Użytkowanie obszarów wokół małych miast Polski w wybranych aspektach jakości życia ich mieszkańców

• Autorzy: Pieńkowski Paweł , Podlasiński Marek

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.30450/202301

Warianty tytułu

EN

Land use of areas around small cities in Poland in selected aspects of the quality of life of their residents

• Języki publikacji: PL EN

Abstrakty

PL

Wpływ sposobu użytkowania w obrębie obszarów otaczających miasta jest szczególnie silny w przypadku małych ośrodków, gdyż tereny leśne i rolnicze graniczą tam częstokroć bezpośrednio ze strefami mieszkalnymi. Coraz liczniej pojawiają się publikacje, które dokumentują oddziaływanie tych dwóch sposobów użytkowania, wskazując m.in. na znaczenie uwarunkowań przestrzennych, które determinują wielkość wpływu otoczenia na jakość życia mieszkańców miast. Celem pracy było oszacowanie udziału sposobów użytkowania w otoczeniu 738 małych miast Polski (<20 tys. mieszkańców), z uwzględnieniem potencjału rekreacyjnego lasów i ewentualnych zagrożeń wyni¬kających z bliskiego sąsiedztwa z intensywnie użytkowanymi gruntami rolnymi. Podstawą uzyskanych wyników była baza Corine Land Cover z 2018 roku, z której pozyskano informację o usytuowaniu zabudowy miejskiej, lasach oraz terenach rolnych (grunty orne i sady). Uzyskane wyniki wskazują, że w przypadku 35,6% małych miast Polski teren zabudowany nie sąsiadował z lasami, a 7,3% miast nie posiadało lasów w promieniu 1,5 km. Natomiast tylko w 5,6% miastach teren zabudowany nie graniczył z jakimkolwiek terenem rolnym, a w 4,9% teren ten otoczony był w ponad 80% polami. Należy sądzić, że w grupie miast otoczonych polami, przy planowaniu struktury przestrzennej, szczególną uwagę należałoby poświęcić projektowaniu nowych terenów zielonych i rewaloryzacji już istniejących.

EN

The impact of land use within the areas surrounding cities is particularly strong in the case of small towns, as forest and agri¬cultural areas often directly border residential areas. There are more and more publications that document the impact of these two forms of land use, highlighting, among other things, the importance of spatial conditions that determine the impact of the environment on the quality of life of city inhabitants. The aim of the study was to estimate the share of different land use methods in the vicinity of 738 small Polish towns (<20,000 inhabitants), taking into account the recreational potential of forests and possible threats resulting from close proximity to intensively used agricultural land. The study was based on the Corine Land Cover database from 2018. Information on the location of urban development, forests and agricultural land (arable land and orchards) was obtained from this database. The results indicate that in the case of 35.6% of small Polish towns, built-up areas were not adjacent to forests, and 7.3% of towns did not have forests within a radius of 1.5 km. On the other hand, only in 5.6% of cities did no built-up areas border agricultural areas, and in 4.9% of cities more than 80% of built-up areas were surrounded by fields. In cities surrounded by fields, special attention should be paid to the design of new green areas and the redevolopment of existing ones when planning the spatial structure.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

pokrycie terenu; ekologia miasta; jakość życia; krajobraz leśny; krajobraz rolny

EN

land cover; towns in ecology; quality of life; agricultural landscape; forest landscape

• Wydawca: Komisja Krajobrazu Kulturowego Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego
• Czasopismo: Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: nr 49 (1)
• Strony: 5--20
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Pieńkowski Paweł

• Department of Environmental Management, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6782-291X

autor

Podlasiński Marek

• Department of Environmental Management, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3487-0664

Bibliografia

• Alexandra, J., Norman, B., 2020: The city as forest – integrating living infrastructure, climate conditioning and urban forestry in Canberra, Australia. Sustainable Earth, 3(1): 1-11.
• Andersson K, Lindgren M, Lundgren P, 2005: Customer and stakeholder analysis [Kund-och intressent analys]. In: Slutrapport, (Final report). Kairos Future AB, Stockholm (In Swedish).
• Barbosa, O., Tratalos, J. A., Armsworth, P. R., Davies, R. G., Fuller, R. A., Johnson, P., Gaston, K. J., 2007: Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83(2-3), 187-195.
• Bolz H., Sieke Ch., Michalski B., Schäfer R.B., Kubiak R., 2022. Spray drift based pesticide residues on untreated edible crops grown near agricultural areas. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 17: 21-31.
• Bovolenta, S.,2012: The role of grassland in rural tourism and recreation in Europe Study and quantification of ecosystem services provided by mixed farms View project Human-wildlife negative interactions: socio-ecological factors influencing livestock predations and agricultural damages View project Giuseppe Parente Independent Researcher. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/302964131.
• Bruley, E., Locatelli, B., Lavorel, S., 2021: Nature’s contributions to people: Coproducing quality of life from multifunctional landscapes. Ecology and Society, 26 (1): 1-21.
• Damalas, C. A., Eleftherohorinos, I. G., 2011: Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 8, Issue 5: 1402-1419.
• Dereumeaux, C., Fillol, C., Quénel, P., Denys, S., Sébastien, D., Quenel, P., 2020: Pesticide exposures for residents living close to agricultural lands: A review. Environment International, 134: 1-14.
• Erdönmez, C., Atmiş, E., 2021: The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on green space use in Turkey: Is closing green spaces for use a solution? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 64: 1-11.
• Ergen, M., 2020: Using the Buffer Zone Method to Measure the Accessibility of the Green Areas in Tokat, Turkey: 1-10
• Ge, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, M., Li, X., 2022: Area Threshold Interval of Urban Forest Patches Required to Maintain the Synergy between Biodiversity Conservation and Recreational Services: Case Study in Beijing, China. Forests, 13(11), 1848: 1-22.
• GUS – Bank Danych Lokalnych (Central Statistical Office). 2021: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/dane/ podgrup/tablica (access: 25.02.2023)
• Humpel, N., Owen, N., Leslie, E., Marshall, A. L., Bauman, A. E., Sallis, J. F., 2004: Associations of Location and Perceived Environmental Attributes with Walking in Neighborhoods. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(3): 239-242.
• Hyland, C., McConnell, K., DeYoung, E., Curl, C., 2022: Evaluating the accuracy of satellite-based methods to estimate residential proximity to agricultural crops. Journal of Exposure Science Environmental Epidemiology: 1-14.
• Iacono, M., Krizek, K., El-Geneidy, A., Humphrey, H. H., 2008: How Close is Close Enough? Estimating Accurate Distance Decay Functions for Multiple Modes and Different Purposes. Report 4 in the series Access to Destinations Study, St. Paul, Minnesota: 76 pp.
• Jansma, J. E., Wertheim-Heck, S. C. O., 2022: Feeding the city: A social practice perspective on planning for agriculture in peri-urban Oosterwold, Almere, the Netherlands. Land Use Policy, 117: 1-10.
• Kasner, E. J., Prado, J. B., Yost, M. G., Fenske, R. A., 2021: Examining the role of wind in human illness due to pesticide drift in Washington state, 2000- 2015. Environmental Health, 20(1): 1–15.
• Konijnendijk, C. C., Nilsson, K., Randrup, T. B., Schipperijn, J., 2005: Urban Forests and Trees. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg: 525 pp.
• Kruse-Plaß, M., Hofmann, F., Wosniok, W., Schlechtriemen, U., Kohlschütter, N., 2021: Pe¬sticides and pesticide-related products in ambient air in Germany. Environmental Sciences Europe, 33(1): 1-21.
• Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., Pozzer, A., 2015: The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 525(7569): 367-371.
• Linhart, C., Niedrist, G. H., Nagler, M., Nagrani, R., Temml, V., Bardelli, T., Wilhalm, T., Riedl, A., Zaller, J. G., Clausing, P., Hertoge, K., 2019: Pesticide contamination and associated risk factors at public playgrounds near intensively managed apple and wine orchards. Environmental Sciences Europe, 31(1): 1-16.
• Marans, R. W., 2012: Quality of Urban Life Studies: An Overview and Implications for Environment-Behaviour Research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35: 9-22.
• Martin, W., Wagner, L., 2018: How to grow a city: Cultivating an urban agriculture action plan through concept mapping. Agriculture and Food Security, 7(1): 1-10.
• Ospina, J. P., Botero-Fernández, V., Duque, J. C., Brussel, M., Grigolon, A., 2020: Understanding cycling travel distance: The case of Medellin city, Colombia). Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86: 1-22.
• Pieńkowski, P., Podlasiński, M., 2017: Proposal of a method for determination background landscape based on land cover domination index. Dissertations of Cultural Landscape Commision, 35: 9-18.
• Pieńkowski, P., Podlasiński, M., & Szpigiel, M. (2019). Reasons for the occurrence of small fo¬rest patches within post-glacial areas used for agriculture in Northern Poland. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(5), 11995-12011.
• Schindler, M., le Texier, M., Caruso, G., 2022: How far do people travel to use urban green space? A comparison of three European cities. Applied Geography, 141: 1-11.
• Seto, K. C., Sánchez-Rodríguez, R., Fragkias, M., 2010: The new geography of contemporary urbanization and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35: 167-194.
• Simões, M., Huss, A., Brouwer, M., Krop, E., Janssen, N., Vermeulen, R., 2022: Residential proximi¬ty to crops and agricultural pesticide use and cause-specific mortality: A prospective census-based cohort study in the Netherlands. Science of the Total Environment, 817: 1-14.
• Spagnoli, L., Mundula, L., 2021: Between urban and rural: Is agricultural parks a governance tool for developing tourism in the Periurban areas? re-flections on two Italian cases. Sustainability, Switzerland), 13(14): 1-22.
• Standish, R. J., Hobbs, R. J., Miller, J. R., 2013: Im¬proving city life: Options for ecological restoration in urban landscapes and how these might influence interactions between people and nature. Landscape Ecology, 28(6): 1213-1221.
• Stangierska, D., Kowalczuk, I., Juszczak-Szelą¬gowska, K., Widera, K., Ferenc, W., 2022: Urban Environment, Green Urban Areas, and Life Quality of Citizens—The Case of Warsaw. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17): 1-15.
• Sung, H., 2023: Causal impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on daily ridership of public bicycle sharing in Seoul. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89: 1-11.
• Texier, M. le, Schiel, K., Caruso, G., 2018: The provision of urban green space and its accessibility: Spatial data effects in Brussels. PLoS ONE, 13(10): 1-17.
• \vakhlamova, T., Rusterholz, H.-P., Kamkin, V., Baur, B., 2016: Recreational use of urban and suburban forests affects plant diversity in a Western Siberian city. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 17: 92-103.
• Xiang, L., Tian, Y., Pan, Y., 2022: Study on landscape evaluation and optimization strategy of Central Park in Qingkou Town. Scientific Reports, 12(1): 1-11.
• Xiang, M., Liu, Y., Yamamoto, S., Mizoue, T., Kuwahara, K., 2022: Association of Changes of lifestyle behaviors before and during the COVID-19 pan¬demic with mental health: a longitudinal study in children and adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19(1): 1-11.
• Yasmin, F., Larsen, J., El-Geneidy, A. M., 2010: Examining travel distances by walking and cycling, Montréal, Canada: 1-18.
• Zhai, Y., Li, W., 2022: Study on the Construction of Landscape Architecture in Residential District Based on Urban Greening Remote Sensing. Journal of Sensors, 2022: 1-11.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).