Living space: the contemporary housing environment as a place for the family

Dudzic-Gyurkovich, Karolina

doi:10.37705/TechTrans/e2023014

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Living space: the contemporary housing environment as a place for the family

Autorzy

Dudzic-Gyurkovich Karolina

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37705/TechTrans/e2023014

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This paper discusses housing areas from the perspective of meeting the livingneeds of families. In recent decades, significant changes have been observedin Poland both in terms of the formation of new housing complexes and insocial expectations regarding living conditions. The new housing complexesdiffer significantly from the traditional, typical ones with distinctive architectureand low-standard common spaces, commonly referred to as panel blockhousing estates. Previous research on housing environment quality generallypoints to the need to create developments that provide the highest possiblequality of life. These studies focused on the problems of one particular groupof residents, such as children, seniors or people with disabilities. However,families, which make up a significant portion of the population and are importantusers, have not been adequately addressed in urban planning studies to date.Therefore, this problem merits investigation and existing research methods orurban development concepts that can be used to evaluate residential areasshould be identified as should factors and spatio-functional characteristics ofresidential areas that can influence the creation of high-quality space for families.This study, based on a literature review, evaluated two selected developmentmodels in terms of providing optimal living conditions for families. It was foundthat current proposals may be useful in determining features of family-dedicatedspace, yet they display a range of deficiencies that should be addressed.The study’s conclusions can be used as a basis for further investigation and asrecommendations in the context of planning and urban policymaking.

Słowa kluczowe

urban space family urban planning housing environment 15-minute city

przestrzeń miejska rodzina urbanistyka środowisko mieszkaniowe miasto 15-minutowe

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej im. Tadeusza Kościuszki

Czasopismo

Technical Transactions

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 120, iss. 1

Strony

art. no. e2023014

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 44 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Dudzic-Gyurkovich Karolina

karolina.dudzic-gyurkovich@pk.edu.pl

Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9610-7288

Bibliografia

1. Allam, Z., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Chabaud, D., & Moreno, C. (2022). The 15-minute city offers a new framework for sustainability, liveability, and health. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(3), e181–e183. doi:10.1016/S25425196(22)00014-6
2. Baranowski, A. (2007). Miejsce Jako Mikro Środowisko Codzienne. Czasopismo Techniczne Politechniki Krakowskiej, 3-A.
3. Bergantino, A. S., Biscione, A., de Felice, A., Porcelli, F., & Zagaria, R. (2022). Kindergarten Proximity and the Housing Market Price in Italy. Economies, 10(9), 1–16. doi:10.3390/economies10090222
4. Browning, M., & Lee, K. (2017). Within what distance does “greenness” best predict physical health? A systematic review of articles with gis buffer analyses across the lifespan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7), 1–21. doi:10.3390/ijerph14070675
5. Di Marino, M., Tomaz, E., Henriques, C., & Chavoshi, S.H. (2023). The 15-minute city concept and new working spaces: a planning perspective from Oslo and Lisbon. European Planning Studies, 31(3), 598–620. doi:10.1080/09654313.2022.2082837
6. Dovey, K. (2015). Sustainable Informal Settlements? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 179, 5–13. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.406
7. Gaglione, F., Gargiulo, C., Zucaro, F., & Cottrill, C. (2022). Urban accessibility in a 15-minute city: a measure in the city of Naples, Italy. Transportation Research Procedia, 60(2021), 378–385. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.049
8. Golubchikov, O., & Badyina, A. (2012). Sustainable Housing for Sustainable Cities. UN Habitat.
9. Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864), 756–760. doi:10.1126/science.1150195
10. GUS. (2017). JAKOŚĆ ŻYCIA W POLSCE edycja 2017. Retrieved 10 September 2023, from http://www.stat.gov.pl
11. Guzman, L. A., Arellana, J., Oviedo, D., Alberto, C., & Aristizábal, M. (2021). COVID-19, activity and mobility patterns in Bogotá. Are we ready for a ‘15-minute city’? doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.008
12. Haupt, P. (2012). Hammarby Sjöstad – przestrzeń odzyskana, zrównoważona, społeczna Hammarby Sjöstad. Środowisko Mieszkaniowe = Housing Environment, 3, 55–57.
13. Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, M. (2010). Zdrowie środowiskowe a zrównoważone środowisko mieszkaniowe. Przestrzeń i Forma, 13, 90–98.
14. Jennings, V., & Bamkole, O. (2019). The relationship between social cohesion and urban green space: An avenue for health promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3). doi:10.3390/ijerph16030452
15. JLL, O. (2023). Preferencje nabywców mieszkań 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2023, from https://www.jll.pl/pl/trendy-i-analizy/badanie/preferencjenabywcow-mieszkan-2022
16. Kałdon, B. M. (2016). Rodzina Jako Instytucja Społeczna W Ujęciu Interdyscyplinarnym. Forum Pedagogiczne, 1(1), 228–241. doi:10.21697/fp.2011.1.12
17. Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Sharifi, A., & Sadeghi, A. (2023). The 15-minute city: Urban planning and design efforts toward creating sustainable neighborhoods. Cities, 132(October 2022), 104101. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.104101
18. Kisiel, R., & Zielińska-Szczepkowska, J. (2021). Housing policy in Poland. Studia Prawno-Ekonomiczne, 118, 227–247. doi:10.26485/spe/2021/118/12
19. KKSM. (2022). Badanie jakości środowiska mieszkaniowego krakowskich osiedl. Retrieved 10 September 2023, from https://rewitalizacja.krakow.pl/rewitalizacja/273032,artykul,badanie_jakosci_srodowiska_mieszkaniowego_krakowskich_osiedli.html
20. Kothencz, G., Kolcsár, R., Cabrera-Barona, P., & Szilassi, P. (2017). Urban Green Space Perception and Its Contribution to Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(7), 766. doi:10.3390/ijerph14070766
21. Kurian, S.M., & Thampuran, A. (2011). Assessment of Housing Quality. Institute of Town Planners, India Journal, 8(2), 74–85.
22. Kurkowska, A. (2017). Zamieszkiwanie jako wartość towarzysząca istnieniu. In Wartość a przestrzeń architektoniczna :Tożsamość, tradycja, komunikacja (pp. 21–36). Gdańsk: Poliechnika Koszalińska.
23. Lee, A.C.K., & Maheswaran, R. (2011). The health benefits of urban green spaces: A review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health, 33(2), 212–222. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
24. Liu, A.M.M. (1999). Residential satisfaction in housing estates: A Hong Kong perspective. Automation in Construction, 8(4), 511–524. doi:10.1016/S0926-5805(98)00098-3
25. Maes, J., Zulian, G., Günther, S., Martijn, T., & Raynal, J. (2019). Enhancing Resilience of Urban Ecosyxstems throug Green Infrastructure (EnRoute). doi:10.2760/689989
26. Milewska-Wilk, H., & Nowak, K. (2022). Dane o mieszkalnictwie w Polsce. Kraków – Warszawa: Instytut Rozwoju Miast i Regionów. doi:10.51733/opm.2022.05
27. Ministerstwo Rozwoju i Technologii. (2023). Polityka mieszkaniowa. Retrieved 5 October 2023, from https://www.gov.pl/web/rozwoj-technologia/polityka-mieszkaniowa
28. Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities 2021, Vol. 4, Pages 93-111, 4(1), 93–111. doi:10.3390/SMARTCITIES4010006
29. Nelson, N.M., Foley, E., O’Gorman, D.J., Moyna, N.M., & Woods, C.B. (2008). Active commuting to school: How far is too far? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5, 1–9. doi:10.1186/14795868-5-1
30. Noworól, A., Kopyciński, P., Hałat, P., Salamon, J., & Hołuj, A. (2022). The 15-Minute City–The Geographical Proximity of Services in Krakow. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12), 1–34. doi:10.3390/su14127103
31. Olotuah, A.O., & Bobadoye, S.A. (2009). Sustainable Housing Provision for the Urban Poor : A Review of Public Sector Intervention in Nigeria. The Built & Human Environment Review, 2(May), 51–63.
32. Öner, Ö. (2017). Retail city: the relationship between place attractiveness and accessibility to shops. Spatial Economic Analysis, 12(1), 72–91. doi:10.1080/17421772.2017.1265663
33. Papas, T., Basbas, S., & Campisi, T. (2023). Urban mobility evolution and the 15-minute city model: from holistic to bottom-up approach. Transportation Research Procedia, 69(2022), 544–551. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.206
34. Pozoukidou, G., & Chatziyiannaki, Z. (2021). 15-minute city: Decomposing the new urban planning Eutopia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–25. doi:10.3390/su13020928
35. Ruszel, M.E. (2010). Rodzina, wartości, przemiany. Stalowa Wola: Fundacja Uniwersytecka w Stalowej Woli.
36. Schneider-Skalska, G. (2012). Funkcje i formy przestrzeni społecznej. Środowisko Mieszkaniowe, 10, 6–10.
37. Schneider-Skalska, G. (2019). Healthy Housing Environment in Sustainable Design. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(9). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092083
38. Schneider, A., Friedl, M.A., & Potere, D. (2010). Mapping global urban areas using MODIS 500-m data: New methods and datasets based on ‘urban ecoregions’. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(8), 1733–1746. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2010.03.003
39. Stachura, E., & Tufek-Memisevic, T. (2022). Tendencje rozwojowe w architekturze mieszkaniowej i mieszkalnictwie w Polsce w I dwudziestoleciu XXI w. Środowisko Mieszkaniowe, (38), 40–50. doi:10.4467/25438700sm.22.001.16101
40. Tasan-Kok, T., van Kempen, R., Raco, M., & Bolt, G. (2013). Towards Hyper- -Diversified European Cities: A Critical Literature Review. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences. Utrecht. Retrieved from /www.urbandivercities.eu
41. Ukoha, O.M., & Beamish, J.O. (1997). Assessment of residents’ satisfaction with public housing in Abuja, Nigeria. Habitat International, 21(4), 445–460. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(97)00017-9
42. Ulloa-Leon, F., Correa-Parra, J., Vergara-Perucich, F., Cancino-Contreras, F., & Aguirre-Nuñez, C. (2023). “15-Minute City” and Elderly People: Thinking about Healthy Cities. Smart Cities, 6(2), 1043–1058. doi:10.3390/ smartcities6020050
43. United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. United Nations (Vol. 16301). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf
44. Winston, N. (2009). Urban Regeneration for Sustainable Development: The Role of Sustainable Housing? European Planning Studies, 17(12), 1781–1796. doi:10.1080/09654310903322306

Uwagi

Section "Architecture and Urban Planning"

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-c1226c9f-64a0-4ef6-960b-2ce86a022d4b