Diversity of the influence of urbanisation on valuable nature areas according to selected features of the cities of Wielkopolska

• Autorzy: Zwierzchowska I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purpose of this study was to classify the cities of the voivodeship of Wielkopolska with regard to the diverse value of the natural environment of their surroundings and the intensity of urban pressure exerted on them. Two groups of factors were analysed. The first group included factors related to the value of the natural environment of the city surroundings within a 1 km wide belt along the administrative boundaries of cities. In regard to this the following features were taken into consideration: the surface area and share of protected areas, the surface area and share of ECONET-PL areas, CORINE biotopes sites and wildlife corridors connecting NATURE 2000 sites. In the second part of the analysis, which concerned the urban pressure, the following factors were analysed: the population density in the urban fabric, the surface area of land used for investment, land cover changes from open into investment areas between 1990 and 2000, and the density of roads. As a result of the research conducted, 4 types of spatial relationships between cities and valuable nature areas in the voivodeship of Wielkopolska were distinguished. Among the cities whose surroundings have a valuable natural environment it was the cities exerting the strongest pressure on the regional nature system that were identified as causing the most severe spatial interference in the region.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

city location; protected area; conflict; Wielkopolska

• Wydawca: Komisja Krajobrazu Kulturowego Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego
• Czasopismo: Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego
• Rocznik: 2008
• Tom: nr 8
• Strony: 61--73
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Zwierzchowska I.

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Science, Centre of Education in Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development

Bibliografia

• [1] Ahern J., 1995: Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning 33, p. 131-155.
• [2] Alberti M., Marzluff, J.M., 2004: Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems, 7, ss.241-265.
• [3] Andrzejewski R. 1986: Planowanie przestrzenne a środowisko przyrodnicze [Spatial planning and natural environment] [w:] Problemy ochrony i kształtowania środowiska przyrodniczego w planowaniu przestrzennym (red.): S. Kozłowski. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.
• [4] Beatley T., 2004: Land Development and Endangered Species:Emerging Conflicts [w:] The Sustainable Urban Development. Routledge (eds.): S.M. Wheeler, T. Beatley. London-New York.
• [5] Benedict M.A., McMahon, E.T., 2002: Green Infrastructure: Smart Conservation fo the 21st Century. Renewable Resources Journal 20 (3), p.12-17.
• [6] Breuste J., 2004: Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation with urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning 68, p. 439-452.
• [7] Colinge S.K., 1996: Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: Implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 36, p. 59-77.
• [8] EEA 1997 CORINE Biotopes Sites - Database Status and Perspectives 1995. Prepared by: Pinborg, U., Moss, D., Davies, C., Roy, D., European Environment Agency.
• [9] EEA 2001 Phare Topic Link and Nature conservation programme. Project: Strengthening Capacity in Accession Countries in Environmental Reporting Phare Topic Link on Nature Conservation.Corine biotopes polygon data.
• [10] EEA 2007 Dane CORINE Land Cover 2000 (CLC2000) 100 m - version 9/2007.
• [11] Geneletti D., 2004: Using spatial indicators and value functions to assess ecosystem fragmentation caused by linear infrastructures. International Journal of applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5, p. 1-15.
• [12] Główny Urząd Statystyczny, 2006. Regionalna Baza Danych.
• [13] Hough M., 2004: Cities and Natural Process: A Basis for Sustainability. Routledge, London.
• [14] Jędrzejewski W., Nowak, S., Stachura K., Skierczyński, M., Mysłajek, R.W., Niedziałkowski, K., Jędrzejewska, B., Wójcik, J.M., Zalewska, H., Pilot, M., 2005: Projekt korytarzy ekologicznych łączących Europejską Sieć Natura 2000 w Polsce. ZBS PAN, Białowieża.
• [15] Kozłowski S., 2002: Ocena zrównoważonego rozwoju (ekorozwoju) w procesie transformacji polskiej gospodarki. Ekspertyza. Zeszyty Naukowe PAN nr 30, Warszawa.
• [16] Liro A., 1995: Koncepcja krajowej sieci ekologicznej ECONET-POLSKA. Fundacja IUCN, Warszawa.
• [17] Makomska-Juchiewicz M., 2007: O ochronie różnorodności biologicznej [w:] Integralna ochrona Przyrody (red.): M. Grzegorczyk. Instytut Ochrony Przyrody PAN, Kraków, s. 55-68.
• [18] Mapa Geośrodowiskowa Polski, 2005 Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny, Warszawa.
• [19] Polski M., 2007: Systemowe Planowanie Przestrzenne a Ochrona Środowiska. Czasopismo Techniczne A, Architektura, z. 14 (104), ss.73-78.
• [20] Zimny H., 2005: Ekologia miasta. Agencja Reklamowo-Wydawnicza Arkadiusz Grzegorczyk, Warszawa.