Improving accountability and sustainability through value creation and dynamic capabilities : an empirical study in public interest companies

• Autorzy: Abdullah Nik Herda Nik , Darsono Junianto Tjahjo , Respati Harianto , Said Jamaliah

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.01

Warianty tytułu

PL

Poprawa odpowiedzialności i zrównoważonego rozwoju poprzez tworzenie wartości i dynamicznych możliwości : empiryczne studium w przedsiębiorstwach pożytku publicznego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Traditionally, value creation is about producing new products and new production processes that add value to the firm reflecting an increase in shareholders’ wealth and customers’ value. However, besides this economic focus, a new paradigm of value creation emphasizes on financial, social and environmental sustainability, accountability, and survival of the business to ensure long term value creation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of dynamic capabilities on value creation in public interest companies in Malaysia called Government Linked Companies (GLCs). This study adopted the quantitative approach through a cross-sectional survey test to address the research objective. The questionnaire survey was distributed by mail to 455 state and federal level GLCs in Malaysia and collected 215 responses. The findings reveal that dynamic capabilities play a significant role in developing value creation. This study is expected to provide evidence on how to significantly enrich value creation through dynamic capabilities that improve competitiveness in the industry, accountability and sustainability, as well as to secure long-term performance.

PL

Tradycyjnie tworzenie wartości polega na wytwarzaniu nowych produktów i nowych procesów produkcyjnych, które zwiększają wartość firmy, odzwierciedlając wzrost bogactwa akcjonariuszy i wartości klientów. Jednak oprócz tego aspektu ekonomicznego, nowy paradygmat tworzenia wartości kładzie nacisk na stabilność finansową, społeczną i środowiskową, odpowiedzialność i przetrwanie firmy, aby zapewnić długoterminowe tworzenie wartości. Celem tego artykułu jest zbadanie wpływu dynamicznych możliwości na tworzenie wartości w przedsiębiorstwach pożytku publicznego w Malezji zwanych przedsiębiorstwami powiązanymi z rządem (GLC). W badaniu przyjęto podejście ilościowe poprzez przekrojowy test ankietowy w celu realizacji celu badawczego. Ankieta została rozesłana pocztą do 455 państwowych i federalnych GLC w Malezji i zebrała 215 odpowiedzi. Rezultaty pokazują, że dynamiczne możliwości odgrywają znaczącą rolę w tworzeniu wartości. Oczekuje się, że badanie to dostarczy dowodów na to, jak znacząco wzbogacić tworzenie wartości poprzez dynamiczne zdolności, które poprawiają konkurencyjność w branży, rozliczalność i zrównoważony rozwój, a także zapewniają długoterminowe wyniki.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

accountability; dynamic capabilities; government linked companies; sustainability; value creation

PL

odpowiedzialność; możliwość dynamiczna; firmy powiązane z rządem; rozwój zrównoważony; tworzenie wartości

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 19, No. 2
• Strony: 9--21
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 57 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Abdullah Nik Herda Nik

• Taylor’s Business School, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya 47500, Malaysia

autor

Darsono Junianto Tjahjo

• University Merdeka of Malang, Indonesia

autor

Respati Harianto

• University Merdeka of Malang, Indonesia

autor

Said Jamaliah

• Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia

Bibliografia

• 1. Awang Z., 2014, A handbook on SEM for academicians and practitioners: the step by step practical guides for the beginners, MPWS Rich Resources. Bandar Baru Bangi.
• 2. Barney J.B., 1991, Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, “Journal of Management”, 17.
• 3. Čajka P., Olejárová B., Čajková A., 2018, Migration as a factor of Germany's security and sustainability, “Journal of Security and Sustainability”, 7(3).
• 4. Chenhall R.H., Hall M., Smith D., 2010, Social capital and management control systems: A study of a non-government organization, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(8).
• 5. Chirico F., Nordqvist M., 2010, Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture, “International Small Business Journal”, 28(5).
• 6. Dahan N.M., Doh J.P., Oetzel J., Yaziji M., 2010, Corporate-NGO Collaboration: Co-creating New Business Models for Developing Markets, Long Range Planning, 43.
• 7. Danesh M.H., Yu E., 2014, Modeling enterprise capabilities with i*: reasoning on alternatives, International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Springer International Publishing.
• 8. Danneels E., 2008, Organizational antecedents of second order competences, “Strategic Management Journal”, 29(5).
• 9. Davila T., 2000, An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4-5).
• 10. Faizan R., Haque A.U., Cockrill A., Aston J., 2019, Females at strategic level affecting logistic firms’ competitiveness: qualitative comparative analysis of contrasting gender in Pakistan and Canada, Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 1.
• 11. Fernandez P., 2015, Shareholder Value Creation: A Definition. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=268129
• 12. Freyd M., 1923, The graphic rating scale, “Journal Education Psychology”, 14.
• 13. Gomez-Mejia L.R., Balkin D.B., Cardy R.L., 2001, Managing Human Resources, Pearson
• 14. Grover V., Maholtra M.K., 1999, A Framework for Examining the Interface between Operations and Information Systems: Implications for Research in the New Millennium, Decision Sciences, 30(4).
• 15. Helfat C.E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M.A., Singh H., Teece D.J., Winter S.G., 2007, Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations, London: Blackwell.
• 16. Henseler J., Ringle C.M., Sinkovics R.R., 2009, The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, Advances in International Marketing, 20.
• 17. Jurisch M.C., Palka W., Wolf P., Krcmar H., 2014, Which capabilities matter for successful business process change? “Business Process Management Journal”, 20(1).
• 18. Kadir M.R.A., Abidin Z.Z., Ramli A.R., Surbaini K.N., 2014, Factors Influencing A Business Towards Zakat Payment In Malaysia, “International Journal of Science Commerce and Humanities”, 2(3).
• 19. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P., 2004, How strategy maps frame an organization's objectives: in an excerpt from their new book, two noted authors on corporate management outline how organizations can mobilize and sustain their intangible assets for value-creating internal processes, Financial Executive, 20(2).
• 20. Kasali R., 2010, Creating value and business opportunity, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Indonesia.
• 21. Kasimoglu M., Halici A., Aktaş R., Gruber A.G., 2011, Human Capital Heterogeneity and Organisational Performance Analysis: An Empirical Study about International Hotel Chains in Turkey, “Emerging Markets Journal”, 2.
• 22. Kraaijenbrink J., Spender J.C., 2011, Theories of the Firm and their Value Creation Assumptions, Annual International Conference of the Strategic Management Society, US.
• 23. Lau Y.W., Tong C.Q., 2008, Are Malaysian Government Linked Companies (GLCs) creating value? International Applied Economics and Management Letters, 1(1).
• 24. Lawson B., Samson D., 2001, Developing innovation capability in organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach, “International Journal of Innovation Management”, 5(3).
• 25. Leung S.O., 2011, A Comparison of Psychometric Properties and Normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-Point Likert Scales, “Journal of Social Service Research”, 37(4).
• 26. Martins T.S., Kato H.T., Martins R.D.R.R., da Silva E.D., 2014, An analytical framework for miles and snow typology and dynamic capabilities, Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 13(1).
• 27. Massingham P.R., Tam L., 2015, The relationship between human capital, value creation and employee reward, “Journal of Intellectual Capital”, 16(2).
• 28. McKinsey, 2010, Creating more value with corporate strategy. Available at: https://www.coursehero.com/file/16377016/Creating-Value-with-Corporate-Strategy-McKinsey-1101pdf/
• 29. Miller R., Floricel S., 2004, Value creation and games of innovation, Research-Technology Management, 47(6).
• 30. MINDA (Malaysian Directors Academy), 2009, Mid-Term Progress Review: GLCs are Much More Resilient and Focused on Catalysing Growth and Realising the Programme’s 2015 Aspirations, July(2).
• 31. Mintzberg H., 1973, Strategy making in three modes, California Management Review, 16(2).
• 32. OECD, 2013, Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing.
• 33. Pallant J., 2010, SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, Maidenhead.
• 34. Perrini F., Tencati A., 2006, Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15.
• 35. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.Y., Podsakoff N.P., 2003, Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, “Journal of Applied Psychology”, 88(5).
• 36. Porter M.E., 1980, Competitive Strategy, The Free Press, New York.
• 37. Prahalad C.K., Ramaswamy V., 2004, Co-creating unique value with customers, Strategy and Leadership, 32(3).
• 38. Rohrbeck R., Schwarz J.O., 2013, The value contribution of strategic foresight: Insights from an empirical study of large European companies, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80.
• 39. Sanders N.R., Premus R., 2005, Modeling the relationship between firm IT capability, collaboration, and performance, “Journal of Business Logistics”, 26(1).
• 40. Schilke O., 2014, On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect for environmental dynamism, “Strategic Management Journal”, 35.
• 41. Schilke O., Goerzen A., 2010, Alliance Management Capability: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement, “Journal of Management”, 36(5).
• 42. Schreiner M., Kale P., Corsten D., 2009, What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success? “Strategic Management Journal”, 30(13).
• 43. Sekaran U., Bougie R., 2013, Research Methods for Business (6th ed.), John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
• 44. Slater S.F., Olson E.M., Hult G.T.M., 2006, The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship, “Strategic Management Journal”, 27.
• 45. Song M., Droge C., Hanvanich S., Calantone R., 2005, Marketing and technology resource complementarity: an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts, “Strategic Management Journal”, 26(3).
• 46. Spraakman G., O’Grady W., Askarany D., Akroyd C., 2018, ERP systems and management accounting: New understandings through “nudging” in qualitative research, “Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change”, 14(2).
• 47. Sulphey M.M., Alkahtani N.S., 2017, Organizational ambidexterity as a prelude to corporate sustainability, “Journal of Security and Sustainability”, 7(2).
• 48. The Star, 2017, GLCs must operate with accountability and integrity. Available at: https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/columnists/the-star-says/2017/08/02/glcs-must-operate-with-accountability-and-integrity/
• 49. Ting I.W.K., Lean H.H., 2012, Capital structure of government-linked companies in Malaysia, “Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance”, 7(2).
• 50. Toms S., 2010, Value, profit and risk: accounting and the resource-based view of the firm, “Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal”, 23(5).
• 51. Trkman P., 2010, The critical success factors of business process management, “International Journal of Information Management”, 30(2).
• 52. Wonyra K.O., 2018, Impact of Telecommunications Market Liberalization on Labor Productivity in Economic Community of West African States, “Journal of Social Economics Research”, 5(2).
• 53. Wonyra K.O., 2018, Industrialization and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Role of Human Capital in Structural Transformation, “Journal of Empirical Studies”, 5(1).
• 54. Yamaguchi M., 2018, Are Foreign Banks in China Homogenous?: Classification of their Business Patterns, “Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research”, 3(1).
• 55. Zhang Y., Fu M., Xu T., 2018, Impacts of regional and global financial crises on employment cycles and industrial structures: a case study of cities in the Pearl River Delta, Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(6).
• 56. Zhu Y., Ge J., Wang X., Xu Z., 2018, Feature Analysis of Ship Emission Under China’s ECA Policy: A Perspective from Shanghai, “International Journal of Management and Sustainability”, 7(3).
• 57. Zikmund W.G., 2003, Business Research Methods (7th ed.), Ohio: Thompson South western.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).