Formation of a Representative Selection of It-Indicators to Assess the Quality Information Systems at Enterprise

• Autorzy: Garkin G.G.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

For the effective use of the acquired or existing information system (IS) at the enterprise it is necessary to solve the problems relatedto an assessment of the IS quality. The information system is represented as a set of the functional components therefore it is necessary at first to evaluate quality of each of the components, and then get an integral assessment of the entire system. Quite tricky in the processes of IS quality assessment is the ambiguity of existing methods of formation the set of IT-indicators, most adequately characterizing the current state of functioning of the IS. It is necessary to define quantity and the list of IT-indicators (representative selection) which can be used to evaluate the quality of information systems in the enterprise to ensure the accuracy and veracity of quality assessment of IS. For formation of such selection it is offered to use an expert method. Expert's task is to select the criteria for the assessment quality of IS components, the formation of a representative selection of its indicators that best describe the real state of the information system at the enterprise, establishment of weights for IT-indicators, i.e. the importance of each IT-indicator to assess the quality of entire IS. The implementation of such actions, taking into account the recommendations of existing standards and using the method hierarchies’ analysis, are considered.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

information system; quality of information system; criteria of an assessment quality; IS status; IT-indicators; selection; representativeness

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 3, No 3
• Strony: 13--21
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Garkin G.G.

• Kharkiv National University of Economics Named Simon Kuznets, Pr. Lenin, 9a, Kharkiv

Bibliografia

• 1. Calculation of error and sample size. Marketing research. Consulting for business [electronic resource]: access mode: http://www.gortis.info/index.php?option= com_content&task=view&id=340
• 2. Chukhray N. 2012. Competition as a strategy of enterprise functioning in the ecosystem of innovations // Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal. Vol. 01, No. 3, 09–15.
• 3. Diagnosis of Enterprise State: Theory and Practice: [monograph] / [ed. A.E Voronkova]. Kharkov, PH “INZHEK”. 2008. 520.
• 4. Feshchur R., Samulyak V., Shyshkovskyi S., Yavorska N. 2012. Analytical instruments of management development of industrial enterprises // Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal. Vol. 01, No. 3, 17–22.
• 5. Ilchuk P., Kots O. 2012. Place of Scientific and Technological Production Preparation in the Forming of Enterprise Competitiveness Strategy // Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal. – Vol. 01, No. 3, 23–28.
• 6. ISACA. Iinformation systems. Certified information systems auditor. CISA Review Manual. 2012. – 440.
• 7. ITIL. The key to Managing IT services Office of Government Commerce. London: TSO. 2005. - 418.
• 8. Job Descriptions. Computer technology. [Electronic resource]: access mode: http://www.jobs.ua/job_description
• 9. Koretskyy B.O. 2008. Grounds for establishing the methodology algorithm for estimation the competitive position of the subject of economic activity in transit economy // Investments: practice and experiences. - №5. – 39–44.
• 10. Kuzmin O. Ye. and Melnyk O. H. 2012. Economic diagnostics: [handbook]. K.: Knowledge. 318.
• 11. Kuzmin O. Ye., Melnyk O. H., Shpak N. O., Mukan O. V. 2012. The concept of creation and use of the polycriterial diagnostics systems of enterprise activity // Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal. Vol. 01, No. 4. 23-29.
• 12. Kuzmin O., Melnyk O., Chyrkova Yu. 2012. The instruments of the enterprises rating activity // Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal. – 2012, Vol. 01, No. 4. 39–46.
• 13. Kuzmin O.Ye., Melnik, O.H. Mukan O.V. 2012. Polycriterial diagnostics of the enterprise development // Econtechmod. An International Quarterly Journal. Vol. 01, No. 3, 55-63.
• 14. Melnyk O. H. 2010. System oriented diagnostic of enterprises’ activity // Actual economic problems. No 1 (103). 143-150.
• 15. Pushkar A.I., Sybilev K.S. 2011. Methodical approach to assessing the quality of informational works at the enterprise // Economics of Development. No.3 (59), 67-74.
• 16. Quality Control Systems. Main terms and the terminological list of DSTU ISO 9000: 2007. National standard of Ukraine [Valid from 01.01.2008]. Derzhspozhivstandart of the Ukraine. - [Electronic resource]: access mode: http://www.document. org.ua/sistemi -upravlinnja-jakistyu.-osnovni-polozhen-nja-ta-slovnik-nor14237.html
• 17. Seleznyova O.V. 2007. Methodological grounds for estimation the competitive capacity of the enterprise // Economics and state. - №6. – 31–33.
• 18. The Cobit 4.1. Framework. Control Objectives. Management Guidelines. Maturity Models. The IT Governance Institute. USA, 2011. - 196.
• 19. Yul J.E., Kendèl M.J. 1960. Theory of statistics. Gosstatizdat USSR. - Moscow. 780.
• 20. Zhelezko B.A., Synyavskaya O.A., Kobziev V.G. 2010. Information and technological infrastructure of enterprises as object of rating estimation / Materials of VI Intern. conf. “Informational systems and technologies”. -Minsk, Publisher A.N. Varaksyn. 264-267.