Vigo F. and Castro-Chirinos G. (2020). Satisfaction of Old Graduates of Zootechnical Engineering for Improvement of Educational Quality at the UNCP. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 5(2), pp. 166-173.
• 6. Choe N.H. and Borrego M. (2020). Master’s and doctoral engineering students’ interest in industry, academia, and government careers. Journal of Engineering Education, 109, pp. 325-346.
• 7. Davenport T.H. (2007). Zarządzanie pracownikami wiedzy. Kraków: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer Business.
• 8. Drucker P.F. (2010). Zarządzanie XXI wieku – wyzwania. Warszawa: New Media.
• 9. Dubovikova E.P. (2019). International Conference on Construction, Architecture and Technosphere Safety. Materials Science and Engineering, 687, 044046, pp. 1-6.
• 10. Fedoseeva M.A. Prokudina N.A., Fedoseeva N.Yu, Evdokimov V.S., Kapelukhovskaya A.A. and Yusha V.L. (2019). Developing teamwork skills for students trained in compressors and refrigeration programs. International Conference on Compressors and their Systems. Materials Science and Engineering, 604, pp. 1-8.
• 11. Gartner, Inc. (2017). [online] Available at: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom, [Accessed 20 Apr. 2020].
• 12. Ghonim M. and Eweda N. (2019). Instructors’ perspectives on the pedagogy of architectural graduation projects: A qualitative study. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8, pp. 415-427.
• 13. Gorshkova O.O. (2019). Technology to form Students’ Readiness for Research in Engineering Universities. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 9(1), pp. 3881-3887.
• 14. Gracel J. and Makowiec M. (2017). Kluczowe kompetencje menedżera w dobie czwartej rewolucji przemysłowej – Przemysłu 4.0. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici, Zarządzanie, XLIV, 4, pp. 105-129.
• 15. Haidi S. and Rabiman (2019). The Evaluation of Industrial Assisted Classes Program in Vocational Schools in Yogyakarta. International Conference on Technology and Vocational Teacher, Materials Science and Engineering 535, pp. 1-9.
• 16. Hollinger P. (2016). Meet the cobots: humans and robots together on the factory floor, Financial Times, [online] Available at: https://cobotsguide.com/2016/05/meet-the-cobots-humans-and-robots-together-on-the-factory-floor [Accessed 20 Apr. 2020].
• 17. IMD World Competitiveness Centre (2019). IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2019, Switzerland.
• 18. Łapuńka I., Czerwińska-Lubszczyk A. and Grebski M. (2020). Badanie luk kompetencyjnych inżynierów Przemysłu 4.0, In: R. Knosala, ed., Inżynieria Zarządzania. Cyfryzacja Produkcji. Aktualności Badawcze 2. Warszawa: PWE, pp. 173-182.
• 19. OECD (2019). OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work, OECD Publishing, Paris, [online] Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9ee00155-en, [Accessed 20 Apr. 2020].
• 20. Palti I. (2017), Could creativity drive the next industrial revolution?, [online] Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/04/why-creativity-will-drive-the-next-industrial-revolution? [Accessed 20 Apr. 2020].
• 21. Racero F.J., Bueno S. and Gallego M.D. (2020). Predicting Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Open Source Software: A Combined View of the Technology Acceptance Model and Self-Determination Theory. Applied Sciences, 10, 2711, pp. 1-15.
• 22. Rozporządzenie Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 27 września 2018 r. w sprawie studiów Na podstawie art. 81 ustawy z dnia 20 lipca 2018 r. – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce (Dz. U. poz. 1668).
• 23. Sabirova U.F., Gusenina S.V., Sukhomlinova M.V. and Safyanov V.I. (2019). Humanization as a Sociocultural Component of the Higher Education Quality. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 9(1), pp. 3209-3218.
• 24. Schwab K. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: The World Economic Forum.
• 25. Sergeeva M.G., Vilkova A.V., Litvishkov V.M, Kovtunenko L.V., Lukashenko D.V. and Klimova E.M. (2019). Technology and Innovation in the Development of Cognitive Activity. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(12), pp. 1050-1055.
• 26. Smirnova Z.V., Vaganova O.I., Konovalova E.Y., Kulagina J.A., Zhitnikova N.E., Frolova N.V. and Lukina E.V. (2019). Modern Communication Technologies in Professional Education. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(11), pp. 3751-3756.
• 27. Stoch M. and Gracel J. (2017). Inżynierowie przemysłu 4.0: jak ich rozwijać? Harvard Business Review Polska [online] Available at: https://www.hbrp.pl, [Accessed 20 Apr. 2020].
• 28. Sveiby K.E. (1997). The new organizational wealth. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehle Publishers.
• 29. Syahmaidi E., Hidayat H., Hartanto S. and Rahmadani A.F. (2019). Needs Analysis of Designing Online Computer-Assisted Training to Improve Pedagogical Competencies in Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 8(6), pp. 4619-4624.
• 30. Toffler A. (2006). Trzecia fala. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Kurpisz.
• 31. World Economic Forum (2018). The Future of Jobs Report 2018, Insight Report, Centre for the New Economy and Society, Geneva, Switzerland.
• 32. Zamaletdinova G.R., Konopleva N.V. and Gorbunova N.V. (2019). Electronic Educational Resources as Means of Formation of the Foreign-Language Professionally Focused Competence of Future Philologists. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 9(1), pp. 5115-5118.