Evaluation of Pressure Distribution in Buried Pipes with Liquid in the Explosion

• Autorzy: Parviz M. , Aminnejad B. , Fiouz A. R.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/ace-2019-0030

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this Paper, a parametric study on pipes buried in soil was performed illustrating the results of blast loading. Effects of various parameters such as the physical properties of water, oil, gas, air, soil, pipes, and TNT have been investigated. The arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) method was employed using LS-DYNA software. The maximum pressure in a buried pipe explosive was observed at an angle of about 0° to 45° and the minimum pressure occurred at an angle of about 45° to 90°. Therefore, all figures in this study illustrate that fluid pressure levels in buried pipes can help in their stabilization. In generally, by increasing the 1.23 times of liquid density under the explosion, the pressure levels in the soil decreased by 1.3 percent. The gas pressure has been increasing more than oil and water pipes 39.73 and 40.52 percent, respectively.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

buried pipe; Lagrangian-Eulerian method; blast; pressure; Ls-Dyna

PL

rura zakopana; metoda Lagrange’a-Eulera; podmuch; ciśnienie; LS-DYNA

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 65, nr 3
• Strony: 3--14
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Parviz M.

• Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

autor

Aminnejad B.

• Department of Civil Engineering, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

autor

Fiouz A. R.

• Department of Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

Bibliografia

• 1. De, A., “Numerical simulation of surface explosions over dry, cohesionless soil”, Computers and Geotechnics 43: 72-79. 2012.
• 2. Thom C., Cronin D. Shock wave amplification by fabric materials. Shock Waves, 2009, 19: 39-48. doi: 10.1007/s00193-009-0186-x
• 3. Blanchard R., Arndt D., Gra¨ tz R., et al. Explosions in closed pipes containing baffles and 90 degree bends. J Loss Preven Process IND, 2010, 23: 253-259.doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.09.004
• 4. Guo Ch, Lin B, Zhu Ch, et al. Effect of filling ratio of premixed methane/air explosion in an open-end pipe. International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics, 2016, 1: 1-7.
• 5. Lou Ch., Ruihai W., Liang W. An Explosion Suppression Material and Its Manufacturing Method [P], 2002, CN: 101906561A,02- 02.
• 6. Youjie Zh., Gaojun A., Xudong W. Study on Explosion Suppression Technologies for Oil and Gas Pipeline Procedia Engineering, 2014, 84: 412-418.
• 7. RU C-Y., WANG D-X. The explosion-proof mechanism and application of HAN blocking explosion-proof technology. China Science and Technology Information, 2006, 18:295-296.
• 8. Zimmerman, H., Cooper, G., Carney, J. and Ito, Y. Cratering and ground shock environment prediction of buried armor piercing bomb in dry Socorro plaster sand, Technical Report CRT-3295-010-01, California Research and Technology, Chattsworth Calif, 1990.
• 9. Baker W.E., Cox P., Westin P.S., Kulesz J.J., Strehlow R.A. Explosion hazard and evaluation. Elsevier, New York.
• 10. Yan S, Xu Y, Chang H. Numerical simulation of dynamic response of buried pipeline by ground explosion. Journal of Earth and Space, ASCE, Pp. 1159-1166, 2012.
• 11. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual Vol. 1. Version 971, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), California, USA, 2013.