University maturity model – a bibliometric analysis

• Autorzy: Szydło Joanna , Sakowicz Agnieszka , di Pietro Filippo

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.34659/eis.2024.91.4.938

Warianty tytułu

PL

Model dojrzałości uczelni – analiza bibliometryczna

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In today's dynamic and competitive environment, universities play a key role in generating, transmitting, and applying knowledge and innovation. The growing interest in evaluating university performance at national and international levels has led to developing and applying university maturity models as effective assessment tools. This article aims to present various approaches to modelling university maturity. A bibliometric analysis was based on publications in the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The research query included TITLE-ABS-KEY ("maturity model" and universit*) for Scopus and TS = ("maturity model" and universit*) for the Web of Sciences database. A total of 123 publication records were analysed. Materials published between 1994 and 2024 in English were examined. A total of 123 publications were selected for the final analysis. Based on the literature review, key factors that may influence university maturity across nine areas were identified. A theoretical University Maturity Model (UMM) is also presented, which should undergo expert evaluation in subsequent stages. Findings suggest that the application of maturity models can significantly enhance universities' management and operational efficiency, offering valuable insights for policymakers in formulating educational policies.

PL

We współczesnym dynamicznym i konkurencyjnym środowisku uniwersytety odgrywają kluczową rolę w generowaniu, przekazywaniu i zastosowaniu wiedzy oraz innowacji. Rosnące zainteresowanie oceną funkcjonowania uniwersytetów na poziomie krajowym i międzynarodowym doprowadziło do rozwoju i zastosowania modeli dojrzałości uczelni jako skutecznych narzędzi oceny. Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie różnych podejść do modelowania dojrzałości uczelni. Zastosowano analizę bibliometryczną. Wykorzystano publikacje dostępne w bazach Web of Science i Scopus. Objęto nią teksty zawierające frazy („maturity model” i universit*) w temacie oraz w tytule, abstrakcie i słowach kluczowych. Zapytanie badawcze obejmowało TITLE-ABS-KEY („maturity model” and universit*) dla bazy Scopus oraz TS = („maturity model” and universit*) dla bazy Web of Sciences. Przeszukano materiały opublikowane w latach 1994-2024 w języku angielskim. Do ostatecznej analizy wybrano 123 publikacje. Na podstawie przeglądu literatury zidentyfikowano kluczowe czynniki, które mogą wpływać na dojrzałość uniwersytetów w dziewięciu obszarach. Przedstawiono również teoretyczny model dojrzałości uczelni, który w kolejnych etapach powinien zostać poddany ocenie ekspertów. Wyniki sugerują, że zastosowanie modeli dojrzałości może znacznie poprawić zarządzanie i efektywność operacyjną uniwersytetów, oferując cenne informacje dla decydentów w formułowaniu polityki edukacyjnej.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

maturity model; university

PL

model dojrzałości; uczelnie

• Wydawca: Polskie Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistów Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych
• Czasopismo: Economics and Environment
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: No. 4
• Strony: art. no. 938
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 106 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Szydło Joanna

• Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska Street 45A, 15-312 Bialystok, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2114-4770

autor

Sakowicz Agnieszka

• Bialystok University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9076-984X

autor

di Pietro Filippo

• University of Seville

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1573-8553

Bibliografia

• Aboramadan, M. (2021). Servant leadership and followers' creativity: does climate for creativity matter? Evidence-Based Hrm-A Global Forum For Empirical Scholarship, 9(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-01-2020-0012
• Acuna, J. M. M., Hernandez-Perlines, F., & Cisneros, M. A. I. (2024). Digital transformation model for universities: A preliminary proposal. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(3), 864-895. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v12i3.3762
• Alghail, A. A., Yao, L., & Kie, C. J. (2017). Importance of project-oriented organisational culture in knowledge management processes. Global Journal for Research Analysis, 6(6), 400-403. http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/21809/
• Alghail, A., Abbas, M., & Yao, L. (2023). Where are the higher education institutions from knowledge protection: a systematic review. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(3), 387-413. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2020-0166
• Alghail, A., Yao, L., Abbas, M., & Baashar, Y. (2022). Assessment of knowledge process capabilities toward project management maturity: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(5), 1207-1234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0180
• Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006
• Anthony, S. G., & Antony, J. (2022). Lean Six Sigma in Higher Education Institutions: The Need to Change. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781803826011
• Anthony, S., & Antony, J. (2016). Academic leadership and Lean Six Sigma: A novel approach to systematic literature review using design of experiments. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 33(7), 1002-1018. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2015-0047
• Awasthy, R., Flint, S., Jones, R. L., & Sankaranarayana, R. (2018). UICMM: A Maturity Model for University-Industry Collaboration. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, Stuttgart, Germany, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436266
• Bass, J. M. (2010). A New ICT Maturity Model for Education Institutions in Developing Countries. Manchester: Centre for Development Informatics.
• Behroozi, M., & Khodadadi, S. (2017). Determination of maturity level of human resource capability based on the pattern of (PCMM) in Azad University of Bushehr. Iran. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 787-791. https://iris.unipa.it/retrieve/e3ad891b-d9de-da0e-e053-3705fe0a2b96/2017_10_1.pdf
• Bianchi, I., & de Sousa, R. D. (2015). IT governance for public universities: Proposal for a framework using Design Science Research. Espacios, 36(21), 3. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a15v36n21/153621E3.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com
• Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2017). Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1857-1859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2373-3
• Brajer-Marczak, R. (2012a). Efektywność organizacji z perspektywy modelu dojrzałości procesowej. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 1(3), 513-523. http://bazekon.icm.edu.pl/bazekon/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171247431 (in Polish).
• Brajer-Marczak, R. (2012b). Modele dojrzałości procesowej w rozwoju organizacji. In A. Stabryła & S. Wawak (Eds.), Metody badania i modele rozwoju organizacji (pp. 197-207). Kraków: Mfiles.pl. (in Polish).
• Carcary, M. (2012). Developing a framework for maturing IT risk management capabilities. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, Cork, Ireland, 33-40.
• Cardoso, E., & Su, X. (2022). Designing a Business Intelligence and Analytics Maturity Model for Higher Education: A Design Science Approach. Applied Sciences, 12(9), 4625. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094625
• Chiavenato, I. (2019). Introducción a la teoría general de la administración. Mexico City: McGraw-Hill Interamericana. (in Spanish).
• Cichowicz, E., & Rollnik-Sadowska, E. (2018). Inclusive growth in CEE countries as a determinant of sustainable development. Sustainability, 10(11), 3973. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113973
• Crosby, P. (1979). Quality is Free. The Art Of Making Quality Certain. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
• Czerniawska, M., & Szydło, J. (2020). The Worldview and Values – Analysing Relations. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 17, 594-607. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2020.17.58
• Dayan, R., & Evans, S. (2006). KM your way to CMMI. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610650111
• Dounos, P., & Bohoris, G. (2010). Factors for the Design of CMMI-Based Software Process Improvement Initiatives. 14th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, Tripoli, 10-12 September 2010, 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCI.2010.46
• Duarte, D., & Martins, P. V. (2013). A Maturity Model for Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, 1(1), 25-45. https://www.jsod-cieo.net/journal/index.php/jsod/article/view/2
• Dzimińska, M., Fijałkowska, J., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2018). Trust-based quality culture conceptual model for higher education institutions. Sustainability,10(8), 2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082599
• Dzimińska, M., Fijałkowska, J., & Sułkowski, Ł. (2020). A conceptual model proposal: Universities as culture change agents for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(11), 4635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114635
• Edirisinghe, R., Pablo, Z., Anumba, C., & Tereno, S. (2021). An actor–network approach to developing a life cycle bim maturity model (Lcbmm). Sustainability, 13(23), 13273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313273
• Fisher, D. M. (2014). The Business Process Maturity Model. BP Trends, 1-7. https://bptrends.info/wp-content/publicationfiles/10-04%20ART%20BP%20Maturity%20Model%20-%20Fisher.pdf
• Fowler, J. (2019). Business intelligence at the university. Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, Las Vegas, USA, 821-825. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI49370.2019.00156
• Frondizi, R., Fantauzzi, C., Colasanti, N., & Fiorani, G. (2019). The evaluation of universities' third mission and intellectual capital: Theoretical analysis and application to Italy. Sustainability, 11(12), 3455. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11123455
• Ganzarain, J., & Errasti, N. (2016). Three stage maturity model in SME’s towards industry 4.0. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(5), 1119-1128. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2073
• Glińska, E., & Siemieniako, D. (2018). Binge drinking in relation to services – bibliometric analysis of scientific research directions. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/emj-2018-0004
• Głuszek, E., & Martusewicz, J. (2015). Metodologiczne podstawy projektowania modeli dojrzałości. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, 23(2), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.15611/noz.2015.2.02 (in Polish).
• Grajewski, P. (2012). Procesowe zarządzanie organizacją. Warszawa: PWE. (in Polish).
• Grela, G. (2013). Ocena poziomu dojrzałości procesowej organizacji. Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy, 35, 169-182. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-6b50d4ba-592e-4622-a648-5a8b8fa18d20 (in Polish).
• Gudanowska, A. E. (2017). Modern research trends within technology management in the light of selected publications. Procedia Engineering, 182, 247-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.185
• Hammer, M. (2007). The Process Audit. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 111-123. https://hbr.org/2007/04/the-process-audit
• Harin, R. S., Sanmukhaprian, S. R. J., Raghuram, P., Raja Sreedharan, V., & Zouadi, T. (2024). Developing a Capability Maturity Model for Knowledge Exchange Dynamics Among Stakeholders and Universities: Evidence From Morocco Higher Education Institution. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 13531-13544. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3240927
• Heinemann, C., & Uskov, V. L. (2018). Smart university: Literature review and creative analysis. In V. Uskov, J. Bakken, R. Howlett & L. Jain (Eds.), Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (pp. 11-46). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59454-5_2
• Ilker Murat, A. R., Temel, S., Dabic, M., Howells, J., Mert, A., & Baris Yesilay, R. (2023). The Role of Supporting Factors on Patenting Activities in Emerging Entrepreneurial Universities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(6), 2293-2304. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3069147
• Jaico, J. B., Lalupú, J. A., García, R. A., & Reyes, N. G. (2019). Maturity model for digital teacher transformation based on digital and organisational competencies in higher education. Proceedings of the 2019 International Congress on Educational and Technology in Sciences, Arequipa, Peru, 2555, 103-112. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079760289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
• Kalender, Z. T., & Žilka, M. (2014). A Comparative Analysis of Digital Maturity Models to Determine Future Steps in the Way of Digital Transformation. Procedia Computer Science, 232, 903-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.01.090
• Kalinowski, T. B. (2011). Modele oceny dojrzałości procesów. Acta Universitatis Lodzienis. Folia Oeconomica, 258, 173-187. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.hdl_11089_757 (in Polish).
• Katiliute, E., & Daunoriene, A. (2015). Dissemination of sustainable development on university's websites. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 865-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.337
• Keathley-Herring, H., Van Aken, E., Gonzalez-Aleu, F., Deschamps, F., Letens, G., & Orlandini, P. C. (2016). Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework. Scientometrics, 109(2), 927-951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2096-x
• Kitagawa, F., & Lightowler, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: A comparison of policies, strategies, and funding incentives in English and Scottish higher education. Research Evaluation, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs035
• Kobylińska, U., Garcia Goñi, M., Rollnik-Sadowska, E., Szpilko, D., & Szydło, J. (2024). Student’s perception of sustainable univeristy – on the example of Bialystok University of Technology. Economics and Environment, 89(2), 837. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.89.2.837
• Korzeb, Z., Fariñas, B. A., Irimia-Dieguez, A. I., Jiménez-Naharro, F., Kobylińska, U., di Pietro, F., Palacin-Sanchez, M. J., Rollnik-Sadowska, E., Szpilko, D., Szydło, J., & de la Torre Gallegos, A. (2024). The future of European universities on the path to sustainable development. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 16(2), 68-89. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0014
• Kosieradzka, A. (2016). Modele dojrzałości jako narzędzie stymulowania zrównoważonego rozwoju organizacji. In J. Ejdys (Ed.), Społeczna odpowiedzialność i zrównoważony rozwój w naukach o zarządzaniu (pp. 187-197). Toruń: TNOiK Dom Organizatora. (in Polish).
• Kosieradzka, A., & Smagowicz, J. (2016). Analiza porównawcza modeli dojrzałości organizacji. In M. Ćwiklicki, M. Jabłoński, S. Mazur, M. Ćwiklicki, M. Jabłoński & S. Mazur (Eds.), Współczesne koncepcje zarządzania publicznego. Wyzwania modernizacyjne sektora publicznego (pp. 283-296). Kraków: Fundacja Gospodarki i Administracji Publicznej. (in Polish).
• Kropsu-Vehkaperä, H., & Kess, P. (2013). Information systems support to the human resource management in universities. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, Stara Lesna, Slovakia, 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1109/iceta.2013.6674430
• Lenert Gansiniec, R. (2021). Systematyczny przegląd literatury w naukach społecznych. Przewodnik dla studentów, doktorantów i nie tylko. Warszawa: WN Scholar. (in Polish).
• Llamosa-Villalba, R., & Méndez Aceros, S. E. (2010). Process management model for higher education: Improvement of educational programs in software quality. Proceedings of the IEEE Education Engineering Conference, EDUCON 2010, Madrid, Spain, 1955-1963. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492445
• Llamosa-Villalba, R., Delgado, D. J., Camacho, H. P., Paéz, A. M., & Valdivieso, R. F. (2014). Organisational leadership process for university education. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, Porto, Portugal, 119-126. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED557397
• Lutteroth, C., Luxton-Reilly, A., Dobbie, G., & Hamer, J. (2007). A maturity model for computing education. Proceedings of the ninth Australasian conference on Computing education, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia, 66, 107-114. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1273672.1273685
• Maciąg, J. (2019). Lean Culture in Higher Education: Towards Continuous Improvement, Lean Culture in Higher Education: Towards Continuous Improvement. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05686-5
• Marshall, S. (2010). Change, technology and higher education: Are universities capable of organisational change? ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 18(3), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687769.2010.529107
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2002). An E-Learning Maturity Model? Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Auckland, New Zeland, 1-10.
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2003). Potential Indicators of e-Learning Process Capability. Proceedings of the EDUCAUSE in Australasia 2003 Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 99-106.
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2004). Applying SPICE to e-learning: an e-learning maturity model? Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Australasian Computing Education, Dunedin, New Zealand, 185-191.
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2005). E-Learning Process Maturity in the New Zealand Tertiary Sector. Proceedings of the EDUCAUSE in Australasia 2005 Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, 1-10.
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2006a). Assessing Sector E-Learning Capability With an E-Learning Maturity Model. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the Association for Learning Technology, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1-10.
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2006b). E-Learning Maturity Model Version Two: New Zealand Tertiary Institution E-Learning Capability: Informing and Guiding E-Learning Architectural Change and Development Project Report. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/tertiary_education/e-learning/58139
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2007). Benchmarking International E-learning Capability with the E-Learning Maturity Model. Proceedings of the EDUCAUSE in Australasia 2007, Melbourne, Australia, 1-10.
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2008). What are the key factors that lead to effective adoption and support of e-learning by institutions? Proceedings of the HERDSA, Rotorua, New Zealand, 1-10.
• Marshall, S. J., & Mitchell, G. (2009). Using the e-Learning Maturity Model to Benchmark Institutional Learning and Teaching Plans and Capabilities. Proceedings of the Educause in Australasia Conference, Perth, Australia, 1-17.
• Miller, K., Mcadam, M., & Mcadam, R. (2014). The changing university business model: A stakeholder perspective. R & D Management, 44(3), 265-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12064
• Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organisations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
• Moczydłowska, J., Sadkowska, J., Żelazko, B., Ciocoiu, C. N., & Stawicka, E. (2023). Understanding Risk Culture in the Context of a Sustainable Project: A Preliminary Study. Sustainability, 15(6), 5302. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065302
• Moreira, F. G. P., Ramos, A. L. F., & Fonseca, K. R. C. (2021). Safety culture maturity in a civil engineering academic laboratory. Safety Science, 134, 105076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105076
• Naim, A., & Malik, P. K. (2023). The relevance of e-learning and quality development in higher education. In A. Naim (Ed.), Accreditation Processes and Frameworks in Higher Education (pp. 243-265). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
• Neuhauser, C. (2004). A maturity model: Does it provide a path for online course design. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(1), 1-17. https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/3.1.3.pdf
• Niñerola, A., Sánchez-Rebull, M. V., & Hernández-Lara, A. B. (2019). Tourism Research on Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 11(5), 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051377
• OGC. (2007). Zarządzanie ryzykiem: przewodnik dla praktyków. https://books.google.com/books/about/Zarzadzanie_ryzykiem.html?id=-6CW4Qj9QxAC (in Polish).
• OMG. (2008). Business Process Maturity Model (BPMM). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMM/1.0/PDF
• Othman, R., & Omar, A. F. (2012). University and industry collaboration: Towards a successful and sustainable partnership. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 575-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.106
• Painén-Paillalef, M. J., Ramírez-Valdivia, M. T., Villalobos-Acuña, B., & Garrido-Rodríguez, C. (2022). Integration of Project Monitoring and Quality Management: A case study. Proceedings of the International Conference on Quality Engineering and Management, Minho, Portugal, 609-631. https://publicacoes.riqual.org/icqem-22-609-631/
• Paños-Castro, J., Korres, O., Iriondo, I., & Petchamé, J. (2024). Digital Transformation and Teaching Innovation in Higher Education: A Case Study. Education Sciences, 14(8), 820. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080820
• Peck, S. (2023). Beyond knowledge exchange: doctoral training, collaborative research and reflective pedagogies in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 47(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.1956882
• Pee, L. G., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). A model of organisational knowledge management maturity based on people, process, and technology. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 8(2), 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649209002270
• Petrie, M., García, V., & Giraldo, G. (2009). Modelo de Registro y Acreditación de Instituciones de Educación Superior basado en el Modelo CMMI. Proceedings of the Seventh LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI’2009), San Cristóbal, Venezuela, 1-8. https://www.laccei.org/LACCEI2009-Venezuela/Papers/Acc116_LarrondoPetrie.pdf (in Spanish).
• Power, B. (2007). Michael Hammer’s process and enterprise maturity model. BP Trends, 7, 1-4. https://bptrends.info/wp-content/publicationfiles/07-07-ART-HammersPEMM-Power-final1.pdf
• Rico-Bautista, D., Guerrero, C. D., Collazos, C. A., Maestre-Gongora, G., Sánchez-Velásquez, M. C., Medina-Cárdenas, Y., Parra-Sánchez, D. T., Barreto, A. G., & Swaminathan, J. (2022). In A.K. Nagar, D.S. Jat, G. Marín-Raventós & D.K. Mishra (Eds.), Intelligent Sustainable Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (pp. 651-663). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6309-3_61
• Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y. B., Sungkur, R. K., Maudarbocus, M. I., & Greller, W. (2020). Enabling continuous improvement in online teaching and learning through e-learning capability and maturity assessment. Business Process Management Journal, 26(6), 1687-1707. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2018-0335
• Secundo, G., De Beer, C., Schutte, C. S. L., & Passiante, G. (2017). Mobilising intellectual capital to improve European universities’ competitiveness: The technology transfer offices’ role. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(3), 607-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-12-2016-0139
• Secundo, G., Dumay, J., Schiuma, G., & Passiante, G. (2016). Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 298-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2015-0046
• Secundo, G., Elena-Perez, S., Martinaitis, Ž., & Leitner, K. H. (2015). An intellectual capital maturity model (ICMM) to improve strategic management in European universities: A dynamic approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(2), 419-442. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2014-0072
• Secundo, G., Margherita, A., Elia, G., & Passiante, G. (2010). Intangible assets in higher education and research: Mission, performance or both? Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931011039651
• Secundo, G., Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Bagnoli, C. (2018). Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research: A critical case study in university settings. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2016-0113
• Sheen, C., & Chung, D. W. (2011). Development of safety culture assessment model using safety culture maturity model and 4P-4C matrix. Proceedings of the 2011 International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA, 2, 2143-2152. https://www.proceedings.com/content/011/011651webtoc.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
• Siderska, J., & Jadaa, K. S. (2018). Cloud manufacturing: a service-oriented manufacturing paradigm. A review paper. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 10(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1515/emj-2018-0002
• Silva, C., Ribeiro, P., Pinto, E. B., & Monteiro, P. (2021). Maturity model for collaborative R&D university-industry sustainable partnerships. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 811-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.234
• Su, X., & Cardoso, E. (2021). Measuring the Maturity of the Business Intelligence and Analytics Initiative of a Large Norwegian University: The BEVISST Case Study. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research, 12(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJBIR.297061
• Szewczyk, P. (2018). Modele dojrzałości procesowej – przegląd i analiza porównawcza. Journal of Modern Management Process, 3(2), 16-25. https://journalmmp.com/index.php/jmmp/article/view/52/54 (in Polish).
• Szpilko, D., & Ejdys, J. (2022). European Green Deal — research directions. A systematic literature review. Economics and Environment, 81(2), 8-38. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2022.81.2.455
• Szpilko, D., Jimenez Naharro, F., Lăzăroiu, G., Nica, E., & de la Torre Gallegos, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the smart city — a literature review. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 15(4), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2023-0028
• Szum, K. (2021). IoT-based smart cities: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 13(2), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2021-0017
• Teah, H. Y., Pee, L. G., & Kankanhalli, A. (2006). Development and application of a General Knowledge Management Maturity Model. Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: ICT and Innovation Economy, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 401-416. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221228902_Development_and_Application_of_a_General_Knowledge_Management_Maturity_Model
• Teichert, R. (2019). Digital transformation maturity: A systematic review of literature. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(6), 1673-1687. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061673
• Thompson, E. (2004). Towards a learning process maturity model. Proceedings of the Eighth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2006), 8-16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228600045_Towards_a_learning_process_maturity_model
• Tocto-Cano, E., Paz Collado, S., López-Gonzales, J. L., & Turpo-Chaparro, J. E. (2020). A Systematic Review of the Application of Maturity Models in Universities. Information, 11(10), 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11100466
• Uhl, A., & Gollenia, L. A. (2016). Digital enterprise transformation: A business-driven approach to leveraging innovative IT. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315577166
• Van Looy, A. (2014). Business Process Maturity - A Comparative Study on a Sample of Business Process Maturity Models. Cham: Springer.
• Wang, Z., & Zhang, X.-Y. (2007). An ITIL-based IT Service Management Model for Chinese Universities. Proceedings of the 5th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management & Applications (SERA 2007), Busan, Korea (South), 493-497. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA.2007.51
• White, B., Longenecker, H., Leidig, P., Reynolds, J., & Yarbrough, D. (2003). Applicability of CMMI to the IS Curriculum: A Panel Discussion. Proceedings of the Information Systems Education Conference, San Diego, California, 2222-2233. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255618383_Applicability_of_CMMI_to_the_IS_Curriculum_A_Panel_Discussion
• Zacarias, M., & Martins, P. V. (2011). Collaborative Methods for Business Process Discovery. Spatial and Organisational Dynamics, 7, 45-55. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233992927_Collaborative_Methods_for_Business_Process_Discovery

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).