Larval Habitat Preferences of Vanishing Butterfly Hipparchia semele L. : Surviving on Human-Altered Habitats in the Czech Republic, Central Europe

• Autorzy: Kadlec T. , Jakubikova L. , Herman P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.3161/15052249PJE2016.64.1.012

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The Grayling Hipparchia semele L. belongs to rapidly vanishing butterfly species in its central and western European range. We studied larval microhabitat preferences of two last viable populations of the Grayling in the Czech Republic. The field study was carried out at two types of human-influenced habitats: a fly ash deposit — a postindustrial site partly left under natural succession processes, and a semi-natural extensively grazed xeric calcareous grassland in May and June 2012 and 2013. During five nights, 89 caterpillars were found (fly ash deposit: 8, xeric grassland: 81). The caterpillars were found on steeper slopes covered with sparse shrubs and shorter herbaceous vegetation with high amount of bare soil or rocks. The most frequently observed behaviour was feeding on fine-leaf fescue grasses with varied size of tufts and rather smaller height up to 20 cm. Usage of larval preferences in a way of active conservation management application is discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

conservation management; larval ecology; post-industrial sites; satyrid butterflies; semi-natural grasslands

PL

zarządzanie ochroną; ekologia larwalna; tereny postindustrialne; tereny poprzemysłowe; motyle rodziny Satyridae; oczennicowate; półnaturalne łąki

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 64, nr 1
• Strony: 130--135
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kadlec T.

• Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 21 Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic

autor

Jakubikova L.

• Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 21 Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic

autor

Herman P.

• Czech Society for Butterfly and Moth Conservation, Solni 127, 383 01 Prachatice, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• [1] Beneš J. , Konvička M. , Dvořák J. , Fric Z. , Havelda Z. , Pavlíčko A. , Vrabec V. , Weidenhoffer Z. (eds.) 2002 — Motýli České republiky: rozšíření a ochrana I, II. [Butterflies of the Czech Republic: Distribution and conservation I, II.] — SOM, Praha, 857 pp. (in Czech and English).
• [2] Cahenzli F. , Erhardt A. 2012 — Enhancing offspring quality or quantity? Different ways for using nectar amino acids in female butterflies — Oecologia, 169: 1005–1014.
• [3] Čížek O. , Tropek R. , Kadlec T. , Šamata J. 2010 — Zhodnocení stavu populace kriticky ohroženého okáče metlicového (Hipparchia semele) na odkališti elektrárny Tušimice [Population assessment of the critically endangered Grayling (Hipparchia semele) at ash deposit from Tusimice Power Station] — Regional Authority of the Usti Region, Ústí nad Labem, 44 pp. (in Czech).
• [4] Dennis R. L. H. , Shreeve T. G. , Sparks T. H. 1998 — The effects of island area, isolation and source population size on the presence of the grayling butterfly Hipparchia semele (L.) (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) on British and Irish offshore islands — Biodivers. Conserv. 7: 765–776.
• [5] Dostálek J. , Frantík T. 2008 — Dry grassland plant diversity conservation using low-intensity sheep and goat grazing management: case study in Prague (Czech Republic) — Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 1439–1454.
• [6] ESRI 2011 — ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10 — Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlans, California.
• [7] Farkač J. , Král D. , Škorpík M. (eds.) 2005 — Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky. Bezobratlí. List of threatened species in the Czech Republic. Invertebrates — Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha, 760 pp. (in Czech, English summary).
• [8] Fox R. , Warren M. S. , Brereton T. M. , Roy D. B. , Robinson A. 2011 — A new red list of British butterflies — Insect Conserv. Diver. 4: 159–172.
• [9] Jakubíková L. 2012 — Autekologie kriticky ohroženého okáče metlicového (Hipparchia semele L.) v CHKO Český kras [Autecology of critically endangered Grayling (Hipparchia semele L.) in Bohemian Karst PLA] — Thesis — Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 56 pp. (in Czech, English summary).
• [10] Janíková E. , Kulfan J. , Zach P. 2009 — Is the Great Banded Grayling [Brintesia circe (Fabricius 1775)] (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) a stenotopic species? — Linzer Biol. Beitr. 41: 691–696.
• [11] Joy J. 1996 — The larval habitats of the Grayling butterfly Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Satyridae) at inland lead mine sites in Shropshire — Entomol. Gaz. 47: 139–142.
• [12] Kadlec T. , Vrba P. , Konvicka M. 2009 — Microhabitat requirements of the critically endangered butterfly Chazara briseis (L.) (Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) in the Czech Republic — Nota Lepid. 32: 39–46.
• [13] Karlsson B. , Wiklund C. 2005 — Butterfly life history and temperature adaptations; dry open habitats select for increased fecundity and longevity — J. Anim. Ecol. 74: 99–104.
• [14] Kohler F. , Gillet F. , Gobat J. M. , Buttler A. 2006 — Effect of cattle activities on gap colonization in mountain pastures — Folia Geobot. 41: 289–304.
• [15] Kudrna O. , Harpke A. , Lux K. , Pennerstorfer J. , Schweiger O. , Settele J., Wiemers M. 2011 — Distribution atlas of butterflies in Europe — Gesellschaft für Schmetterlingsschutz, Halle, 576 pp.
• [16] Kulfan J. , Štrbová E. , Zach P. 2012 — Effect of vegetation and management on occurrence of larvae and adults of generalist Maniola jurtina L. (Lepidoptera) in meadow habitats — Pol. J. Ecol. 60: 601–608.
• [17] Leopold P. 2007 — Larvalökologie der Rostbinde Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758; Lepidoptera, Satyrinae) in Nordrhein-Westfalen: die Notwendigkeit raumzeitlicher Störungsprozesse für den Arterhalt [Larval ecology of the Grayling Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758, Lepidoptera, Satyrinae) in North Rhine- Westphalia: the necessity of spatio-temporal disturbances for species conservation] — Abrhandlungen aus dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde, 69: 1–146 (in German).
• [18] Maes D. , Van Dyck H. 2001 — Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe´s worst case scenario? — Biol. Conserv. 99: 263–276.
• [19] Maes D. , Bonte D. 2006 — Using distribution patterns of five threatened invertebrates in a highly fragmented dune landscape to develop a multispecies conservation approach — Biol. Conserv. 133: 490–499.
• [20] Möllenbeck V. , Hermann G. , Fartmann T. 2009 — Does prescribed burning mean a threat to the rare satyrine butterfly Hipparchia fagi? Larval-habitat preferences give the answer — J. Insect Conserv. 13: 77–87.
• [21] R Core Team 2013 — R: A language and environment for statistical computing — R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
• [22] Snep R. P. H. , WallisDeVries M. F. , Opdam P. 2011 — Conservation where people work: A role for business districts and industrial areas in enhancing endangered butterfly populations? — Landscape Urban. Plan. 103: 94–101.
• [23] Ter Braak C. J. F. , Šmilauer P. 1998 — CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4) — Centre for Biometry Wageningen (Wageningen, NL) and Microcomputer Power (Ithaca NY, USA), 352 pp.
• [24] Tolasz R. (ed.) 2007 — Atlas podnebí Česka [Climate atlas of Czechia] — Český hydrometeorologický ústav — Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Praha — Olomouc, 360 pp. (in Czech).
• [25] Tropek R. , Cerna I. , Straka J. , Kocarek P. , Malenovsky I. , Tichanek F. , Sebek P. 2015 (in press) — In search for a compromise between biodiversity conservation and human health protection in restoration of fly ash deposits: effect of anti-dust treatments on five groups of arthropods — Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
• [26] Vankova J. , Kovar P. 2004 — Plant species diversity in the biotopes of un-reclaimed industrial deposits as artificial islands in landscape (In: Natural Recovery of Human-Made Deposits in Landscape (Biotic Interactions and Ore/ Ash-Slag Artificial Ecosystems), Ed: P. Kovar ) — Academia, Prague, pp. 30–45.
• [27] Van Swaay C. , Cuttelod A. , Collins S. , Maes D. , López Munguira M. , Šašić M. , Settele J. , Verovnik R. , Verstrael T. , Warren M. , Wiemers M. , Wynhof I. 2010 — European red list of butterflies — Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 47 pp.
• [28] Wermeille E. , Chittaro Y. , Gonseth Y. 2014 — Rote liste der Tagfalter und Widderchen. Gefährdete Arten der Schweiz, Stand 2012 [Red list of butterflies and burnet moths. Threatened species in Switzerland, Status 2012] — Bundesamt für Umwelt, Bern, und Schweizer Zentrum für die Kartografie der Fauna, Neuenburg, 97 pp (in German).
• [29] Wiklund C. 1984 — Egg-laying patterns in butterflies in relation to their phenology and the visual apparency and abundance of their host plants — Oecologia, 63: 23–29.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.