Drivers and Barriers of Digital Transformation in Asset Management

• Autorzy: Maletič Damjan , Grabowska Marta , Maletič Matjaž

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/mper.2023.145370

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper aims to improve understanding of the drivers and barriers to digital transformation in asset management. Accordingly, this paper contributes to the literature by conducting a qualitative Delphi study with 15 experts (including academia, consultancy and industry) to identify, validate, and classify the drivers and barriers affecting digital transformation in asset management. As a result of the experts’ interactions, 20 barriers were identified. The main barriers to digital transformation in asset management are the following: Misunderstanding of the strategic importance of asset management, no clear vision/strategy, existing mindset and culture, inadequate asset management system, lack of understanding of digital trends, and lack of employee knowledge and skills. The study also highlights 12 drivers that are critical to the digital transformation of asset management. These include cost reductions, opportunities in condition monitoring of assets, expected benefits in asset management processes, expected benefits in risk management and others.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

asset management; digital transformation; drivers; barriers; delphi

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 14, No. 1
• Strony: 118--126
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Maletič Damjan

• Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Kidričeva c. 55a, 4000, Kranj, Slovenia

autor

Grabowska Marta

• Management and Production Engineering Division, Poznan University of Technology, Poland

autor

Maletič Matjaž

• Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Slovenia

Bibliografia

• Almeida N.M., Vieira J., Silva J.G. and e Castro C. (2021), The Impact of Asset Management Development Programs in Infrastructure Organizations, In H. Rodrigues, F. Gaspar, P. Fernandes, & A. Mateus (Eds.), Sustainability and Automation in Smart Constructions (pp. 247–258). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35533-3_29.
• Alsyouf I., Alsuwaidi M., Hamdan S. and Shamsuzzaman M. (2021), Impact of ISO 55000 on organisational performance: Evidence from certified UAE firms. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, No. 1–2, Vol. 32, Article 1–2. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2018.1537750.
• Chattopadhyay G. (2021), Asset Management Journey for Realising Value from Assets. In K.B. Misra (Ed.), Handbook of Advanced Performability Engineering (pp. 429–450). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-55732-4_19.
• Cichosz M., Wallenburg C.M. and Knemeyer A.M. (2020), Digital transformation at logistics service providers: Barriers, success factors and leading practices. The International Journal of Logistics Management, No. 2, Vol. 31, pp. 209–238. DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229.
• Crespo Marquez A., Gomez Fernandez J.F., MartínezGalán Fernández P. and Guillen Lopez A. (2020a), Maintenance Management through Intelligent Asset Management Platforms (IAMP). Emerging Factors, Key Impact Areas and Data Models. Energies, No. 15, Vol. 13, Article 15. DOI: 10.3390/en13153762.
• Crespo Márquez A., Macchi M. and Parlikad A.K. (2020b), Fundamental Concepts and Framework. In A. Crespo Márquez, M. Macchi, & A.K. Parlikad (Eds.), Value Based and Intelligent Asset Management (pp. 3–38). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20704-5_1.
• Gajic S. and Palcic I. (2019), A new framework for complexity analysis in international development projects – Results from a Delphi study, Advances in Production Engineering & Management, No. 2, Vol. 14, pp. 225–238. DOI: 10.14743/apem2019.2.324.
• Gavrikova E., Volkova I. and Burda Y. (2020), Strategic Aspects of Asset Management: An Overview of Current Research, Sustainability, No. 15, Vol. 12, Article 15. DOI: 10.3390/su12155955.
• Hsu C.-C. and Sandford B. (2019), The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, No. 1, Vol. 12. DOI: 10.7275/pdz9-th90.
• Huet J.-C., Lamouri S., Talhi E. and Fortineau V. (2020), A methodology for cloud manufacturing architecture in the context of industry 4.0, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences; No. 2, Vol. 68 (i.a. Special Section on Computational Intelligence in Communications); pp. 271–284. https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/131849/edition/115176.
• Industry 4.0 after the initial hype: Where manufacturers are finding value and how they can best capture it (2016), McKinsey & Company.
• ISO 55000 (2014), Asset management - Overview, principles and terminology. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
• ISO 55001 (2014), Asset management - Management systems - Requirements. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
• Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek M., Legutko S. and Kluk P. (2020), Maintenance 4.0 technologies - new opportunities for sustainability driven maintenance, Management and Production Engineering Review, No 2, Vol. 11, https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/133730/edition/116853.
• Kagermann H. (2015), Change Through Digitization - Value Creation in the Age of Industry 4.0. In H. Albach, H. Meffert, A. Pinkwart, & R. Reichwald (Eds.), Management of Permanent Change (pp. 23-45), Springer Fachmedien. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658- 05014-6_2.
• Landeta J. (2006), Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, No. 5, Vol. 73, pp. 467–482. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002.
• Liere-Netheler K., Packmohr S. and Vogelsang K. (2018), Drivers of Digital Transformation in Manufacturing. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 10.
• Lima E.S., McMahon P. and Costa A.P.C.S. (2021), Establishing the relationship between asset management and business performance. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 232. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107937.
• Maletič D., Almeida N.M., Gomišček B. and Maletič M. (2022), Understanding motives for and barriers to implementing asset management system: An empirical study for engineered physical assets, Production Planning & Control, Published online. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2022.2026672.
• Maletič D., Maletič M., Al-Najjar B. and Gomišček B. (2018), Development of a Model Linking Physical Asset Management to Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Research, Sustainability, No. 12, Vol. 10, Article 12. DOI: 10.3390/su10124759.
• Maletič D., Maletič M., Al-Najjar B. and Gomišček B. (2020), An Analysis of Physical Asset Management Core Practices and Their Influence on Operational Performance. Sustainability, No. 21, Vol. 12, Article 21. DOI: 10.3390/su12219097.
• Martínez-Galán P., Crespo A., la Fuente A. de and Guillén A. (2020), A new model to compare intelligent asset management platforms (IAMP). IFACPapersOnLine, No. 3, Vol. 53, pp. 13–18. DOI: 10. 1016/j.ifacol.2020.11.003.
• Mohammed I. K. and Trzcielinski S. (2021), The Interconnections Between ICT, Industry 4.0 and Agile Manufacturing, Management and Production Engineering Review; No. 4, Vol. 12, https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/139998/edition/121963.
• Okoli C. and Pawlowski S.D. (2004), The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications, Information & Management, No. 1, Vol. 42, pp. 15–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.
• Osmundsen K., Iden J. and Bygstad B. (2018), Digital Transformation: Drivers, Success Factors, and Implications, MCIS 2018 Proceedings. https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2018/37
• Peillon S. and Dubruc N. (2019), Barriers to digital servitization in French manufacturing SMEs, Procedia CIRP, Vol. 83, pp. 146–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.008.
• Roblek V., Meško M., Pušavec F. and Likar B. (2021), The Role and Meaning of the Digital Transformation As a Disruptive Innovation on Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.592528.
• Rojek I., Mikołajewski D., Macko M., Burczyński T. and Sága M. (2021), Machine modelling and simulations, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences; No. 2, Vol. 69 E136716, https://journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/136716/edition/119400.
• Sandu G., Varganova O. and Samii B. (2022), Managing physical assets: A systematic review and a sustainable perspective. International Journal of Production Research, No. 0, Vol. 0, pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2126019.
• Schroeder A., Ziaee Bigdeli A., Galera Zarco C. and Baines T. (2019), Capturing the benefits of industry 4.0: A business network perspective, Production Planning & Control, No. 16, Vol. 30, pp. 1305–1321. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1612111.
• Stentoft J., Adsbřll Wickstrřm K., Philipsen K. and Haug A. (2021), Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: Empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers, Production Planning & Control, No. 10, Vol. 32, pp. 811–828. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1768318.
• Trappey A.J.C., Trappey C.V., Hareesh Govindarajan U., Chuang A.C. and Sun J.J. (2017), A review of essential standards and patent landscapes for the Internet of Things: A key enabler for Industry 4.0. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 33, pp. 208-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2016.11.007.
• Trindade M. and Almeida N. (2018), The impact of digitalisation in asset-intensive organisations, Network Industries Quarterly, No. 4, Vol. 20. https://www.network-industries.org/2018/12/14/the-pathtowards-digitalisation-in-road-infrastructure/
• Turisová R., Pačaiová H., Kotianová Z., Nagyová A., Hovanec M. and Korba P. (2021), Evaluation of eMaintenance Application Based on the New Version of the EFQM Model. Sustainability, No. 7, Vol. 13, Article 7. DOI: 10.3390/su13073682.
• von Leipzig T., Gamp M., Manz D., Schöttle K., Ohlhausen P., Oosthuizen G., Palm D. and von Leipzig K. (2017), Initialising Customer-orientated Digital Transformation in Enterprises, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 8, pp. 517–524. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.066.
• Worrell J.L., Di Gangi P.M. and Bush A.A. (2013), Exploring the use of the Delphi method in accounting information systems research, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, No. 3, Vol. 14, pp. 193–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2012.03.003.