A survey of farmer approach to grazing : a case study of the Curvature Subcarpathians, Romania

• Autorzy: Neculau Gianina , Minea Gabriel , Ciobotaru Nicu , Ioana-Toroimac Gabriela , Mircea Sevastel , Mititelu-Ionuș Oana , Rodrigo-Comino Jesús

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jwld.2021.139024

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study aims to investigate how grazing is perceived across the Curvature Subcarpathians (Romania) by farmers. We investigate farmers’ attitudes toward and understanding of grazing practice and associated processes involving small ruminants (sheep and goats). Additionally, we review the scientific literature and new discussions about grazing vs overgrazing terms and changes in the Romanian small ruminant livestock. Results of the survey on the total of 101 case studies from villages in 3 counties (Damboviţa, Buzau, and Vrancea) show that: (i) grazing is differently perceived; (ii) most of the areas designated for grazing are located near riverbanks (over 55%); most of the respondents reported that the areas intended for grazing are quite close to the inhabited areas; distances are less than 2.5 km; and over 60% of respondents believe that the areas are continuously subject to soil degradation processes; (iii) answers given in connection with the issues addressed provide both relevance to the Curvature Subcarpathians (6792 km² ) and the potential impact of higher pressure of grazing on local areas due to the discouragement of specific transhumance policies (more than 60% required subsidies). The average stocking density is about 4.7 head per ha. In general, beyond different farmers’ perceptions, a scientific question remains open regarding the quantitative impact of grazing on hydrological processes. Hence, a field survey (e.g., rainfall-runoff experiments) to assess grazing pressure on water and soil resources will be performed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Curvature Subcarpathians; grazing; human perception; hydrology; regional studies; small ruminants

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: no. 51
• Strony: 144--151
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 74 poz., fot., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Neculau Gianina

• University of Bucharest, Research Institute of the University of Bucharest, 90 Panduri Street, Sector 5, 050107, Bucharest, Romania
• National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, 97 E Bucureşti – Ploieşti Road, Sector 1, 013686, Bucharest, Romania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-7871

autor

Minea Gabriel

• University of Bucharest, Research Institute of the University of Bucharest, 90 Panduri Street, Sector 5, 050107, Bucharest, Romania
• National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, 97 E Bucureşti – Ploieşti Road, Sector 1, 013686, Bucharest, Romania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6662-7090

autor

Ciobotaru Nicu

• University of Bucharest, Research Institute of the University of Bucharest, 90 Panduri Street, Sector 5, 050107, Bucharest, Romania
• National Institute of Hydrology and Water Management, 97 E Bucureşti – Ploieşti Road, Sector 1, 013686, Bucharest, Romania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6052-985X

autor

Ioana-Toroimac Gabriela

• University of Bucharest, Faculty of Geography, Bucharest, Romania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-0383

autor

Mircea Sevastel

• University of Bucharest, Research Institute of the University of Bucharest, 90 Panduri Street, Sector 5, 050107, Bucharest, Romania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4684-6346

autor

Mititelu-Ionuș Oana

• University of Craiova, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Craiova, Romania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0289-6416

autor

Rodrigo-Comino Jesús

• University of Granada, Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, Department of Regional Geographic Analysis and Physical Geography, Granada, Spain

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4823-0871

Bibliografia

• ALLEN V.G., BATELLO C., BERRETTA E.J., HODGSON J., KOTHMANN M., LI X., MCIVOR J., MILNE J., MORRIS C., PEETERS A., SANDERSON M. 2011. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass and Forage Science. Vol. 66(1) p. 2–28. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00780.x.
• ARMAŞ I. 2012. Weights of evidence method for landslide susceptibility mapping. Prahova Subcarpathians, Romania. Natural Hazards. Vol. 60(3) p. 937–950. DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9879-4.
• BĂLTEANU D., CIOACĂ A., DINU M., SANDU M. 1996. Some case studies of geomorphological risk in the Curvature Carpathians and SubCarpathians. Revue Roumaine de Geographie. Vol. 40 p. 51–59.
• BECKER T., KAYSER M., TONN B., ISSELSTEIN J. 2018. How German dairy farmers perceive advantages and disadvantages of grazing and how it relates to their milk production systems. Livestock Science. Vol. 214 p. 112–119. DOI 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.05.018.
• BILOTTA G.S., BRAZIER R.E., HAYGARTH P.M. 2007. The impacts of grazing animals on the quality of soils, vegetation, and surface waters in intensively managed grasslands. Advances in Agronomy. Vol. 94 p. 237–280. DOI 10.1016/s0065-2113(06)94006-1.
• BIRD D.K. 2009. The use of questionnaires for acquiring information on public perception of natural hazards and risk mitigation – A review of current knowledge and practice. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. Vol. 9(4) p. 1307–1325. DOI 10.5194/NHESS-9-1307-2009.
• BOUAHIM S., RHAZI L., ERNOUL L., MATHEVET R., AMAMI B., ER-RIYAHI S., MULLER S.D., GRILLAS P. 2015. Combining vulnerability analysis and perceptions of ecosystem services in sensitive landscapes: A case from western Moroccan temporary wetlands. Journal for Nature Conservation. Vol. 27 p. 1–9. DOI 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.05.003.
• CERDÀ A., RODRIGO-C OMINO J. 2021. Regional farmers’ perception and societal issues in vineyards affected by high erosion rates. Land. Vol. 10(2), 205. DOI 10.3390/land10020205.
• CHEN Y., ZHOU L. 2016. Farmers’ perception of the decade-long grazing ban policy in Northern China: A case study of Yanchi County. Sustainability. Vol. 8(11), 1113. DOI 10.3390/su8111113.
• CHENDEȘ V. 2011. Resursele de apă din Subcarpații de la Curbură. Evaluări geospațiale [Water resources in Curvature Subcarpathians. Geospatial assessments]. București. Editura Academiei. ISBN 978-973-27-2131-5 pp. 339.
• CHERLET M., HUTCHINSON C., REYNOLDS J., HILL J., SOMMER S., VON MALTITZ G. (eds 2018.), World atlas of desertification [online]. Luxembourg. Publication Office of the European Union. [Access 15.05.20121]. Available at: https://wad.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
• CHEVAL S., BREZA T., BACIU M., DUMITRESCU A. 2012. Caracteristici ale precipitatiilor atmosferice extreme din România pe baza curbelor intensitate-durata-frecventa [Characteristics of extreme atmospheric precipitation in Romania based on intensity-duration-frequency curves]. Sesiunea de comunicari stiintifice. 8–9.11.2012 Bucharest Administratia Naționala de Meteorologie p. 8–9.
• COHEN-SHACHAM E., DAYAN T., DE GROOT R., CORALIE BELTRAME C., GUILLET F., FEITELSON E. 2015. Using the ecosystem services concept to analyse stakeholder involvement in wetland manage ment. Wetlands Ecology and Management. Vol. 23(2) p. 241–256. DOI 10.1007/s11273-014-9375-1.
• CORNISH L., DUNN A. 2009. Creating knowledge for action: the case for participatory communication in research. Development in Practice. Vol. 19(4/5) p. 665–677. DOI 10.1080/09614520902866330.
• COUGHENOUR M.B., SINGER F.J. 1991. The concept of overgrazing and its application to Yellowstone’s northern range. In: The great er Yellowstone ecosystem: Redefining America’s wilderness heritage. Eds. R.B. Keiter, M.S. Boyce. New Haven, Conn. Yale Univ. Press p. 209–230.
• EVANS D.M., REDPATH S.M., ELSTON D.A., EVANS S.A., MITCHELL R.J., DENNIS P. 2006. To graze or not to graze? Sheep, voles, for estry and nature conservation in the British uplands. Journal of Applied Ecology. Vol. 43(3) p. 499–505. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01158.x.
• EVANS R. 1998. The erosional impacts of grazing animals. Progress in Physical Geography. Vol. 22(2) p. 251–268. DOI 10.1177/030913339802200206.
• FICK S.E., BELNAP J., DUNIWAY M.C. 2020. Grazing-induced changes to biological soil crust cover mediate hillslope erosion in long-term exclosure experiment. Rangeland Ecology & Management. Vol. 73 p. 61–72. DOI 10.1016/j.rama.2019.08.007.
• FLIS M. 2014. The level and variability of damage caused by wolves among livestock in the Subcarpathian Province in 2004–2013. Scientific Annals of Polish Society of Animal Production. Vol. 10(4) p. 169–177.
• FOLEY J.A., DEFRIES R., ASNER G.P., BARFORD C., BONAN G., CARPENTER S.R., ..., SNYDER P.K. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. Vol. 309(5734) p. 570–574. DOI 10.1126/science.1111772.
• FULLER R.J. 1996. Relationships between grazing and birds with particular reference to sheep in the British uplands. Norfolk. British Trust for Ornithology. Research Report. No. 164 pp. 94.
• HINNANT R.T. 1994. What is an animal-unit? A time to conform. Rangelands Archives. Vol. 16(1) p. 33–35.
• HOLOHAN C., RUSSELL T., MULLIGAN F.J., PIERCE K.M., LYNCH M.B. 2021. A survey analysis of farmer practices and perceptions of zero-grazing on Irish dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science. Vol. 104 (5) p. 5665–5674. DOI 10.3168/jds.2020-19164.
• HUSS D. 1996. The role of domestic livestock in desertification control [online]. Rome. FAO. [Access 2.05.2021]. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/x5321e/x5321e00.htm
• INSSE 2020. AGR201A – Efectivele de animale, pe categorii de animale, forme de proprietate, macroregiuni, regiuni de dezvoltare si judete, la sfarsitul anului [AGR201A – Livestock, by animal category, ownership form, macroregions, development regions and counties, at the end of year]. Bucuresti. Institutul Național de Statistică. [Access 30.12.2020]. Available at: http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/#/pages/tables/insse-table
• IOANA-TOROIMAC G. 2016. Inventory of long-term braiding activity at a regional scale as a tool for detecting alterations to a rivers’ hydromorphological state: a case study for Romania’s South-Eastern Subcarpathians. Environmental Management. Vol. 58 p. 93–106. DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0701-7.
• JURCHESCU M., KUCSICSA G., MICU M., SIMA M., BĂLTEANU D. 2020. Landslide exposure assessment under environmental change in the Romanian Subcarpathians. Studia Geomorphologica Carpatho-Balcanica. Vol. LIII–LIV p. 59–84.
• KELLEY H.W. 1990. Keeping the land alive [online]. FAO Soils Bulletin. No. 50. [Access 5.05.2021]. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/t0389e/T0389E00.htm#Content
• MEYLES E.W., WILLIAMS A.G., TERNAN J.L., ANDERSON J.M., DOWD J.F. 2006. The influence of grazing on vegetation, soil properties and stream discharge in a small Dartmoor catchment, southwest England, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group. Vol. 31 (5) p. 622–631. DOI 10.1002/esp.1352.
• MICU M. 2017. Landslide types and spatial pattern in the Subcarpathian area. In: Landform dynamics and evolution in Romania. Eds. M. Radoane, A. Vespremeanu-Stroe. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32589-7_13.
• MOHAMMADZADEH CHENAR H., FARZADMEHR J., GHORBANI M., BADGERY W.B., RAHDARI M.R., RODRIGO-COMINO J. 2021. Effect of collectiva and council ownership on social and ecological indicators in wintery rangelands of Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. DOI 10.1007/s13762-021-03459-z.
• MOLES R. 1992. Trampling damage to vegetation and soil cover at patos within the Burren National Park, Mullach Mor, Co. Clare. Irish Geography. Vol. 25(2) p. 129–137. DOI 10.1080/00750779209478725.
• MORALES F.D.A.R., GENÍS J.M.C., GUERRERO Y.M. 2019. Current status, challenges and the way forward for dairy goat production in Europe. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. Vol. 32 (8) p. 1256–1265. DOI 10.5713/ajas.19.0327.
• MUICĂ E.C. 1993. Prospects for Vrancea: A traditional mountains community in Romania. GeoJournal. Vol. 29(1) p. 69–82. DOI 10.1007/BF00806869.
• MYSTERUD A. 2006. The concept of overgrazing and its role in management of large herbivores. Wildlife Biology. Vol. 12(2) p. 129–141. DOI 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[129:TCOOAI]2.0.CO;2.
• NICU I.C. 2018. Is overgrazing really influencing soil erosion? Water. Vol. 10(8), 1077. DOI 10.3390/w10081077.
• NIS 2021. AGR101B – Land fund area by usage, counties and localities]. Bucharest. National Institute of Statistics of Romania. [Access 1.05.2021]. Available at: https://insse.ro/cms/en http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/?page=tempo2&lang=en&context=45
• OLARIU P., COJOC G.M., TIRNOVAN A., OBREJA F. 2014. The future of reservoirs in the Siret River Basin considering the sediment transport of rivers (Romania). Georeview. Vol. 24 p. 66–75. DOI 10.4316/GEOREVIEW.2014.24.1.169.
• OLDEMAN L.R. 1992. Global extent of soil degradation. In Bi-Annual Report 1991–1992, ISRIC [online]. Wageningen, The Netherlands. ISRIC p. 19–36. [Access 19.05.20121]. Available at: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/299739
• OLDEMAN L.R., HAKKELING R.T.A., SOMBROEK W.G. 1991. World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: An explanatory note [online]. ISRIC report. [Access 11.05.20121]. Available at: https://www.isric.org/sites/default/files/isric_report_1990_07.pdf
• PAPANASTASIS V.P. undated. Description of reasons leading to over-grazing and why it is an issue in the context of desertification. Desertification Indicator System for Mediterranean Europe. [Access 10.05.20121]. Available at: https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa. eu/public_path/shared_folder/projects/DIS4ME/issues/issue_o-vergrazing.htm
• PEREVOLOTSKY A., SELIGMAN N.A.G. 1998. Role of grazing in Mediterranean rangeland ecosystems. Bioscience. Vol. 48(12) p. 1007–1017.
• PRĂVĂLIE R. 2016. Drylands extent and environmental issues. A global approach. Earth-Science Reviews. Vol. 161 p. 259–278. DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.003.
• PRĂVĂLIE R. 2018. Major perturbations in the Earth’s forest ecosystems. Possible implications for global warming. Earth-Science Reviews. Vol. 185 p. 544–571. DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.06.010.
• MEYLES E.W., WILLIAMS A.G., TERNAN J.L., ANDERSON J.M., DOWD J.F. 2006. The influence of grazing on vegetation, soil properties and stream discharge in a small Dartmoor catchment, southwest England, UK. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms: The Journal of the British Geomorphological Research Group. Vol. 31 (5) p. 622–631. DOI 10.1002/esp.1352.
• MICU M. 2017. Landslide types and spatial pattern in the Subcarpathian area. In: Landform dynamics and evolution in Romania. Eds. M. Radoane, A. Vespremeanu-Stroe. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32589-7_13.
• MOHAMMADZADEH CHENAR H., FARZADMEHR J., GHORBANI M., BADGERY W.B., RAHDARI M.R., RODRIGO-COMINO J. 2021. Effect of collectiva and council ownership on social and ecological indicators in wintery rangelands of Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. DOI 10.1007/s13762-021-03459-z.
• MOLES R. 1992. Trampling damage to vegetation and soil cover at patos within the Burren National Park, Mullach Mor, Co. Clare. Irish Geography. Vol. 25(2) p. 129–137. DOI 10.1080/00750779209478725.
• MORALES F.D.A.R., GENÍS J.M.C., GUERRERO Y.M. 2019. Current status, challenges and the way forward for dairy goat production in Europe. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. Vol. 32(8) p. 1256–1265. DOI 10.5713/ajas.19.0327.
• MUICĂ E.C. 1993. Prospects for Vrancea: A traditional mountains community in Romania. GeoJournal. Vol. 29(1) p. 69–82. DOI 10.1007/BF00806869.
• MYSTERUD A. 2006. The concept of overgrazing and its role in management of large herbivores. Wildlife Biology. Vol. 12(2) p. 129–141. DOI 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[129:TCOOAI]2.0.CO;2.
• NICU I.C. 2018. Is overgrazing really influencing soil erosion? Water. Vol. 10(8), 1077. DOI 10.3390/w10081077.
• NIS 2021. AGR101B – Land fund area by usage, counties and localities]. Bucharest. National Institute of Statistics of Romania. [Access 1.05.2021]. Available at: https://insse.ro/cms/en http://statistici.insse.ro/shop/?page=tempo2&lang=en&context=45
• OLARIU P., COJOC G.M., TIRNOVAN A., OBREJA F. 2014. The future of reservoirs in the Siret River Basin considering the sediment transport of rivers (Romania). Georeview. Vol. 24 p. 66–75. DOI 10.4316/GEOREVIEW.2014.24.1.169.
• OLDEMAN L.R. 1992. Global extent of soil degradation. In Bi-Annual Report 1991–1992, ISRIC [online]. Wageningen, The Netherlands. ISRIC p. 19–36. [Access 19.05.20121]. Available at: https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/299739
• OLDEMAN L.R., HAKKELING R.T.A., SOMBROEK W.G. 1991. World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: An explanatory note [online]. ISRIC report. [Access 11.05.20121]. Available at: https://www.isric.org/sites/default/files/isric_report_1990_07.pdf
• PAPANASTASIS V.P. undated. Description of reasons leading to over-grazing and why it is an issue in the context of desertification. Desertification Indicator System for Mediterranean Europe. [Access 10.05.20121]. Available at: https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/public_path/shared_folder/projects/DIS4ME/issues/issue_o-vergrazing.htm
• PEREVOLOTSKY A., SELIGMAN N.A.G. 1998. Role of grazing in Mediterranean rangeland ecosystems. Bioscience. Vol. 48(12) p. 1007–1017.
• PRĂVĂLIE R. 2016. Drylands extent and environmental issues. A global approach. Earth-Science Reviews. Vol. 161 p. 259–278. DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.003.
• PRĂVĂLIE R. 2018. Major perturbations in the Earth’s forest ecosystems. Possible implications for global warming. Earth-Science Reviews. Vol. 185 p. 544–571. DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.06.010.
• PULIDO M., BARRENA-GONZÁLEZ J., BADGERY W., RODRIGO-COMINO J., CERDÀ A. 2018. Sustainable grazing. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health. Vol. 5 p. 42–46. DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.04.004.
• RIES J.B., ANDRES K., WIRTZ S., TUMBRINK J., WILMS T., PETER K.D., BURCZYK M., BUTZEN V., SEEGER M. 2014. Sheep and goat erosion – experimental geomorphology as an approach for the quantification of underestimated processes. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie. Vol. 58(3) p. 1–23. DOI 10.1127/0372-8854/2013/S-00158.
• ROSALES M., LIVINETS S. 2005. Grazing and land degradation in CIS countries and Mongolia [online]. Proceedings of the electronic conference on grazing and land degradation in CIS countries and Mongolia. 10 June–30 July 2005. Rome, Italy. FAO p. 5. [Access 1.05.20121]. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/tem-plates/lead/pdf/e-conf_05-6_background.pdf
• RUJOIU-MARE M.R., OLARIU B., MIHAI B.A., NISTOR C., SĂVULESCU I. 2017. Land cover classification in Romanian Carpathians and Subcarpathians using multi-date Sentinel-2 remote sensing imagery. European Journal of Remote Sensing. Vol. 50(1) p. 496–508. DOI 10.1080/22797254.2017.1365570.
• TÖRÖK-OANCE R., TÖRÖK-OANCE M. 2012. Trends in land cover change in abandoned mountain pastures. A case study: Măgura Marga Massif (the Southern Carpathians). Forum Geografic. Vol. XI(2) p. 214–222. DOI 10.5775/fg.2067-4635.2012.084.d.
• TRIMBLE S.W., MENDEL A.C. 1995. The cow as a geomorphic agent – A critical review. Geomorphology. Vol. 13(1–4) p. 233–253. DOI 10.1016/0169-555X(95)00028-4.
• VAN DE KOPPEL J., RIETKERK M., WEISSING F.J. 1997. Catastrophic vegetation shifts and soil degradation in terrestrial grazing systems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. Vol. 12(9) p. 352–356. DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01133-6.
• VAN DEN POL-VAN DASSELAAR A., HENNESSY D., ISSELSTEIN J. 2020. Grazing of dairy cows in Europe – An in-depth analysis based on the perception of grassland experts. Sustainability. Vol. 12(3), 1098. DOI 10.3390/su12031098.
• VASILICĂ I., MIHU PINTILIE A., LUPAȘCU A., HAJDAS I., TELEAGA E. 2018. Paleoenvironment data and vegetation history from a small mesotrophic site in the Curvature Subcarpathians. Case study: Ink Quaking Bog, Romania. International Scientific Conference Geobalcanica. Vol. 4 p. 79–86. DOI 10.18509/GBP.2018.09.
• WOLAŃSKI P., BOBIEC A., ORTYL B., MAKUCH-PIETRAŚ I., CZARNOTA P., ZIOBRO J., KOROL M., HAVRYLIUK S., PADEREWSKI J., KIRBY K. 2021. The importance of livestock grazing at woodland-grassland interface in the conservation of rich oakwood plant communities in temperate Europe. Biodiversity and Conservation. Vol. 30(3) p. 741–760. DOI 10.1007/s10531-021-02115-9.
• WOOD S., SEBASTIAN K., SCHERR S.J. 2000. Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: Agroecosystems [online]. Washington, DC. World Resources Institute. [Access 5.05.20121]. Available at: https://files.wri.org/d8/s3fs-public/pdf/page_agroecosystems.pdf
• YUH., LI Y., OSHUNSANYA S.O., ARE K.S., GENG Y., SAGGAR S., LIU W. 2019. Re-introduction of light grazing reduces soil erosion and soil respiration in a converted grassland on the Loess Plateau, China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. Vol. 280 p. 43–52. DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.020.
• ZAHARIA L., GRECU F., IOANA-TOROIMAC G., NECULAU G. 2011. Sediment transport and river channel dynamics in Romania – Variability and control factors. In: Sediment transport in aquatic environments. Ed. A.J. Manning. Rijeka. Intechopen p. 293–316. DOI 10.5772/21416.
• ZĂVOIANU I., MUICĂ C., ALEXANDRESCU M. 1996. The critical environment of the Subcarpathian region of Romania (state-of-the-art). Geograficky Casopis Slovenskej Akademie Vied. Vol. 48 p. 105–112.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).