Simulations in orthopedics and rehabilitation - Part 2: Computer simulations

• Autorzy: Dygut J. , Piwowar P. , Gołda M. , Popławski K. , Jakubas R. , Gonzales G. , Piwowar M.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/bams-2016-0022

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Simulations in medicine have already become the mainstream trend in the field of research and education. It includes simulations on simulators through which students are afforded the opportunity to train manual skills as well as series of simulations that enable one to train not just motor and manual skills alone. Some of these offer the student the basis to train decision-making process and conduct experiments that visualize biological phenomena that are important from a doctor’s perspective. The authors have done a review of medical computer simulations and found that simulations in medicine focus, in respect of the issues raised, on techniques and computer science aspects. The first one is discussed in the paper “Simulations in orthopedics and rehabilitation – Part I: Simulators.” The second one is discussed in this paper. In the paper, the authors focus on computer simulations, in the broadest sense, presenting them while taking into consideration the distinction between simulations used for the following purposes: test (conducted under laboratory conditions), training (incorporated into school, universities syllabus), and diagnostic and therapeutic (within the hospital, clinics, private medical practice).

Słowa kluczowe

EN

simulation; medicine; orthopedics; rehabilitation; simulator

• Wydawca: Uniwersytet Jagielloński - Collegium Medicum ; Index Copernicus Sp. z o.o.
• Czasopismo: Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 12, no. 4
• Strony: 159--168
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., zdj.

Twórcy

autor

Dygut J.

• Hospital in Przemyśl, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Piwowar P.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Department of Measurements and Electronic, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

autor

Gołda M.

• Non-public Health Care Facility RehStabul. Piłsudskiego 53, 34-600 Limanowa, Poland

autor

Popławski K.

• Hospital in Przemyśl, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Jakubas R.

• Hospital in Przemyśl, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Gonzales G.

• Hospital in Przemyśl, Monte Cassino 18, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland

autor

Piwowar M.

• Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine, Jagiellonian University – Medical College, Łazarza 16, 31-530 Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Zadpoor AA. Open forward and inverse problems in theoretical modeling of bone tissue adaptation. J MechBehav Biomed Mater 2013;27:249–61.
• 2. Rzeciak ZB, Kalski KO, Owiński TO, Ałuśyńska KR, Orkowski PI. Przedoperacyjne i pooperacyjne planowanie zabiegu i jego rehabilitacja. Modelowanie Inżynierskie 2008;36:295–300.
• 3. Marra MA, Vanheule V, Fluit R, Koopman BH, Rasmussen J, Verdonschot N, et al. A subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling framework to predict in vivo mechanics of total knee arthroplasty. J BiomechEng 2015;137:020904.
• 4. Emergency Medicine Simulation Resources Online. 2016. http://www.emedu.org/sim/.
• 5. Working Model 2D – Design Simulation Technologies. 2016. http://www.design-imulation.com/wm2d/.
• 6. SIMWISE. 2016. https://www.design-simulation.com/SimWise4d/.
• 7. Oroń G. Wykorzystanie programów komputerowych w symulacji procesów biomechanicznych. Technol i Autom Montażu 2011;1:38–43.
• 8. Kwolek A. Rehabilitacja Medyczna. Tom 2, Wyd. II. Elsevier Urban & Partner; 2013. http://www.elsevier.pl/ksiazka/rehabilitacja-medyczna-tom-2-wyd-ii. Accessed 27 Dec 2014.
• 9. Biomet. 2016. http://www.biomet.com/mySignatureSolution/.
• 10. Cook DA, Erwin PJ, Triola MM. Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Acad Med 2010;85:1589–602.
• 11. Kufner J, Kononowicz AA, Hege I. Virtual patient repositories-a comparative analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform 2014;205:788–92.
• 12. Stangel-Wojcikiewicz K, Piwowar M, Migdał M, Skotniczny K. Virtual patient case: study of a urinary incontinence therapy procedure in a woman. Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 2014;10:151–7.
• 13. CASUS. 2016. https://krakow.casus.net.
• 14. Jacek D, Płonka S, Roterman-Konieczna I. Involvement of medical experts in legal proceedings: an e-learning approach. Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 2014;10:159–65.
• 15. Dygut J, Sylwia P. Student medical education with the real orthopedic case presented as interactive computer simulation. Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems 2015;11:59–67.
• 16. INNMEDIA Simulator. 2016. http://www.inmedea-simulator.net/.
• 17. Al-Hadithy N, Gikas PD, Al-Nammari SS. Smartphones in orthopaedics. IntOrthop 2012;36:1543–7.
• 18. medtube. 2016. http://medtube.pl/.
• 19. Diers. 2016. http://www.mediprofit.pl.
• 20. Adams. 2016. http://www.mscsoftware.com/product/adams.
• 21. Frank RM. Try before you buy: simulate, then operate. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2013;42:E48–50.
• 22. Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2016. http://www.ssih.org/.
• 23. Society in Europe for Simulation applied to Medicine. http://www.sesam-web.org/.
• 24. Olsztyn University Hospital, the Department of Medical Simulation.2016. http://www.uwm.edu.pl/wnm/.
• 25. Department of Bioinformatics and Telemedicine. 2016. http://www.bit.cm-uj.krakow.pl/en.