PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Past and contemporary changes in forest cover and forest continuity in relation to soils (Southern Latvia)

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
A set of medium-scale historical maps was used to reconstruct changes in spatial patterns of forest area during the last 220 years in an agricultural matrix of north-eastern Europe (Zemgale region, Latvia). Changes in total forest area by soils were determined, as well as the time period of continuous forest cover. Proportion of protected area for each soil trophic group was also calculated. Patterns of recent forest development differed between soil trophic groups. Afforestation occurred mainly on wet and poor soils in the 19th and 20th centuries, while the proportion of woodland area on fertile soils typical for nemoral forests was fairly stable. Only 1% of the fertile soil area has been covered by continuous forest for more than 220 years, and only 11% of them are protected. Nemoral deciduous forests cover only 15% of their potential natural vegetation area of forested eutrophic soils. Therefore, in regard to habitat protection that is representative of natural distribution of ecosystems, priority in conservation should be given to forests on fertile soils.
Rocznik
Strony
625--638
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 65 poz., il.
Twórcy
autor
  • Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Kronvalda Boulevard 4, Riga LV-1010, Latvia
  • Latvian State Forest Research Institute ‘Silava’, Rigas Street 111, Salaspils LV-2169, Latvia
autor
  • Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, Alberta Street 10, Riga LV-1010, Latvia
autor
  • Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Kronvalda Boulevard 4, Riga LV-1010, Latvia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Andren H. 1994 – Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review – Oikos, 71: 355–366.
  • 2. Axelsson A-L., Östlund L. 2001 – Retrospective gap analysis in a Swedish boreal forest landscape using historical data – Forest Ecol. Manag. 147: 109–122.
  • 3. Axelsson A-L., Östlund L., Hellberg E. 2002 – Changes in mixed deciduous forests of boreal Sweden 1866-1999 based on interpretation of historical records – Landscape Ecol. 17: 403–418.
  • 4. Brunet J., Valtinat K., Mayr M.L., Felton A., Lindbladh M., Bruun H.H. 2011 – Understory succession in post-agricultural oak forests: Habitat fragmentation affects forest specialists and generalists differently – Forest Ecol. Manag. 262: 1863–187−1.
  • 5. Brunet J., Von Oheimb G. 1998 – Migration of vascular plants to secondary woodlands in southern Sweden – J. Ecol. 86: 429–438.
  • 6. Czarnecka B. 2011 – Vascular plants of the mountain element in the Polish lowlands: from a regional to individual level – Pol. J. Ecol. 59: 217–218.
  • 7. Delle P. 1932 – Mežu atjaunošana un meliorācijas darbi [Forest regeneration and amelioration] – Meža Dzīve, 81: 3009–3011 (in Latvian).
  • 8. Eiche V. 1940 – Latvijas mežu ģeogrāfisks iedalījums [Geographical distribution of Latvian forests] (In: Mežkopja Darbs un Zinātne, Ed: V. Eiche), Šalkone, Riga, pp. 471–561 (in Latvian).
  • 9. Eriksson S., Skånes H., Hammer M., Lönn M. 2010 – Current distribution of older and deciduous forests as legacies from historical use patterns in a Swedish boreal landscape (1725–2007) – Forest Ecol. Manag. 260: 1095–1103.
  • 10. Flinn K.M., Vellend M., Marks P. 2005 – Environmental causes and consequences of forest clearance and agricultural abandonment in central New York, USA – J. Biogeogr. 32: 439–452.
  • 11. Forman R.T. 1995 – Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 632 pp.
  • 12. Foster D.R., Motzkin G., Slater B. 1998 – Land-use history as long-term broad-scale disturbance: regional forest dynamics in central New England – Ecosystems, 1: 96–119.
  • 13. Galeniece M. 1959 – Karta rastitelnostji Latvijskoj SSR [Geobotanical Map of the Latvian SSR] (In: Rastitelnostj Latvijskoj SSR [Vegetation in Latvian SSR]) – Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk Latvijskoj SSR, pp. 29–45 (in Russian).
  • 14. Graae B.J., Økland R.H., Petersen P.M., Jensen K., Fritzbøger B. 2004 – Influence of historical, geographical and environmental variables on understorey composition and richness in Danish forests – J. Veg. Sci. 15: 465–474.
  • 15. Hanski I. 2011 – Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation – Ambio, 40: 248–255.
  • 16. Hermy M., Honnay O., Firbank L., Grashof-Bokdam C., Lawesson J.E. 1999 – An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation – Biol. Conserv. 91: 9–22.
  • 17. Hermy M., Verheyen K. 2007 – Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity (In: Sustainability and Diversity of Forest Ecosystems, Ed: T. Nakashizuka) – Springer, Japan, pp. 361–371.
  • 18. Hietel E., Waldhardt R., Otte A., 2004 – Analysing land cover changes in relation to environmental variables in Hesse, Germany – Landscape Ecol. 19: 473–489.
  • 19. Honnay O., Degrotte B., Hermy M. 1998 – Ancient-forest plant species in western Belgium: a species list and possible ecological mechanisms – Belg. J. Bot. 130: 139–154.
  • 20. Ikauniece S., Brūmelis G., Kasparinskis R., Nikodemus O., Straupe I., Zariņš J. 2013 – Effect of soil and canopy factors on vegetation of Quercus robur woodland in the boreo-nemoral zone: A plant-trait based approach – Forest Ecol. Manag. 295: 43–50.
  • 21. Ikauniece S., Brūmelis G., Kondratovičs T. 2012a – Naturalness of Quercus robur stands in Latvia, estimated by structure, species, and processes – Estonian J. Ecol. 61: 64– 81.
  • 22. Ikauniece S., Brūmelis G., Zariņš J. 2012b – Linking woodland key habitat inventory and forest inventory data to prioritize districts needing conservation efforts – Ecol. Indic. 14: 18–26.
  • 23. Jacquemyn H., Butaye J., Hermy M. 2001 – Forest plant species richness in small, fragmented mixed deciduous forest patches: the role of area, time and dispersal limitation – J. Biogeog. 28: 801–812.
  • 24. Jones E.W. 1959 – Biological flora of the British Isles: Quercus L. – J. Ecol. 47: 169–222.
  • 25. Kasparinskis R., Nikodemus O. 2012 – Influence of environmental factors on the spatial distribution and diversity of forest soil in Latvia – Estonian J. Earth Sci. 61: 48–64.
  • 26. Kavacs J. 1994 – Latvijas teritorijā veiktie liela mēroga uzmērījumi un kartogrāfijas darbi 17-20.gadsimtā [Large-scale surveys and cartographic work in the territory of Latvia in 17-20th centuries] – Latvijas Vēstures Institūta Žurnāls, 4: 77–92 (in Latvian).
  • 27. Kirby K.J., Watkins C. 1998 – The ecological history of European forests – CAB International, Wallingford, 373 pp.
  • 28. Laiviņš M. 1998 – Latvijas boreālo priežu mežu sinantropizācija un eitrofikācija [Synantrophization and eutrophisation of Latvia boreal pine forests] – Latvijas veģetācija, 137 pp. (in Latvian, English summary).
  • 29. Lūkins M., Nikodemus O. 2011 – Meža masīva struktūras maiņa 20. gs. pauguraines ainavā Vidzemē [The change of forest structure during the 20th century. Case study of forest tract in Vidzeme hummocky landscape] – Acta Universitatis Latvensis Earth Environ. Sci. 762: 7–25 (in Latvian, English summary).
  • 30. Maciejewski Z. 2011 – Spontaneous regeneration of the Carpathian beech forest in planted pine stands of the Roztocze National Park (the Roztocze Highlands, south-east Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 59: 235–247.
  • 31. Milad M., Schaich H., Bürgi M., Konold W. 2011 – Climate change and nature conservation in Central European forests: a review of consequences, concepts and challenges – Forest Ecol. Manag. 261: 829–843.
  • 32. Nikodemus O., Kasparinskis R., Kukuls I. 2013 – Influence of afforestation on soil genesis, morphology and properties in glacial till deposits – Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 59: 449–465.
  • 33. Nikodemus O., Bell S., Grine I., Liepiņš I. 2005 – The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia – Landscape Urban Plan. 70: 57–67.
  • 34. Oranovskij A. 1862 – Маtеriаli gеоgrаfii i statistiki Rosii, sobrannije oficerami generalnogo staba. Kurlandskaja gubernja [The matherials of geography and statistics of Russia, collected by officers of General Staff. Province of Kurland] (in Rusian).
  • 35. Orczewska A. 2009 – Age and origin of forests in south-western Poland and their importance for ecological studies in man-dominated landscapes – Landscape Res. 34: 599–617.
  • 36. Palo A. 2005 – Relationships between landscape factors and vegetation site types: case study from Saare Country, Estonia – PhD thesis, Universitatis Tartuensis, 114 pp.
  • 37. Pāvulāns V. 1988 – Pa mūsu plostu ceļiem [By raft roads] (In: Dabas un vēstures kalendārs 1989.gadam, Ed: O. Gerts) – Riga, pp. 206–208 (in Latvian).
  • 38. Penēze Z. 2009 – Latvijas lauku ainavas izmaiņas 20. un 21. gadsimtā: cēloņi, procesi un tendences [Transformations of the of Latvian rural landscape in 20th and 21st centuries: causes, processes and tendencies] – PhD thesis, University of Latvia, Riga, 255 pp (in Latvian).
  • 39. Penēze Z., Nikodemus O., Krūze I. 2009 – Izmaiņas Latvijas lauku ainavā 20. un 21. gadsimtā [Changes in Latvian Rural Landscape during the 20th-21st century] – Acta Universitatis Latviensis Earth Environ. Sci. 724: 168–183 (in Latvian, English summary).
  • 40. Peterken G.F. 1996 – Natural woodland: ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 522 pp.
  • 41. Rhemtulla J.M., Mladenoff D.J., Clayton M.K. 2009 – Legacies of historical land use on regional forest composition and structure in Wisconsin, USA (mid-1800s-1930s-2000s) – Ecol. Appl. 19: 1061–1078.
  • 42. Sikorska D., Sikorski P., Wierzba M. 2008 – Ancient forest species in tree stands of different age as indicators of the continuity of forest habitat – Annals of Warsaw University of Life Science-SGGW, Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, 29: 155–162.
  • 43. Sivers M.V. 1903 – Die forstlichen Verhältnisse der Baltischen Provinzen Dargestellt auf Grundlage der baltischen Forstenquête vom Jahre 1901 – WF Häcker, Riga, 48 pp.
  • 44. State Forest Ser vice 2010 – State Forest Reg¬ister. Riga, Latvia.
  • 45. Stachurska-Swakoń A., Cieślak E., Ronikier M. 2011 – Genetic variability of small isolated populations of Cicerbita alpina (L.) Wallr.(Asteraceae) in the Beskid Mały Mts (southern Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 59: 279–288.
  • 46. Szymura T.H. 2012 – How does recent vegetation reflect previous systems of forest management – Pol. J. Ecol. 60: 859–862.
  • 47. Szymura T.H., Szymura M. 2011 – Soil properties and light availability determine species richness and vegetation diversity in an overgrown coppice oak stand – Pol. J. Ecol. 59: 523–533.
  • 48. Terauds A., Brumelis G., Nikodemus O. 2011 – Seventy-year changes in tree species composition and tree ages in state-owned forests in Latvia – Scand. J. Forest Res. 26: 446–456.
  • 49. Thompson J.R., Foster D.R., Scheller R., Kittredge D. 2011 – The influence of land use and climate change on forest biomass and composition in Massachusetts, USA – Ecol. Appl. 21: 2425–2444.
  • 50. Turner B.L., Meyer W.B., Skole D.L. 1994 – Global land-use / land-cover change: towards an integrated study – Ambio, 23: 91–95.
  • 51. Van Laar J.N., Den Ouden J.B., Kirby K.J., Watkins C. 1998 – Forest history of the Dutch province of Drenthe and its ancient woodland: a survey (In: The ecological history of European forests, Eds: K. Kirby, C. Watkins) – CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 95–106.
  • 52. Vasiļevskis A. 2007 – Latvijas Valsts Mežu Apsaimniekošana 1918–1940 [Management of Latvian State forests 1918–1940] – Nacionālais Apgāds, Riga, 430 pp (in Latvian).
  • 53. Vassiljev J., Saarse L., Rosentau A. 2011 – Palaeoreconstruction of the Baltic Ice Lake in the Eastern Baltic (In: The Baltic Sea Basin, Eds: J. Harff, S. Björck, P. Hoth) – Springer, pp. 189–202.
  • 54. Vellend M. 2003 – Habitat loss inhibits recovery of plant diversity as forests regrow – Ecology, 84: 1158–1164.
  • 55. Verheyen K., Bossuyt B., Hermy M., Tack G. 1999 – The land use history (1278-1990) of a mixed hardwood forest in western Belgium and its relationship with chemical soil characteristics – J. Biogeogr. 26: 1115–1128.
  • 56. Von Löwis A. 1824 – Ueber die ehemalige Verbreitung der Eichen in Liv- und Ehstland Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Anbaues dieser Länder – Schünmann, Tartu, 290 pp.
  • 57. Westphal C., Härdtle W., Von Oheimb G. 2004 – Forest History, Continuity and Dynamic Naturalness (In: Forest Biodiversity: Lessons from History for Conservation, Eds. O. Honnay, K. Verheyen, B. Bossuyt, M. Hermy) – CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 205–218.
  • 58. Winter S., Chirici G., McRoberts, R. E. Hauk, E. 2008 – Possibilities for harmonizing national forest inventory data for use in forest biodiversity assessments – Forestry, 81: 33–44.
  • 59. WRB 2006 – World reference base for soil resources - a framework for international classification, correlation and communication – International Union of Soil Sciences, ISRIC, World Soil Information and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  • 60. Wulf M. 1997 – Plant species as indicators of ancient woodland in northwestern Germany – J. Veg. Sci. 8: 635–642.
  • 61. Wulf M. 1998 – Distribution of ancient woodland, afforestation and clearances in relation to quaternary deposits and soil types in northwestern Brandenburg (Germany) (In: The ecological history of European forests, Eds: K. Kirby, C. Watkins) – CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 301–310.
  • 62. Wulf M. 2004 – Plant species richness of afforestations with different former use and habitat continuity – Forest Ecol. Manag. 195: 191–204.
  • 63. Wulf M., Sommer M., Schmidt R. 2010 – Forest cover changes in the Prignitz region (NE Germany) between 1790 and 1960 in relation to soils and other driving forces – Landscape Ecol. 25: 299–313.
  • 64. Zelčs V. 1998 – Zemgales līdzenums [The Zemgale Plain] (In: Latvija un latvieši. Latvijas daba [Latvia and latvians. Latvian nature, Ed: G. Kavacs], vol 6) – Preses nams, Riga, pp. 126–128 (in Latvian).
  • 65. Zunde M. 1999 – Mežainuma un koku sugu sastāva pārmaiņu dinamika un to galvenie ietekmējošie faktori Latvijas teritorijā [Dynamics of forest area and tree species composition, and their main driving factors] (In: Latvijas mežu vēsture līdz 1940. gadam [History of Latvian Forests up to 1940], Ed: H. Strods) – WWF, Riga, pp. 111–203 (in Latvian).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-c2a7fb92-0673-405d-a03a-ce8ca68627d2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.