Expandable endoprosthesis for growing patients - Reliability and research

• Autorzy: Borkowski P. , Skalski K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1016/j.bbe.2014.05.005

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Nowadays expandable endoprosthesis for growing children is an alternative to amputation in the course of surgical treatment. Modern non-invasive endoprosthesis gives the possibility of elongation without a surgical operation. In the paper, the results of research with the application of computer technique in geometrical modelling are presented, as well as the design and manufacture in processing the medical images and experimental studies during an initial estimation of a new expandable prosthesis construction for growing patients, which will lead to the preparation for production and implantation processes in Poland.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

bone sarcoma; invasive expandable prosthesis; noninvasive expandable prosthesis; arthroplasty; reliability; preoperative planning

PL

mięsak kości; proteza; alloplastyka; niezawodność; planowanie przedoperacyjne

• Wydawca: Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Elsevier
• Czasopismo: Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 34, no. 4
• Strony: 199--205
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Borkowski P.

• Bialystok University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Materials and Biomedical Engineering, ul. Wiejska 45c, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland

autor

Skalski K.

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Production Engineering, Department of Machine Designed and Biomedical Engineering, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Balke M, Ahrens H, Streitbürger A, Gosheger G, Hardes J. Modular endoprosthetic reconstruction in malignant bone tumors: indications and limits. Treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas, II. Recent Results Cancer Res 2009;179: 39–50.
• [2] Bicels J, Witting JC, Kollender Y, Henshaw RM, Malawer MM. Distal femur resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;400:225–35.
• [3] Dotan A, et al. Expandable endoprosthesis for limb-sparing surgery in children: long-term results. J Child Orthop 2010;4 (5):391–400.
• [4] Henderson ER, Pepper AM, Marulanda GA, Millard Justin D, Letson GD. What is the emotional acceptance after limb salvage with an expandable prosthesis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468(11):2933–8.
• [5] Henderson ER, Pepper AM, Letson GD. What are estimated reimbursements for lower extremity prostheses capable of surgical and nonsurgical lengthening? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470(4):1194–203.
• [6] Kotz R, Windhager R, Dominkus M, Robioneck B, Müller- Daniels H. A self-extending pediatric leg implant. Nature 2000;406:143–4.
• [7] Krzakowski M. Clinical onkology. Children's solid tumours. Warsaw, Poland: PZWL; 2006.
• [8] Larysz D, Wolański W, Kawlewska E, Mandera M, Gzik M. Biomechanical aspects of preoperative planning of skull correction in children with craniosynostosis. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2012;14(2):19–26.
• [9] Malawer MM, Sugarbaker PH, editors. Musculoskeletal cancer surgery: treatment of sarcomas and allied diseases. Springer; 2001.
• [10] Piszczatowski S. Geometrical aspects of growth plate modelling using Carter's and Stokes's approaches. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2012;14(1):93–106.
• [11] Schwartz AJ, Kabo JM, Eilber FC, Eilber FR, Eckardt JJ. Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468 (8):2198–210.
• [12] Skalski K, Kwiatkowski K, Kedzior K, Cejmer W, Skoworodko J. Application of a CT/CAD/CAE system to preoperative planning and post-operative estimation of vertebroplasty. Proc 12th IFToMM World Congress; 2007.
• [13] Tkaczyk A, Borkowski P. Identification of bone tissue material properties on the basis of computer tomography images. 1st Congress of Polish Mechanics; 2007.
• [14] Woźniak W. Children's solid tumours. Clinical oncology. 1st ed. Warsaw: M. Krzakowski Borgis v.II; 2001. pp. 556–604.