Fractal analysis of land development elements for spatial planning purposes

• Autorzy: Bieda Agnieszka , Adamczyk Tomasz , Bydłosz Jarosław , Cichociński Piotr , Parzych Piotr

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.57599/gisoj.2021.1.1.131

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Spatial planning is a set of complex processes that aim to determine the correct location of objects in the established area subject to planning procedures. Planning documents, executed at all levels of detail, must consider the current state of land development, both in the area subject to land-use planning procedures and adjacent areas. Hence, the creation of such documents must be preceded by multiple analyses. These considerations should lead to the determination of conditions to be met by future land development elements in such a way as to take into account and use the existing ones. Because land use elements such as river network, road networks, buildings or forest areas are considered examples of random fractals, it was considered that the detection of fractal structures in area subject to land-use planning procedures could facilitate decision-making processes during creation of planning documents on a regional scale. This paper checks if it is possible to mathematically describe the clear chaos that prevails in the existing area subject to land-use planning procedures and if the use of fractal analysis in spatial planning is possible. The research was based on data from the Database of General Geographical Objects and the Bank of Local Data. Analyses were conducted within the borders of provinces.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

box-counting dimension; fractal structures; land-use; planning procedure; regional planning

PL

wymiar pudełkowy; struktury fraktalne; zagospodarowanie terenu; procedura planistyczna; planowanie regionalne

• Wydawca: SILGIS Association ; Croatian-Polish Scientific Network
• Czasopismo: GIS Odyssey Journal
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 1, no. 1
• Strony: 131--145
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Bieda Agnieszka

• AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9725-5960

autor

Adamczyk Tomasz

• AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-6169

autor

Bydłosz Jarosław

• AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0350-8112

autor

Cichociński Piotr

• AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8633-1235

autor

Parzych Piotr

• AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering, Krakow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-1978

Bibliografia

• 1. Abid R.I., Tortum A., Atalay A. (2021). Fractal Dimensions of Road Networks in Amman Metropolitan Districts. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 60(4), pp. 4203–4212.
• 2. Act of 27 March 2003 on Spatial Planning and Development. Journal of Laws 2021 item. 741, with later changes).
• 3. Adamczyk T., Begović V., Bieda A., Bielecka E., Bugaj P., Dawidowicz A., Džunić I., Gajos M., Jankowska M., Kereković D., Krukowska K., Kryszk H., Kurowska K., Parzych P., Rahmonov O., Schrunk I., Wójciak E., Źróbek, R. (2014). Spatial data in wide geospace. Zagreb, Nacionalna Knjižnica.
• 4. Bajerowski T. (2003). Niepewność w dynamicznych układach przestrzennych (Uncertainty in dynamic spatial systems). Olsztyn, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warminsko-Mazurskiego.
• 5. Bieda A. (2016). Possibilities of Using Fractal Geometry to Identify Areas at Risk of Their Shoreline Becoming Outdated. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 39–47.
• 6. Bieda A., Hanus P., Hycner R. (2012). Geodezyjne aspekty planowania przestrzennego i wybranych opracowań projektowych (Surveying aspects of land use planning and selected design studies). Katowice, Wydawnictwo Gall.
• 7. Czaja J. (1997). Modele statystyczne w informacji o terenie (Statistical models in land information). Kraków, Wydawnictwo AGH.
• 8. Frankhauser P. (2018). Fractals, urban fabrics and planning – a few clarifications. Cybergeo Conversation. https://cybergeo.hypotheses.org/273 [access: 7.06.2021].
• 9. Furmanek P. (2002). Struktury fraktalne jako źródło inspiracji w kształtowaniu formy architektonicznej (Fractal structures as a source of inspiration in shaping architectural form). Politechnika Wrocławska, doctoral dissertation, unpublished work.
• 10. Gromada M. (2003). Fraktale i samopodobieństwo (Fractals and self-similarity). mathspace.pl [access: 7.06.2021].
• 11. Husain A., Reddy J., Bisht D., Sajid M. (2021). Fractal dimension of coastline of Australia. Scientific Reports, 11(1), pp. 1–10.
• 12. Jevrić M., Knežević M., Kalezić J., Kopitović-Vuković N., Ćipranić I. (2014). Application of fractal geometry in urban pattern design. Tehnički vjesnik, 21(4), pp. 873–879.
• 13. Kudrewicz J. (2015). Fraktale i chaos (Fractals and chaos). Warszawa, Wydawnictwo WNT.
• 14. Lu Z., Zhang H., Southworth F., Crittenden J. (2016). Fractal dimensions of metropolitan area road networks and the impacts on the urban built environment. Ecological indicators, 70, pp. 285-296.
• 15. Mandelbrot B.B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. San Francisco, W.H. Freeman and Company.
• 16. Pászto V. (2014). Fractal dimension of the Czech road network. Presentation from Third InDOG Doctoral Conference in Olomouc, Czech Republic. 13 – 16 October 2014. http://www.slideshare.net/swenney/paszto-fractal-dimension-of-the-czech-road-network [access: 7.06.2021].
• 17. Patuano A., Tara A. (2020). Fractal geometry for Landscape Architecture: Review of methodologies and interpretations. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 5, 72-80.
• 18. Popović S.G., Dobričić M., Savić S.V. (2021). Challenges of sustainable spatial development in the light of new international perspectives – The case of Montenegro. Land Use Policy, 105, 105438.
• 19. Purevtseren M., Tsegmid B., Indra M., Sugar M. (2018). The fractal geometry of urban land use: The case of Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia. Land, 7(2), 67.
• 20. Regulation of Ministry of the Interior and Administration from 17 November 2011 on the database of topographic objects and the database of general geographical objects as well as standard cartographic elaborations. Journal of Laws from 2011, no. 279, item 1642).
• 21. Ratajczak W. (1998). Metodologiczne aspekty fraktalnego modelowania rzeczywistości (Methodological aspects of fractal reality modeling). Poznań, Uniwersytet im. A. Mickiewicza.
• 22. Ratajczak W. (2013). Obiekty, struktury i procesy przestrzenne. Analiza fraktalna (Spatial objects, structures and processes. Fractal analys.). Poznań, Bogucki Wydawnictwa Naukowe.
• 23. Shan Y. (2000). On Extraction and Fractal of Urban and Rural Residential Spatial Pattern in Developed Area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 55(6), pp. 671–678.
• 24. Tannier C., Pumain D. (2005). Fractals in urban geography: a theoretical outline and an empirical example. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. 307.