Vs30-based site classifcation and assessment of site-specifc ground response analysis for densely populated urban areas of Trabzon (NE Turkey)

Mustafa, Senkaya

doi:10.1007/s11600-022-00887-4

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Vs30-based site classifcation and assessment of site-specifc ground response analysis for densely populated urban areas of Trabzon (NE Turkey)

Autorzy

Mustafa Senkaya

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s11600-022-00887-4

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The city of Trabzon has no site classification map or site-specific analyses representing the assessment earthquake hazard so far, although Trabzon had been influenced and damaged due to earthquakes that occurred particularly in the North Anatolian Fault zone both in the recent and distant past. This paper presents the site classification and analyzes the site-specific pseudo-spectral acceleration (PSA) for densely populated areas of Trabzon. The coastline and the east and west edges of the city demonstrate minimum Vs30 in the overall study area from 175 to 396 m/s, respectively, which falls CD to DE class in NEHRP, and ZC to ZE in TBDY. The Vs30 of the remaining areas vary between 347 and 851 m/s, representing CD to BC in NEHRP and ZD to ZB in Turkish Building Regulation. The wide range of Vs30 is mostly due to the depth of the volcanic main rock, altered and agglomerated settings of dominant formation. The estimated PSA curves along the coast side of Trabzon including the lowest Vs30 demonstrate significantly greater spectral acceleration values than the design spectrum, particularly in TA–TB range that was used for almost whole constructions in the study area. Also, PSAs of the neighborhoods mostly classified as ZC in TDBY indicate overlapping with design spectrums and peak values are pretty close to limits. As a result, the proposed paper demonstrates that the earthquake hazard should not be underestimated, in particular considering the high possibility of well-known frequent ruptures on the east side of the North Anatolian Fault.

Słowa kluczowe

Vs30 NEHRP TBDY PSA Trabzon design spectrum site classification

Vs30 NEHRP TBDY PSA Trabzon

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 71, no. 1

Strony

129--146

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 78 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Mustafa Senkaya

msenkaya@ktu.edu.tr

Geophysical Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-3479

Bibliografia

1. AFAD (2018a) Natural Disasters of Turkey between 2010–2017. https://www.afad.gov.tr/afet-analiz. Accessed 14 Jan 2021
2. AFAD (2018b) Turkish Earthquake Building Regulations. The Ministry of Interior, Turkey
3. Ahmetoglu S (2019) The constitutional revolution of 1908 and its aftermath in Trabzon. Leiden University
4. Akgün A, Bulut F (2007) GIS-based landslide susceptibility for Arsin-Yomra (Trabzon, North Turkey) region. Environ Geol 51:1377–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0435-6
5. Aki K, Richards PG (1980) Quantitative seismology: theory and methods. Freeman, W. H
6. Akin Ö, Sayil N (2016) Site characterization using surface wave methods in the Arsin-Trabzon province. NE Turkey Environ Earth Sci 75:72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4840-6
7. Akkar S, Azak T, Çan T et al (2018a) Evolution of seismic hazard maps in Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3197–3228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0349-1
8. Akkar S, Eroğlu Azak T, Çan T, et al (2014) Revision of Turkish seismic hazard map. AFAD, Ankara
9. Akkar S, Kale Ö, Yakut A, Çeken U (2018b) Ground-motion characterization for the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3439–3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0101-2
10. Aktaş Y (2020) Erzincan’da Meydana Gelen Depremler (XI-XV. Yüzyıllar). Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Derg 399–419. doi: https://doi.org/10.14222/Turkiyat4308
11. Alessio C, Crova R, Duò E, Naldi M (2015) MASW 2D Seismic Survey in Urban Areas - The Case of the Turin Metro 1 Line. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, pp 1–5
12. Ali A, Kim KY (2016) Seismic site conditions in Gangneung, Korea, based on Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves and topographic data. Geosci J 20:781–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-016-0013-1
13. Aung AMW, Leong EC (2015) Application of weighted average velocity (WAVe) method to determine Vs, 30. Soils Found 55:548–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.04.007
14. Babacan AE (2013) The Determination of Engineering Properties of Volcanic Rocks of Kabakoy Formation (Trabzon) with Seismic Tomography Method. MSc Thesis in Turkish, Karadeniz Technical University
15. Babacan AE, Gelisli K, Ersoy H (2014) Seismic tomography and surface wave analysis based methodologies on evaluation of geotechnical properties of volcanic rocks: a case study. J Earth Sci 25:348–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-014-0417-7
16. Babacan AE, Gelisli K, Tweeton D (2018) Refraction and amplitude attenuation tomography for bedrock characterization: Trabzon case (Turkey). Eng Geol 245:344–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.09.008
17. Babayev G, Telesca L (2016) Site specific ground motion modeling and seismic response analysis for Microzonation of Baku, Azerbaijan. Acta Geophys 64:2151–2170. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0105
18. Bard P-Y, Campillo M, Chávez-Garcia FJ, Sánchez-Sesma F (1988) The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985—A Theoretical Investigation of Large- and Small-scale Amplification Effects in the Mexico City Valley. Earthq Spectra 4:609–633. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585493
19. Bekler T, Demirci A, Ekinci YL, Büyüksaraç A (2019) Analysis of local site conditions through geophysical parameters at a city under earthquake threat: Çanakkale, NW Turkey. J Appl Geophys 163:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.02.009
20. Bozer A (2020) Tasarım Spektral İvme Katsayılarının DBYBHY 2007 ve TBDY 2018 Yönetmeliklerine Göre Karşılaştırması. DÜMF Mühendis Derg 11:393–404. https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.559965
21. Brown LT, Diehl JG, Nigbor RL (2000) A simplified procedure to measure average shear-wave velocity to a depth of 30 Meters (Vs30). Auckland, New Zealand, p 0677
22. BSSC (2020) NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. Federal Emergency Management Agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security By the Building Seismic Safety Council of the National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C
23. CEN (2004) Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European committee for standardization, Brussels
24. Cercato M, Donno GD, Desideri FS, Giambattista LD (2021) Geophysical investigations for the identification of active seismic faults below alluvium for seismic hazard assessment. Surf Geophys 19:127–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12147
25. Chávez-García FJ, Pedotti G, Hatzfeld D, Bard P-Y (1990) An experimental study of site effects near Thessaloniki (northern Greece). Bull Seismol Soc Am 80:784–806. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0800040784
26. Comina C, Foti S, Boiero D, Socco L (2011) Reliability of Vs30 evaluation from surface-wave tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137:579–586. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000452
27. Cultrera G, Cornou C, Di Giulio G, Bard P-Y (2021) Indicators for site characterization at seismic station: recommendation from a dedicated survey. Bull Earthq Eng 19:4171–4195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01136-7
28. Eray Bi̇ber T (2019) Karadeniz’de Depremler ve Yardımlar (1939–1944). Marmara Türkiyat Araştırmaları Derg 6:151–181. https://doi.org/10.16985/mtad.660163
29. Ergin M, Özalaybey S, Aktar M, Yalçin MN (2004) Site amplification at Avcılar, Istanbul. Tectonophysics 391:335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2004.07.021
30. Ersoy H, Karsli MB, Çellek S et al (2013) Estimation of the soil strength parameters in Tertiary volcanic regolith (NE Turkey) using analytical hierarchy process. J Earth Syst Sci 122:1545–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0366-z
31. Eyuboglu Y, Chung S-L, Santosh M et al (2011a) Transition from shoshonitic to adakitic magmatism in the eastern Pontides, NE Turkey: implications for slab window melting. Gondwana Res 19:413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2010.07.006
32. Eyuboglu Y, Santosh M, Bektas O, Ayhan S (2011b) Arc magmatism as a window to plate kinematics and subduction polarity: Example from the eastern Pontides belt, NE Turkey. Geosci Front 2:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2010.12.004
33. Fichtner A, Saygin E, Taymaz T et al (2013) The deep structure of the North Anatolian fault zone. Earth Planet Sci Lett 373:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2013.04.027
34. Foti S, Hollender F, Garofalo F et al (2017) Guidelines for the good practice of surface wave analysis: a product of the InterPACIFIC project. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0206-7
35. Foti S, Lai CG, Rix GJ, Strobbia C (2014) Surface wave methods for near-surface site characterization, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
36. Grecu B, Zaharia B, Diaconescu M et al (2018) Characterization of site conditions for selected seismic stations in eastern part of Romania. Acta Geophys 66:153–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0117-2
37. Günaydin M, Atmaca B, Demir S et al (2021) Seismic damage assessment of masonry buildings in Elazığ and Malatya following the 2020 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake, Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng 19:2421–2456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01073-5
38. Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, et al (2020) DEEPSOIL 7.0, User Manual
39. Inc G (2009) SeisImager. OYO Corporation, USA
40. Işık E, Büyüksaraç A, Ekinci YL et al (2020) The effect of site-specific design spectrum on earthquake-building parameters: a case study from the marmara region (NW Turkey). Appl Sci 10:7247. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207247
41. Kalafat D, Toksöz MN (2015) Karadeniz’in yakın dönem depremselliğine ve sismotektoniğine genel bir bakış. Sakarya, p 71
42. Kanlı AI, Tildy P, Prónay Z et al (2006) VS30 mapping and soil classification for seismic site effect evaluation in Dinar region, SW Turkey. Geophys J Int 165:223–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02882.x
43. Karsli H, Senkaya M (2019) Effects of Physical and Acquisition Parameters on Fundamental Dispersion Curve in MASW Method. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, pp 1–5
44. Kim B, Nam MJ, Kim D et al (2016) An analysis of MASW responses for urban ground subsidence. ASEG Ext Abstr 2016:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1071/aseg2016ab213
45. KOERI (2021) Bogaziçi University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute. http://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/sismo/2/deprem-bilgileri/buyuk-depremler/. Accessed 27 Mar 2021
46. Kul B (2012) Geotechnical Investigation on Yeşilyurt (Trabzon) Landslide and Slope Support Design Using by Back Analysis. MSc Thesis in Turkish, Karadeniz Technical University
47. Leyendecker EV, Hunt RJ, Frankel AD, Rukstales KS (2000) Development of maximum considered earthquake ground motion maps. Earthq Spectra 16:20
48. Liu W, Chen Q, Wang C et al (2017) Spatially correlated multiscale Vs30 mapping and a case study of the Suzhou site. Eng Geol 220:110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.01.026
49. Macau A, Benjumea B, Gabàs A et al (2018) Geophysical measurements for site effects characterisation in the urban area of Girona, Spain. Surf Geophys 16:340–355. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2018004
50. Menke W (2014) Review of the generalized least squares method. Surv Geophys 36:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-014-9303-1
51. MEU (2007) Turkish Earthquake Building Regulations. Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation, Turkey
52. Muthuganeisan P, Raghukanth STG (2016) Site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard map of Himachal Pradesh, India. Part I. Site-Specific Ground Motion Relations. Acta Geophys 64:336–361. https://doi.org/10.1515/acgeo-2016-0010
53. Naeim F (2001) Earthquake excitation and response of buildings. In: Braun S (ed) Encyclopedia of Vibration. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 439–461
54. Nazri FM, Ghuan TC, Hussin SN, Majid TA (2015) Evaluation of soil flexibility of the reclaimed area in Penang using the non-destructive method. Nat Hazards 78:1267–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1770-2
55. Pamuk E, Özdağ ÖC, Özyalın Ş, Akgün M (2017) Soil characterization of Tınaztepe region (İzmir/Turkey) using surface wave methods and nakamura (HVSR) technique. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 16:447–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0392-y
56. Park C, Miller RD, Xia J (1998) Imaging dispersion curves of surface waves on multi-channel record. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1998. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 1377–1380
57. Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (1999) Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64:800–808. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444590
58. Pudi R, Roy P, Martha TR, Kumar KV (2021) Estimation of earthquake local site effects using microtremor observations for the Garhwal-Kumaun Himalaya, India. Surf Geophys 19:73–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12128
59. Putti SP, Devarakonda NS, Towhata I (2019) Estimation of ground response and local site effects for Vishakhapatnam, India. Nat Hazards 97:555–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03658-5
60. Putti SP, Satyam N (2017) Ground response analysis and liquefaction hazard assessment for Vishakhapatnam city. Innov Infrastruct Solut 3:12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-017-0113-4
61. Rastogi BK, Singh AP, Sairam B et al (2011) The possibility of site effects: the anjar case, following past earthquakes in Gujarat, India. Seismol Res Lett 82:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.82.1.59
62. Sairam B, Singh AP, Patel V et al (2018) Influence of local site effects in the Ahmedabad Mega City on the damage due to past earthquakes in Northwestern India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 108:2170–2182. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170266
63. Sairam B, Singh AP, Patel V et al (2019) VS30 mapping and site characterization in the seismically active intraplate region of Western India: implications for risk mitigation. Surf Geophys 17:533–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12066
64. Senkaya M, Karsli H, Socco LV, Foti S (2020) Obtaining reliable S-wave velocity depth profile by joint inversion of geophysical data: the combination of active surface-wave, seismic refraction and electric sounding data. Near Surf Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12126
65. Senkaya M, Karslı H (2016) Joint inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion data and vertical electric sounding data: synthetic tests on characteristic sub-surface models. Geophys Prospect 64:228–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12289
66. Şeşetyan K, Sakin O, Sönmez S, Tümsa MBD (2020) Seismic history of central north anatolian region: new contribution from ottoman archives. Seismol Res Lett 91:2590–2600. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200095
67. Silahtar A, Kanbur MZ (2021) 1D nonlinear site response analysis of the Isparta Basin (Southwestern Turkey) with surface wave (ReMi) and borehole data. Environ Earth Sci 80:268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09551-4
68. Socco L, Strobbia CL (2004) Surface-wave method for near-surface characterization: a tutorial. Surf Geophys. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2004015
69. Socco LV, Mabyalaht G, Comina C (2015) Robust static estimation from surface wave data. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 5222–5227
70. Stanko D, Markušić S, Strelec S, Gazdek M (2017) Equivalent-linear site response analysis on the site of the historical Trakošćan Castle, Croatia, using HVSR method. Environ Earth Sci 76:642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6971-4
71. TADAS (2021) 247730–4302-AFAD - TADAS. https://tadas.afad.gov.tr/waveform-detail/3151. Accessed 20 Sep 2021
72. Tezcan SS, Ipek M (1972) Long distance effects of the 28 March 1970 gediz turkey earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290010302
73. Tezcan SS, Kaya E, Engin Bal İ, Özdemir Z (2002) Seismic amplification at Avcılar, Istanbul. Eng Struct 24:661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00002-0
74. Tran N-L, Aaqib M, Nguyen B-P et al (2021) Evaluation of seismic site amplification using 1D site response analyses at Ba Dinh square area. Vietnam Adv Civ Eng 2021:e3919281. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3919281
75. USGS (2000) Implications for earthquake risk reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
76. Vanlı Senkaya G, Senkaya M, Karsli H, Güney R (2020) Integrated shallow seismic imaging of a settlement located in a historical landslide area. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79:1781–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01612-0
77. Xia J, Shen C, Xu Y (2013) Near-surface shear-wave velocities and quality factors derived from high-frequency surface waves. Lead Edge 32:612–618. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle32060612.1
78. Zülfi̇kar AC, (2020) 24 Ocak 2020 Elazığ Depreminin Kuvvetli Yer Hareketi Verilerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendis-Mimar Fakültesi Derg 35:821–834. https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.846809

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-c1ea072b-16b0-4b75-bbe8-2c6b87c8769e