Doświadczenia zagraniczne w stosowaniu poziomego oznakowania dróg do zarządzania prędkością

• Autorzy: Pogodzińska S.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Foreign experience of the use of non-standard road marking as a speed management measure

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule opisano dotychczasowe doświadczenia zastosowania poziomych znaków niestandardowych jako sposobu na zarządzanie prędkością. Przedstawiono wybrane przykłady omawianych znaków stosowanych w praktyce zagranicznej. Na podstawie studiów literatury opisano wyniki badań wpływu poziomych znaków niestandardowych na prędkość pojazdów. Ponadto wskazano podstawowe metody badawcze i mierniki wykorzystywane w ocenie skuteczności omawianego oznakowania.

EN

The paper presents previous experience of the use of non-standard road marking as a speed management measure. Selected examples of discussed road marking, commonly used in foreign practice, were presented. Based on literature review, selected results of impact of non-standard road marking on vehicles speed were presented. The article also presents basic research methods and measures used in evaluation of effectiveness of non-standard road marking implementation.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

oznakowanie; oznakowanie niestandardowe; organizacja ruchu; zarządzanie prędkością; bezpieczeństwo ruchu drogowego

EN

non-standard road marking; experimental road marking; speed management

• Wydawca: Stowarzyszenie Inżynierów i Techników Komunikacji Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej
• Czasopismo: Drogownictwo
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: nr 5
• Strony: 175--180, okł.
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., fot.

Twórcy

autor

Pogodzińska S.

• Politechnika Krakowska

Bibliografia

• [1] Arnold E., Lantz K.: Evaluation of Best Practices in Traffic Operations and Safety: Phase I: Flashing LED Stop Sign and Optical Speed Bars. Final Report, Virginia Transportation Research Council, 2007.
• [2] ATSSA: Low Cost Local Road Safety Solutions. American Traffic Safety Services Association. Fredericksburg, Virginia, 2006.
• [3] Australian Road Research Board: Understanding Traffic Control Devices. Special Report No. 44, Melbourne, Victoria, 1989.
• [4] Boodlal L., et al.: Factors Influencing Operating Speeds and Safety on Rural and Suburban Roads. Publication No. FHWAHRT-15-030, Federal Highway Administration, 2015.
• [5] Charlton S., de Pont J.: Curve speed management. Research Report 323, Land Transport New Zealand, 2007.
• [6] Corkle J., Giese J. L., Marti M. M.: Investigating the Effectiveness of Traffic Calming Strategies on Driver Behavior, Traffic Flow and Speed. Minnesota Local Road Research Board, Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2001.
• [7] Denton G.: The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed. Report LR 409,Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, 1971.
• [8] Dougald L.: Best Practices in Traffic Operations and Safety:Phase II: Zig-zag Pavement Markings. Report No. FHWA/VTRC 11-R9, Virginia Transportation Research Council, 2010.
• [9] Drakapoulos A., Vergou G.: An Evaluation of the Converging Chevron Pavement Marking Pattern at one Wisconsin Location. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 2003.
• [10] Gates T., Qin X., Noyce D.: Effectiveness of Experimental Transverse-Bar Pavement Marking as Speed-Reduction Treatment on Freeway Curves. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2056, pp. 95-103, 2008.
• [11] Godley S., Fildes B., Triggs T., Brown L.: Perceptual Countermeasures: Experimental Research. Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Research Report CR 182, 1999.
• [12] Hallmark S., Knickerbocker S., Hawkins N.: Evaluation of Low Cost Traffic Calming for Rural Communities – Phase II. Report No. IH RB Project TR-630,Center for Transportation Research and Education, 2013.
• [13] Hunter M., et. al.: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Converging Chevron Pavement Markings. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2 149, pp. 50-58, 2010.
• [14] Katz B. J.: Pavement Markings for Speed Reduction. Final Report, Science Applications International Corporation, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, 2004.
• [15] Lee J. H., et. al.: The Effects of Pavement Markings on High-risk Drivers’ Speeds. International Journal of Highway Engineering, vol.15, no.1, pp. 127-134, 2013.
• [16] Macaulay J., et. al.: On-road evaluation of perceptual countermeasures. Report No. CR 219, Australian Transport Safety Bereau, 2004.
• [17] Mutabazi M.: Dilemma of ZigZag Lines at Mid-Block Pedestrian Crossings. TRB 88th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM. Washington, D.C., 2009
• [18] Radalj T., Kidd B.: A trial with rumble strips as a means of alerting drivers to hazards at approaches to passively protected railway level crossings on high speed Western Australia rural roads. Australasian Road Safety Research Policing Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 2005.
• [19] Shinar D., RockwellT. H., Malecki J.: The Effects of Changes in Driver Perception on Rural Curve Negotiation. Ergonomics, Vol. 23, pp. 263-275, 1980.
• [20] Thompson T., Burris M., Carlson P.: Speed changes due to transverse rumble strips on approaches to high-speed stop-controlled intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1973, pp. 1-9, 2006.
• [21] Voigt A. P., Kuchangi S. P.: Evaluation of Chevron Markings on Freeway-to-freeway Connector Ramps in Texas. Report No. FHWA/TX-08/0-4813-2, Texas Department of Transportation, 2008.
• [22] Wilson, D.G.: Zig-zag Markings at Zebra Crossings: A Before and After Study. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Department of the Environment, TRRL Supplementary Report 35RC, Crowthorne, Berkshire, England, 1974.
• [23] http://statystyka.policja.pl/st/ruch-drogowy/76562,Wypadkidrogowe-raporty-roczne.html
• [24] www.timesofmalta.com