Wear of a rough disc in dry sliding contact with a smooth ball: experiment and modeling

• Autorzy: Dzierwa Andrzej , Pawlus Paweł

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-021-00240-4

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main objective of this work is to model wear of a disc which was subjected to dry contact with a ball in unidirectional sliding. Tribological tests of sliding pairs were carried out using a tribological tester T-11 in a ball-on disc configuration. Stationary balls made of 100Cr6 steel with a hardness of 62 ± 2 HRC co-acted with rotating discs with 42CrMo4 steel with a hardness of 40 ± 2HRC. Discs were machined by lapping, grinding, milling, and vapour blasting. The values of the Sq parameter of disc surfaces were between 0.1 and 5.86 µm. Wear volumes of the discs were lower for bigger roughness heights. The simulation of disc wear was conducted on the basis of the repetitive contact between sliding surfaces. Strong correlation was achieved between the modeled and measured volumetric wear levels.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

friction; wear; surface texture; contact; modeling

PL

tarcie; zużycie; struktura powierzchni; modelowanie

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 21, no. 2
• Strony: 732--751
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Dzierwa Andrzej

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Powstancow Warszawy 8 Av., 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4545-1748

autor

Pawlus Paweł

• Rzeszow University of Technology, Powstancow Warszawy 8 Av., 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-5300

Bibliografia

• [1] Pawlus P, Reizer R, Wieczorowski M. A review of methods of random surface topography modeling. Tribol. Int. 2020;152:106530.
• [2] Thomas TR. Computer simulation of wear. Wear. 1972;22:84–90.
• [3] Stout KJ, King TG, Whitehouse DJ. Analytical techniques in surface topography and their application to a running-in experiment. Wear. 1977;43(1):99–115.
• [4] Stout KJ, Davis EJ, Sullivan PJ. Atlas of machined surfaces. London: Chapman and Hall; 1990.
• [5] Mathia TG, Zahouani T, Schissler JM, Rakowski W. Analysis of cylinder bores-the relationship between metallurgical structure, manufacture and wear characterization. Proc Int Cong Tribol. 1993;4:311–6.
• [6] Rosén BG, Ohlsson R, Thomas TR. Wear of cylinder bore microtopography. Wear. 1996;198:271–9.
• [7] Jeng YR, Gao CC. Changes of surface topography during wear for surfaces with different height distribution. J Tribol. 2000;43:749–57.
• [8] Sugimura J, Kimura Y, Amino K. Analysis of the topography changes due to wear-geometry of the running-in process. J Jpn Soc Lubr Eng. 1986;31(11):813–20.
• [9] Thomas TR. Rough Surfaces. London: Imperial College Press; 1999.
• [10] Pawlus P. Simulation of stratified surface topographies. Wear. 2008;264:457–63.
• [11] Nonogaki M, Morimoto T, Nakahara T. Method of determination of truncation parameters from measured surface profile. Tribol Int. 2003;36(10):745–52.
• [12] Hu S, Huang W, Brunetiere N, Liu X. Truncated separation method for characterizing and reconstructing bi-Gaussian stratified surfaces. Friction. 2017;5(1):32–44.
• [13] Hu S, Brunetiere N, Huang W, Liu X, Wang Y. Bi-Gaussian surface identification and reconstruction with revised autocorrelation functions. Tribol Int. 2017;110:185–94.
• [14] Hu S, Huang W, Shi X, Peng Z, Liu X, Wang Y. Multi-Gaussian stratified modeling and characterization of multi-process surfaces. Tribol Lett. 2018;66:117.
• [15] Pawlus P, Michalski J. Simulation of cylinder ‘zero-wear’ process. Wear. 2009;266:208–13.
• [16] Krzyzak Z, Pawlus P. Piston skirt surface topography modelling during a low wear process. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J-J Eng Tribol. 2011;225:229–41.
• [17] Reizer R, Galda L, Dzierwa A, Pawlus P. Simulation of textured surface topography during a low wear process. Tribol Int. 2011;44(11):1309–19.
• [18] Jiang J, Arnell RD. On the running-in behaviour of diamond-like carbon coatings under the ball-on-disk contact geometry. Wear. 1998;217(2):190–9.
• [19] Bortoleto EM, Rovani AC, Seriacopi V, Profito FJ, Zachariadis DC, Machado IF, Sinatora A, Souza RM. Experimental and numerical analysis of dry contact in the pin on disc test. Wear. 2013;301(1–2):19–26.
• [20] Ilincic S, Vernes A, Vorlaufer G, Hunger H, Dörr N, Franek F. Numerical estimation of wear in reciprocating tribological experiments. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J-J Eng Tribol. 2014;227(5):510–9.
• [21] Hegadekatte V, Kurzenhäuser S, Huber N, Kraft O. A predictive modeling scheme for wear in tribometers. Tribol Int. 2008;41(11):1020–31.
• [22] Kucharski S, Mróz Z. Identification of wear process parameters in reciprocating ball-on-disc tests. Tribol Int. 2011;44(2):154–64.
• [23] Akbarzadeh S, Khonsari MM. On the prediction of running-in behavior in mixed-lubrication line contact. J Tribol. 2010;132(3):032102–11.
• [24] Dzierwa A, Pawlus P, Zelasko W, Reizer R. The study of the tribological properties of one-process and two-process textures after vapour blasting and lapping using pin-on-disc tests. Key Eng Mater. 2013;527:217–22.
• [25] Sedlacek M, Podgornik B, Vizintin J. Correlation between standard roughness parameters skewness and kurtosis and tribological behaviour of contact surfaces. Tribol Int. 2012;48:102–12.
• [26] Sedlacek M, Podgornik B, Vizintin J. Inf luence of surface preparation on roughness parameters, friction and wear. Wear. 2009;266:482–7.
• [27] Sahlin F, Almqvit A, Larsson G, Almqvis A, Lugt PM, Marklund P. A mixed lubrication model incorporating measured surface topography. Part I: Theory of flow factors. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J-J Eng Tribol. 2010;224:335–49.
• [28] Wang WZ, Wang H, Liu YC, Hu YZ, Zhu D. A comparative study of the methods for calculation of surface elastic deformation. Inst Mech Eng Part J-J Eng Tribol. 2003;217(2):145–54.
• [29] Jamari J, Schipper DJ. Deformation due to contact between a rough surface and a smooth ball. Wear. 2007;262:138–45.