Test and comparison of different digitalization techniques for objects with surfaces difficult to scan

• Autorzy: Kowalik Michał , Pelowski Filip , Lipowiecki Ignacy

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/194997

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article presents the results of research conducted as part of the project titled "Improvement of access to culture and activation of disabled and socially excluded persons" Gospostrateg-VI/0022/2021 co-financed by the National Centre for Research and Development. The aim of the research was to compare three widely used digitalization technologies: photogrammetry, structured light 3D scanning, and computer tomography. The comparison was conducted in terms of the quality and accuracy of reproducing the geometry of scanned objects, the complexity of the measurement process, its duration, and costs. One of the research assumptions was that during scanning, no interference with the surface of the scanned object was allowed (e.g., using matting sprays or applied markers), which simulated conditions such as scanning museum exhibits. The selected objects for the research had various challenging characteristics for scanning, such as highly glossy, matte, porous, or blurry surfaces, and were made of different materials such as metal, wood, or plastics. The article briefly discusses the operation of each tested technology, the methods and steps taken to obtain the final 3D models, and presents their comparison. The research showed that highly glossy surfaces posed the greatest challenge for photogrammetry and structured light scanning, while high density and thickness of the object negatively affected the quality of results obtained using computer tomography. The most accurate reproduction of geometry was provided by the most expensive computer tomography, while the least accurate was the cheapest technology, photogrammetry. Both methods require lot of time, knowledge and skills from the operator to achieve best results . Often, the structured light scanner proved to be the best solution, combining simple and fast operation with very satisfactory results in terms of accuracy and detail in reproducing the real object.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

3D scanning; photogrammetry; structured light scanner; CT scan; digitalization

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology ; Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin
• Czasopismo: Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Vol. 19, no. 2
• Strony: 1--15
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kowalik Michał

• Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Nowowiejska 24, 00-665 Warszawa, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7632-6782

autor

Pelowski Filip

• Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warszawa, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2543-2324

autor

Lipowiecki Ignacy

• Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Nowowiejska 24, 00-665 Warszawa, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6451-8672

Bibliografia

• 1. Pérez-Martínez, I., Martínez-Rojas, M. and Soto-Hidalgo, J.M., 2023. A methodology for urban planning generation: A novel approach based on generative design. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 124, 106609.
• 2. Zhang, X., Wang, X., Du, S., Tian, S., Jia, A., Ye, Y., Gao, N., Kuang, X. and Shi, X., 2024. A systematic review of urban form generation and optimization for performance-driven urban design. Building and Environment, 111269.
• 3. Jiang, F., Ma, J., Webster, C.J., Chiaradia, A.J., Zhou, Y., Zhao, Z. and Zhang, X., 2024. Generative urban design: A systematic review on problem formulation, design generation, and decision-making. Progress in Planning, 180, 100795.
• 4. Zawidzki, M., 2016. Automated geometrical evaluation of a plaza (town square). Advances in Engineering Software, 96, 58–69.
• 5. Zare, Z., Yeganeh, M. and Dehghan, N., 2022. Environmental and social sustainability automated evaluation of plazas based on 3D visibility measurements. Energy Reports, 8, 6280–6300.
• 6. Li, J., Chen, M., Wu, W., Liu, B. and Zheng, X., 2021. Height map-based social force model for stairway evacuation. Safety Science, 133, 105027.
• 7. Martinez-Gil, F., Lozano, M. and Fernández, F., 2017. Emergent behaviors and scalability for multi-agent reinforcement learning-based pedestrian models. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 74, 117–133.
• 8. Zawidzki, M., Chraibi, M. and Nishinari, K., 2014. Crowd-Z: The user-friendly framework for crowd simulation on an architectural floor plan. Pattern Recognition Letters, 44, 88–97.
• 9. Zawidzki, M., 2016. Optimization of multi-branch Truss-Z based on evolution strategy. Advances in Engineering Software, 100, 113–125.
• 10. Zawidzki, M., 2015. Retrofitting of pedestrian overpass by Truss-Z modular systems using graph-theory approach. Advances in Engineering Software, 81, 41–49.
• 11. Herr, C.M. and Ford, R.C., 2016. Cellular Automata in architectural design: From generic systems to specific design tools. Automation in Construction, 72, 39–45.
• 12. Herr, C.M. and Kvan, T., 2007. Adapting Cellular Automata to support the architectural design process. Automation in Construction, 16(1), 61–69.
• 13. Araghi, S.K. and Stouffs, R., 2015. Exploring Cellular Automata for high density residential building form generation. Automation in Construction, 49, 152–162.
• 14. Zawidzki, M., 2009. Implementing Cellular Automata for dynamically shading a building facade. Complex Systems, 18(3), 287.
• 15. Zawidzki, M. and Fujieda, I., 2010. The prototyping of a shading device controlled by a Cellular Automaton. Complex Systems, 19(2), 157.
• 16. Artec 3D., 2024. Home. Available at: https://www.artec3d.com/. (Accessed April 25, 2024).
• 17. GOM., 2024. ATOS Q. Available at: https://www.gom.com/en/products/3d-scanning/atos-q. (Accessed April 25, 2024).
• 18. Montalti, A., Ferretti, P. and Santi, G.M., 2024. A cost-effective approach for quality control in PLA-based material extrusion 3D printing using 3D scanning. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 41, 100660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2024.100660.
• 19. Reyno, T., Marsden, C., Wowk, D., 2018. Surface damage evaluation of honeycomb sandwich aircraft panels using 3D scanning technology. NDT & E International, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.007.
• 20. Rządkowski, W., Tracz, J., Cisowski, A., Gardyjas, K., Groen, H., Palka, M., Kowalik, M., 2021. Evaluation of bonding gap control methods for an epoxy adhesive joint of carbon fiber tubes and aluminum alloy inserts. Materials, 14, 1977. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14081977.
• 21. Statham, N., 2020. Use of photogrammetry in video games: a historical overview. Games and Culture, 15(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018786415.
• 22. Apollonio, F.I., Fantini, F., Garagnani, S., Gaiani, M., 2021. A Photogrammetry-Based Workflow for the Accurate 3D Construction and Visualization of Museums Assets. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030486.
• 23. Saraczyn, R., Deroszewska, M., Kowaluk, T., Skołek, E., Rządkowski, W., Myszka, D., 2023. Supported by 2D and 3D imaging methods investigation of the influence of fiber orientation on the mechanical properties of the composites reinforced with fibers in a polymer matrix. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 17(3), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/166101.
• 24. Stehel, S., Vertaľ, P., Demčáková, L., 2021. Application of close-range photogrammetry in documenting the location of an accident. Transportation Research Procedia, 55, 1657–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.310.
• 25. Minachi, C., Karuppanan, G., 2015. Advancements in accident investigation - accident reconstruction and forensics using photomodeler software. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10, 345–9.
• 26. Nikon Metrology., 2024. Nikon XT H 160/225/450. Available at: http://www.ckpi.net/Catalog_Nikon/Nikon%20XT%20H%20160,225,450.pdf. (Accessed April 25, 2024.)
• 27. Drelich, E., Tracz, J., Cisowski, A., et al., 2023. Force prediction in the cylindrical grip for a model of hand prosthesis. Sci Rep, 13, 17205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43600-1.
• 28. Charlier, P., Kissel, E., Moulherat, C., et al., 2020. First in-situ use of a mobile CT-scan for museum artefacts: The quai Branly – Jacques Chirac museum experience. Forensic Imaging, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fri.2020.200327.
• 29. Miłosz, M.M., Montusiewicz, J., Kęsik, J., et al., 2022. Virtual scientific expedition for 3D scanning of museum artifacts in the COVID-19 period – The methodology and case study. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2022.200394.
• 30. Apollonio, F.I., Fantini, F., Garagnani, S., Gaiani, M., 2021. A photogrammetry-based workflow for the accurate 3D construction and visualization of museums assets. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030486.
• 31. Böhler, W., 2006. Comparison of 3D scanning and other 3D measurement techniques. In: Centro Stefano Franscini Monte Verità, Ascona (Ed.). Recording, Modeling and Visualization of Cultural Heritage: Proceedings of the International Workshop. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
• 32. Freeman Gebler, O., Goudswaard, M., Hicks, B., Jones, D., Nassehi, A., Snider, C., Yon, J., 2021. A comparison of structured light scanning and photogrammetry for the digitisation of physical prototypes. Proceedings of the Design Society, 1, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.2.
• 33. Mathys, A., Brecko, J., Semal, P., 2013. Comparing 3D digitizing technologies: What are the differences? In: 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage), Marseille, France, 2013, 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743733.
• 34. Waltenberger, L., Rebay-Salisbury, K., Mitteroecker, P., 2021. Three-dimensional surface scanning methods in osteology: A topographical and geometric morphometric comparison. Am J Phys Anthropol, 174, 846–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24204.
• 35. Lipowiecki, I.K., Rządkowski, W., Zapał, W., Kowalik, M.P., 2023. Combining the technology of long-range laser 3D scanners and structured light handheld 3D scanners to digitize large-sized objects. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 17(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/166186.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).