PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Conception of 4-component architecture of information systems on example of Artificial Neural Networks

Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Konferencja
Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (16 ; 02-05.09.2021 ; online)
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Nowadays Information Systems (IS) become more and more distributed, complex, and heterogeneous. Such nature of IS make them or their components a Black Box. Although classical software operates according understandable logic, modern complex software often shows non-determinism in its operation. Artificial Intelligence (AI) based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) is an example of such systems. This paper considers IS architecture consisting of 4 components, one of which represents non-determinism as an "Machine Intuition". The architecture is derived from 3-tier computer architecture and based on psychological findings. This approach allowed building a simple and user/developer friendly model. Practical value of the architecture is concluded in ability to better understand, design, and develop the IS containing units with non-deterministic behavior, deal with AI overfitting, underfitting, and threat problems. Architecture and principles represented in this paper can be applied not only to AI/ANN but different IS types.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
159--166
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
  • Institute of Control Systems, Bakhtiyar Vahabzadeh str. 68, AZ1141, Baku, Azerbaijan
Bibliografia
  • 1. S. Fulton, “What is quantum computing today? The how, why, and when of a paradigm shift”, 2020, https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-quantum-computing-understanding-the-how-why-and-when-of-quantum-computers/, accessed on 19th April 2021.
  • 2. L. Ng, “The AI Wolf That Preferred Suicide Over Eating Sheep”, https://onezero.medium.com/the-ai-wolf-that-preferred-suicide-over-eating-sheep-49edced3c710, accessed in July, 2021.
  • 3. J. Lehman, J. Clune, D. Misevic, C. Adami, L. Altenberg, J. Beaulieu, P. Bentley, S. Bernard, G. Beslon, D. Bryson, N. Cheney, P. Chrabaszcz, A. Cully, S. Doncieux, F. Dyer, K. Ellefsen, R. Feldt, S. Fischer, S. Forrest, A. Fŕenoy, C. Gagńe, L. Goff, L. Grabowski, B. Hodjat, F. Hutter, L. Keller, C. Knibbe, P. Krcah, R. Lenski, H. Lipson, R. MacCurdy, C. Maestre, R. Miikkulainen, S. Mitri, D. Moriarty, J. Mouret, A. Nguyen, C. Ofria, M. Parizeau, D. Parsons, R. Pennock, W. Punch, T. Ray, M. Schoenauer, E. Schulte, K. Sims, K. Stanley, F. Taddei, D. Tarapore, S. Thibault, R. Watson, W. Weimer, J. Yosinski, “The Surprising Creativity of Digital Evolution: A Collection of Anecdotes from the Evolutionary Computation and Artificial Life Research Communities”, Artif Life, 26 (2), pp. 274-306, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1162/artl_a_00319.
  • 4. L. Yaeger, “Computational genetics, physiology, metabolism, neural systems, learning, vision, and behavior or PolyWorld: Life in a new context”, Artificial Life III, vol. XVII, pp. 263-298, Addison-Wesley, 1993, https://doi.org/10.1.1.38.6719.
  • 5. R. Feldt, "Generating multiple diverse software versions with genetic programming", Proc. 24th EUROMICRO Conference, vol.1 pp. 387-394, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1109/EURMIC.1998.711831.
  • 6. R. Cook, “How Complex Systems Fail”, Cognitive Technologies Laboratory, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 1998.
  • 7. R. Williams, R. Yampolskiy, “Understanding and Avoiding AI Failures: A Practical Guide”, Philosophies, 6(3):53, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6030053.
  • 8. S. McGregor, C. Custis, J. Yang, J. McHorse, S. Reid, S. McGregor, S. Yoon, C Olsson, R. Yampolskiy, “AI Incident Database”, 2021, https://incidentdatabase.ai/, accessed in July, 2021.
  • 9. P. Scott, R. Yampolskiy, “Classification Schemas for Artificial Intelligence Failures”, Delphi - Interdisciplinary Review of Emerging Technologies, vol. 2, iss. 4, pp. 186-199, 2019, https://doi.org/10.21552/delphi/2019/4/8.
  • 10. K. Lui, J. Karmiol, “AI Infrastructure Reference Architecture”, IBM Systems, 2018.
  • 11. K. Bertels, A. Sarkar, T. Hubregtsen, M. Serrao, A. A. Mouedenne, A. Yadav, A. Krol, I. Ashraf, “Quantum computer architecture: towards full-stack quantum accelerators”, Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 1-6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE48585.2020.9116502.
  • 12. N. Jones, R. Meter, A. Fowler, P. McMahon, J. Kim, T. Ladd, Y. Yamamoto, “Layered Architecture for Quantum Computing”, Phys. Rev. X 2, 031007, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.031007.
  • 13. P. Berander, L. Damm, J. Eriksson, T. Gorschek, K. Henningsson, P. Jönsson, S. Kågström, D. Milicic, F. Mårtensson, K. Rönkkö, P. Tomaszewski, “Software quality attributes and trade-offs”, Blekinge Institute of Technology, June 2005.
  • 14. S. Wagner, K. Lochmann, S. Winter, A. Goeb, M. Klaes, “Quality Models in Practice: A Preliminary Analysis”, ESEM’09, 2009.
  • 15. S. Wagner, K. Lochmann, L. Heinemann, M. Kläs, A. Trendowicz, R. Plösch, A. Seidl, A. Goeb, J. Streit, “The Quamoco Product Quality Modelling and Assessment Approach”, 34th Int. Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 1133-1142, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227106.
  • 16. S. Wagner, K. Lochmann, S. Winter, A. Goeb, M. Kläs, S. Nunnenmacher, “Software Quality Models in Practice. Survey Results”, http://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1110601/274701.pdf, accessed in July, 2021.
  • 17. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org, accessed in April 2021.
  • 18. A. Tafti, S. Janosepah, N. Modiri, A. Noudeh, H. Alizadeh, “Development of a Framework for Applying ASYCUDA System with N-Tier Application Architecture”, Comm. in Comp. and Inf. Science, vol. 181 pp. 533-541, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22203-0_46.
  • 19. Z. Durdik, “Architectural Design Decision Documentation through Reuse of Design Patterns”, KIT Scientific Publishing, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000043807.
  • 20. M. Fowler, “Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture”, Addison-Wesley, 2011
  • 21. D. Brée, “Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Psychology: A New Look at Human Factors”, Human-Computer Interaction, 1988, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73402-1_17.
  • 22. T. Moran, S. Card, “Applying Cognitive Psychology to Computer Systems”, A Graduate Seminar in Psychology, 1980.
  • 23. A. E. Bolock, J. Salah, Y. Abdelrahman, C. Herbert, S. Abdennadher, “Character Computing: Computer Science meets Psychology”, MUM’18, pp. 557-562, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1145/3282894.3286060.
  • 24. P. Panditi, “Psychology - The Land That Software Engineering Forgot”, Proc. of Innovations in Software Engineering Conference, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1145/3172871.3172889.
  • 25. K. VAT, “Teaching Software Psychology: Expanding the Perspective”, Proc. of the 31st SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Comp. Sci. Ed., 2000, https://doi.org/10.1145/331795.331892.
  • 26. P. Young, “Understanding NLP Principles & Practice”, Crown House Publishing 2nd ed, 2004.
  • 27. С. Ковалёв, “Психотерапия человеческой жизни”, Москва, 2018.
  • 28. W. McWhinney, “Growing Into the Canopy”, Journal of Transformative Education, vol. 5 no. 3 pp. 206-220, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344607307023.
  • 29. W. McWhinney, J. Webber, D. Smith, B. Novokowsky, “Creating Paths of Change: Managing Issues and Resolving Problems in Organizations”, SAGE Publications, 1997.
  • 30. N. Walliman, “Research Methods. The Basics”, Routledge, London, 2011.
  • 31. S. Epstein, “Demystifying Intuition: What it is, What it Does, and How it Does it”, Psychological Inquiry, 21, 295-312, 2010.
  • 32. H. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Jiang, "Overfitting and Underfitting Analysis for Deep Learning Based End-to-end Communication Systems", 11th Int. Conf. on Wireless Comm. and Sign. Processing (WCSP), pp. 1-6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/WCSP.2019.8927876.
  • 33. H. Gabbar, R. Khan, “Methods to avoid over-fitting and under-fitting in supervised machine learning (comparative study)”, CompSci Comm. Instr. Dev., pp. 163-172, 2014.
  • 34. F. Yusufi, A. Ahmed, J. Ahmad, “Modelling and developing diabetic retinopathy risk scores on Indian type 2 diabetes patients”, Int. J. Diabetes Dev Ctries 39, pp. 29-38, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-018-0652-z.
  • 35. E.A. Martínez-García, N. Rodríguez, R. Rodríguez-Jorge, J. Mizera-Pietraszko, J. Sheba, R. Mohan, E. Magid, “Non Linear Fitting Methods for Machine Learning”, Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 13 pp. 807-818, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69835-9_76.
  • 36. X. Ying, “An Overview of Overfitting and its Solutions”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1168, issue 2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1168/2/022022.
  • 37. M. Tegmark, “An Open Letter: Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence, https://futureoflife.org/ai-open-letter. accessed in April 2021.
  • 38. G. Miller, “Artificial Intelligence Project Success Factors: Moral Decision-Making with Algorithms”, Proceedings of the 16th Con¬fe¬rence on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems, M. Ganzha, L. Maciaszek, M. Paprzycki, D. Ślęzak (eds). ACSIS, Vol. 25, pp. 379-390, 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.15439/2021F26
  • 39. E. Ziemba, “The ICT adoption in enterprises in the context of the sustainable information society”, Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 11 pp. 1031-1038, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15439/2017F89.
  • 40. M. Fanea-Ivanovici, M. Pană, "From Culture to Smart Culture. How Digital Transformations Enhance Citizens’ Well-Being Through Better Cultural Accessibility and Inclusion", IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 37988-38000, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2975542.
Uwagi
1. Track 3: Advances in Information Systems and Technology
3. Communication papers
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-c2b33d8e-02e0-4f5d-a12c-5b1ae6f52cf6
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.