Zasady zarządzania ryzykiem zawodowym związanym z narażeniem na nanoobiekty, ich aglomeraty i agregaty (NOAA)

• Autorzy: Jankowska E.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Principles of occupational risk management related to exposure to nano-objects, their agglomerates and aggregates (NOAA)

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

W artykule przedstawiono zasady zarządzania ryzykiem zawodowym i praktyczne rady dotyczące ich wdrożenia, zgodnie z zaleceniami przedstawionymi w specyfikacjach technicznych: ISO/TS 12901-1:2012 Nanotechnologies – Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials –Part 1. Principles and approaches i ISO/TS 12901-2:2014 Nanotechnologies – Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials – Part 2. Use of the control banding approach. Stwierdzono, że ponieważ obecnie brak jest powszechnie akceptowanych metod do oceny ryzyka zawodowego związanego z narażeniem na NOAA, których podstawą są dane pomiarowe określane w rzeczywistych warunkach narażenia, oraz wartości referencyjnych (dopuszczalnych) w odniesieniu do poszczególnych NOAA występujących w środowisku pracy, to w procesie zarządzania ryzykiem zawodowym związanym z narażeniem na NOAA może być stosowana metoda bazująca na ustalaniu kategorii zagrożenia (HB) i szacowaniu poziomu narażenia (EB) przedstawiona w specyfi kacji technicznej ISO/TS 12901-2.

EN

The article presents principles of occupational risk management and practical advice on their implementation in accordance with the recommendations proposed in the technical specifications ISO/TS 12901-1:2012 Nanotechnologies – Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials – Part 1. Principles and approaches and ISO/TS 12901-2:2014 Nanotechnologies – Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials – Part 2. Use of the control banding approach. Because there are no commonly accepted methods to assess the occupational risks associated with exposure to NOAA, based on the measurement data determined in the real conditions of exposure, and reference values (limits) for each NOAA in the working environment method based on determining hazard category (HB) and estimating the level of exposure (EB) presented in ISO/TS 12901-2 can be used in the process of occupational risk management related to exposure to NOAA.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

nanomateriały; nanoobiekty; powietrze na stanowiskach pracy; zasady zarządzania ryzykiem zawodowym; ocena narażenia

EN

nano-objects; principles of occupational risk management; evaluation of exposure

• Wydawca: Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Podstawy i Metody Oceny Środowiska Pracy
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Nr 2 (84)
• Strony: 17--36
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Jankowska E.

• Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy 00-701 Warszawa ul. Czerniakowska 16

Bibliografia

• 1.Balazy A., Toivola M., Reponen T., Podgórski A., Zimmer A., Grinshpun S.A. (2006) Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 fi ltering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 50(3), 259–269.
• 2.Brouwer D., van Duuren-Stuurman B., Berges M., Jankowska E., Bard D., Mark D. (2009) From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects. J. Nanopart. Res. 11(8), 1867–1881. doi 10.1007/ s.11051-009-9772-1.
• 3.Brouwer D.H., Gijsbers J.H., Lurvink M.W. (2004) Personal exposure to ultrafi ne particles in the workplace; Exploring sampling techniques and strategies. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 48(5), 439–453.
• 4.Department of Energy Nanoscale Science Research Centres (2007) Nanoscale science research center. Approach to nanomaterial ES&H. Revision 2 – June.
• 5.EN 14907:2006 Ambient air quality – Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM2,5 mass fraction of suspended particulate matter.
• 6.EA, Environment Agency (2005) What is a hazardous waste? A guide to the hazardous waste regulations and the list of waste regulations in England and Wales (HWR01). Bristol.
• 7.Golanski L., Guiot A., Rouillon F., Pocachard J., Tardif F. (2009) Experimental evaluation of personal protection devices against graphite nanoaerosols. Fibrous fi lter media, masks, protective clothing, and gloves. Human & Experimental Toxicology 28, 353–359.
• 8.HSE, Health and Safety Executive (2003) HSG 103: Safe handling of combustible dusts: Precautions against explosions.
• 9.HSE, Health and Safety Executive (2006) Risk management of carbon nanotubes.
• 10.ICS 13.340. Protective Equipment.
• 11.ILO, International Labour Organization (2009). Zasady zarządzania ryzykiem3.indd 35 2015-07-03 13:33:36 Safe work. Chemical control banding. [on-line: http://www.ilo.org/legacy/english/protection/safework/ ctrl_banding/index.htm]
• 12.ISO/TR 13121:2011 Nanotechnologies – Nanomaterial risk evaluation.
• 13.ISO/TR 27628:2007 Workplace atmospheres – Ultrafi ne, nanoparticle and nanostructured aerosols – Inhalation exposure characterization and assessment.
• 14.ISO/TS 12901-1:2012 Nanotechnologies – Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials – Part 1. Principles and approaches.
• 15.ISO/TS 12901-2:2014 Nanotechnologies – Occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials – Part 2. Use of the control banding approach.
• 16.Maynard A.D., Aitken R.J. (2007) Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology 1(1), 26–41.
• 17.Methner M., Hodson L., Geraci C. (2010) Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identifi cation and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials – Part A. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7, 127–132. Doi 10.1080/15459620903476355.
• 18.NANOSAFE dissemination report. Are conventional protective devices such as fi brous fi lter media, respirator cartridges, protective clothing and gloves also effi cient for nanoaerosols? [on-line: www.nanosafe.org/scripts/home/publigen/content/ templates/show.asp?P=63&L=EN&ITEMID=13]
• 19.NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2009a) Approaches to safe nanotechnology, managing health and safety concerns with engineered nanoparticles.
• 20.NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2009b) Current intelligence bulletin 60: interim guidance for medical screening and hazard surveillance for workers potentially exposed to engineered nanoparticles. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Publication nr 2009–116.
• 21.NIOSH (2011) Current intelligence bulletin 63. Occupational exposure to titanium dioxide. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Publication nr 2011–160.
• 22.OECD (2009) Emission assessment for identify cation of sources and release of airborne manufactured nanomaterials in the workplace. Compilation of existing guidance. Series on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials nr 11. ENV/JM/MONO, 16.
• 23.Packham C. (2006) Gloves as chemical protection – Can they really work? Annals of Occupational Hygiene 50(6), 545–548.
• 24.Paik S.Y., Zalk D.M., Swuste P. (2008) Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposure. Ann. Occ. Hyg. 52(6), 419–428.
• 25.PD 6699-2:2007 Nanotechnologies – Part 2: Guide to safe handling and disposal of manufactured nanomaterials. BSI.
• 26.Rengasamy S., King W.P., Eimer B.C., Shaffer, R.E. (2008) Filtration performance of NIOSHapproved N95 and P100 fi ltering facepiece respirators against 4 to 30 nanometer-size nanoparticles. Journal of Occupationaland Environmental Hygiene 5(9), 556–564.
• 27.Shaffer R., Rengasamy S. (2009) Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles: A Review. J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 1661–1672.