A conceptual scheme for modelling forestry and LUC CO2 emissions in Ukraine

• Autorzy: Turkovska O. , Gustil M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A number of global land-use change and forest management models for studying CO2 emissions in land-use change and forestry, in particular: G4M, GLOBIOM, Land- SHIFT, GTM and GCOMAP are considered. The main issues and features of forestry in Ukraine (e.g. illegal forest harvesting, lack of reliable and consistent data on forestry, difference between concepts of Ukrainian and international legislation in forestry) are analyzed. A conceptual scheme for modelling forestry and land-use CO2 emissions in Ukraine is developed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

LULUCF; CO2 emission; Ukraine; information technology; modeling

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 2, No 1
• Strony: 57--62
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Turkovska O.

• Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine

autor

Gustil M.

• International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

Bibliografia

• 1. About adoption of Conception of developing sole state system of electronic inventory of wood / Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 16 September 2009 No 1090-r (in Ukrainian). Available at: http://dklg.kmu.gov.ua/forest/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=66017 &cat_id=65318
• 2. Böttcher H., Verkerk P.J, Gusti M., HavlÍk P., and Grassi G. H. 2012. Projection of the future EU forest CO2 sink as affected by recent bioenergy policies using two advanced forest management models, GCB Bioenergy,
• 3. Boychuk P., Boychuk Kh., Nahorski Z. and Horabik J. 2012. Spatial inventory of greenhouse gas emissions from the road transport in Poland, Econtechmod, vol. 1, n. 4, 9-16.
• 4. Charkovska N., Bun R., Nahorski Z. and Horabik J. 2012. Mathematical modeling and spatial analysis of emission processes in polish industry sector: cement, lime and glass production, Econtechmod, , vol. 1, n. 4, 7-22.
• 5. Climate Change 2001. Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, 2001, 760. Available at: http://www.grida.no/ publications/other/ipcc_tar/
• 6. Copenhagen Accord (2/CP.15), Addendum Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its fifteenth session. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009. FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1, UNFCC, 2010. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf
• 7. Decision 2/CMP.7, Addendum Part Two, Action taken by the Conference of the Parties. Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on its seventh session, held in Durban from 28 November to 11 December, FCCC/KP/CMP/2011/10/Add.1., UNFCCC, 2011. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/ 2011/cmp7/eng/10a01.pdf
• 8. Fifth National Communication on Climate Change of Ukraine, [Edt. by Osadchui V.I.], Kyiv, 2009. 281 (in Ukrainian).
• 9. Forest-growing in Ukraine: facts and illusions, Popkov M., Kozhushko I., Savushchuk M., 2009 (in Ukrainian). Available at: http://www.lesovod.org.ua/webfm_send/21
• 10. Four scenarios for Europe. Based on UNEP’s third Global Environment Outlook, UNEP/DEIA&EW/TR.03-10 and RIVM 402001021, 2003. Available at: http://www.unep.org/ geo/GEO3/pdfs/four_scenarios_europe.pdf
• 11. General characteristics of Ukrainian forests, Agency of State Forestry Resources of Ukraine, 2010 (in Ukrainian). Available at: http://dklg.kmu.gov.ua/forest/control/uk/publish/article? art_id=62921&cat_id=32867
• 12. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation, Kindermann G., Obersteiner M., Sohngen B. [et al.], PNAS, 2008, No 30, 10302-10307.
• 13. Global Environmental Outlook 3 – Past, Present and Future Perspectives, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), London, Earthscan Publications Ltd., 2002, 426. Available at: http://www.unep.org/geo/geo3.asp
• 14. Global Environmental Outlook 4 – Environment for Development. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Valetta, Progress Press Ltd., 2007, 540. Available at: http://www.unep.org/geo/geo4.asp
• 15. Global Forest Resources Assessment, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome 2010, 344. Available at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en/
• 16. Gusti M.I. 2010. An Algorithm for Simulation of Forest Management Decisions in the Global Forest Model,Artifi cial Intelligence, No 4. 45-49.
• 17. Havlik, P., Schneider A.U. and Schmid E. [et al.]. 2011. Global land-use implications of fi rst and second generation biofuel targets, Energy Policy.
• 18. IPCC Special Report: Emission Scenarios, Cambridge University Press. 2000. 570. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/emission/index.php?idp=0
• 19. Is it optimal «optimal forest cover share»? Savushchuk M.P. and Popkov M.Y. 2009 (in Ukrainian). Available at: http://www.lesovod.org.ua/node/4446
• 20. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change 1998. Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf
• 21. Lesiv M., Bun R., Shpak N., Danylo O., and Topylko P. 2012. Spatial analysis of GHG emissions in eastern polish regions: energy production and residential sector, Econtechmod, vol. 1, n. 2, 17-24.
• 22. National Inventory Report of Ukraine for 1990-2010, Kyiv, 2012, 729p (in Ukrainian).
• 23. Nijnik M., Oskam A. and Nijnik A. 2012. Afforestation for the Provision of Multiple Ecosystem Services: A Ukrainian Case Study, International Journal of Forestry Research, 2012. Vol. 12.
• 24. Osypenko V. 2012. The algorithm of bifurcation points forecasting in the analytical researches of complex agroecological systems, Econtechmod, vol. 1, n. 2, 35-38.
• 25. Pavelko A. and Skrulnikov D. 2010. Illegal harvesting in Ukraine, Szentendre: Regional ecological center of Central and Eastern Europe. 44 (in Ukrainian).
• 26. Ross W. Gorte. 2009. Carbon Sequestration in Forests, USA, Congressional Research Service. 23.
• 27. Schaldach R. Alcamo J. and Koch J. [et al.]. 2011. An integrated approach to modelling land-use change on Continental and global scales, Environmental Modelling & Software. No 26. 1041-1051.
• 28. Sohngen B., Mendelsohn R. and Sedjo R. 1999. Forest Management, Conservation, and Global Timber Markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. No 81. 1-13.
• 29. Soloviy I.P. 2008. Climate change and forestry: interferences, alternatives, perspectives, Scientifi c bulletin of National Forestry University of Ukraine. No 18.11. 209-216.
• 30. State target program «Forests of Ukraine for 2010 – 2015», Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine from 16 September 2009. 􀊋 977 (in Ukrainian). Available at: http://dklg.kmu.gov.ua/forest/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=66072&cat_id=66071
• 31. The causes of land-use change and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Lambin F.E., Turner B.L., Geist J.H. [et al.]. Global Environmental Change. 2001. No 11. 261-269.
• 32. To the problem of optimization of forest cover share in Ukraine, Savushchuk M.P., Popkov M.Y, 2006 (in Ukrainian). Available at: http://www.lesovod.org.ua/node/611
• 33. Ukraine (2011) Submission under the Ad-hoc working group on further commitments for Annex I Parties under Kyoto Protocol: Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Available at: http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/ad_hoc_working_groups/kp/application/pdf/awgkp_ukraine_2011.pdf
• 34. Yue T.-X., Jorgensen E.S. and Laroque R.G. 2010. Progress in global ecological modelling, Ecological Modelling.No 14. 2172-2177.
• 35. Zotkiewicz Z. and Karwinski A. 2012. Effect of temperaturę on the volume of gas emissions, Econtechmod, vol. 1, n. 2, 75-84.