The influence of standing vegetation height on the reproductive allocation In populations of Serratula tinctoria L. (Asteraceae)

• Autorzy: Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt K. , Bąba W.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The advantage of the clonal plants over the nonclonal species in colonization of all biomes and biogeographical regions primarily is due to occurrence of two modes of reproduction. The creating of vegetative propagules with high vitality and survivability, enables the spread in the newly colonized site, while seed production increases the chances for successful recruitment of seedlings, ensuring the genetic diversity of the population. The differences in allocation into vegetative reproduction and generative propagation in relation to rising height of adjacent plants was investigated in populations of Serratula tinctoria L., occurring in Molinietum caeruleae meadows localized in Southern Poland. Each locality was represented by randomly established three permanent study plots: dominated by small meadow species (LOW), prevailed by large-tussock grasses (INTER) and overgrown by shrubs and trees (HIGH). In the years 2009–2011 the number of leaf rosettes and length of the longest leaf in rosette (as a measure of allocation in vegetative propagation), as well as height of generative stems, number of capitula per stem and number of seeds per capitulum (as indicators of investment in generative reproduction) were observed. The allocation in vegetative reproduction decreased along the gradient of vegetation height. The gradually decline of number of rosettes might be caused by lack of free space suitable for establishment of new ramets, whereas the small leaf size could be due to drastically augmentation of shading. The allocation in generative reproduction increased along the gradient of vegetation height. The placement of structures necessary for generative propagation in higher layers of herbaceous canopy, as well as considerable number of capitula and seed production might increase the chances for successful recruitment of seedlings. On the basis of obtained results combining with published data it should be assumed, that the substantial allocation in vegetative reproduction and the slight investment in generative propagation seems to be sufficient for persistence of Serratula tinctoria populations in patches dominated by small meadow species, while the considerable allocation in generative reproduction could be crucial for maintenance of population viability under competitive conditions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

allocation; flowering stem; leaf rosette; capitulum; seed production; Serratula tinctoria; vegetation height

PL

rozmieszczenie; rozkwit; rozeta liściowa; produkcja nasion; Sierpik barwierski

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 62, nr 1
• Strony: 89--99
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 75 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt K.

• Department of Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland

autor

Bąba W.

• Department of Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Kraków, Poland,

Bibliografia

• 1. Bąba W., Kurowska M., Kompała-Baba A., Wilczek A., Długosz J., Szarejko I. 2011 – Genetic diversity of Brachypodium pinnatum metapopulation in the Cracow Upland (In: Advances in grass biosystematics, Ed: L. Frey) – W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, pp. 46–56.
• 2. Bąba W., Kurowska M., Kompała-Baba A., Wilczek A., Długosz J., Szarejko I. 2012a – Genetic diversity of the expansive grass Brachypodium pinnatum in a changing landscape: Effect of habitat age – Flora, 207: 346–353.
• 3. Bąba W., Kurowska M., Kompała-Baba A., Wilczek A., Długosz J., Szarejko I. 2012b – Genetic diversity of populations of Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) P. Beauv.: expan¬sive grass in a fragmented landscape – Pol. J. Ecol. 60: 31–40.
• 4. Bischoff A. 2002 – Dispersal and establishment of floodplain grassland species as limiting factors in restoration – Biol. Conserv. 104: 25–33.
• 5. Bischoff A., Warthemann G., Klotz S. 2009 – Succesion of floodplain grasslands following reduction in land use intensity: the importance of environmental conditions, management and dispersal – J. Appl. Ecol. 46: 241–249
• 6. Bissels S., Hölzel N., Otte A. 2004 – Population structure of the threatened perennial Serratula tinctoria in relation to vegetation and management – Appl. Veg. Sci. 7: 267–274.
• 7. Bissels S., Donath T.W., Hölzel N., Otte A. 2006 – Effects of different mowing regimes on seedling recruitment in alluvial grasslands – Basic and Appl. Ecol. 7 (5): 433–442.
• 8. Bzdon G., Ciosek M.T. 2006 – Fen orchid Liparis loeselii (L.) Rich. in abandoned gravel-pit in Dąbrówka Stany near Siedlce (Poland) – Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 1–2: 193–195.
• 9. Chaloupecká E., Lepš J. 2004 – quivalence of competitor effects and tradeoff between vegetative multiplication and generative reproduction: case study with Lychnis flos-cuculi and Myosotis nemorosa – Flora, 199:157–167.
• 10. Coelho F.F., Deboni L., Lopes F.S. 2005 – Density-dependent reproductive and vegetative allocation in the aquatic plant Pistia stratioides (Araceae) – Int. J. of Tropical Biol. 53: 369–376.
• 11. Cookson S.J., Van Lijsebettens M., Granier C. 2005 – Correlation between leaf growth variables suggest intrinsic and early controls of leaf size in Arabidopsis thaliana – Plant Cell Environ. 28: 1355–1366.
• 12. Cookson S.J., Granier Ch. 2006 – A dynamic analysis of the shade-induced plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana rosette leaf development reveals new components of the shade-adaptative response – Ann Bot. 97: 443–452.
• 13. Colling G., Matthies D., Reckinger C. 2002 – Population structure and establishment of the threatened long-lived perennial Scorzonera humilis in relation to environment – J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 310–320.
• 14. Colling G. 2005 – Red List of Vascular Plants of Luxembourg – Ferrantia. Trav. Scientif. Mus. Hist. Nat. Lux. 42: 1–77.
• 15. Curtis T.G.F., McGough H.N. 1988 – The Irish Red Data Book – Published by Stationary Office, Dublin, 80 pp.
• 16. Davis M.A. 1992 – The effects of pocket gophers on survivorship, growth and reproduction of large beardtongue (In: Proceedings of the Twelve North American Prairie Conference, Eds: D.D. Smith, C.A. Jacobs) – University of Northrn Iowa Press, Cedar Falls IA, pp. 47–49.
• 17. Davis M.A., Ritchie B., Graf N., Gregg K. 1995 – An experimental study of the effects of shade, conspecific crowding, pocket gophers and surrounding vegetation on survivorship, growth and reproduction in Penstemon grandiflorus – Am. Midl. Nat. 134: 237–243.
• 18. Den Virtuella Floran 1996 – Ängsskära Serratula tinctoria L. – http://linnaeus.nrm.se/flora/welcome.html, available: 18 August 2012) (in Swedish).
• 19. Denisiuk Z. 1987 – O ochronę nadwiślińskich łak w Krakowie [Let us safeguarded the riverside meadows along the Vistula in Cracov] – Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 43: 22–31 (in Polish with English summary).
• 20. Denisiuk Z., Korzeniak J., Płecha R. 1995 – Godne ochrony łąki w Opatkowicach pod Krakowem [Meadows in Opatkowice near Cracov deserze protection] – Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 51: 30–35 (in Polish with English summary).
• 21. Dubiel E. 1991 – Mapa roślinności rzeczywistej miasta Krakowa [Map of the actual vegetation of the city Cracov] – Zesz. Nauk. UJ, Prace Bot. 958: 121– 133 (in Polish with English summary).
• 22. Dubiel E. 1996 – Łąki Krakowa. Część I: Klasa Molinio-Arrhenatheretea [Meadows in Cracov. Part I: Molinio-Arrhenatheretea class] – Studia Ośr. Dok. Fizjogr. PAN, 24: 145–171 (in Polish).
• 23. Ellstrand N.C., Roose, M.L. 1987 – Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species – Am. J. Bot. 74: 123–131.
• 24. Eriksson O. 1989 – Seedling dynamics and life histories in clonal plants – Oikos, 55: 231–238.
• 25. Falińska K. 2002 – Przewodnik do badań biologii populacji roślin [Guidebook to research in plant population biology] – Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa, 586 pp. (in Polish).
• 26. Falińska K., Lembicz M., Jarmołowski A., Borkowska L. 2010 – Patterns of genetic diversity in populations of Filipendula ulmaria (L.) at different stages of succession on a meadow abandoned for 30 years – Pol. J. Ecol. 58: 27–40.
• 27. Gardner S.N., Mangel M. 1999 – Modeling investments in seeds, clonal offspring, and translocation in a clonal plant – Ecology, 80: 1202–1220.
• 28. Grime J.P., Mason, G., Curtis, A.A., Rodman, J., Band, S.R., Mowforth, M.A.G., Neal, A.M. and Shaw, S. 1981 – A comparative study of germination characteristics in a local flora – J. of Ecology, 69: 1017–1059.
• 29. Hegi G. 1987 – Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa: Pterodophyta, Spermatophyta, Com¬positae II: Matricaria-Hieracium VI – Parey, Berlin, Hamburg, DE
• 30. Hollingsworth M.L., Bailey J.P. 2000 – Evidence for massive clonal growth in the invasive weed Fallopia japonica (Japanese Knotweed) – Bot. J. of the Linnean Society, 133: 463–472.
• 31. Hölzel N., Otte A. 2004a – Ecological significance of germination characteristics in flood-meadow species – Flora, 199: 12–24.
• 32. Hölzel N., Otte A. 2004b – Assessing soil seed bank persistence in flood meadows: The search for reliable traits – J. Veg. Sci. 15: 93– 100.
• 33. Holub J., Proházka F. 2000 – Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic – Preslia, 72: 167–186 (In Czech).
• 34. Hultén E., Fries M. 1986 – Atlas of North European vascular plants north of the Tropic of Cancer III – Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein, Germany.
• 35. Ikegami M., Whigham D.F., Werger M.J.A. 2004 – Density effects on seed and vegetative propagation of Scirpus olneyi A. Gray (In: Functional specialization of ramets in a clonal plant network, Ed: M. Ikegami) – Proefschrift Universiteit, Utrecht, pp. 41–52.
• 36. Janečková P., Votavová K., Schödelbauerová I., Jersáková J., Kindlmann P. 2006 – Relative effects of management and environmental conditions on performance and sur¬vival of populations of a terrestrial orchid, Dactylorhiza majalis – Biol. Conserv. 129: 40–49.
• 37. Jongejans E., de Vere N., de Kroon H. 2008 – Demographic vulnerability of the clonal and endangered meadow thistle – Plant Ecol. 198: 225–240.
• 38. Klimešová J. & Klimeš L. 2012 – Clo-Pla3 – database of clonal growth of plants from Cen¬tral Europe. http://clopla.butbn.cas.cz/ (available: 18 August 2012).
• 39. Klimešová J., Hendriks R., van Groenendael J. 1997 – Clonal plant architecture: a comparative analysis of form and function (In: The ecology and evolution of clonal plants, Eds: H. de Kroon, J. van Groenendael) – Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherland, pp. 1–29.
• 40. Kosiński I, Stefanowicz-Hajduk J., Ochocka R. 2009 – Demographic versus genetic (RAPD) variation between two populations of the clonal plant Paris quadrifolia L. (Liliaceae) – Pol. J. Ecol. 57: 303–311.
• 41. Kostrakiewicz K. 2007 – The effect of dominant species on numbers and age structure of Iris sibirica L. population on blue moor-grass meadow in southern Poland – Acta Bot. Soc. Pol. 76: 165–173.
• 42. Kostrakiewicz K. 2008 – Population structure of a clonal endangered plant species Iris sibirica L. in different habitat conditions – Pol. J. Ecol. 56: 581–592.
• 43. Kostrakiewicz K., Wróblewska A. 2008 – Low genetic variation in subpopulations of an endangered clonal plant Iris sibirica in southern Poland – Ann. Bot. Fen. 45: 186–194.
• 44. Kostrakiewicz K. 2009 – The influence of shadow created by adjacent plants on phenotypic plasticity of endangered species Trollius europaeus (Ranunculaceae) – Pol. J. Ecol. 57: 625–634.
• 45. Kostrakiewicz K. 2011 – The effect of gaps size on colonization process in Molinietum caeruleae meadows – Pol.J. Ecol. 59: 677–686.
• 46. Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt K. 2013a – The structure of ramets in Dianthus superbus L. in mosaic meadow vegetation – Acta Agrobot. 66 (3): 23-30.
• 47. Kostrakiewicz-Gierałt K. 2013b – The ef¬fect of vegetation character on abundance and structure of subpopulations of rare herb species Gentiana pneumonanthe L. – Pol. J. Ecol. 61: 35–46.
• 48. Kotorová I., Lepš J. 1999 – Comparative ecology of seedlings recruitment in an oligortrophic wet meadow – J. Veg. Sci 10: 175–186.
• 49. Kubikova P., Zeidler M. 2011 – Habitat demands and population characteristiks of the rare plant species Gladiolus imbricatus L. in the Frenštát region (NE Moravia, the Czech Republik) – Čas. Slez. Muz. Opava, 60: 154–164.
• 50. Lei S.A. 2010 – Benefits and costs of vegetative and sexual reproduction in perennial plants: a review of literature – Journal of the Arizona- Nevada Academy of Science, 42: 9–14.
• 51. Li W., Wang B., Wang J. 2006 – Lack of genetic variation of an invasive clonal plant Eichhornia crassipes in China revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers – Aquatic Botany, 84: 176– 180.
• 52. Loechle C. 1987 – Partitioning of reproductive effort in clonal plants: a benefit-cost model – Oikos, 49: 199–208.
• 53. Moser D., Gygax A., Bäumler B., Wyler N., Palese R. 2002 – Liste Rouge des fougères et plantes à fleurs menacées de Suisse – Office fédéral de l’environnement, des forêts et du paysage, Berne, Centre du Réseau Suisse de Floristique, Chambésy, Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève, Chambésy. Série OFEFP “L’environnement pratique”, 118 pp.
• 54. Müller-Schneider P. 1986 – Verbreitungsbiologie der Blütenpflanzen Graübundens – Veröff. Geobot. Inst. Eidg. Tech. Hochsch. Rübel Zür, 85: 1–263.
• 55. Nishitani S., Takada T., Kachi N. 1999 – Optima resorce allocation to seeds and veg-etative propagules under density-dependent regulation in Syneilesis palmata (Compositae) – Plant Ecol. 141: 179–189.
• 56. Obeso 2002 – The costs of reproduction in plants – New Phytologist, 155: 321–348.
• 57. Pollux B.J., Jong M.D., Steegh A., Verbruggen E., van Groenendael J.M., Ouborg N.J. 2007 – Reproductive strategy, clonal structure and genetic diversity in populations of the aquatic macrophyte Sparganium emersum in river systems – Mol Ecol. 16: 313–25.
• 58. R Development Core Team 2012 – R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL http://www.R-project.org/.
• 59. Rautiainen P., Koivula K., Hyvarinen M. 2004 – The effect of within-genet and between genet competition on sexual reproduction and vegetative spread in Potentilla anserina ssp egedii – J. Ecol. 92: 505–511.
• 60. Reisch Ch., Schurm S., Poschlod P. 2007 – Spatial genetic structure and clonal diversity in an alpine population of Salix herbacea (Salicaceae) –Ann Bot. 99: 647–651.
• 61. Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 5 stycznia 2012 r. w sprawie ochrony gatunkowej roślin [Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 5 January 2012 on the plant species protection.] – Dz. U. z 2012 r., poz. 81.
• 62. Schautzer J., Fichtner A., Huckauf A., Rasran L., Jensen K. 2011 – Long-term population dynamics of Dactylorhiza incarnata (L.) Soó after abandonment and re-introduction of mowing – Flora, 206: 622–630.
• 63. Silvertown J. 2008 – The evolutionary maintenance of sexual reproduction: evidence from the ecological distribution of asexual reproduction in clonal plants – International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 157–168.
• 64. Stammel B., Kiehl K., Pfadenhauer J. 2006 – Effects of environmental and real land use on seedling recruitment of six fen species – Basic and Appl. Ecol. 7: 334–346.
• 65. Takada T., Nakajima H., 1996 – The optimal allocation for seed reproduction and vegetative reproduction in perennial plants: an application to the density-dependent transition matrix model – J. Theor. Biol. 182: 179–191.
• 66. van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Schmid B. 2000 – Costs of plasticity in foraging characteristics of the clonal plant Ranunculus reptans – Evolution, 54: 47–55.
• 67. van Kleunen M, Fischer M, Schmid B 2001 – Effects of intraspecific competition on size variation and reproductive allocation in a clonal plant – Oikos, 94: 515–524
• 68. Wang Y.J., Tao J.P., Zhong Z.C. 2009 – Factors influencing the distribution and growth of dwarf bamboo, Fargesia nitida, in a subalpine forest in Wolong Nature Reserve, southwest China – Ecol. Research, 24: 1013–1021.
• 69. Wilk J.A., Kramer A.T., Ashley M.V. 2009 – High variation in clonal vs. sexual reproduction in populations of the wild strawberry, Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae) – Ann. Bot. 104: 1413–1419.
• 70. Winkler E., Stöcklin J. 2002 – Sexual and vegetative reproduction of hieracium pilosella L. under competition and disturbance: a grid-based simulation model – Ann. Bot. 89: 525–536.
• 71. Wu G-L., Li W., Li X-P., Shi Z-H. 2011 – Grazing as a mediator for maintenance of offspring diversity: Sexual and clonal recruit¬ment in alpine grassland communities – Flora, 206: 241–245.
• 72. Young T.P. 1984 – The coparative demography of smelparous Lobelia telekii and iteroparous Lobelia kenensis on the Mount Kenia – J. Ecol. 72: 637–650.
• 73. Young T.P. 1985 – Lobelia telekii herbivory, mortality, and size at reproduction: variation with growth rate – Ecology, 66: 1879–1883.
• 74. Zhang Y., Zhang D. 2007 – Asexual and sexual reproductive strategies in clonal plants – Frontiers of Biology in China, 2: 253–262.
• 75. Zarzycki K. 1958 – Wilgotne łąki w okolicach Czernichowa i potrzeba ich ochrony [Humid meadows in the environments of Czernichów near Cracow deserving protection] – Ochr. Przyr. 25: 49–68 (in Polish, English summary).