Reconsidering Land System Changes in Borderlands: Insights from the China-ASEAN Borderland

Hua, Xiaobo; Kono, Yasuyuki

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Reconsidering Land System Changes in Borderlands: Insights from the China-ASEAN Borderland

Autorzy

Hua Xiaobo , Kono Yasuyuki

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Nowe podejście do systemowych zmian na lądzie na pograniczu: przypadek pogranicza Chin i innych krajów azjatyckich

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This study contributes to the literature on how to explicitly describe, track, and interpret the structure and dynamics of land systems in borderlands. The shift in land system science analytics from place-based toward larger-scale analysis of interactions and connections in a globalized context provides an opportunity to synthesize the knowledge about borderlands. This paper argues that studies on land system changes in borderlands need to thoroughly link the features of borderland regions with multiple interactions – on either or both sides of a border – rather than simply focusing on shifts within closed national boundaries. Furthermore, this paper provides important insights that can advance existing approaches to track and interpret changes in the land systems of borderlands.

Niniejsze opracowanie przyczynia się do jednoznacznego opisu, śledzenia i interpretacji struktury i dynamiki systemów lądowych na obszarach przygranicznych. Przejście w analizie nauk o systemie lądowym z analizy opartej na miejscu na analizę interakcji i połączeń na większą skalę w zglobalizowanym kontekście daje możliwość nowej syntezy wiedzy na temat pogranicza. W niniejszym artykule wykazuje się, że badania zmian w systemie lądowym na obszarach przygranicznych muszą dokładnie wiązać cechy regionów przygranicznych z wieloma interakcjami – po jednej lub po obu stronach granicy – zamiast koncentrować się wyłącznie na przesunięciach w obrębie zamkniętych granic krajowych. Ponadto niniejszy artykuł zawiera ważne informacje, które mogą usprawnić istniejące podejścia do śledzenia i interpretacji zmian w systemach lądowych pogranicza.

Słowa kluczowe

borderland land system land use change interactions synthesis sustainability

pogranicze system lądowy zmiany użytkowania gruntów interakcje synteza zrównoważoność

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2020

Tom

Vol. 15, nr 1

Strony

179--187

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 59 poz., fig.

Twórcy

autor

Hua Xiaobo

huaxiaobo1988@gmail.com

Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University, 46 Shimoadachi-cho, Yoshida Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

autor

Kono Yasuyuki

Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University, 46 Shimoadachi-cho, Yoshida Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan

Bibliografia

1. ANDERSEN K. E., 2017, Codification of customary communal tenure of upland shifting cultivation communities in Myanmar, in: Shifting cultivation policies: Balancing environmental and social sustainability, ed. Cairns M., Cabi, Boston, p. 917- 941.
2. ARNOLD D., PICKLES J., 2011, Global work, surplus labour, and the precarious economies of the border, in: Antipode, 43(5), p. 1598-1624.
3. BAIRD I. G., FOX J., 2015, How land concessions affect places elsewhere: Telecoupling, political ecology, and large-scale plantations in Southern Laos and Northeastern Cambodia, in: Land, 4(2), p. 436-453.
4. BAIRD I. G., LI, C. 2017, Variegated borderlands governance in Dehong Dai-Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture along the China-Myanmar border, in: Geoforum, 85, p. 214-224.
5. BAIRD I. G., NOSEWORTHY W., TUYEN N. P., HA L. T., FOX J., 2019, Land grabs and labour: Vietnamese workers on rubber plantations in southern Laos, in: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 40(1), p. 50-70.
6. BORRAS JR, S. M., LIU J., HU, Z., LI H., WANG C., XU Y., FRANCO J. C., YE J., 2018, Land control and crop booms inside China: implications for how we think about the global land rush, in: Globalizations, 15(1), p. 134-151.
7. DEVENDRA C., THOMAS D., 2002, Smallholder farming systems in Asia, in: Agricultural systems, 71(1-2), p. 17-25.
8. DIANA A., 2013, The experimental governing of mobility and trade on the China-Laos frontier: The Tai Lue case, in: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34(1), p. 25-39.
9. DIENER A. C., HAGEN J., 2012, Borders: A very short introduction, Oxford University Press.
10. DONNAN H., WILSOM T. M., 2001, Borders: 3 It is available at: http://kpl.gov.la/En/Detail.aspx?id= 23032. 186 Frontiers of identity, nation and state, Berg, Oxford.
11. DONG J., XIAO X., SHELDON S., BIRADAR C., XIE G., 2012, Mapping tropical forests and rubber plantations in complex landscapes by integrating PALSAR and MODIS imagery, in: ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 74, p. 20- 33.
12. EAKIN H., DEFRIES R., KERR S., LAMBIN E. F., LIU J., MARCOTULLIO P. J., MESSERLI P., REENBERG A., RUEDA X., SWAFFIELD S.R., WICKE B., ZIMMERER K., 2014, Significance of telecoupling for exploration of land-use change, in: Rethinking global land use in an urban era, eds Seto K. C., ReenbergA., MIT Press, p. 141-161.
13. EIA/TELEPAK, 2008, Borderlines: Vietnam‘s booming furniture industry and timber smuggling in the Mekong Region, EIA and Telepak, London.
14. FOX J., 2009, Crossing borders, changing landscapes: land-use dynamics in the Golden Triangle, Honolulu.
15. FRIIS C., NIELSEN J. Ø., 2016, Small-scale land acquisitions, large-scale implications: Exploring the case of Chinese banana investments in Northern Laos, in: Land Use Policy, 57, p. 117-129.
16. FRIIS C. NIELSEN J. Ø. 2017a, Land-use change in a telecoupled world: the relevance and applicability of the telecoupling framework in the case of banana plantation expansion in Laos, in: Ecology and Society, 22(4), p. 30.
17. FRIIS C., NIELSEN J. Ø., 2017b, On the system. Boundary choices, implications, and solutions in telecoupling land use change research, in: Sustainability, 9(6), p. 974.
18. GAINSBOROUGH M., 2008, On the borders of state power: frontiers in the greater Mekong subregion, Routledge.
19. GALLAHER C., DAHLMAN C., GILMARTIN M., MOUNTZ A., SHIRLOW P., 2009, Key concepts in political geography, Sage.
20. GREGORY D., JOHNSTON R., PRATT G., WATTS M., WHATMORE S., 2011, The dictionary of human geography, John Wiley & Sons.
21. HALL D., 2013, Land, Polity Press, Cambridge.
22. HUA X., KONO Y., ZHANG L., XU E., LUO R., 2019, How transnational labour migration affects upland land use practices in the receiving country: Findings from the China-Myanmar borderland, in: Land Use Policy, 84, p. 163-176.
23. HUA X., YAN J., LI H., HE W., LI X., 2016, Wildlife damage and cultivated land abandonment: Findings from the mountainous areas of Chongqing, China, in: Crop Protection, 84, p. 141-149.
24. KOJIMA T., BADENOCH N., 2013, From tea to temples and texts: transformation of the interfaces of upland-lowland interaction on the China-Myanmar Border, in: Southeast Asian Studies, 2(1), p. 95-131.
25. KOLOSSOV V., SCOTT J., 2013, Selected conceptual issues in border studies, in: Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, (1), p. 1-19.
26. KONO Y., SATO T., WATANABE K., TOMITA S., ZHANG L., 2018, Reconsidering development Mechanisms of tropical agriculture: Focusing on micro-development in Mainland Southeast Asia, in: Environmental Resources Use and Challenges in Contemporary Southeast Asia, Springer, Singapore, p. 21-39.
27. KUBO K., 2016, Myanmar's cross-border trade with China: beyond informal trade, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO).
28. KUBO K., 2018, Myanmar’s fresh fruit export to China via cross-border trade, in: Impact of China's Increasing Demand for Agro Produce on Agricultural Production in the Mekong Region, eds. Kubo K., Sakata S., Bangkok, Report No. 21.
29. LAHIRI-DUTT K., BROWN H., 2017, Governing the ungovernable? Reflections on informal gemstone mining in high-altitude borderlands of GilgitBaltistan, Pakistan, in: Local Environment, 22(11), p. 1428-1443.
30. LAMBIN E. F., GEIST H. J., 2008, Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts,: Springer Science & Business Media.
31. LEISZ S. J., ROUNDS E., THI BICH YEN N., NGUYEN BANG T., DOUANFPHACHANH S., NINCHALEUNE B., 2016, Telecouplings in the east–west economic corridor within borders and across, in: Remote Sensing, 8(12), p. 1012.
32. LESSER C., MOISE-LEEMAN E., 2009, Informal cross-border trade and trade facilitation reform in Sub-Saharan Africa, OECD Publishing, Paris.
33. LIU J., 2017, Integration across a metacoupled world, in: Ecology and Society, 22(4), p. 29.
34. LIU J., 2018, An integrated framework for achieving Sustainable Development Goals around the world, in: Ecology, Economy and Society: the INSEE Journal, 1(2), p. 11-17.
35. LIU J., HULL V., BATISTELLA M., DEFRIES R., DIETZ T., FU F., HERTEL T. W., IZAURRALDE R. C., 2013, Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world, in: Ecology and Society, 18(2), p. 26.
36. LIU J., HULL V., MORAN E., NAGENDRA H., SWAFFIELD S. R., TURNER B., 2014, Applications of the telecoupling framework to landchange science, in: Rethinking global land use in an urban era, eds Seto K., Reenberg A., MIT Press, p. 119-139.
37. LIU M., QI Q., LIU J., ZOU X., LI J., 2006, Spatialtemporal changes of the land use/cover and its ecological effect analysis in trans boundary Yunnan Province, in: Yunnan Geographic Environment Research, 18(2), p. 1-5.
38. LU J. N., 2017, Tapping into rubber: China’s opium replacement program and rubber production in Laos, in: The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(4), p. 726- 747.
39. MEYFROIDT P., 2016, Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science, in: Journal of Land Use Science, 11(5), p. 501-522.
40. MEYFROIDT P., CHOWDHURY R. R., DE BREMOND A., ELLIS E., ERB K.-H., FILATOVA T., GARRETT R., GROVE J. et al., 2018, Middlerange theories of land system change, in: Global Environmental Change, 53, p. 52-67.
41. MINGHI J. V., 1991, From conflict to harmony in border landscapes, in: The geography of border landscapes, eds Rumley D., Minghi J.V., Routledge, London, New York, p. 15-30.
42. NEWMAN D., 2006, The lines that continue to separate us: borders in ourborderless' world, in: Progress in Human geography 30(2), p. 143-161.
43. PARKER B. J., 2006, Toward an understanding of borderland processes, in: American Antiquity 71(1), 187 p. 77-100.
44. PRESCOTT G. W., SUTHERLAND W. J., AGUIRRE D., BAIRD M., BOWMAN V., BRUNNER J., CONNETTE G. M., COSIER M. et al., 2017, Political transition and emergent forest‐ conservation issues in Myanmar, in: Conservation Biology, 31(6), p. 1257-1270.
45. ROUSSEAU J. F., 2018, A failed market experiment and ignored livelihoods: Jatropha expansion in the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands, in: Routledge handbook of Asian borderlands, eds Horstmann A., Saxer M., Routledge, Abingon, New York, p. 202- 211.
46. ROUSSEAU J. F., STURGEON J., 2019, The disappearance of water buffalo from agrarian landscapes in Western China, in: Journal of Agrarian Change, 19(2), p. 319-336.
47. STEINBERG D. I., FAN H., 2012, Modern ChinaMyanmar relations: dilemmas of mutual dependence, Nias press.
48. STURGEON J. C., 2007, Border landscapes: the politics of Akha land use in China and Thailand, University of Washington Press, Seattle and London.
49. STURGEON J. C., 2010, Governing minorities and development in Xishuangbanna, China: Akha and Dai rubber farmers as entrepreneurs. In, Geoforum, 41(2), p. 318-328.
50. STURGEON J. C., 2013, Cross‐border rubber cultivation between China and Laos: Regionalization by Akha and Tai rubber farmers, in: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34(1), p. 70-85.
51. TRINCSI K., TURNER S., 2014, Mapping mountain diversity: Ethnic minorities and land use land cover change in Vietnam's borderlands, in: Land Use Policy, 41, p. 484-497.
52. TURNER S., 2013, Under the state's gaze: Upland trading-scapes on the Sino-Vietnamese border. in: Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 34(1), p. 9-24.
53. VAN SCHENDEL W., 2005, The Bengal borderland: Beyond state and nation in South Asia, Anthem Press.
54. VERBURG P. H., HRB K. H., MERTZ O., ESPINDOLA G., 2013, Land system science: between global challenges and local realities. in: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainbility, 5, p. 433-437.
55. WOODS K., 2012, The political ecology of rubber production in Myanmar: an overview, Global Witness, Yangon, Myanmar.
56. WOODS K., 2019, Rubber out of the ashes: locating Chinese agribusiness investments in ‘armed sovereignties’ in the Myanmar-China borderlands, in: Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(1), p. 79-95.
57. YAN J., YANG Z., LI Z., LI X., XIN L., SUN L., 2016, Drivers of cropland abandonment in mountainous areas: A household decision model on farming scale in Southwest China, in: Land Use Policy, 57, p. 459-469.
58. ZHANG L., KONO Y., KOBAYASHI S., 2014, The process of expansion in commercial banana cropping in tropical China: A case study at a Dai village, Mengla County, in: Agricultural Systems, 124, p. 32-38.
59. ZIMMERER K., LAMBIN E., VANEK S., 2018, Smallholder telecoupling and potential sustainability, in: Ecology and Society, 23(1), p. 30.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-c1e0ffe7-079c-47bf-91dd-9e4ced9b3ee9